Forum:Chuck Norris Template

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.

Can I get one like this one, but it says "Chuck Norris"?

		"Gunnery Sergeant R. Lee Ermey does not like this article!"
	What is this article's major malfunction Private Pyle?
	Private Pyle this article is sheeeeeiiittt! Now drop and give me 300 push-ups by rewriting it.

I'm of the opinion (and I think others will agree with me) that jokes involving Chuck Norris have run their course. They're all conceptually the same joke, pretty much. We get it. He's tough. And now he has a bajillion(actual statistic) references to him floating around the database. Seriously, do a search. You'll see how his jokes can start to get more than a little old. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 06:31, May 4

Uncyclopedia memes have the advantage that everyone can "get" them. Our in-jokes are, in a way, like jokes just for us. The disadvantage is that they rapidly lose their luster. In Soviet Russia, incidentally, luster loses you. Sir Modusoperandi 09:52, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

“In Soviet Russia, they know when a joke has run its course.”

~ Yakov Smirnov on internet memes - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 19:40, May 4

I would favor the creation of a Chuck Norris template about as much as I would favor the creation of a template consisting of used toilet paper. Yes, it is just that poopy. Norris jokes are 2-years-stale, and templates are mostly irrelevant crap that disfigures they infest. Bitchy bitchy bitchy today I am. ----OEJ 17:48, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

I agree and I am one that helped create the R. Lee Ermey template in the first place. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 18:23, 4 May 2008 (UTC)