| Delete |
- Delete Oh No! MrN just nominated an "In-Joke" for VFD... Well, VFD is a tad slow right now so... I looked at the talk page as requested... Clicked a few links... Gave up. Do enough people care if this is kept? MrN
22:58, May 21
- Delete. If someone can explain why this is funny, I'll happily reconsider, but right now this is doing a whole lot of nothing. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 08:23, May 22
- An injoke... but one I've never heard of before, and a really bad one with no setup and a tiny sliver of a background. --Grand General Wizard Etc x2 and Senator G/K/O/CUNT.K.F. WHORE! ZOTM MAFE VANDL UOTM WOTM TOP10 FP PMOTM UWotM 03:28, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - Do not understand the joke. --¿Qua? es mi página de discusión, es lo que mi contribuiría 00:36, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete I get it. Not funny. Sorry. -OptyC Sucks!
cun14:21, 30 May
- Delete I don't get it. --sabrown100 16:25, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
- Yawn. --
Frankie! (Roman Dog Bird) 18:49, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete I understand the joke and it's still not funny--Sgt. Fluffy 19:09, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete I agree that this page really doesn't have much going for it compared to the large number of existing in-jokes. Is anyone willing to userfy it, though? --Pentium5dot1 22:34, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- No seriously, could someone please explain this one to me? The joke is that someone put a template on an article at wikipedia? Really? There has to be something I'm missing. MrN
00:11, May 22
- Abstain, I think I understood this "joke" when it was created, but I don't think that I found it funny. -- Major Sir Zombiebaron GUN • WotM • UotM • PotM • AotM • EGAEDM • UPotM • MAFE • ZotM • IotM • VotM • UGotM (shout) 03:22, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
- Yea, I'm guessing the author is poking fun at the Wikipedia article, and organised religion. Although both of these are something I would encourage, I'm not in-favour of keeping this just because someone put it into the "In-Joke" category. Especially as it was added to "In Jokes" half an hour after it was created. MrN
12:01, May 22
- I checked out the Wikipedia history. Someone disagreed with the accuracy of the article, so put a disputed template on the article, but at the same time blanked the page of content - so a blank page with no info whatsoever was nonetheless "disputed." I found it quite funny that this was on Wikipedia. The Uncyclopedia article begins "From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia." Sir Roger 08:03, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
- Yea, I did see that. I just don't think the whole thing justified an article here, especially considering how much effort was required to find out about it. Also Zombiebaron! I thought we were not voting Abs these days... Nail your flags to the post sir! MrN
08:52, May 23
- That's weird, I totally missed that Dump. In anycase, I disagree with Mordillo's statement at the beginning; I feel that "abstain"s are (when I use them) a simple and absolute denial of my will to vote — I am neither for keeping nor for deleting, for a good reason (which I then supply). People's feeling don't enter into it, as Mordillo supposed, and "clogging VFD" shouldn't be such a shameful thing – this is, afterall, a page for discussing the artistic and humourstic merits of articles as much as it is a place for pushing through long forgotten cruft as fast as possible; if one or two such constructive discussions last longer than "normal" we may just discover new and terribly interesting things instead of deleting them. -- Major Sir Zombiebaron GUN • WotM • UotM • PotM • AotM • EGAEDM • UPotM • MAFE • ZotM • IotM • VotM • UGotM (shout) 19:32, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
- Which is kinda what I said at the time... MrN
02:17, May 29
- Yay! Newly discovered in-joke! - I hate to be one of those bitches that vote keep on an in-joke article that people hate, even if I do find this lol funny. (Of course, I laugh at really stupid things all the time.) It reminds me of Elephant (Wikipedia article). I'm just going to let everyone else decide. Worst case scenario: I have to move it to Illogicopedia. (Which I'll probably do anyway.) -- Kip teh Dip • Talk • Works • Faq • Vote in '08 •
04:57, May. 25, 2008
- Still here? Any chance we can get a verdict? This has been here a week now.--Sgt. Fluffy 19:09, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
- What's your hurry? Got money on this one? -OptyC Sucks!
cun20:08, 31 May
- Sick of seeing it, It's taking up a slot of vfd meaning we have 19 instead of 20. I'm a slave to efficacy I suppose.--Sgt. Fluffy 20:35, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
|