Talk:Hard to read

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.

Feature? --The Dit 13:24, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

I'll vote for it if you nom it. RabbiTechno 18:13, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Definitely I'll vote for it. Since I made it and all...   ~   Cajek! <-> 18:21, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

I'd give it a for. I'm not sure what it'd look like on the main page, but it was pretty amusing, and interesting, too. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 20:58, Oct 11

Give it a whack. I'm going to warn you though, it's going to go over hard with the Quality Engineers. --Grand General Wizard Etc x2 and Senator G/K/O/CUNT.K.F. WHORE! ZOTM MAFE VANDL UOTM WOTM TOP10 FP 22:38, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Sweet peaches, that was hard to read! -- Kip teh Dip • Talk • Works • Faq • Vote in '08 • 00:00, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Sounds like VFH time, then. --The Dit 04:27, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Uncyclopedia:VFH/Hard to read

[edit] General Discussion

Hey Dit, just remember to keep the gimmick going. One thing that wouldn't be funny is if there was a section that was actually readable. --  ~   Cajek! <-> 13:02, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

I like the idea of expanding the last section. --  ~   Cajek! <-> 13:38, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Best thing ever on Uncyclopedia! we need more articles like this. --—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.10.60.58 (talk • contribs)

hehe, thank you! This is dit's project now, btw. --  ~   Cajek! <-> 02:11, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

A section containing light yellow text would work very well. Sometimes its the simple things. R3tr0r0ck3r 14:36, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] ...

This article is fucking fuckable.Charming Golf 13:06, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

I don't find it that hard to read, but I did feel a powerful urge to leap on it and eat it. Verp 16:54, 15 April 2008 (UTC)