Uncyclopedia:Pages for deletion/archive127

• Delete. Gamecruft. List. Hnng. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 10:19, Apr 3
• Shitler's List (oh dear, I'm getting lamer) --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 10:44, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. The blue links should be on the "see also" section of the various GTA pages. This page is unnecessary (and not in the usual Uncyclopedia manner of unnecessarity). Sir Modusoperandi 10:55, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. Too avant-garde for my taste. --SYNDROME _{MUN medicate} 11:07, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete - Crappy forumcruft. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:18, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. forum dramacruft belongs in ED. --Count of Monkey Crisco 07:14, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. Per the above. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 10:13, Apr 3
• Delete. Nobody Cares --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 10:45, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete. Eh? Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:15, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
• Crush the Van --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 05:20, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. WTF? get rid. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 10:12, Apr 3
• Delete. MrN  11:49, Apr 3

• Keep. All it needs is about 60% of the page to go away, a whittle down to tightly focussed randomness. Sir Modusoperandi 13:00, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
• Keep I don't think I'd even trim that much off. --OptyC Sucks! cun 19:59, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
• Keep It's got some good stuff here and there. MrN  21:04, Apr 2
• Keep Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:48, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete. Just another article on randomness, ignored Pee Review, no changes, ... let's kill the bastard child! --BlackInkWriter 09:02, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
• Ignored the good pee review that was done on it.   CAKE J! <Apr 02, 2008 [12:48]>

oh fine I agree with both keep and delete on this one, now.   CAKE J! <Apr 02, 2008 [13:01]>

• Kept Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:48, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
• Did you guys actually read through that?? I think it's cliche and has no substance. --BlackInkWriter 09:43, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Wait! We're supposed to read pages?! Madness! Sir Modusoperandi 10:56, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
    • Well, not reading in that sense, but ... you know, skimming through that article like the pros do. Real quick. "Read-a-book-in-3-seconds" quick that is. I thought you guys were tougher about shabby articles. If FNM is gonna change it to the better, so be it. Then again, who am I to say? HEH! --BlackInkWriter 14:15, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

• Weak Keep Not great, but it's coherent and sorta different. --Count of Monkey Crisco 12:50, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete. Short 'n' shit. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 12:39, Mar 31
• Delete. Shitty 'n' short. ...Your welcome.   CAKE J! <Mar 31, 2008 [15:24]>
• Delete. I held back on nominating this one myself a while back, but I forget why... MrN  11:53, Apr 1
• Delete --OptyC Sucks! cun 20:52, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:40, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete Random. YouFang 08:31, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. Thought it might be passable, but it got pretty bad by the end. --Count of Monkey Crisco 09:44, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. Random, name-droppy rubbish. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 13:38, Apr 1
• Delete please. --OptyC Sucks! cun 19:52, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete MrN  21:06, Apr 2
• Delete. Oh ghawd. It's even worse than the movie. --BlackInkWriter 21:31, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

• CruftHuff - unfunny stub --Kurgan 20:27, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. I can't see anything worth keeping. MrN  11:54, Apr 1
• Delete. Crap from start to finish. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 13:34, Apr 1
• Delete It may be short but it's got a list, an Oscar Wilde quote and a reference to Chuck Norris. The shit trifecta. --OptyC Sucks! cun 19:50, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:41, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete. Short, shit 'n' listy. -SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 12:39, Mar 31
• Delete. Tortuously anemic writing. --Count of Monkey Crisco 12:53, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. listy, shit 'n' short. MrN  11:50, Apr 1
• Delete I'm putting more effort into voting than the author obviously did in writing this crap. --OptyC Sucks! cun 19:47, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:39, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete. What the crap is this crap? --Count of Monkey Crisco 03:07, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. Unless I missed something very subtle, this seems to be absolute drivel. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 09:55, Mar 31
• Delete. absolute drivel. MrN  11:49, Apr 1
• Delete. Drivel, absolutely. --OptyC Sucks! cun 19:39, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:39, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

• CruftHuff Unfunny bandcruft-stub --Kurgan 23:35, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. *sigh* Bandcruft. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 09:51, Mar 31
• Delete. Slash it. MrN  11:48, Apr 1
• Delete Fresh start please. --OptyC Sucks! cun 19:37, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:38, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete. Stoopid little one-liner that snuck by QVFD when we were all looking the other way. Do the right thing. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 11:21, Apr 1
• Delete. What on earth? MrN  11:44, Apr 1
• Delete. the hell out if it. --Count of Monkey Crisco 16:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. Delete? Isshiki Kotonashi-tan =3 | Talk! | IMRAC! | Sign! | Play! | Courtier Isshiki FBu! 01:46, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 08:43, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete. ZZZzzZZzZRantZzZZ. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 12:39, Mar 31
• Delete as fast as possible How this one snucked by ICU really got me. --Pleb- Sawblade5 ^{[citation needed] ( yell | FAQ | I did this )} 13:15, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. Drive it off a cliff, and blow the doors off first. MrN  11:51, Apr 1
• Snucked is my new favorite word. --OptyC Sucks! cun 20:48, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
• Snucked Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 08:43, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

• Keep - Maybe I'm feeling generous today, but, meh. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:13, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete Possibly a good idea, but very poor execution. MrN  12:42, Mar 24
• Delete. Nah, it's a poor, one-note idea based around a duff pun. I usually like bad puns, but this execution kills even that. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 09:55, Mar 30
• Delete. - Short 'n stupid (Bonner) (Talk) Mar 30, 19:34

• Comment I read in that interview with Chronarion that the UnRecipies project was deleted once the lawsuits started rolling in. I don't know what exactly was illegal about it, but this article reminded me of that. --SYNDROME _{MUN medicate} 07:53, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
• Still inconclusive after 9 days of voting. Kept Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 08:46, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

• April Fools!! --Kurgan 10:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete --AAA! (AAAA) 13:22, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Stupid page containing articles of generally very low quality... Only once a year though eh? Next person to do this, gets a right slap on the bottom! :P MrN  22:03, Apr 1

• Yes, very funny... :P MrN  23:25, Apr 1

• Well I thought it was funny... Robertodole 20:37, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

• CVP 5 previous deletions, unfunny, short, Star Wars cruft --Kurgan 01:20, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
• Weak Delete It's almost not crap.--Count of Monkey Crisco 07:18, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. No, it is crap. Memey, stupid, badly-written crap. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 10:06, Mar 30
• Delete. - It went downhill from Muslims... (Bonner) (Talk) Mar 30, 19:40
• Delete. Not good. MrN  11:46, Apr 1

• Comment: It is still listed on UN:REQ. (Semi-off-topic: I have added a hatnote to UN:REQ reminding newbies about HTBFANJS and UN:PEE.) What should we do to solicit a rewrite effort? --Pentium5dot1 22:11, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete. A short, unfunny intro, then several unfunny lists. And that's it. Easy delete, surely? --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 15:12, Mar 30
• Delete. - Seconded (Bonner) (Talk) Mar 30, 19:41
• Its like a big, boring list Robertodole 20:32, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
• Kill! Kill! --Count of Monkey Crisco 23:29, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
• Cruft-Huff --Kurgan 23:52, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Delete. stupid --Count of Monkey Crisco 20:53, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete. Yeah, a bad idea turned into a bad article. Who'da thunk it? Plus, that image sucks. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 10:04, Mar 30
• Nuke - What the fuck is this shit? (Bonner) (Talk) Mar 30, 19:38
• Why does this even exist? Robertodole 20:34, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

• Vanity? doubt barry scott wrote this article it is hardly flattering to him. I think it should be kept. Its quite short but it's a really funny idea--Veggieburgerfish 01:00, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
• Weak keepIn the USA Cilit Bang is called Easyoff BAM! and we have obnoxious commercials about it. This article is just barely worthwhile.--Count of Monkey Crisco 07:27, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
• Keep and expand - Made me smile (Bonner) (Talk) Mar 30, 19:37

• Delete Vanity maybe. Pants anyway. MrN  00:24, Mar 28
• Delete Random listy pants. --OptyC Sucks! cun 00:28, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
• Pants? WTF does that mean? Mr. N won't tell me!   CAKE J! <-> Mar 28 (01:29)
• Delete. Don't see the good idea, do see a crappy little stub. And yes, I do know about the inestimable Mr Scott. Bah. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 10:03, Mar 30

Cajek: I want to tell you, I really do, but Mr. N threatened my family if I told you. --OptyC Sucks! cun 22:05, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

• if your reading this and you don't already know who Barry Scott is- then don't take part in the discussion. I am from the U.K. and its just occurred to me that maybe you don't have Cilit bang in the U.S.--Veggieburgerfish 01:00, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

That as it may be, the mere fact that this may not be vanity is not in and of itself a reason to keep an article. Also, MrN9000 is a jolly old UKer, and he nommed this article... -- Major Sir Zombiebaron GUN • WotM • UotM • PotM • AotM • EGAEDM • UPotM • MAFE • ZotM • IotM • VotM • UGotM (shout) 01:03, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

BANG! and the dirt is gone!!!! Um, come on now though... OK, I have to admit I did not notice the reference to the advert... I guess that's why I said maybe vanity. It is however still pants... There is potential there for a good article here, but I'm afraid this has got caught up in part of my stub hunt. If you want to copy this to your userspace and make an actual article out of this Veggieburgerfish go for it... If you're not up for doing this, I'm not sure who will be. Also, we don't exclude people from voting based on where they live, so please don't try to tell others what to do or not to do when voting on VFD. Oh, I hope you do have a go at 'righting' this, it would be good to see the results! Have fun... MrN  04:50, Mar 29

Oh, I'm not sure, but I think Optimuschris may be British also... MrN  04:53, Mar 29

Nope, American. But I've always hated Eastenders if that's any consolation. :P --OptyC Sucks! cun 13:47, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

• (arbitrary outdent) Is there anything in here we could merge to Barry Scott or Cillit Bang? --Pentium5dot1 22:13, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

• Keep I think it stays... MrN  23:13, Mar 27
• Mhm --Grand General Wizard Etc x2 and Senator G/K/O/CUNT.K.F. WHORE! ZOTM MAFE VANDL UOTM WOTM TOP10 FP PMOTM UWotM 19:55, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
• Keep. Me approves of this. --ASHPD 04:17, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete A dumping ground for in-jokes. YouFang 23:02, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

This is a rather old article that has gone through many revisions. It is one of those articles that seems to believe the referencing of in-jokes is funny. I disagree.

• C-C-CEPT BREAKER -- Major Sir Zombiebaron GUN • WotM • UotM • PotM • AotM • EGAEDM • UPotM • MAFE • ZotM • IotM • VotM • UGotM (