Talk:Muslim

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.

This article was nominated for deletion on April 30, 2007. The result of the discussion was Keep.

Archive: Talk:Muslim/archive1

[edit] Not funny at all.

Compared to the articles on Islam and Allah this article is not in the least amusing. The whole joke of a muslim being a person infected with some sort of terrorist disease is shit.

This needs a complete rewrite, something that isn't just one person having a slam at a religion he hates. More stupid humour needed like the "I-slam planes into buildings" joke on the Islam article. Also QUOTES!!! Where are they!?

Needs a complete redo.

Current funny rating: NO STARS YOU ARE SHIT WHOEVER WROTE THIS. BECAUSE I'M MYSELF A MUSLIM AND I DO NOT SUPPORT THE IDEA OD SOMEONE MAKING FUN OF MY F**KING CULTURE !!!

.

whoever wrote this must seriously be retarded..and with a ass instead of a brain.

[edit] Prevalence

Haha I used the word "prevalence" in the article, which is a common enough term in the medical literature. Rickyrab 14:18, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Stupid as shit

Still not funny, also what idiot thought that when I type in Arabs in the search bar it should redirect me to Muslim? Enough with the bigotry, this is supposed to be a funny article not just random bashing, be creative, if you are a racist bastard you know which imageboard to go on and post your crappy thoughts, fuck off Uncyclopedia.138.253.207.214 12:56, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Arabs was voted for deletion because it was even worse than this one. It was redirected here since the original article was mentioned in too many places. And why is that bigotry exactly? Aren't the majority of Arabs - Muslims? Sir Mordillo GUN WotM FP UotM AotM MI AnotM VFH +S 13:07, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

So? What about the Christian Arabs? In Lebanon they comprise 50% of the country, in the U.S.A. the number of Christian Arabs is much bigger than the number of Muslim Arabs, also I said that article was bigoted because it was hateful and such passages are the least shitty - "NOTICE: A Cure for Muslim has been discovered by field reasearchers in Iraq. By injecting the Muslim infected with .50 cal FMJ rounds this destroys the virus. But because the shock of the virus being destroyed most people don't make it past recovery, but some maybe able to survive with only a lost limb or two." Now, how is that funny? I've got no problems with the Jihad article, and the Arab article after removing some passages was at least bearable, I've got no problems with mentioning Jihad and even association with terrorism because unfortunately it's a fact, but this place is not for hatred, it's about making fun, the same way The Chasers do it (for example the Jihad car commercial), it's funny and nicely thought out, no hatred, no bigotry, no racism. If they can do it, I'm sure there are uncyclopedia authors who can do it too right?138.253.207.214 14:55, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Can't say about the Arabs in the US but you're mistaken about Lebanon, the Maronites haven't been the majority in Lebanon for a long time now, and the Shiites took the lead, even though the Lebanese political system doesn't reflect that. As for the article itself, I agree. It's bad, as any Muslim/Arab related article, and someday I might have the energy to try and rewrite it, as with any Jewish related article.... Sir Mordillo GUN WotM FP UotM AotM MI AnotM VFH +S 14:59, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

You're probably right, it wouldn't surprise me, considering that Muslims usually have more children than Christians. Thanks for the efforts, anyway :) 138.253.207.214 22:43, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

This article is one of the most rewritten articles on this site. When I first found it, it was just plain offensive. No humor at all, just tired insults. So I rewrote a much more respectful version and got nothing but complaints about how it wasn't insulting enough. That article got scrapped by the version you see now, which at least has a concept. The policy with articles you don't like is always to write a better one. Think you can do better writing an article on Arabs, then do it. Think you can write a better article making fun of muslims? Then write it up somewhere, then transfer it over. If people like it, it'll stay. ---Rev. Isra (talk) 15:22, 13 February 2008 (EST)

Well, unfortunately I can't, but that doesn't mean if something is bad and there isn't anything better it should stay. Also, where's the proof that people like it? Anyway, end of discussion, I just hope people will not take this thing seriously and won't use it to reflect their hateful opinions. 138.253.207.214 22:43, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Btw, who locked this article? I registered to see if the "Edit" would appear but it didn't. Xantion 17:24, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Hilarious

There are a few lines that cross the line into unfunny ignorance in this one, but I think overall, this is the right way to do off-color religious gags. Brilliantly conceived. MosKillinest 07:12, 4 March 2008 (UTC)