Talk:Star Trek

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.

Given the food-related bent of this page, I wonder if I should move my episodic piss-take elsewhere? --IMBJR 22:33, 16 Aug 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Deleting Facts

Some of the 'Facts' on this page can probably be deleted. GravityIsForSuckers 16:58, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] A New Idea

Given how much trekkies hate being associated with Star Wars, why not make this into a seemingly legitimate page about star wars, but replace the word 'Wars' with 'Trek' every single time. 69.158.63.172 05:23, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Go for it...At the moment this page is not funny in anyway.

[edit] So How is this Funny?

This article is just dumb. No humour at all.

General Tso's Chicken 22:51, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

I dunno, I lol'd.141.195.156.132 18:28, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

It sure seems to need some love/attention. I guess I'll come by soon to give it some ol' fashioned parenting (whip it with my belt until it bleeds from the arse). ~CaputosistheHorrible 16:55, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

HAD to get rid of that documents stuff. It's not funny. Time to delete the crap out of this. Matt lobster 12:57, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] tomorrow

I know I may have knackered this article. It neeeds a good idea. It needs funny.

[edit] put a template

I put in a template that I thought might be appropriate. If you don't like it, delete it, but I think it belongs. DarkBlue 21:31, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Conoyer

Someone please delete the "Conoyer" section - it violates the "Try to be funny not just stupid" rule. In spades. David Spades.

[edit] time travel machines

i edited the comment concerning time traveling delorians as the universe seems to be fresh out of them, flying steam trains seem to be the going replacement (see the last 5 mins of back to the future 3). 220.253.95.242 14:05, 23 March 2008 (UTC) Andrew H