Forum:For or against???
From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
Note: This topic has been unedited for 547 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.
<>
...
Please vote below.
There were 62 votes since the poll was created on 20 Dec 2006 17:40:09 UTC.
Votes
Score: π¾
For. I am in support. --
01:05, 19 September 2006 (UTC)- AGAINST What the hell was I thinking!?!? -- 04:12, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
- AGAINST What the hell was I thinking!?!? --
- Against It's just not that good, maybe add a bit more green text in the top right corner? --Major Sir Zombiebaron GUN • WotM • UotM • PotM • AotM • EGAEDM • UPotM • MAFE • ZotM • IotM • VotM • UGotM (shout) 01:47, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- Pat Buchanan. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 02:30, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- Neutral. This idea may or may not suck. Only time will tell. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 02:36, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- H. Ross Perot because he was right on the money about NAFTA and other trade agreements. That giant sucking sound we heard for the past 15 years or so were jobs going out of the USA. --2nd_Lt Orion Blastar (talk) 03:00, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- Dagnabbit. This conflabbit gobbledygook of a page was written by nincompoops that don't know Hootenanny!--Grumpy Old Man (the good ol'days) 04:03, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- 4. --L 05:53, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- AAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAA --AAAAAAAA AA:AA AA AAAAAAAAAA AAAA( AAAA)
- Comment - I agree. Micoolio101 11:59, 19 September 2006 (UTC)Micoolio101
- Pie. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 06:47, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- For, voting on things is the cool thing to do! --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 07:01, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- Bat Fuck Insane. -- 11:55, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- Merge with Tompkins --Chronarion 15:24, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete: It's the only votes I know how to cast. --Sir gwax (talk)
» 
Major KUN UotM FH++ F@H CM GD NS Bur. +S 
20:17, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- Cite Sources this is unacceptable, I contest this information forthwith, and request it to be removed until it can be verified![Citation not needed at all; thank you very much] --Olipro
Anchor KUN (Harass) 23:08, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- For -As much as I hated Iraq, this is funny., but Template:AgainstComment However, YES! Great! Aaadddaaammm 06:01, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
- Er, refresh the page a bit, something's messed up with your comment and it's fucking up the page. I checked the templates, but don't see the root of the problem. --User:Nintendorulez 14:47, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
- Conditional for or against. • Spang • UotF | talk • 07:03, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
- Against. It wasn't properly nominated.--Procopius 13:41, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
- Forgainst. What are we talking about anyway? –
- For. ~ 14:55, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
- or --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 04:24, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
- ↕ -- mowgli 07:09, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
- I'm changing my vote. Sorry. -- mowgli 20:22, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
- Vote I am herby voting a vote.--no, yuo
chat 12:25, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- SQUIGLE! -- Sir Mordillo
GUN WotM FP UotM AotM MI AnotM VFH +S 15:40, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- Abstain. I can't help but feel partially responsible for this. Whatever "this" is.--Sir Modusoperandi 00:14, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- Fnord, but with some cheese, if you don't mind. --The Acceptable
Cainad 
(Fnord) 00:05, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Strong for, could do with some cleanup, and there's too much drama. But has lots of potential. --User:Nintendorulez 00:41, 7 November 2006 (UTC)- REMOVE THIS FROM THE SACRED LAND OF BENSON. --User:Nintendorulez 00:55, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- BENSON! Mrthejazz 00:51, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- COMMENT YOU FORGET HIS MAJESTY'S ROYAL CAPS LOCK! --User:Nintendorulez 00:55, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- OH SHIT EDITED [[User:
- Maybe. -- Sir C Holla | CUN 06:23, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
- JERK OFF! --Micoolio101 20:38, 17 October 2006 (OMG)
- 5. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 18:44, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- Goose egg - What are we voting for, anyway? --AAA! (AAAA) 08:50, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
- For and a half! Hilarious!!! --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 04:38, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
ForAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA oh AAAAA!!!!
I WAS HERE-Kjhf! (feeling chatty?) <image removed> 20:20, 3 January 2007 (UTC)- Second vote This time, for. -- 04:08, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
- STM are you a complete retard? Against --
09:21, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
- AAAAAAAAA! - It's the only one that makes any sense Wildy
I'm jumping on the bandwagon 15:26, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Against: 4!!, against, dunno, AAAAAAAAA, and your mom.--Math Poet 15:39, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- Four - I don't know what this is about, but it sounds like a good thing. -- The fatgoat Talk (to me, obviously) The Crap I've Done 19:18, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- For -- Because I never vote against, unless it's a vote an wether to ban something or someone, such as banning gay marriage or banning Nintendorulez --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 19:25, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- AAAAAAAAA!, because... 04/8 22:07
