Talk:Cremationism

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.

Look, I gotta be honest, I COULD improve this article by editing it, and making a clever use of what appears to be an unintended typo. I COULD write an article about cremationsim being the belief that all those who believe that evolution can be used to describe the advent of life on this planet from single-celled organisms to more complex multicellular organisms such as humans and parrots should be killed, and their remains burnt and scattered to the winds (ie. cremated...oh, the wit!)

Yeh I could write that, but I seriously can't be bothered. If the original author of this text wants to come back and, for example, use a DICTIONARY and a 3RD GRADE EDUCATION, then perhaps I might be persuaded to help them improve the content. As it is, I don't want to waste any more time on the immature dribblings of a loser. See below for the original text (not written by me...you might notice I can spell words with more than 4 letters correctly.)

Ha ha, I'm rolling on the floor laughing. Now let me point something out to you, you buttface. Where are all the misspelled words? If I misspelled any words it was on purpose. Now get back to life and look at evilution. The author of that page needs a kindergarten education, plus his ABC's, plus he actually needs to know what creationism is. I'm certainly not asking you to edit this page, because you'll probably add some evolutionist crap to it. If that's what you were going to do, I'd prefer you to keep your grubs off of it. Now go get some chocolate ice cream from a cow's butt and stop your babyish ranting. 4.159.5.95 17:04, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, really. Beezwax 17:04, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

I agree. After all, the Evilution article is obviously much worse than this. Uncyclopedia is about humour. (And humour) It is inevitable that subjects close to your heart will be vulnerable to satire. I have Aspergers, and I found the article on it desperately unfunny. But this sort of thing has to happen. If my feelings or those of other sufferers were spared, there would be no articles on here. Sayle 10:16, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, yeah, Beezwax 01:53, 17 March 2007 (UTC)