Uncyclopedia:FFS

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.

Jump to: navigation, search
Meh, nobody cares about this article.
      Whoops! Maybe you were looking for Ban Patrol?
Vote to ban users
  • Sign below a user you find abhorrent. Please add new nominations on the top.
    • Initial nominations do not count as a vote For. Please use "Nomination and For" or some iteration thereof if you wish to vote for your nomination.
    • IP votes carry half the weight of registered votes.
    • Unsigned votes and votes without timestamps will be struck out, so make sure you sign your votes with ~~~~ or press the "your signature with timestamp" button (Image:Button sig.png) above the edit box.
    • You may nominate and vote for yourself if you so choose, but to do so would be absurdist and attention-seeking.
    • When nominating a user, the template Template:FFS should be added to the userpage of the user you are nominating to be banned {{FFS}}. Anything you add {{FFS}} to also shows up in

Category:ban_nomination.

  • Failed FFS nominations should only be archived/removed by the sysops who pay attention to this sort of thing.
  • Previous bans can be found on the archive pages.
THIS IS A DISCUSSION PAGE.

If you feel the need to whine or start flamewars please do it HERE. Violators of this policy will be BUMMED.

Survivors will be GIVEN INTRAVENOUS KETAMINE.
Then we bum them again.

Contents


[edit] Current Nominations (new stuff at top, prefix votes with * )

SELF-NOMINATION REGULATION: self-nominated users (i.e. you hate yourself and your writings and have decided to prostrate yourself amongst your unhinged peers) must be at least a week old before nomination. Any user under one week old who can type may not self-nominate. Users nominated by people other than themselves can still be nominated at any time.

ADMIN LOOPHOLE: Admins may not be nominated for banning. BECAUSE THEY CAN JUST UNBAN THEMSELVES, and because THIS IS A FASCIST OLIGARCHICAL SECT NOT A CAPITALIST MERITOCRACY.

[edit] Modusoperandi (TalkContribsEditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: 1
  • N♥m && f♥r. Attempted to join the cabal. Even though such an exemplary organization does not exist, and as much as I wish that it did, this sort of tomfoolery cannot be tolerated. In short, fie. sirErr.gifsysrq @ 17:40 Jul 4

[edit] EugeneKay (TalkContribsEditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

[edit] <insert name here> (TalkContribsBlock (rem 1st all)LogsGroups)

[edit] Cajek (TalkContribsEditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: 2
  • Tradition If I had a ban for every time I said that... I'd be absofuckinglutely nowhere near Cajek's level --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent OZ! 15:54, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
  • F♥r. I think it's been 20 minutes, he's due for another ban. sirIgnignokt.gifsysrq @ 22:51 Jun 17

[edit] DJ Irreverent (TalkContribsEditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: 0
  • Tradition i liek bran, and I suck a guitar. There, that should be good enough for my resume. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent OZ! 15:54, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Against because it's my personal mission to make sure Irreverent never gets what he wants in life. Even if it's a ban. --Hyperbole 20:25, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Hyperbole (TalkContribsEditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: +1
  • For I don't want you banned. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent OZ! 11:29, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Abstain I'm getting mixed signals, here. --Hyperbole 23:11, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Roman Dog Bird (TalkContribsEditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: +3 vote(s) to help RDB get a job

[edit] Dexter111344 (TalkContribsEditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: +3 votes out of boredom

[edit] VGDictator (TalkContribsEditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: +2 Internet Lolcats
Yeh I was thinking about asking for a ban along the same lines...But for two reasons I'm going to vote against: 1) Just to annoy you (now I deserve a ban, heh heh!) and 2)CMC people never get banned. - 18:50 26 May Sir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!
Never get blocked, eh? Isshiki Kotonashi-ue =3 | Talk! | IMRAC! | Sign! | Play! | Courtier Isshiki FBu! 23:49, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
Yes. - This Is Just A Tribute To The Greatest Sig Of All Time! [17:25 5 July]
What number are you thinking of now? --SYNDROME MUN medicate 17:54, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Er...3? I dunno, you tell me! I wanna know, now! TELL ME! - [20:10 4 June] Sir FSt. Yettie (talk) QotF BFF NotM RotM UNPotM CUN PEE SR UnProvise
654. Isshiki Kotonashi-chama =3 | Talk! | IMRAC! | Sign! | Play! | Courtier Isshiki FBu! 20:28, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

n00bz The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.0.195.125 (talk • contribs)

Like you can talk, silly. =3 Isshiki Kotonashi-shi =3 | Talk! | IMRAC! | Sign! | Play! | Courtier Isshiki FBu! 19:38, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Modusoperandi (TalkContribsEditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: +1 Image Vandals
  • Nom and For For fucking up the nomination for Uncyclopedia:VFP/1, the orginal image that was up for nomination was better but he changed it mid nomination. --Pleb- Sawblade5 ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 23:35, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
    • This sounds like whining to me. I refuse to vote unless this nom is in true spirit of FFS and not just some whiny VFP BS. sirIgnignokt.gifsysrq @ 01:50 Apr 21
      • Maybe but I felt it wasn't bad enough to send to the next level, so I listed it here so it wouldn't be as hard. --Pleb- Sawblade5 ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 06:44, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
        • You do realize what FFS is all about, right? sirIgnignokt.gifsysrq @ 15:46 Apr 21
  • Retracting For Vote I kinda gave up on this one and I felt its not needed anymore. If you have another reason to vote for baning you can vote on it on this nom I guess. --Pleb- Sawblade5 ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 00:26, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
  • For FS --SYNDROME MUN medicate 06:49, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Syndrome (TalkContribsEditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: 1 weird people
  • Nom and For - A weird little oddball if I say so myself. --The Improver talkcontribs20:48, Apr 14 2008 (UTC)
  • Against. I was going to vote "for," but you misspelled "weird" twice in this nomination. Shame. sirIgnignokt.gifsysrq @ 21:00 Apr 14

*Against. Don't be silly. Or not. Isshiki Kotonashi-chin =3 | Talk! | IMRAC! | Sign! | Play! | Courtier Isshiki FBu! 01:03, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] !!!!!!PENISPENISPENIS!!!!!! (TalkContribsEditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: 4 hatehatehaters

[edit] Capercorn (TalkContribsEditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: .5 - It may be yes, it may be no...

* Against. ...Sorry. Isshiki Kotonashi-sama =3 | Talk! | IMRAC! | Sign! | Play! | Courtier Isshiki FBu! 01:04, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Kip the Dip (TalkContribsEditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: +3 Users that keep tradition alive +1 that wants to do everyone a favour!