Peer-to-peer
From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
Peer-to-Peer is a basic concept within child psychology where each child, adolescent, teenager, or dumbass gives and receives from every other. Usually the giving and receiving is in the form of sex, drugs or rock and roll.
Contents |
[edit] Peer-to-Peer
[edit] What it is
A prime example given to describe Peer-to-Peer is usually that of an average teeanger, let's call her Lindsey Lohan. Lindsey wants to give some sex to another teeanger, let's call him you. In this example, Lindsey can not find you, because you live under a rock and do nothing but edit Uncyclopedia. So, she gives sex to the nearest peer, let's call him Joe. Joe gives an interview for a national newspaper and goes on talk shows to describe the sex that Lindsey gave him. This allows Joe to give some sex to another teenager who sees him on TV, let's call her Paris Hilton.
After a few cycles of this, you meet some skank in a pub who got some sex from some guy, etc., all the way back to Lindsey.
That is the basics of Peer-to-Peer.
[edit] What it is not
It is not something that you can actually hope for, because, as much as Uncyclopedia admins research the subject, Self-to-Self just does not count. You need to get some.
[edit] Other examples
[edit] Rock and Roll
This is an extremely common form of Peer-to-Peer, so much so that most experts consider it more prevalent than the first example. It is when peers exchange Rock and Roll (abbrev: MP3.) All peers (kids, teenagers, congressmen) know that the exchanging of MP3 is a good, healthy pursuit. It is people who do not exchange MP3 generally grow up stunted, deformed and unloved.
The basic mechanics of this field of Peer-to-Peer are difficult, if not impossible, to fully understand. This is caused by the near-constant alteration of data sets available to the researcher. With everyone switching over to iTunes, it almost doesn't matter.
[edit] Not Drugs
Drugs are bad for you, even the good ones. You should never use drugs, even if a peer offers them to you. Take the sex instead.
Most Peer-to-Peer research in this area was conducted between 1963 and 1978. All research after that was monumentally tacky and should be discarded. The main problem with this branch of Peer-to-Peer activity is its linear, one-dimensional or tubular aspect. As opposed to the above sex example, which you should take instead.
A peer in the coca fields of Columbia harvests a crop, and gets that crop to a peer who works tirelessly on it. Then a non-peer steals it, flys it to Miami while paying off some other non-peers to make sure it can get to all the nice peers in the streets. Those peers cut it with laundry detergent, carry it to a peer you might know as Vic who is nice enough to sell it to you. You buy some, share it with your peers (or peeps) have a great party and all wind up a fascinating shade of blue by morning.
Take the sex instead.
