Talk:Halo
From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
 | This article was nominated for deletion on August 4, 2007. The result of the discussion was Keep. |
Contents |
[edit] New Pic
If it is not too offending to the original creator I would like to alter the Image to read "Halo: Combat Created". Many unlols I can imagine but it makes more sense than holy combat.
Go ahead. im really the only one who edits this page with any good edits anymore and i dnt mind.--Fbuchele 15:20, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Read it all
Damn it people, read the whole article before adding anything. No one wants to hear your shitty Halo 3 jokes or why you think the legendary version of the game is an overpriced piece of crap. please, http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Uncyclopedia:How_To_Be_Funny_And_Not_Just_Stupid...
--Fbuchele 18:46, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] this page sux
i've been through many pages here and there are some funny shit but this is just retarded... really there is NOTHING funny about this
- I think the reason why this page sux is becasue were dealing with some long term Vandalisim problems here I am look up in the edit history of this page to see where it went very wrong at. I seen the past version of this page is way better than the current version which is crap. Otherwise I would have UN:VFD this real quick. Pleb- Sawblade5 ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 03:46, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
I just removed the most unfunny quote ever.. Skeelz 16:05, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
"If you are able to reach 40,000 Points then you gain access to the mini game where you must try and extract a lightbulb from Hilters ass without it breaking."
it is an ambiguous reference. Does it refer to Hitler's parts or the lightbulb? And the whole scenario was likely taken out of an episode of Scrubs anyway. kotorian1
[edit] combat evolved
i don't give 2 fucks about what happens to this page but...combat:intelligently designed? priceless. always keep that.
[edit] Please
Please only edit this page if you actually have something to contribute. No more of that gay picture of the cat with the helmet. That's just retarded. Not funny, retarded. Knock it off. --Fbuchele
Aw, but kitty CUTE!
[edit] From Pee Review
Here are the results of teh Pee Review.
|
[edit] Halo
I am wondering how this article can be improved and how to get rid of Stupid Crap on it, if there's any. --Pleb- Sawblade5 ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 06:13, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
| Humo(u)r: | 8 | Good random humor! Really hit my funny bone hard there. Could use a bit more humor though, some parts of the article were completely lacking any lawls from me. |
| Concept: | 8 | Good content, but article could be lengthened...maybe include other religions in the different versions on the bottom with lots of random humor assorted throughout the article?? |
| Prose and Formatting: | 9 | I am illiterate in prose, but the formatting was excellent! |
| Images: | 10 | Extremely hilarious pictures that ACTUALLY helped make the rest of the article more humorous and enjoyable to read! |
| Miscellaneous: | 10 | Excellent random humor! |
| Final Score: | 45 | Overall, maybe a bit more content, with some more humor, but still a damn good article! |
| Reviewer: | Razorflame | |
I hope we can improve on it, but based on the review it appears to have redeeming value. --Pleb- Sawblade5 ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 02:16, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Yes, I believe it to have very good redeeming value, I just hope that you can work out the kinks in it to make it a good page. Kind of stupid though, since it already is a good page. --Razorflame 02:19, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Oh why thank you! i rewrote most of this crap, so im glad it got such good reviews. anyone have any specific ideas on how to improve it?--Fbuchele 15:28, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Way To Many Redos
Basicly like every week this article is re-written, and then flushed down the crapper. Make a good one and keep it, Its hard to think stuff up for it if it is redone every week! --Lord Vipes 18:56, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
