| Keep |
- Weak Keep and rewrite -- This has potential, but needs a complete rewrite to reach that potential.Genital Sniper 01:56, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
 Keep.. I can actually see how this article can be turned, quite easily to a funny one. Anyone wants to collaborate with me on that? ~ Mordillo 15:06, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. - Heh, made me smile, not many articles on VFD do that
 (Bonner)  (Talk) Jan 6, 15:59
- 'Keep I like the idea. Needs a rewrite. --Dexter111344 17:26, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- 'Keep Even as it is, I think we need this page. MrN
  20:55, Jan 6
- Keep and Rewrite - It has its moments. Definetly needs fixing up but its not VFD material. --Uncle J 21:35, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
- Comment this would have been so much funnier if the choises were fewer and all single syllable. And it would have been funnier if Dick Cheney's hand wasn't jammed into W.'s asshole and used like the puppet he is. Did that just come out of my typing, because I never would say such a thing. Dame
 GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 02:48, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- Could be good but needs to be rewritten.--WillMcC 15:56, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
- Keep. -- For Sophia. --NXWave 01:08, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- Motherfucking Keep There's nothing wrong with it, people use it for their userspaced, and there are cool parodies. -- Kip teh Dip • Talk • Works • Faq • Vote in '08 •
  23:31, Jan. 5, 2008
- Hella Keep as per Kip. --MNM5150 00:03, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- Strong Keep per Kip and the fact that this template is funny as hell. --Pleb- Sawblade5 [citation needed] ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 02:35, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- Strong Keepin the name of Sophia. And because TheKillerFroggy wants to get rid it, so I say it should stay. Dame GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 02:51, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. Noooo!! It's a piece of history! ~ Mordillo 13:43, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. - It has served us well for a good few years.
 Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 13:59, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep --WillMcC 15:59, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep hasn't changed any since last keep. --Dexter111344 17:23, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - Piece of history to go aling with the crap I Am Your Master Insert complaint here - 6:58 PM ET 6 January 2008
|
| Delete |
- Delete This has been here twice before and has been kept both times, but it's been a while since those times and things have changed. First of all, it generally no longer exists in articles, myself and Insineratehymn made sure of that, so don't use its "widespread use" as an excuse to keep it. Secondly, it's unnecessary since it serves no useful purpose whatsoever. It used to serve as some sort of rewrite tag in the past, but it has no function now. It just takes up space. Also, in the past people have said it should be kept purely as a way of authors to express dissatisfaction with their articles. However, as I went through my purging (and I still do, occasionally), I noticed that 99 percent of the time, users and IPs that are not the authors add the template to the articles. We can't just ban anyone who throws around a template, so lets cut off this abuse at the source --Grand General Wizard Etc x2 and Senator G/K/O/CUNT.K.F. WHORE! ZOTM MAFE VANDL UOTM WOTM TOP10 FP PMOTM UWotM 23:28, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete and/or redesign - I hate this template for two reasons: it's too small and it's used excessively in the wrong places. --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 00:29, Jan. 6, 2008
- Strikes me as useless. NRV. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon
 (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 00:30, Jan 6
- delete there are plenty of other templates that are similiar
 Image:Smelly Water.mp3
- Crap--Æ 01:31, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
 Delete. Razorflame  (contributions) Talk 02:12, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- Nuke (Bonner) (Talk) Jan 6, 13:43
- Delete. --
 Frankie! (Roman Dog Bird) 16:54, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. MrN 20:52, Jan 6
|
| Comments |
- Comment "Its been here twice before and kept both times" - So let it go. Dame GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 02:54, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- I think the problems with nonauthors adding the template wouldn't exist today if we hadn't deleted {{crapbelow}}, which was specifically designed to be added by nonauthors. (I acknowledge that crapbelow was deleted because it didn't really fit into the maintenance system and encouraged people to not take poor quality seriously.) Anyway, the arguments given by the keep voters suggest the possibility of userfying this template. Pentium5dot1 07:57, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- Temporarily userfied to User:Pentium5dot1/Storage facility/Crap template; I say "temporarily" because it really belongs in the userspace of someone who contributed to it more actively. Also, if the decision is against userfication, could we subst the remaining occurrences of the template before deleting? --Pentium5dot1 18:06, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
 Comment The reason I don't like this template is the same reason that I dislike the Jesus/Satan Approved and Cowbell templates. It just gets spammed all over the place. Not only that, but I think it encourages people to write pages that are, in fact, crap, and that just sticking that template at the top makes it ok. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 17:10, Jan 6
- Isn't "spamming" also a concern with a lot of other templates? Is that cause to nominate other templates for deletion? Most templates do have a legitimately humorous use, this one included. --Pentium5dot1 18:06, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- I do, and I will. I've killed many useless templates in the past and I continue to do so to the day. This serves no function whatsoever, be it humor or utility. The only reason I could think of for keeping it is because it has already been kept before, and that's a fuck-off stupid reason because before it was on nearly every page and now it's almost completely defunct in the mainspace. LISTEN TO TLB, PEOPLE! HE SPEAKS THE TRUTH! --Grand General Wizard Etc x2 and Senator G/K/O/CUNT.K.F. WHORE! ZOTM MAFE VANDL UOTM WOTM TOP10 FP PMOTM UWotM 18:08, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- So what about substing and/or userfying? Also, I admit that my standards are a little too low, but why isn't the use of this template at the top of Shit (to express the literal meaning of the words "shit" and "crap") acceptable? --Pentium5dot1 18:27, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- Comment I just think that instead of looking at stuff like this, there are more pressing issues involving articles that contain words, shmushed together to form sentences (in the loosest sense of the word) that need addressing. Crap like this isn't hurting the site, crapy articles are the enemy! Dame GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 20:51, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
|
