Temporal paradox

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.

For those without comedic tastes, the so-called experts at Wikipedia think they have an article about Temporal paradox.

“Do you know how fucking stupid back to the future is?!”

~ Michael J. Fox on Temporal Paradox

“Soylent Green is made out of CHINESE”

~ Charlton Heston on Temporal Paradox

The following lists some temporal paradoxes; for more information, see Time travel or Time Travel.

[edit] Index of Temporal Paradoxes

[edit] Temporal Paradox #1

If you travel to the past to kill a person, and succeed, then in the future (your present) that person will not exist, thus you don't have to go back in time to kill him/her. But if you didn't go back, then he/she will still be alive. Then you'd have to send yourself back in time to kill him/her, but, if you succeed, he/she wouldn't be alive when you first planned to kill him/her. And, as it is pointless to kill a dead person, you give up the time travel. But look! He/She is still alive, because you didn't go back in time to kill him/her! And if you decide to kill that person again in his/her past, then you'd travel back in time, and if you succeed, that person would be dead in the future again, so you wouldn't bother building the extremely expensive time-travelling machinery to kill a dead person! And as soon as you give up travelling in time, the previously deceased ceases its deceased state, because you had never really killed him/her.

[edit] Temporal Paradox #2

If you travel back in time and accidentally kill your grandfather, you would not exist in the present, and thus you'd be in a condition totally inappropriate for travelling; you'd be non-existent. But, if you don't exist, then you cannot kill your grandfather, so your grandfather would live his life well, until an ungrateful grandchild happened to kill him.

[edit] Temporal Paradox #3

“If you read an Oscar Wilde quote on Uncyclopedia that is so memorable that it prompts you to build a time machine, travel back in time and deliver the anecdote to Wilde himself, the witticism is completely without an original author. It is thus a violation of the Law of Conservation of Wit.”

~ Oscar Wilde on Temporal paradox #3

[edit] Temporal Paradox #4

From a time of war between man and machines, you are sent to the past by your best friend, the leader of the human resistance, to keep the machines from killing his mother, thus allowing him to exist and continue to resist the machines. You have sex with his hot mom and become his father, securing his existance, however when the machine hunting your friend's mother (your baby momma) is destroyed, pieces are left behind. This allows scientists of the past to study and develop the machines that start to rise against humanity. This makes one wonder if it was such a great idea to go back in the first place, because if your friend (or son) would not have existed, the machines would not have to kill his mother or him and would not have been made in the first place.

(Retort) I am afraid due to this section being too unfunny I am forced to retort. In the film (Teminator.. OMG didn't you realise it was?) The parts found allow the humans to progress faster what they were already working on, as stated in T2 Judgement day. They end up causing the death of some black guy and all his achievements leaving his son and wife scarred for life from seeing some austrian cut his flesh off shortly before invading poland. This supposedly would stop judgement day.

HOWEVER in T3, it states that judgement day is actually inevitable and the technology is developed anyway because funnily enough being a robot from the future delivering mass carnage and mayhem doesn't actually go unoticed. It is also said that Skynet has to be developed because the US government is incapable of controlling its own army, what with sending it to vast areas of sand searching WMD's. So they have to build a flying computer to control it all, why does it need to fly? Well who knows, the only important thing is that this giant supercomputer flies.

The paradox really is, if they hadnt gone back in time at all, it would have saved us three very similar, bad guy comes after you and eventually dies films, that made absolutely no difference to the course of history what-so-ever. Thus time cannot be changed

IT CANNOT!!! anyone who says differently is a c***.

[edit] Solution to some Temporal Paradoxes

While time travelling, don't alter the past. Altering the past includes:

• Killing people. Those people include important historical figures, your relatives, and most important, yourself. Do not kill yourself.

• Having unsafe sexual relations with people from the past.

• Leaving objects from the future. DeLorean cars, garbage and laser pistols must be brought back.

• Speaking, writing, drawing, miming, or communicate future events in any means.

• Enslaving native people.

• Singing karaoke.

• Existing.

But if you stick to the rules, time-travelling can be fun and safe:

• Parking your Time Machine on the Turin Shroud and travel backwards to see where it really came from.

• Standing behind the grassy knoll at Daley Plaza on November 22, 1963 12:30 PM CST.

Please remember to always wear the appropriate clothes for the time/place you are visiting, and keep your hands and internal organs inside the time machine during the travel.