Talk:Pam

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.

Jump to: navigation, search

[edit] From Pee Review

Humo(u)r: 3 This is a weak spot in the article, it barely made me giggle. I simply didn't find much of it funny.
Concept: 5 The concept is fairly good, but it could have been better.
Prose and Formatting: 7 There is nothing particularly wrong with the formatting, but nothing amazing either. I suggest that the images should be moved further apart. One image should be at the top of the page.
Images: 6 The images are fine, yet I don't like the pixellated mortar board. It spoils the image.
Miscellaneous: 8 There isn't much to say. I suggest that there should be less (mis)quotes at the top of the article. It could also do with some more content. I would recommend less nonsense and more a couple more facts.
Final Score: 29 This article has the potential to be a good article, but it lacks humour and wit. Think of some good jokes to put into it, and it'll be great!
Reviewer: Anotherpongo 17:09, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Personal tools
projects