Uncyclopedia:Pages for deletion/archive144

• Just because I didn't agree with you putting John Goodman all over everything doesn't make it suitable for deletion, does it? Crablogger 14:20, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

• Kerkill Ready for a new term? Slappycruft. It means it's Slappy Squirrel fancruft created to please one user. Plus, the user (using his IP) has reverted to the vanity version! --Pleb Dexter111344 • Complain here • Vote now! 14:16, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. Or move to userspace per my Slappy's Angels 5 vote comment. --UU Blah / Pee 14:36, Jul 22
• Crab, you are a sick son of a bitch. And I mean that in a bad way. Get help.   CAKE J! <15:35, 22 Jul 2008>
• delete. regardless of any controversy, these articles bring nothing to the table and do not belong on uncyclopedia. --OfficerGerrycheeversKunTalk 16:52, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

• Just move all the slappycruft into his userspace. Easy. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 14:30, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
• Move somewhere off-wiki. I think the bulk of Crablogger's contributions need a new home entirely. Really, this series of articles is like nothing I've ever seen. It's enormous - less than half of it is on VFD right now. The amount of material we have on Animaniacs' Slappy Squirrel rivals the volume of everything I've ever written. And it's not amateur or sloppy work - the prose and formatting are excellent, the articles are long and thorough. The thing is, I can't find any satire or jokes or humor in them. It appears to me that Crablogger could be a member of the furry community who has a fixation on Slappy Squirrel, given his contributions on WikiFur - this seems even more true given that the content of this endless series of Slappy articles is just a long stream of prose about cartoon characters getting naked and having sex. Am I honestly looking at some kind of furry porn right now? I mean, is that the joke - that a furry fetishist would write all this material? Or has a furry fetishist really come here and written all this material? At any rate, none of this fits on Uncyclopedia. It's just something other than comedy. I hate to just say "delete" on something so much work has gone into, but I think the dozen or more articles about the sexual habits of an Animaniacs character really have to be taken somewhere else. Any thoughts? pillow talk 14:48, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

  What he said. --UU Blah / Pee 15:07, Jul 22

  Sounds good. And while we're moving all of this off-wiki, let's pull out of Iraq, too. --SYNDROME _{MUN medicate} 17:29, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

• Cajek! Please don't say that. It's likely to cause drama. --Pleb Dexter111344 • Complain here • Vote now! 16:15, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

• Just because you hate this article yourself doesn't make it a candidate for deletion. Personal opinions don't make a good case for deletion. Crablogger 14:23, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

• Kerkill Slappycruft. --Pleb Dexter111344 • Complain here • Vote now! 14:16, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. Or move to userspace per my Slappy's Angels 5 vote comment. --UU Blah / Pee 14:35, Jul 22
• bah, horrifying   CAKE J! <15:35, 22 Jul 2008>
• delete. regardless of any controversy, these articles bring nothing to the table and do not belong on uncyclopedia. --OfficerGerrycheeversKunTalk 16:52, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

• Moved --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 14:43, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

• So are you planning to move pretty much everything at Template:Slappy's Angels? Seems that right now half of it is in and half of it is out of userspace. Or maybe I should just calm down and give you some time to finish... pillow talk 14:58, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

• Or not, per Mordillo's recent comment... pillow talk 15:05, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

• You're doing it again. If you think it is Slappycruft, then explain why Full Throttle and Slappy's Angels 5 were both given 5-star ratings from other users, and this one 4 stars. Crablogger 14:24, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

• Kerkill Guess what kind of cruft it is! --Pleb Dexter111344 • Complain here • Vote now! 14:16, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. Or move to userspace per my Slappy's Angels 5 vote comment (particularly the bit about article ratings). --UU Blah / Pee 14:35, Jul 22
• no no no, not even to userspace.   CAKE J! <15:35, 22 Jul 2008>
• delete. regardless of any controversy, these articles bring nothing to the table and do not belong on uncyclopedia. --OfficerGerrycheeversKunTalk 16:52, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

• Moved --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 14:43, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
• REVERTED. See my remarks down there. ~ 15:04, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

• Yes, we know what it is. It's you abusing your power. Crablogger 14:25, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

• Dexter isn't "abusing power". He's taking a group of pages in front of the community for our opinion. No special power or privileges are involved; you could easily do the same. pillow talk 14:59, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

• Kerkill You know what it is. --Pleb Dexter111344 • Complain here • Vote now! 14:16, 22 July 2008 (UTC)#
• Delete. Or move to userspace per my Slappy's Angels 5 vote comment. --UU Blah / Pee 14:34, Jul 22
• no no no, not even to userspace.   CAKE J! <15:35, 22 Jul 2008>
• delete. regardless of any controversy, these articles bring nothing to the table and do not belong on uncyclopedia. --OfficerGerrycheeversKunTalk 16:52, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

• Slappycruft that has a high rating among members. Crablogger 14:25, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

• Kerkill More Slappycruft. --Pleb Dexter111344 • Complain here • Vote now! 14:27, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. Or move to userspace. OK, point 1: the ratings are very easy to rig, and there's no way of showing how many people have voted, so it could just be "has a high rating from you, the author". Point 2: see here - I agree with Gwax's basic sentiment, this doesn't really have a place here except for in your userspace, Crablogger, where you are welcome to move it if you want it kept. I, however, see no humour or satire, just a load of fancruft about something completely made up. Plus you keep putting yourself in these articles, which is vanity. All my votes on the other articles will refer to this vote, to save typing this out again. --UU Blah / Pee 14:32, Jul 22

• Out of curiosity, what does a move to userspace accomplish? Seems to me that userspace is more or less identical to mainspace except that the "Random page" button doesn't bring it up. I feel like this belongs on a different wiki altogether, if anywhere. Maybe, you know, Slappypedia. Wonder how hard it would be to set that up. pillow talk 14:55, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

• no no no, not even to userspace.   CAKE J! <15:35, 22 Jul 2008>
• delete. regardless of any controversy, these articles bring nothing to the table and do not belong on uncyclopedia. --OfficerGerrycheeversKunTalk 16:52, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

• It may seem like vanity to you, but the idea was to be the reverse. Note how I keep using self-depreciating humour to make myself look like a complete and utter idiot. The idea was to be vain but to be self-hating. Crablogger 14:39, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

• Well, if this is a series of more than a dozen satire articles, where the target of the satire is your own fixation and how strange it is, that really does break the policy set forth at Uncyclopedia:Vanity Policies. The litmus test is "Might Codeine's Mum have heard of this group/individual/organization?" And there is no way that Codeine's Mum is aware that someone out there is... unusually interested in Slappy Squirrel as a sexual being. Also, does it really take more than ten long articles to take the piss out of someone who is unusually interested in Slappy Squirrel as a sexual being? If this is all a long, extended meta-joke - articles that exist to poke fun at their own existence - I'm having trouble seeing it. It seems like this was written for reasons other than making a bunch of people laugh. pillow talk 14:53, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

• Excuse me but since when exactly do we move mainspace articles into namespace BEFORE the vote has been completed?! You want those moved, you'll wait till the vote is done. Not a second before that. ~ 15:03, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

• No relation to Slappycruft. This is a Scary Movie parody, not a Slappy's Angels spinoff. Crablogger 14:26, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

• Kerkill Bad crap related to Slappycruft. --Pleb Dexter111344 • Complain here • Vote now! 14:16, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
• Ignoring what's going on up there ↑... Listy towards the end and random. Delete. ~~Heeren ["Meh"] [tecħ] [kurk] [22/07 15:43]
• Delete Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally CUN GotA 15:56, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
• delete. --OfficerGerrycheeversKunTalk 16:44, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
• Delete MrN  21:19, Jul 22

• Comment I don't want to be the one to put the nail in the coffin, but I can't find any funny here. The author may want to read UN:BOLLOCKS. It's not very helpful but I think it's at least applicable. --SYNDROME _{MUN medicate} 20:23, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

• delete. pointless, unfunny, essentially no edits since creation. --OfficerGerrycheeversKunTalk 13:27, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally CUN GotA 15:57, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
• Kerkill Not good. --Pleb Dexter111344 • Complain here • Vote now! 16:10, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
• Delete MrN  21:16, Jul 22

• delete. listy, unfunny. --OfficerGerrycheeversKunTalk 13:25, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. Pointless. --UU Blah / Pee 15:05, Jul 22
• Delete Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally CUN GotA 15:57, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
• Kerkill Unfunny. --Pleb Dexter111344 • Complain here • Vote now! 15:58, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
• Silver Hammer, yeah --SYNDROME _{MUN medicate} 20:28, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. MrN  20:58, Jul 22

delete. gross. --OfficerGerrycheeversKunTalk 13:02, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

• delete. MrN  13:35, Jul 22
• Delete.--Sir Sycamore (Blether) 14:25, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. Crap. --UU Blah / Pee 14:48, Jul 22
• Delete - I laughed when I saw this article existed. I stopped laughing when I read the article. pillow talk 15:16, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
• Kerkill Possibly good concept, but it is currently unfunny crap. --Pleb Dexter111344 • Complain here • Vote now! 15:35, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

• delete. random random. --OfficerGerrycheeversKunTalk 12:57, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
• delete. Yep. MrN  14:22, Jul 22
• Delete.--Sir Sycamore (Blether) 14:26, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. Random. Wibble. Norris. --UU Blah / Pee 14:46, Jul 22
• Kerkill Religiouscruft. Plus, Chuck Norris at the end. "Buddha Replied with shooting lazers out of his mouth while screaming, 'SHOOOOP DA WHOOP!'" Buddha was black?(Had to say it.) --Pleb Dexter111344 • Complain here • Vote now! 15:53, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

• delete. list-stub. --OfficerGerrycheeversKunTalk 12:53, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
• delete. MrN  13:32, Jul 22
• Delete.--Sir Sycamore (Blether) 14:26, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. One of the easiest votes I've ever cast. --UU Blah / Pee 14:45, Jul 22
• Kerkill Took a few seconds to read so it clearly is too short. Plus, the lists aren't funny, and neither is the premise of the article itself. --Pleb Dexter111344 • Complain here • Vote now! 15:50, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
• Baleet Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally CUN GotA 15:53, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

• Delete. Another ICU escapee. Unfunny, stubby towncruft. Get rid. --UU Blah / Pee 09:49, Jul 22
• Delete - The AllBrân line made me smile, but apart from that it's shite (Bonner) (Talk) Jul 22, 10:32
• Delete. Town something or other... MrN  10:35, Jul 22
• delete. --OfficerGerrycheeversKunTalk 13:20, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
• Delete.--Sir Sycamore (Blether) 14:27, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
• Kerkill --Pleb Dexter111344 • Complain here • Vote now! 15:48, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally CUN GotA 15:53, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

• Delete. Dull 2005cruft WP spork that's not linked, pointless, and unfunny as far as I can see. And not linked from anywhere. --UU Blah / Pee 09:47, Jul 22
• Nuke - Unfunny? This is horrific (Bonner) (Talk) Jul 22, 10:34
• Delete. MrN  10:34, Jul 22
• delete. aaahhhhh toooooo maannnyyy redddliiiinksss! --OfficerGerrycheeversKunTalk 13:19, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
• No Unfunny shite --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 14:35, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
• AAAAAAAAA! Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally CUN GotA 15:54, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

• Delete. WTF? Random, not linked to, 2005cruft. Not funny, should go. --UU Blah / Pee 09:42, Jul 22
• Delete. Let it go... MrN  10:32, Jul 22
• Delete - Crap (Bonner) (Talk) Jul 22, 10:36
• delete. bad bad bad. -OfficerGerrycheeversKunTalk 13:18, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
• Kerkill Unfunny and listy. --Pleb Dexter111344 • Complain here • Vote now! 15:45, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

• Delete. Crappy little towncruft stub that escaped ICU. --UU Blah / Pee 09:37, Jul 22
• Delete. MrN  10:31, Jul 22
• Delete - (Bonner) (Talk) Jul 22, 10:38
• delete. --OfficerGerrycheeversKunTalk 13:17, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
• Kerkill Absolutely nothing funny. --Pleb Dexter111344 • Complain here • Vote now! 15:41, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

• Delete. Not funny. Listy. Not linked to so not loved. Name-droppy. Did make me laugh, but only accidentally, by claiming Jim Carrey attained "diety" status. --UU Blah / Pee 09:34, Jul 22
• Delete. Yea, not great. MrN  10:30, Jul 22
• Delete - The only thing I laughed at was the misspelling of the word Genesis (Bonner) (Talk) Jul 22, 10:47
• Delete. Bad acronym, listy page. Sir Modusoperandi 11:27, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
• delete. this article praises dane cook. begone with it. --OfficerGerrycheeversKunTalk 13:17, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
• Kerkill --Pleb Dexter111344 • Complain here • Vote now! 14:28, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

• Delete. Escaped ICU. Listy, dull gamecruft. Not linked to, so not loved. Kill. I don't sound in a bad mood, do I? --UU Blah / Pee 09:22, Jul 22
• Delete. Who would suggest such a thing? UU has never been in a bad mood. MrN  10:28, Jul 22
• Fail - (Bonner)