From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.

Welcome to the official page for the official award Reviewer of the Month.

[edit] Eligibility

The Golden Party Badge; the official insignia of the Reviewer of the Month.

To qualify for the Reviewer of the Month award, you must first meet certain criteria.

1. You must be a registered user.
2. You must not have nominated yourself. You can vote for yourself, but not nominate yourself.
3. You must have done at least one review within the last month.

[edit] Rules and guidelines

These are the rules and less-official guidelines for the Reviewer of the Month.

1. IP votes carry full weight. Because many IP's submit articles for review, they benefit from good Reviewers as much as anyone else does. IP's get a full vote instead of the usual half-vote.
2. Nominate those reviewers who have consistently given exceptional reviews. If a user happened to review multiple articles of yours but never gave any suggestions for improvement, do not nominate them. There are many other, far more deserving users out there.
3. You can only vote once. You can cancel your vote using slashes to change your vote, but you still only get one vote to cast every month.
4. Additionally, when a user is nominated, the nomination template {{VoteRotM}} should be added to their user page.

[edit] Reward

Tell 'em what they won, Jon!:

• Winner(s) become a CUN.
• You will receive a free "Steel Kidney" (and will be forever called one)
• You will become an honorary member of People for the Evaluation of Excrement and Influencing Nominations for Greatness
• You will be entitled to the special template for Reviewer of the Month.

[edit] Past Winners

One-eyed Jack • Cajek • MrN9000 • Under user • SysRq • Heerenveen • Mightydandylion • YesTimeToEdit

[edit] Nominations for July

[edit] Orian57 (Talk • Contribs • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

• For Okay am I voting for the right person in here? The one who adopted me? That one, yes. He deserves it because he didn't just adopt me, he went on Safari and helped all the natives, animals and insects. Blood donations are always helpful. Where the hell am I? It's always so confusing in these labyrinths. Mgr. Nacky (talk) 08:03, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
• Nom & for. OK, Orian gets my vote this month. Mainly because he took on the "Melty Blood" review that we were all avoiding because it was longer than Route 66. The article's been deleted, so you can't see what a task he took on, but trust me, that's one hell of a review! He reviewed the hell out of that epic, and still found time to do as many reviews in June as anyone else. He has earned this. --UU Blah / Pee 08:21, Jul 1
• For Much as the above. Also I'm not selling my vote this month and I'll be back to doing more reviews soon, just want to give some attention to my own writing.
  Have Fun! MuCal. BFF Sir Orian57!Talk!PEE!Read!UnProvise!Awards! 08:30 1 July 2008
• For because I haven't seen Javascap's reviews around, and because Sycamore never ever "gets" my articles.   ~   Cajek! <12:54, 01 Jul 2008> changed to Hyperbole. Sorry Orian!   ~   Cajek! <17:34, 05 Jul 2008>
• For Because Orian is my adopter and good reviewer and Sycamore hates my guts because I reviewed his article for my First Review. (One more step to coolness)Baseball^{1 6 Join Here} 17:00, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
• For - I think I kinda regret "buying" Orian's vote for last month, the sex wasn't even that good. If he doesn't get it this month, I may hang myself. - Sir FSt. Yettie (talk) (>>)
  QotF BFF NotM RotM UNPotM CUN PEE SR UnProvise
  [09:15 3 July]
  • comment What do you mean the sex wasn't that good? It was my first time with a girl what did you expect? Have Fun! MuCal. BFF Sir Orian57!Talk!PEE!Read!UnProvise!Awards! 09:18 3 July 2008
• Yep. UU's right. I stared at the "Melty Blood" request many, many times, trying to summon up the will to do it. And I couldn't. But out of my failure arose Orian's success, like a great flaming PEEing phoenix. Cheers. --Hyperbole 18:53, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
• I cast my vote in favor of Orian A good reviewer, and he's constantly around reviewing the hell out of everything. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 17:08, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
• For Nothing witty to say here. --SYNDROME _{MUN medicate} 20:43, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
• For a job well done, over and over and over again. Dame GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 01:48, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
• For He's a good kid really, if a little ins... Oh wait, it's me that's meant to be the kid in this relationship? Yeah, anyway, spot on. Rt Hon W E Gladstone MP GOM | Converse | 19:29, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
  • CommentIns... secure? Insensitive? Insular? Instantaneous? Insubordonate? Instagated? Sir Orian57Talk 19:36 15 July 2008
• For. - I've had a look at the review historys - Orian deserves this--Sir Sycamore (T) (C) 16:29, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Javascap (Talk • Contribs • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

• Nom. Javascap still rocks. He's been consistently reviewing for ages, and still keeps up both quality and quantity. Would also be a worthy winner. --UU Blah / Pee 08:21, Jul 1
• As per last month. ―― Sir Heerenveen, KUN [UotM RotM VFH SK CM NS] (talk), 1/07 10:27
• Aye. • • • SIR FELLOW Necropaxx KUN {PotM VFH VFP Chop HS VotM} (blah, blah, blah...) 23:58, Jul 1
• For Tough choice. -RAHB 19:27, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
• Self-fer Why the heck not? Warm Regards, ▀ĴαVắśСąР▀03:18 July 5 2008 03:18, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
• For --Knucmo2 23:06, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Sycamore (Talk • Contribs • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +1 Sean Connery Impresshionsh

• Nom. Sycamore is a top bloke. He keeps his head down, and quietly and consistently produces thoughtful, quality reviews on a regular basis. --UU Blah / Pee 08:21, Jul 1

#Self for--Sir Sycamore (T) (C) 08:42, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Hyperbole (Talk • Contribs • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +3 HyperReviewers

• Nom+For Did I miss something. Why is this chap not nominated yet? He does quality useful reviews, and could well be the top performer this month... MrN  02:06, Jul 4
• For Hyperbole is, IMHumbleOpinion, the funniest guy here, and therefore I would like a review from him the most.   ~   Cajek! <17:33, 05 Jul 2008>
• Switch-for - He's now got more reviews than post-wikibreak Cajek. In almost no time, too. ~~Heeren ["Meh"] [tecħ] [kurk] [14/07 20:26]

[edit] Boomer (Talk • Contribs • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: -3 persons highly active on IRC

• Nom+against - As per last month... and the one before that... and that other month, and that previous month... Warm Regards, ▀ĴαVắśСąР▀03:17 July 5 2008
• I dunno who this guy is but he seems a bit lazy, so against. :-) - Sir FSt. Yettie (talk) (>>)
  QotF BFF NotM RotM UNPotM CUN PEE SR UnProvise
  [14:03 5 July]
• abs I can't figure out if Boomer is trying to get the lowest score he can this month, so I'm abs, just in case... MrN  00:07, Jul 7
• Against --Dexter111344 Complain here... Vote here today! 19:45, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Awards, Decorations and Honours
	Awards	Order of Uncyclopedia · Awards, Decorations and Honours · Awards · Ninjastars
	Ranks & Honours	Writer of the Month · Uncyclopedian of the Month · n00b of the month UnBooks Author of the Month · Potatochopper of the Month · UnScripts Playwright of the Month Emmanuel Goldstein Award of Excellence in the Distribution of Misinformation · Foolitzer Prize Reviewer of the Month Article Narrator of the Month · User Space Affiliations Writer of the Year · Uncyclopedian of the Year · RadicalX of the Year Admin Rank · RYA · Past Winners
	Limelight	VFH · VFP · Best of · Top 10 of 2005 · Top 10 of 2006 · Top 10 of 2007 · Hall of Shame · Rating System · PFP
	Prix citron	Useless Gobshite of the Month · Sockpuppeteer of the Month · FFS