UnNews talk:Wikipedia Names Man of the Year
From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
| link | score /50 | user | lowest score | date | comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnNews:Uncyclopedia Names Man of the Year | 31 | M4M | Humor: 4 | 10/8 | |
| Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnNews:Uncyclopedia Names Man of the Year | 45 | Farley Grey | Images: 7 | 10/10 | |
| Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnNews:Uncyclopedia Names Man of the Year | 36 | Andy the Idiot | Concept: 6 | 10/17 | |
| Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnNews:Uncyclopedia Names Man of the Year | 45 | Zana Dark | n/a: 9 | 11/9 | |
| avg = 39.3 --- lowest = 6.5 | |||||
| Humo(u)r: | 4 | Sorry but this peice lacked satire. Remember to take a quick look UN:DUMB every now and than. Parts of it were nonsense, specifically first time since it's creation in 1983, Uncyclopedia was created in 2005. Also remember to take your time, seeing you say "A little unnews I whipped up in an hour" |
| Concept: | 7 | The concept has potential - but I'd rename the title to UnNews:Wikipedia Names Person of the Year. It seems more logical - as Wikipedia, would be more funny because they take themselves as factual despite they aren't. Also, don't have prejudice for woman. |
| Prose and Formatting: | 5 | It isn't organized like an UnNews article with the headers, I'd reccomend taking a look at the UnNews page for an example of a good UnNews article |
| Images: | 8 | A lot, all of which were good. My suggestion would be to photo edit the Times Addition of Person of the Year, and change it to "Wikipedia Person of the Year", that is if you were to rename the article liked I suggested |
| Miscellaneous: | 7 | I see this is your first UnNews article, it's off to a good start, and read the final and above comments - this could be a masterpiece. |
| Final Score: | 31 | Has potential to be a great article, keep on working on it, good luck. Also, you reviewed Booger King a while back on Pee Review, and it has improved, will you support on VFH? |
| Reviewer: | --Sir Manforman | |
| Humo(u)r: | 9 | This UnNews article made me chuckle quite a bit. It sounded very professional and screwed up at the same time, which I presume a proper UnNews article is supposed to sound like. Though, it kind of abruptly ended where a few more lines of funniness could've been squeezed in. Still, nice job. |
| Concept: | 10 | Great concept. Though, I have to wonder why this contest hasn't actually happen yet... |
| Prose and Formatting: | 9 | The formatting and prose is near perfect. It just bothers me that I can't read two of the four pictures. |
| Images: | 7 | The pictures are all great and relevant, but, like I said before, I can't read two of them. Namely, the two Time Magazine images. Please, enlarge them. |
| Miscellaneous: | 10 | I wish I could balance a woman on my penis... |
| Final Score: | 45 | This is a great UnNews Article, there are just a few minor problems that need to be fixed. |
| Reviewer: | --Farley of the Sheep-Filled Meadows Try not to puke...(Please!) 20:23, 10 October 2007 (UTC) | |
| Humo(u)r: | 7 | For one of the only times ever, cross Wikipedia/Uncyclopedia jokes are made that don't seem cheesy at all! Its quite odd how most articles that mention the aforementioned -iki-edia are crap, though when this one mentions the -iki-edia, it works in its favour. Good job! |
| Concept: | 6 | What is this satirising? Pretty much just Time 's Person of the Year, only you went for "Man". |
| Prose and Formatting: | 8 | As far as I know, its pretty much flawless without being too amazing. |
| Images: | 7 | I'm taking points away for that truly horrendous image of the man supporting a woman with only his erect penis. You truly are sick... and for that I admire you, Cajek. But seriously - its gross. |
| Miscellaneous: | 8 | UnNews is so cool. |
| Final Score: | 36 | I like it. Your writing style is well suited for all types of genres, be it shock horror, news story, or pseudo-documentary. (Though, all 3 things are kind of similar anyways). |
| Reviewer: | --Andy the Idiot 02:44, 17 October 2007 (UTC) | |




