Talk:Harry Potter (Books)

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.

[edit] Anti-Semitism in the Harry Potter Movies

It's true. Just watch the first movie when Harry goes into Greengotts. On the floor you will see a Star of David and shortly after, Harry asks, "Hagrid, what exactly are these things [the bankers]?" Hagrid responds, "They're goblins. Clever as they come, but they're not the most friendly of beasts. Best stay close." Obviously, the movie is suggesting that Jews (bankers are commonly Jewish) are goblins and "not the most friendly of beasts."

I think you mean Gringotts...--Disenchanted-Rose 07:46, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Yeah....really obvious...couldn't possibly be that Rowling"s interpretation of Goblins is that they are not very friendly, eh? --Zankou 03:18, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

P.S....This is UNcyclopedia, not Wikipedia...keep seriousness out of it.

Add it in, sounds brilliant to me. Ж Kalir, Wandering Hippie Salesman 15:53, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

I just found out my language is a semitic language ^_^ ...I don't really know what that means though.

[edit] Concerned with the information

The book is called "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince", and Snape is a Death Eater, not Voldemort's son. How can Voldemort have a son when all the chicks are belong to the good guys?

He's a hemadrahpite. Like Cartmans Mom. It's true. Say so on page 271, book four.

[edit] ARRRRGH!!

what kind of sick freako can put that spoiler right there and so big????????????? ok, I gotta admit i even like the joke, but man, you just ruined my life...

Learning the twist in a Harry Potter book ruined your life? Right...

Are you seriously saying you didnt know that already? Because that is plain shocking.--Disenchanted-Rose 07:47, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

If learning the spoiler to a book ruins your life, guys who play D&D will laugh at you.

[edit] HOLY SHIIIT!!!!

I hope the spoiler wasn't a true spoiler because if it is a true spoiler it will cause an amount of semen in the reader directly proportional to the amount of laughs it got to him.

Yes, I laughed, but now I want to separate the head from the body of the respectable individual who wrote that X_X

Right to the bone: Be funny and not just stupid. And in this case, be funny and please, not also stupid.

When even people who hated the "spoiler" laughed, I would say that it is funny and not stupid. Certainly a lot moreso than most of the rest of the article. -- Rei 19:44, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 193.217.60.11's edits

User 193.217.60.11 keeps modifying the intro paragraph. Do others agree that their changes are unwanted, or is it just me? -- Rei 18:30, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

I for one think that the intro should be changed because 1. I'm willing to bet 99% of people already know snape kills dumbledore. You'd have to live under a rock to not know it. 2. It's a fact, which i thought was discouraged here ;). 3. The book came out ages ago, we need to start thinking ahead of the game for book 7. I think it would be funnier to have a "spoiler" about book 7 that's likely enough to be believable, so people will think the book is ruined until it comes out and they read it. Those are the best kind. All the fun of ruining the book without the cruelness! Unless whatever is decided upon turns out to be right ;)

How about... that Harry is a horcrux himself and must kill himself to kill Voldemort. Oh yeah, and R.A.B is Sirius' brother, Reguluas Abraxus Black. Will that about do it? --Disenchanted-Rose 07:49, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

193.113.200.162 12:28, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

1) It's funny because it has the possibility of ruining the plot (or making people wonder if the plot was ruined), like we saw above. Another example of this is found in the Cowboy Bebop article, where it's a running theme that Spike dies.

2) Facts aren't discouraged; unfunny things are discouraged. For example, the Norm Coleman article states that Norm is seven feet tall, with green hair and an eye smack in the middle of his head because that's what his publicist said (if you selectively quote him ;) ). The closer you can get to reality while still being funny, the better.

3) Book 7 isn't here yet. I'd be glad to update with a fresh spoiler when it does come out. Nobody would believe that Uncyclopedia had a "sneak peak" at book 7 before it came out.

I strongly disagree; the "spoiler" bit it the only part of the article that IS funny. The rest is been there, done that. And even if it weren't, it wouldn't be funny. Belard 17:07, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] ...Not Just Stupid

The majority of this article seems to violate HTBFANJS. --Linus M. 21:02, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

Not in Soviet Russia, buddy. In Soviet Russia, HTBFANJS seems to violate the majority of this article!!!

I beg to differ- the format of the reversal would be; In Soviet Russia, HTBFANJS seems to violate YOU!!!

[edit] Restructure

Major restructure. Questions, comments, snide remarks? -- Rei 05:53, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Revisiting the header paragraph

While the compromise version (49/49/2 odds of choosing a warning message) of "Snape Kills Dumbledore" is certainly acceptable, I've noticed something. Lots of people keep editing it to make it more like the way it was initially: only saying "Snape Kills Dumbledore". Given that this seems to be a popular edit, should we reconsider having the 49/49/2 compromise, and consider going back to simply saying "Snape Kills Dumbledore"? -- Rei 03:02, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] complaint

Please excuse the rudness, I would just like to say many people don't like the fact that you are revieling a huge spoiler (i've read it myself). That is going beyond funny. It is cruel. How would you feel if someone told you something like that? I suggest it be removed as soon as possible. I have another suggestion. Create some more of those rederects to things that are nonsequitors. By the way, I created the article called "gondola of death." will more people please edit it? Apartment Building 02:39, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

No.

By the way, what nonsequitors are you referring to? I've been trying to keep offtopic and nonsense ramblings (which get added to this article every other day) to a minimum. -- Rei 16:28, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

For a nonsequitor, may I recommend an article on Harry Pothead, a spoiled brat who has no talent and has everything handed to him? The second book is the best, Harry Pothead and the Chamber of Stoners. I can't write an article, can someone else do it?-I'm lazy-

[edit] About the spoiler in the header

Please stop putting back the annoying spoiler at the top of the article. It has ruined the event in the book for me and I don't want that to happen to other fans. As said before, it is cruel to others to spoil something like that. Either don't put anything there at all or put a fake spoiler or some other funny stuff, but stop putting back that major spoiler. --- Fure

Don't worry about the spoiler; I fixed it now. Someone keeps putting a link back to snape though, and it makes the whole spoiler just as annoying.--Me 9:05 April 29 2007

Al-tan love that spoiler. I don't care what are you thinking. Unless you're a cute loli like Al-tan, who alway share me some candy, I will keep revert it back. So stop worry about it, it won't help at all. Ace Attacker 05:32, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
If you don't known that already by now, you aren't a fan and most likely not care about it at all. Ace Attacker 02:30, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
Really, talking about nonsense! You know, some people might not have had the time or chance to read the book yet, because they had other things to do. So they might have an important part of the story ruined by reading that spoiler. I only found time to read it very recently and I'm a huge fan. So don't act like you know all the fans, because you obviously don't. Just put something else there (don't tell me there aren't any other things than this you can come up with) or don't place anything at all, but stop placing back the spoiler! --- Fure
- Fine! I alway want to try this anyway. :p Ace Attacker 14:57, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

I disagree. Most people like the old header, so I'm returning it to that. Unless we get more people arguing against the spoiler... -- Rei 16:57, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

And I disagree to that. Come on, Rei. I thought Ace Attacker's idea was an excellent compromise. It used the names as used in the spoiler, just not at first sight. That way the moment won't be spoiled for people who haven't read it yet and those who are apparently so fond of the spoiler still have it, just not at first sight. It didn't have to be changed back into the original spoiler. And in any case, I'm changing it back to Ace Attacker's header. --- Fure

Ace Attacker was being nice to you, but it's obvious that (s)he wanted the spoiler in there. I want the spoiler in there. It's two to one. -- Rei 18:48, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Whether (s)he was just being to me or not, Ace Attacker's solution had the spoiler in there, just not as clear. It was a compromise I could accept. But why do you insist on putting the spoiler in there, and so clearly on display, so badly? What makes it so funny? I think it's funnier to put in some fake spoiler or something. You know, some random and funny nonsense (either in- or outside the HP world), but not a real spoiler. A real spoiler, especially as big as this one, is just cruel to fans who haven't read the book yet and I just can't see why and how it is funny. Is it really that hard to just accept some compromise? --- Fure

Is the concept of "Two to One" really that hard for you? Besides, the current header is random, offtopic nonsense (at its face value), which is the biggest scourge of Uncyclopedia. RV. -- Rei 19:52, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

No, it is the fact that it ruins the moment for those who haven't read the book and get to this page (like what happened to me recently). That is what's hard for me. Can't the names be replaced by two other characters of the books? So you could make it like "Malfoy kills Hagrid", or whatever other random combination you can think of (besides the real one). That could work, couldn't it? --- Fure

Truth is funnier than fiction. You're overruled. Deal. -- Rei 21:27, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Ehm, truth, for an Uncyclopedia article? Somehow, that doesn't make much sense. Look, I've replaced the names with Aragog and Hagrid now. Can you please leave it that way, if only to do the fans who haven't yet read the book a little favor? --- Fure

Doing fans a favor? You seem to be the one who thinks that this is Wikipedia. The only thing that matters here is humor, and the reactions of people who get the plot spoiled are amusing. And once again, I'll remind you: Two to One. The old version stays. -- Rei 22:30, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Oh, just as a reminder: being nice is definitely not the Uncyclopedia way. If you doubt this, check out the articles Holocaust Tycoon, Cowboy Bebop, and September 11th's pictures. Humour at others' expense is pretty much encouraged around these parts. -- Rei 22:35, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Cute. And wouldn't it be great if the spoiler header actually contained something like, ehm, I don't know, humour? And two to one? If I remember correctly, Ace Attacker was willing to change the spoiler, so that would make it 1.5 to 1.5 . Changing it again. --- Fure

You consider "Fine!" support? You live in a bizarre world, my friend. Even an idiot can tell that (s)he was just trying to get you off his/her back. I'm not such a pushover, as you'll find over the coming weeks that you keep trying to revert the article. Two to one, it stays as it was. -- Rei 23:39, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

PS: As per your "humor" comments: To quote an earlier poster on this thread (Belard): "I strongly disagree; the "spoiler" bit it the only part of the article that IS funny." -- Rei 23:40, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

You've got quite the delusions of grandeur, calling me your friend (don't reply to that one. I know sarcasm when I see it) I never said anything about support. (S)he changed it, meaning there was at least some willingness (no matter how small or for whatever reasons) to change it. The whole header does seem awfully important to you, as you just keep defending it on and on. Why? I've said my reasons for changing it, but what are yours? I still haven't seen you come up with any better arguments than "Two to one", though you'll probably say you won't need any good arguments. As for the example of the previous poster: that doesn't mean the thing is funny. It wasn't, it isn't and it won't be funny. Say what, if I can find others who agree the spoiler should be changed or removed, can/will you comply with that? Changing the thing for now. --- Fure

I'm thinking of put Jesus hate this article template here. I actually not convinced how any fan still not known that spoiler. Even if you're so busy and lack time to read a book, you still prefer to spend your little freetime on this cruel site known as Uncyclopedia rather than slowly read a book, bit by bit. My sole reason for change the tag is, as I said, I alway want to put reference to Fate/Stay Night (Saber can cut Harry's head off at her will, trust me). But as you see, it's red link and I realized it isn't that great. Now I'm thinking of put link in word Snape, Dumbledore and Book Six so everyone would get clear idea what happen! Ace Attacker 10:53, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

I would like to react to the viewpoints taken by Rei and Fure regarding the prominent spoiler on the top of the page. But first of all, I would like to congratulate Rei on a job well done. I had always suspected that witchcraft and homosexuality are firmly intertwined, and his irrefutable proof of their correlation has given me a feeling of euphoria unknown to me since the licensing of ‘Yu-Gi-Oh!’ By 4Kids Entertainment. However, I am of the opinion that the spoiler on the top of the page should be altered. I would like to make one thing clear: I don’t share Fure’s underlying motivations. As Ace Attacker rightfully stated, any true fan would have known that Snape kills Dumbledore since ages (since ‘Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince’ was released more than a year ago). At the same time, it is exactly this statement that illustrates the root of my objection to the spoiler. Any TRUE fan (who obviously constitutes the ideal target for the spoiler) would ALREADY know that Snape kills Dumbledore, and would therefore, upon visiting the page, not be surprised by the spoiler’s content. Due to this sad fact, I am of the opinion that the spoiler has lost its humoristic value; I would recommend formulating an appealing alternative. 145.53.129.4 21:36, 4 January 2007 (UTC) Quiqly
I just can't agree with the "true fans should know the spoiler by now" thing. But that's something I'm not going to continue discussing about, since apparently you (Rei and Ace Attacker) are so stuck up you just don't want to see my point. However, despite disagreeing with Quiqly at some points, his/her comment has made it clear there are others who want to see the damned header changed. That means Rei's "two to one"-crap has become obsolete (though it actually was already). I had a made up a good alternative, but apparently even that's too much for you people. And I guess it's just me, but I have no friggin' idea what the hell that "so you realized you can't win in arguement?" thing in the history section was supposed to mean, Ace Attacker! In any case, I'm changing the header back to my alternative again and unless you come up with GOOD arguments to keep the original spoiler or with better alternatives (for your information; the original spoiler is NOT a better alternative!), just leave it alone! 85.145.237.39 15:42, 5 January 2007 (UTC) Fure

In case you didn't know, 1 + 1 = 2. 2 ! < 2. 2 = 2. -- Rei 19:11, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Well, it mean you stop discuss and just keep changed header for a while, glad that you're return to talk page. Now even if 145.53.129.4 think we shall change the header, he still didn't come up with what it shall be. And I'm still happy with old header. That is, unless Fate/Stay Night got proper article here (then again, it may be better not). To me, the old one is nice enough and until there is better a better alternative, I won't change it. However, since you're so insist, I will leave it for now. By the way, just accept that you're not fan. No, I don't say true fan, you're not fan at all. Face it, it's over a year now and somehow you manage to cut yourself from every media regard the book six (or just pretent to be). And you decide to spend time here, keep change small header of cruel article numerous time instead of grab the book and read it. I'm not a true fan, just read enough so I could understand whatever Hentai doujinshi based-on, yet I was spoiled a month after the book was release. In short, do whatever you want with header, but stop act like you're fan, ok? :p Ace Attacker 18:20, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
Interesting conclusion, to claim I have not read the book (or even all the books) yet. I don't recall having uttered anything about that and to be honest, I don't see anything about it in the discussion at all. Also, stop acting you actually know people whom you obviously don't know.

Now, while I'll admit it's far from being the funniest thing ever, my Russian Reversal spoiler is still a great deal funnier than the original spoiler and an excellent alternative for now. So that's what I'm turning it into again. 85.145.237.39 18:31, 6 January 2007 (UTC) Fure

AAAAAAH!!!!!!!!! THIS SO STUPID!!!! YOU BAKA BAKA BAKA BAKA!!!!!!!!!!! YOU STUPID BAKA!!!!!!! SPOILER IS SOOOOOOO NO FUNY AND STUPID!!!!!!!!! YOU SOOOOO MUCH BAKA REI! DO AWAY NOW!!!!!!!! OR I SEND NY-PNY-CHAN TO KILL YOU AND YOU GOING HAV RLY BIG TROBLE!!!! AN N-PNY-CHAN IS SOOOOOO KAWAII!!!!!!!! KYAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!! ^_^ BUT YOU SUK REI BAKA!!!!!! YOU NO ME GO DO AWAY SPOILER COS IT NO FUNY AN VERY STUPID!!!!!!! YOU NO TUCH IT COS YOU NO WAT REI BAKA HU???!!!!! 3 = 4x + -23.3 / 234 * 34 : 1.542 = 4546.31 = -3.3 + 4 < 78,9 - 43 > 23 + 7 HAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1 ^_^ SO SHAT UP!!!!!!!!!! 130.37.169.186 12:06, 8 January 2007 (UTC) ^_^ MIKI-CHAN ^_^ N-PNY-CHAN IS ROV TEEHEE ^_^

Bakana maniaku. "Eihongo" de kaita no de, bakasou desu. -- Rei 18:13, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

*SHADAP YOU BAKA!!!!! YOU FINK YOU SOOOO COOL TALKING JAPANEES WORDS HU REI BAKA?!????!!!! BUT YOU NO WAT PEOPLE HU????!!! REI JUST SAY NOFINF JUS COPEL JAPANEES WORDS TAT IS NOT REAL SENTENS!!!!! YOU DISGRASE TO MIKI-MIKIS COUNTRII AN MIKI-MIKIS PEPEL!!!!!! SO SHADAP YOU BAKA!!!!!!! AN MIKI-MIKI SAY YOU NO TUCH CHANG OF MIKI-MIKI AN YOU STIL TUCH AN BRING SPOILER BAK!!!!! YOU JUS JELOS COS MIKI-MIKI ROV NY-PNY-CHAN AN NY-PNY-CHAN ROV MIKI-MIKI AN YOU IS LUSER!!!!!!! YOU SO SUK!!!!! NOW MIKI-MIKI GONA SEND FRIENDS AND THEN REI HAVE BIG TROBLE!!!!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!! ^_^ HIHIHIHIHIHI!!!!!!! --130.37.169.186 18:45, 9 January 2007 (UTC) ^_^ MIKI-MIKI ^_^ MIKI-MIKI HART NY-PNY-CHAN! ^_^

Donna seishinshogai o wazurau ka? Itai ka? Eihongo dake de dekireba, nihongo de kakanakute nasai. Wakaru ka?

Atashi wa jouzu ja nai, demo benkyotte iru. -- Rei 22:50, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

- Even if the spoiler header no longer funny as it was, consider it creat this whole mess, which is very amusing, I think it worth to keep (unless we got good article for Fate/Stay Night, of cause!). Ace Attacker 14:54, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

*NOOOOOO!!!!!!! SHADAP YOU!!!!!!! WAT YOU BAKAMONO LIKE SHOU OR SOMFING HU????!?!?!?!?!!!SPOILER IS BIG SUK AN NO FUNY AN IS VERY STUPID!!!!!! SPOILER MUST NO BE HERE!!!!! SO YOU NO SAY SPOILER IS STAY ACE ATACKERR1!!!!! GRRRR!!!!! SHADAP!!!!!! --130.37.169.186 18:50, 9 January 2007 (UTC) ^_^ MIKI-MIKI ^_^ MIKI-MIKI ROV NY-PNY-CHAN SOOOOOOO MACH!!!!! ^_^ TEEHEE!!!!!!

MC Bilal ga rainut shi ni yatte kita doko ni kita? Shibuya DOG!! Aight, iz u ready 4 some brand new shit? Aaiiiiightzzzzzzzz.. Sawage!

zOmGz U iz soo dum! I been readin that banner an I wuz thinkin WTF? Who r Snape n Dumbledor? Ya know I feel thugz but that shit ain’t nuthin ya know? Just been chillin an scopin but member the wepon’s close. Dude U shoud change dat know what I sayin or I iz gonna bust in da club aaaight. Cuz U don wanna meet me no more wit da posse cuz I in the grain. Hell naw! I say shame, shame. Peace outz.. MC Bilal

Woah! I'm only gone for a short while and look what happens! This is, very interesting I must say. And I must for the first time admit I actually agree with Ace Attacker: this is quite amusing. But, that's where the agreeing ends. The original spoiler still sucks and my arguments for this are clear. My standpoint remains the same: I just want it out of the way, either through deletion or alteration. Glad this Miki-Miki person agrees, be it in quite a unique way. And I believe, MC Bilal, from what I can decipher from his ehm "brand new shit"(?), does so as well. Oh btw, Ace Attacker, if you like an article for Fate/Stay Knight, what's stopping you from writing one yourself? --85.145.237.39 21:46, 9 January 2007 (UTC) Fure
- I just not good at creat funny article from scratch. It would end up with lame fanboy's rant and made more knowledgetable otaku to hunt me down (I still don't want to got stab by invisible Excalibur). Ace Attacker 06:19, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
  - Ah, I see, ok. But I suppose you could make a start and if it turns out bad let others make it better. Btw, Rei, it's 4 to 3 now and not in the favor of your original spoiler header. So either alter or delete it, but don't put it back. --85.145.237.39 22:33, 10 January 2007 (UTC) Fure
    - Not following my count? Well, in case you mean you don't understand it, allow me to explain, Rei dear: it's Quiqly, Miki-Miki, MC Bilal and myself against. That makes four against. And it's you, Ace Attacker and Hinoa in favor of. That makes three in favor. I don't know if you kept up with your arithmetic lately, but where I come from four is still more than three, which means there are more people against your spoiler than there are in favor of it. Conclusion: it's either going to be altered or deleted, but it won't stay. And in case you mean you don't care about it, than I can only assume you are quite the pathetic loser. Sure hope it's the first, but in any case stop changing it back, unless you have something to back it up. --85.145.237.39 23:41, 11 January 2007 (UTC) Fure
      - Wow, I think we have to give Ryulong a long applause. His version far more funny than original one, yet still be striking plot-spoiler. I think it settle now. Ace Attacker 11:51, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Waha! Genius! I laughed as soon as I saw the header/spoiler and laughed even harder when i realised it was done the soviet russsia way. And for the record, Uncyclopedia is random and stupid (but ultimately really funny), and if people are gonna be stupid enough to look up an article about something they dont want to be 'spoiled' for them, then they are probably stupid enough to be surprised by it again when they read the book anyway. Knux 14:50, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
I laughed my ass off. It's funny, really. I can't believe you people wanted to read about harry potter without reading book 6 and thinking that there aren't gonna be any spoilers!!

Not only is the spoiler hilarious, but made even funnier reading how much it succeded in here. Best. Argument. Ever.

The spoiler stays. God

Change it back to the old template. The Soviet Russia thing is stupid. It was much funnier before.

I disagree, it's still striking spoiler (unless you don't known what Russian Reversal is) just require more thinking. And to me, a joke that need some though are usually much better. Ace Attacker 03:26, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

I prefer the old one, but I support this one as a compromise. It has humor in its own right, and it solved a big squabble that was happening here. -- Rei

The "DUMBLEDORE KILLS SNAPE IN BOOK SIX" spoiler is the funniest thing i saw on Uncyclopedia!!! It's genius. Don't change it ever! Only true fans realizes how funny it is. Loshmi 04:56, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Well, the Russia Reversal is funny but need some thought. Don't worry, we will replace it with Book 7 spoiler as soon as possible. But for now, lets use Russia Reversal. Ace Attacker 07:09, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

As I said, it's funny but need some thought (I alway like cleaver joke than simple one). And the version you used, Loshmi, is almost spiloer avoid since reader need to put the pointer on Snape and Dumbledore links to get true message. While the Russian Reversal one hide it too, whoever known Russian Reversal will instantly get it. Ace Attacker 16:47, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

I think cleaver jokes are funny, too. I like the ones where I swing the cleaver at people's necks and they gurgle and scream and fall over. Heheheheh.... YAY!

I heard Hermoine is actually a man, Ron is a drug trafficing hooker by night, Dumbledore touches all the children he can get his hands on, and at the end. Harry wakes up and it was all a dream. Trust the truth, and follow your heart!

- The last one make sense (since it's done to dead for rumor of Doraemon's ending :p ). I just never accept first one! Don't try to ruin my precious memory! Has Snape molest anime-ish Hermoine in Hentai doujinshi is great thing! Nothing is greater than tearful deflower scene, face it! So I just won't accept her as Funatari, never! Ace Attacker 03:46, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

i thought that "spoiler" was hilarious. it made me crack up everytime something said "blahblahblah, like how Snape kills Dumbledore (spoiler!)" but the fact is, it's not a spoiler now. two years later, most people should know this.. it's like knowing it was Ginny who opened the chamber of secrets (spoiler!) . July 25, 2007
- Agree. I say we should remove it entirely (maybe with sign notice in memory for the long time it serve this article), it's better than have current lame spoiler. It isn't stupid, but not funny either. Ace Attacker 05:35, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Harry Potter is Evil

Harry potter is a satanic book

YA? RELY?!! HAHAHAHA!!!!! SUGOI!!!! HIHI!!!! --130.37.169.186 18:55, 9 January 2007 (UTC) ^_^ MIKI-MIKI ^_^ MIKI-MIKI GO TO DAET WIT NY-PNY-CHAN!!!! KYAAAAA!!!! ^_^ ^_^ ^_^ AN REI NO GOIN!!!! HAHAHAH!!!
Well, scientists have proven that reading Harry Potter makes you 75-80% more likely to go to Hell
- I'm pretty sure those statistics are higher. Just ask the Catholic church. They'll tell you.
- HAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHaH
Wow. The number of times I've read them... Im screwed.

If I remember rightly, to get into the Ministry of Magic, one must first go into a phone box and dial 62442. 6, (2+4), (4+2). 666!!! Just goes to show, dunnit? SATAAAAAAN! :) (oh, it would also spell the word 'magic' on an alphanumeric phone keypad - spooky stuff, eh?) This load of bollocks was brought to you by RabbiTechno

[edit] what the hell

this is so god dam stupid. its not funny whatever happened to HTBFNJS !!

I'm getting annoyed with this 130... dude.

[edit] the bloody

I added the section "The Whole Point" and I thought it was hilarious but then someone had to go back and remove it. Come on, everyone know that Snape kills Dumbledore by this point so it's not like it's ruining anything.

- Sure, but said it is whole point of this serie is too far. Ace Attacker 05:38, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

I didn't remove it because of the spoiler; I was the one who added the top-line spoiler, in "Snape Kills Dumbledore" form, to begin with. I removed your "The Whole Point" section because it wasn't funny at all. You use long, rambling sentences, go off on "no, wait" tangents, put pointless randomness in there (Rowling really being Clinton, etc), etc. -- Rei 16:22, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] STFU

The spoiler is hilarious and should be left alone. Stop bitching about it because if you knew Uncyclopedia and their policy on spoilers you would have never came here in the first place.

Hilarious as in "ha ha I've stolen any form of amusement you could ever get from the book" or as in "this is quite a funny bit in the book, but it does give away a few plot points, sadly"? Because the first won't be tolerated on account of being more attacksome rather than funny. As for Uncyclopedia's policy on spoilers... wait, they don't have a policy on spoilers. So I'm going to ad-lib it and make two points.

Don't add spoilers on obscure shit like Translated Anime with Ninjas and Breasts and Laser Robots.
Don't spoil something on a major scale.

We spoiled the shit out of every single blockbuster movie that's come out for every year since the spoilers template was made, but this is a pretty large thing to spoil, and would most certainly net complaints from many people, if not threats. But hey, if you want to handle the people making those threats as well as users/admins who disagree with you, go nuts. Ж Kalir, Crazy Indie Gamer _{(ninjas and lasers and gold, oh my!)} 03:45, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

i'm all for the original spoiler. anyone who reads uncyclopedia does so at their own risk. if somebody were stupid enough to even type "harry potter" into a search engine ANYWHERE on the net when they haven't read the book and don't want to be spoiled, they DESERVE to be spoiled. meanwhile i've put up a spoiler for book 4, which is ancient enough that everyone knwos about it. 165.21.154.17 15:04, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

I disagree with your logic, but I'm fine with the current spoiler. And what if they just were looking for pictures from the newest movie or something, do they still deserve to get spoiled? Ж Kalir, Crazy Indie Gamer _{(ninjas and lasers and gold, oh my!)} 15:51, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

They deserved it, I can't think of any logical reason why someone would search for images from uncyclopedia. Wait, I can think one, an unfan who want some crazy image to ruin the fan he known. Ace Attacker 16:34, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

They did say "any search engine on the net", not just Uncyclopedia. Ж Kalir, Wandering Hippie Salesman 23:48, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Seriously -- this is UNcyclopedia. If you're not expecting humor here -- at your expense or someone else's -- what are you doing here? The current "spoiler" Spang forced on the article is a textbook violation of Uncyclopedia:How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid, and gets rid of one of the few sources of genuine amusement the article has caused. -- 23:19, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

He removed the spoilers there because they're not really that funny for someone who is not interested in the books, they're anathema to people yet to read them, they're old news to people who've read the book... in fact, the only group it really is humourous for would be people who actively want to spoil the book for others, which is a fairly minor group right now. If they're searching Uncyclopedia for something, it should be something everyone can laugh at. Having a blunt heavy hammer for a joke is also a textbook violation of HTBFANJS, if you've forgotten. Ж Kalir _{where's my house?} 23:46, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

I like this new fake spoiler template. I hated the old one on this page for three reasons:

1. The spoiler template joke is getting old. REALLY old.

2. The original spoiler template (see Template:Spoiler) is the best spoiler template. Every spoiler template created since has been stupid, unfunny, boring and annoying.

3. Templates that spoil a whole book/movie simply aren't funny, just annoying. The funniest thing about Template:Spoiler is that it takes completely random spoilers that are mostly totally irrelevant to the actual article.

So don't put it back, m'k?

Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:05, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

How could we? You have a small group of admins who have played no part in the development of this article now dictating what it should be like. -- Rei 15:32, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Admins always knows what's best, they are the spice of the universe.

Kingkitty Midnight Train ~ Hopium

15:37, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

THEREFORE CHRONARION IS DUNECAT Ж

WHEEEEE! 15:51, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

NAH, I STILL THINK BRAYDIE ARE DUNECAT. HE WOULDN'TS LIE.

Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:41, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thinking of adding this, but don't want to be killed by Uncyclopedians

Thinking of adding this Did You Know? box somewhere in the article, but Minitrue say spoiler doubleplusungood. What do you think? Departheid 23:50, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, but I get the feeling that will most certainly get you killed. Ж Kalir, Crazy Indie Gamer _{(ninjas and lasers and gold, oh my!)} 00:26, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

All right, that's why I asked. Departheid 00:29, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

It's once there (along with full list of killed and survive people), but now forbid. Ace Attacker 05:23, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

No, I was talking about something different; that spoiler box was sufficiently red enough that I closed my eyes when I saw it and didn't ruin my book. I was one of the lucky ones... Departheid 17:23, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] fun, but

how dare you forget the HOT werevolf Romulus Lupin?

And you should also mention that some people DIE at least five times:)

You seem to have mistaken us with a furry fanfiction website. And no, we shouldn't mention that. Thanks. Ж Kalir _{totally not Wario at all} 15:50, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Someone wanna add the quote 'Daniel Radcliffe plays Harry Potter in the films - Captain Obvious'?

It's not Romulus, it's Remus.

[edit] _Spoiler_

Harry and Cho are in bed, Cho lets slip - "That Ron's a bit tasty" DBULL 22:46, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The REAL characters of Harry Potter

Harry Potter- Is actually a mentally insane person, not a wizard. The car crash that killed his parents caused him to become mentally unstable and he was sent to a asylum. The whole series is just what Harry thinks in real. This is why Harry is able to come back to life in the seventh book. It is because he never really died.

Ron Weasley- Harry's friend. That's about it for Ron. Ron is good for nothing in just about all of the books. Some of his accomplishments include; teaching Harry about wizarding chess, crashing a flying car, peeing his pants when the spiders attack Harry and him, braking his wand, breaking his leg, losing his rat, blaming the cat, being confused, being jealous of Harry, (and this one is the only good one since he can't do anything) and saving Harry.

Hermione Granger-The only member of the golden trio with a fully developed brain. She is the only one smart enough to accomplish anything on her own. Without her Ron and Harry would surely die, and not doing something heroic either, they would most likely meet their doom by falling over each other and landing in a spider infested hole. Hermione and her cat Crookshanks saved the world by taking care of the Scarred One so he could save the world and avenge his parent's deaths.

Draco Malfoy- Prince of slytherin and the death eater's son, this is what we know about Draco. If this story was about him we would also know that he worked as a spy for the order during his school years. Harry didn't like Draco because first off he didn't know Draco was on the side of good and secondly Draco refused to go out with Harry in fifth year saying, and I qoute, 'I don't play for that team.' It is this combination that made Harry despise Draco and love Ginny because she was able to except Harry having only one brain cell and being mentally retarded.

Ginny Weasley- broke her mother's streak of boys, and caused Molly to say enough is enough, and stop popping them out. Ginny is a caring person and, not unlike Hermione, is willing to deal with stupidity. Tragically Ginny fell in love with our protagonist leading her to endure Harry's break downs for the rest of her life. She is Harry's dream girl, literally, you see Harry dreamed her up just like the wizarding world but that does not make her plight less tragic.

These characters are dumb asses and thus we read the Harry Potter stories becuase what is more fun than laughing at their dumb ass behavior? That is correct Harry, nothing, good job *claps and Harry drools*

[edit] Yikes

Harry has a hairy crotch.

[edit] better spoiler needed

seriously... at least something half-believable or true. People who come here not having read the books deserve to be spoilt anyway.

Long ago, we have quite long spoiler death list...In the end, mod denied it (go far enough to ban-threaten whoever spoil anypath of the last book) and Rei (list composer) was so pissed that he/she stop contribute joke here. Well, it maybe wrong time back then (7th book was just released) but I think it should be fine now. Ace Attacker 17:49, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

What is it with you guys and the spoiler?? I thought it was hilarious. Howbout you guys just make a fake spoiler list in there and everyone can keep adding to it? -LadyCakeage