User:Boomer/People for the Evaluation of Excrement and Influencing Nominations for Greatness

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.

Main Current Reviewed Archived Guidelines FAQ Committee ROTM

People for the Evaluation of Excrement and Influencing Nominations for Greatness!

This is a group dedicated to creating, submitting, and, if you feel like it, whoring quality Pee Reviews.

• Any users that wish to join to help improve the quality of Pee Reviews can sign up here.
• Please confine general whoring or whinging about wanting a Pee Review to the talk page.
• All members, and prospective members must swear a solemn oath on our holy book.
• A list showing the current top reviewers can be found HERE.
• This page should generally be used for nominations, announcements, and excremental party business. For general discussion please use the talk page.

Contents 1 Recent News 2 Guidelines 3 Membership Requests (currently: 2) 4 Members 4.1 Ranking 4.2 Captain Catheter 4.3 Fresh Stains 4.4 Attending Urologists 4.5 Steel Kidneys 4.6 Retirees 5 Awards 6 Current Pee Review Artists

[edit] Recent News

[edit] Guidelines

There are currently only 2 rules for membership in the Society.

1. You must give quality Pee Reviews. I will may probably won't be going through Pee Review every few weeks to make sure that members are giving good reviews, but that's OK, because some other guys do it almost daily. This means being completely honest in the review and giving at least a couple of suggestions for improvement (if improvement is needed). Otherwise, you'll get a good firm talking to.
2. You must give at least 1 Pee Review per month. Obviously, we'd like you to do much more than that, but if you don't do at least that you'll end up with the smelly ol' retirees. Our goal is to make sure that the authors of potentially good articles receive the help they need, and to do so we need to make sure that articles actually get reviewed. Doing more than the required amount of reviews every week will likely result in promotion to a higher rank. Whether or not that's a good thing is all up to interpretation.
3. Don't always believe what they tell you about the number of rules.

[edit] Membership Requests (currently: 2)

Place requests here. An Attending Urologist will be along shortly to check you out. 5 good reviews and you're in. (We decide if they're good, not you!)

Hello, me want in. I've done SOME pee REVIEWS. Even before PEEING. --General Minister G5 UPotM UGotM [Y] F@H 10:37, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

HEy Gert, I seem to remember you applied here before, correct me if I'm wrong. I further remember your reviews prior to PEEING being a bit on the short side (like, one line per box, or less - I believe I mentioned it on your talk page). You want in? Great! Nothing we like more than seeing new members. 5 in-depth reviews, and you're in. --UU Blah / Pee 11:05, Jul 7

Me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me. Apparently, my (now 6) long, steaming steams of excreta entitles me to wear the "fresh stain" badge with pride. Or sommat? Anyway, there's a list of my reviews on my user page. Rt Hon W E Gladstone MP GOM | Converse | 19:26, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

OK, I will take a look at your reviews... MrN  19:32, Jul 15

Well, firstly, I would say that you need to be very careful about giving a score of just 1 for anything. OK, maybe Releasimification deserved it... You were harsh giving only 1 to Frankie the Pig though. OK, it was not great, but still 1 was too low. You did give a good review however in what you wrote, and that's the important thing... I think that perhaps you need to have a quick check over UN:PRG and have a look at how we normally score. Your reviews have been improving steadily and that's the important thing. You can probably work on giving a few more suggestions for improvement in the reviews you do in the future. I'm happy that you have done the necessary 5 good reviews to join. Welcome to Peeing! MrN  19:57, Jul 15

Hmmm. I think Frankie the Pig was that bad it deserved it, though maybe not QVFD... Anyway, thanks! -- Rt Hon W E Gladstone MP GOM | Converse | 23:02, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Members

[edit] Ranking

(1) Piss artists of rank Fresh Stain and above

• Entitlement to {{PEEING}} which may be added to their user page identifying as being of high urinary quality.

(2) Piss artists of rank Attending Urologists and above

• Must have been a contender for RotM, and be nominated for this rank by another member of Peeing using the talk page. Boomer (cos he's chief bum around here) will then judge the suitability of the candidate, and promote as appropriate. Boomer's decisions are final.
• May patrol recent Pees and contact those distributing particularly piss poor Pee Reviews and encourage them to improve. That's without pissing them off.
• May update Cajek's list at any time, provided they know how to.

(3) Piss artists of rank Steel Kidney and above

• Automatically gains rank of Commander.

[edit] Captain Catheter

• Captain Mindless drivel Pointless edits

He likes doing review s.

[edit] Fresh Stains

• --SYNDROME _{MUN medicate}
• Sir DJ ~ Irreverent
• Have Fun! MuCal. Orian57|Chat|Chuckle|PEE List|Awarded|UnBlog| (Pee list)
• Sir Sycamore (T) (C)
• THE
• BlueYonder
• OptyC Sucks! cun (Pee List)
• Fag
• Cap'n Ben
• Rt Hon W E Gladstone MP GOM | Converse | (Pee List)
• Gerrycheevers

[edit] Attending Urologists

• Javascap
• Hyperbole

[edit] Steel Kidneys

These badasses can piss for hours, while asleep, without a break, in the Arctic, with a bunch of whiny n00bs bugging them. They also won the Reviewer of the Month award.

• OEJ (November, '07)
•   '~   Cajek! <'> (December, '07) (Pee list)
• MrN  (January, '08) (Pee list)
• SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee (February, '08) (Pee list)
• ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ CUN • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF  (March, '08) (Pee list)
• ―― Sir Heerenveen, KUN [UotM RotM VFH SK CM NS] (talk), (April, '08) (Pee list)
• Mightydandylion (talk) Fk (May, '08) (Pee list)
• Sir FSt. Yettie (talk) QotF BFF NotM RotM UNPotM CUN PEE SR UnProvise (June, '08) (Pee list)

[edit] Retirees

Sometimes, PEEING members need to take a break, either from Pee Review or all of Uncyclopedia, and either temporarily or permanently. However, we still love them (except for that one guy. You know the one.) and they are welcome back anytime they wish. For that purpose, they are forever preserved here, ranks intact.

• Fresh Stain Manforman
• Fresh Stain Premier Tom mayfair
• Fresh Stain RAHB
• Fresh Stain Narf, the Wonder Puppy
• Fresh Stain Pieface
• Fresh Stain Mordillo
• Fresh Stain Electrified mocha chinchilla
• Fresh Stain Doovad
• Fresh Stain Uncyclopedian
• Fresh Stain Jim Groovester
• Fresh Stain TheLedBalloon
• Fresh Stain Unknown_user
• Fresh Stain An Ape that Only Exists on Thursdays
• Fresh Stain Serq_fet
• Fresh Stain AE
• Attending Urologist Finnius

Rather depressing, isn't it?

[edit] Awards

Separate to the RotM award, PEEING now has two other awards to bestow on those who produce high volumes of healthy piss. {{Gold Urinal}} recognises those who have provided 25 in-depth reviews, and {{Platinum Pisser}} is for those hard-core enough to have racked up 50 in-depth reviews. What more incentive could you need?

[edit] Current Pee Review Artists

Updated by lots of different people Cajek, Under User, Heerenveen, and sometimes even SysRq, Javascap, Mightydandylion and YesTimeToEdit.

User:Cajek/Pee
user	# of reviews	# of "in-depth" reviews
√ Under user	80	79
√ Heerenveen	53	52
√ SysRq	56	51
Orian57	52	50
Javascap	55	47

Retrieved from "http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/User:Boomer/People_for_the_Evaluation_of_Excrement_and_Influencing_Nominations_for_Greatness"

Category: PEEING members