Uncyclopedia:Reviewer of the Month
From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
(Redirected from UN:RotM)
|
Welcome to the official page for the official award Reviewer of the Month.
[edit] Eligibility
To qualify for the Reviewer of the Month award, you must first meet certain criteria.
- You must be a registered user.
- You must not have nominated yourself. You can vote for yourself, but not nominate yourself.
- You must have done at least one review within the last month.
[edit] Rules and guidelines
These are the rules and less-official guidelines for the Reviewer of the Month.
- IP votes carry full weight. Because many IP's submit articles for review, they benefit from good Reviewers as much as anyone else does. IP's get a full vote instead of the usual half-vote.
- Nominate those reviewers who have consistently given exceptional reviews. If a user happened to review multiple articles of yours but never gave any suggestions for improvement, do not nominate them. There are many other, far more deserving users out there.
- You can only vote once. You can cancel your vote
using slashesto change your vote, but you still only get one vote to cast every month. - Additionally, when a user is nominated, the nomination template {{VoteRotM}} should be added to their user page.
[edit] Reward
Tell 'em what they won, Jon!:
- Winner(s) become a CUN.
- You will receive a free "Steel Kidney" (and will be forever called one)
- You will become an honorary member of People for the Evaluation of Excrement and Influencing Nominations for Greatness
- You will be entitled to the special template for Reviewer of the Month.
[edit] Past Winners
One-eyed Jack • Cajek • MrN9000 • Under user • SysRq • Heerenveen • Mightydandylion • YesTimeToEdit
[edit] Nominations for July
[edit] Orian57 (Talk • Contribs • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
Score: +5 colourful sigs
- Nom & for. OK, Orian gets my vote this month. Mainly because he took on the "Melty Blood" review that we were all avoiding because it was longer than Route 66. The article's been deleted, so you can't see what a task he took on, but trust me, that's one hell of a review! He reviewed the hell out of that epic, and still found time to do as many reviews in June as anyone else. He has earned this. --UU Blah / Pee
08:21, Jul 1
- For Much as the above. Also I'm not selling my vote this month and I'll be back to doing more reviews soon, just want to give some attention to my own writing.
Have Fun! MuCal. BFF Sir
08:30 1 July 2008
For because I haven't seen Javascap's reviews around, and because Sycamore never ever "gets" my articles. <12:54, 01 Jul 2008>changed to Hyperbole. Sorry Orian! <17:34, 05 Jul 2008>- For Because Orian is my adopter and good reviewer and Sycamore hates my guts because I reviewed his article for my First Review. (One more step to coolness)Baseball1 6 Join Here
17:00, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
- For - I think I kinda regret "buying" Orian's vote for last month,
the sex wasn't even that good. If he doesn't get it this month, I may hang myself. - Sir FSt. Yettie (talk) [09:15 3 July] - Yep. UU's right. I stared at the "Melty Blood" request many, many times, trying to summon up the will to do it. And I couldn't. But out of my failure arose Orian's success, like a great flaming PEEing phoenix. Cheers. --Hyperbole 18:53, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Javascap (Talk • Contribs • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
Score: +4 randomly coloured sigs
- Nom. Javascap still rocks. He's been consistently reviewing for ages, and still keeps up both quality and quantity. Would also be a worthy winner. --UU Blah / Pee 08:21, Jul 1
- As per last month. ―― Sir Heerenveen, KUN [UotM RotM VFH SK CM NS] (talk), 1/07 10:27
- Aye. • • • SIR FELLOW Necropaxx KUN {PotM VFH VFP Chop HS VotM} (blah, blah, blah...)
23:58, Jul 1
- For Tough choice. -RAHB 19:27, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
- Self-fer Why the heck not? Warm Regards, ▀ĴαVắśСąР▀03:18 July 5 2008 03:18, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Sycamore (Talk • Contribs • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
Score: 1 Sean Connery Impresshionsh
- Nom. Sycamore is a top bloke. He keeps his head down, and quietly and consistently produces thoughtful, quality reviews on a regular basis. --UU Blah / Pee 08:21, Jul 1
[edit] Hyperbole (Talk • Contribs • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
Score: 2 HyperReviewers
- Nom+For Did I miss something. Why is this chap not nominated yet? He does quality useful reviews, and could well be the top performer this month... MrN
02:06, Jul 4
- For Hyperbole is, IMHumbleOpinion, the funniest guy here, and therefore I would like a review from him the most. <17:33, 05 Jul 2008>
[edit] Boomer (Talk • Contribs • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
Score: -2 persons highly active on IRC
- Nom+against - As per last month... and the one before that... and that other month, and that previous month... Warm Regards, ▀ĴαVắśСąР▀03:17 July 5 2008
- I dunno who this guy is but he seems a bit lazy, so against. :-) - Sir FSt. Yettie (talk) [14:03 5 July]
- abs I can't figure out if Boomer is trying to get the lowest score he can this month, so I'm abs, just in case... MrN 00:07, Jul 7
| Awards | Order of Uncyclopedia · Awards, Decorations and Honours · Awards · Ninjastars
|
| Ranks & Honours | Writer of the Month · Uncyclopedian of the Month · n00b of the month UnBooks Author of the Month · Potatochopper of the Month · UnScripts Playwright of the Month Emmanuel Goldstein Award of Excellence in the Distribution of Misinformation ·
Foolitzer Prize | |
| Limelight | VFH · VFP · Best of · Top 10 of 2005 · Top 10 of 2006 · Top 10 of 2007 · Hall of Shame · Rating System · PFP
| |
| Prix citron | Useless Gobshite of the Month · Sockpuppeteer of the Month · FFS | |
