Talk:OPOV

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.

[edit] From Pee Review

I just whipped up this article today after watering my pig (don't ask). Third one to post on the Review, though. Tell me what you think and what I should change/delete/add/devour.--DiZ 23:13, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Alright idea, I think, but I'm noticing cliches. First of all, stuff like: To answer the previous question, let's use another paragraph (besides this one).

just isn't particularly funny, I don't think. The jokes should make themselves, not have to be forced and set-up. I would remove the one line jokes that don't really have anything to do with the article.

Parts of it don't strike me as really funny, so much as critical. There's a fine line between good satire and just writing about the topic.

I also believe it has too many 'easy' cliches, like Chuck Norris, Oscar Wilde, Grues, etc. Stick to demonising Wikipedia, is my advice. Cut out the extra stuff, and just make a scatching commentary on the POV policy. :----Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 03:22, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your sound advice, but in my own defense, I knew the Grues, Chuck Norris, and Oscar Wilde were all cliches and inside jokes within Uncyclopedia. That's why I used them. But if they're not funny, I'll consider removing them. I also want to get some other people's opinions before, though. --DiZ 17:04, 24 June 2006 (UTC)