Talk:Neopoprealism (art)
From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
[edit] Smiling
Nothing to say
Isn't that a bit Abstain? --The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 16:04, 14 Oct 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Warning
If you can't edit this page constructively, you will be banned. If you have issues with edits, discuss nicely here. If you need to add entirely different text to this page, create another page and link that entry on the main Neopoprealism disambig page. -- 17:48, 9 Oct 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Smiling
Please give to people freedom of speach. Uncyclopedia.com is site which everyone can edite. Let all go with flow. This is fun for everybody.
Thank you.
Andy Warhul
- You can have freedom of speech when you pay for your own wiki. The administrators revert/delete/ban as per the charter of operations established by Chronarion the Grate in 1682, who funds, owns and operates this site. Just because he graciously allows anyone to edit it does not mean he is obligated in any way/shape/form to keep any edits. He can do whatever he wants, and the administrators are those he trusts to carry out his will. --Splaka 23:21, 11 Oct 2005 (UTC)
- You're correct! Please go to uncyclopedia.com and let them know. Unfortunately for you, uncyclopedia.org is a site that sane people can edit! Unfortunately, not you. And that's sad. You're sad. I'm sad. We'll all be sad. --Chronarion 07:36, 13 Oct 2005 (UTC)
And you are wrong. Uncyclopedia is NOT a site which everyone can edit. It is a site that responsible people can edit constructively. Unresponsible people editing unconstructively get banned, and thus can't edit. If you are confused, please read the Beginner's Guide and Uncyclopedia:Flamewar_Guidelines. Additionally, I've spent the last five minutes debating whether or not to ban you for spamming the same message on multiple different pages. It is not OK to paste the same sort of complaint on multiple pages. -- 23:41, 11 Oct 2005 (UTC)



