Uncyclopedia:Imperial Colonization

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.

Contents 1 Rules 2 Past Colonizations 3 Current Colonization 3.1 Wal★Mart 4 Next Weeks Nominations 4.1 The Big Lebowski 4.2 Death 4.3 John McCain 4.4 Chess 4.5 Egypt 4.6 Sex 4.7 Cthulhu 4.8 Bruce Lee 4.9 Warren Buffett 4.10 Link (Legend of Zelda) 4.11 Mario 4.12 Rupert Murdoch 4.13 William Shakespeare 4.14 Adult Swim

Wal★Mart is this week's Colonization. Help humor settle in its lush, resource rich land!

[edit] Past Colonizations

Robert Mugabe • McDonald's • Hell • Richard Nixon

for a vote record, see here

[edit] Current Colonization

[edit] Wal★Mart

• Same reasoning as McDonald's.   CAKE J! <16:09, 07 Jul 2008>
• I came here to nominate this one, and you beat me to the punch sir. This needs it. For The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 16:42, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
• Same reasoning as McCajek... MrN  17:23, Jul 12
• What, we're voting now? Okay. For. --SYNDROME _{MUN medicate} 20:08, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
• To be colonized from October 19th to October 26th. --Pleb Dexter111344 • Complain here • Vote now! 19:33, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Next Weeks Nominations

[edit] The Big Lebowski

• This actually has some pretty decent stuff in it already, and could prolly be betterified nicely. Also, dude. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 15:32, Jun 30
• For I'd certainly put in some work on this one. -RAHB
• For One of my favorite movies of all time. -OptyC Sucks! cun13:24, 12 Jul
• For - The article abides. -Tritefantastic 03:10, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Death

• I would think it is a fairly well-seen article, and right now it is just a bunch of crappy lists. I figure we could do a pretty good job with it. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 20:30, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
• For Though I've always thought redirecting to You are dead may be a nice idea too. -RAHB 04:28, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

• I think this might be the best shot. Could this perhaps happen? The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 06:24, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

• Yes. This is a good one to do. MrN  16:01, Aug 17

[edit] John McCain

• The article is lackluster, there's lots of potential for many to contribute, and the timing is ripe. ~Sir Rangeley GUN WotM UotM EGA +S (talk) 00:53, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
• yep. I think this would be more entertaining to edit, because (probably) most of the editors are pro-Obama. Although Obama could be funny, too...   CAKE J! <0:55, 08 Jul 2008>

[edit] Chess

• Has some good bits in it. Overall, it might not be the most popular article, but it's popular enough to do a rewrite IMHO.   CAKE J! <15:30, 08 Jul 2008>

I think ZB has a re-write tucked away somewhere. Will we ever see it though? MrN  23:24, Jul 10

That's not a rewrite. That was me and Kalir (and Codeine and Mordillo) actually playing chess. -- Major Sir Zombiebaron GUN • WotM • UotM • PotM • AotM • EGAEDM • UPotM • MAFE • ZotM • IotM • VotM • UGotM (shout) 07:35, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Holy shit, a namedrop that isn't just the USERNAME template at work. Ж Kalir, Awesome Author _{(alliteration affords additional awesome)} 09:09, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

• Could be an interesting topic. Not quite sure where the other vote came from, but I'll add a third. For. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  11:39, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
• For. — Sir Sycamore (talk to me) 11:20, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Egypt

• I really don't know what's going on here. It looks a bit like vanitycruft. It was moved to a page with a stupid name in 2005, and I can't find much on here besides recycled jokes. We can do better than this. --SYNDROME _{MUN medicate} 20:08, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Sex

• Really? This is what we have for sex? This is it? This makes me sad ladies and gentlemen. Real sad. And it sure is getting mighty crowded in here. Just sayin'. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 06:24, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
• I remember, back in the day, there was this awesome line that started the article. "Sex is something that nobody on Uncyclopedia has ever had. Therefore, it will be described in great detail." I never read the rest of it, but it's not particularly relevant to the situation anyways. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by RAHB (talk • contribs)
• Yes Please! MrN  16:25, Aug 17

[edit] Cthulhu

• Is this all we have to honor him with? The C-man's not gonna be pleased with us.   CAKE J! <17:05, 25 Jul 2008>

[edit] Bruce Lee

• I just {{ugly}} tagged it, but figured this might be appropriate too. -- Major Sir Zombiebaron GUN • WotM • UotM • PotM • AotM • EGAEDM • UPotM • MAFE • ZotM • IotM • VotM • UGotM (shout) 07:54, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Warren Buffett

• It sucks and must be saved. --General Minister G5 UPotM UGotM [Y] F@H 14:00, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Link (Legend of Zelda)

• for. this needs to get cleaned up and awesome-ified. OfficerGerrycheeversKunTalk 17:10, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
• YES The whole damn Zelda Template could use some work. Ocarina in particular is pretty bad, but that's a different story. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 17:21, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Mario

• The most well-known and best-selling video game characters ever has this shit for an article? Pitiful! --Pleb Dexter111344 • Complain here • Vote now! 06:45, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Rupert Murdoch

• Could do with a little love? — Sir Sycamore (talk to me) 11:18, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

[edit] William Shakespeare

• If this wasn't Shakespeare, I'd put it on VFD. Instead, we should make a new, better version. Concept-wise, I suggest a "Hey kids, isn't Shakespeare cool?" approach. I'm already planning a "To be or not to be" rap. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  10:49, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Adult Swim

• Considering that this is something I would bet every Uncyclopedian is familiar with, I can't believe they couldn't come up with anything coherent. -Tritefantastic 05:54, 18 November 2008 (UTC)