Uncyclopedia:Pages for deletion/archive19

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.

Contents 1 Template:QuotesPages 2 ADHD 3 East 4 Random Pages 4.1 Powers That Be 4.2 Akropolis 4.3 Erik Estrada 4.4 Lesbos 5 Ingenstans 6 Cut 7 Undictionary 8 Ameri'an language 9 Uncyclopedia:Pages for deletion/templates 10 Armenia 11 Slime Cube 12 Destroy the Foreigners! 13 Category: Uncle Joe's College 14 Category: Wheeling Jesuit University 15 Custard blankets 16 Hayden Lake 17 Harry Krishnas 18 Graham Coxon 19 Vtamn 20 32 Quote templates at Uncyclopedia:Pages_for_deletion/templates 21 The People of Moldova 22 Coprolites (Fossilized Crap) 23 Template:Correcttitle 24 Numpad8 25 The Real Truth About the Brazilian Political Crisis of 2005 26 Febrewery and various other fake months 27 Febtober 28 Buckethead 29 Andover 30 Amy Seymour 31 John_DeHeus 32 Winkler 33 Alexander 34 Canadian ninja 35 Night of the Broken Arse 36 Vice versa 37 Absolute Power 38 Books and Movies for Nerds 39 Terry McIntosh 40 Other Proposed Jesii Deletions 41 Cormyr 42 Kangaroosville 43 Darth Maul 44 Parsley 45 Clown 46 Ninetales 47 William Bryce R. Fulton V 48 Negro 49 Moronificatoriationariality 50 Template:QVFD 51 Pocoyo 52 Mary hedrick 53 Ninja cobras 54 British Intelligence Service 55 Arnold Oksmaa 56 Brazillion 57 List of Pokémon who resisted the Holocaust 58 Kevin zhou 59 Miles Brown 60 Husi 61 Template:Mortal Enemies 62 Saskatoon 63 All caps 64 Trumpet 65 Kill Them All 66 The new jersey monster 67 Not in America's best interests 68 Fascist America 69 William_Foote 70 Villate 71 Euroipods 72 Fghdfgbdfb 73 Self-reference 74 Edit war (video game) 75 Zork3 and all its subpages 76 999 77 Espoo 78 A Perfect Circle (band) 79 1000baselx 80 Priest of Cthulhu 81 Mike Natale 82 Sean Williamson 83 Misfortune 84 Santa Clause

Template:QuotesPages

Advertising that we make up quotes is amusing once, (and horribly abused now) but killing the joke on every other page. Beat as this template beats our quote-creation-humor like a dead horse. Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 01:18, 6 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Yeah, kill it. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 13:06, 6 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Keep I created it. It's simply there to link the "Making up quotes" pages together. If your reason for wanting to delete this is that you don't like the making up quotes pages, then put them all on VFD. This template replaced long lists of "See Also" and "Related Articles" links on lots of pages in the "Making up quotes" series. I don't think that having the articles designated for the making up of quotes has that much to do with there being too many quotes on other pages.

I think moving alot of the crappy quotes off of actual non-"Making up quotes" articles to "Making up quotes" pages would be a better solution. Perhaps an even better idea than that would be to start an UnQuote, similar to UnDictionary, to spoof Wikiquote and move all the content of the "Making up quotes" pages there. --Nerd42 19:55, 6 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Now I know we don't get along, and I don't want to seem like a softie or say anything positive about you, but that's one damn good idea. I mean, if someone else had come up with it. For adding yet another useles appendage to Uncyclopedia, and moving all the "making up quotes" stuff to Uncyclopedia:QuoteUnquote. I'm going to hack a page up there now, since I'm feeling ambitious. Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 01:25, 7 Dec 2005 (UTC)

KILL! KILL! KILL! KILL! KILL! KILL! KILL! KILL! - --Steve "Heeeere's Johnny" Ballmer 20:20, 6 Dec 2005 (UTC)

(offtopic flamefest moved to User talk:JohnnyRaven Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 01:16, 8 Dec 2005 (UTC))

Kill: I'm opposed to the template because it tends to dominate the pages it's on and makes them look lower quality. In fact, for that matter, I'm in favor of fewer templates in general (but that's neither here nor now). --Sir gwax (talk) » Major KUN UotM FH++ F@H CM GD NS Bur. +S 13:37, 7 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I've just moved it off all the main article pages, leaving a single wiki link to the related making up quotes pages. The template still exists on the making up quotes pages and it stays that way, it might be ok to leave it be. However, if it makes it back onto any of the main article pages, I will go back to being pro-nukes. --Sir gwax (talk) » Major KUN UotM FH++ F@H CM GD NS Bur. +S 18:11, 7 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Organize Dominating the pages -- Unfortunately true. Could that be fixed by redesigning the template to be smaller? I think it would be good if this particular series of pages was very organized, (I am making no statements about the site in general here) so that people could easily navigate between the different people. --Nerd42 15:50, 7 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I have changed the format of the template so that (hopefully) it is less threatening. Take a look. --Nerd42 16:20, 7 Dec 2005 (UTC)

It's still huge, so even though it's a little sleeker, the problem still exists. I think that there's a good solution to this whole issue, namely put the template on making up quotes pages but not articles about things that are quoted. On the article about the quotee, a single line can be used, as in See Also -> Making up somebody or other quotes. This way, the interlinking will be preserved and there will be no page domination as only a single line will be used. I'm going to go about so implementing and then I'm going to change my vote. --Sir gwax (talk) » Major KUN UotM FH++ F@H CM GD NS Bur. +S 17:36, 7 Dec 2005 (UTC)

OK then. I'm happy with this. I think the Uncyclopedia has now been made better. :) You might want, however, to make sure the biography articles are all still categorized as Category:People for whom Quotes are Made up. --Nerd42 18:19, 7 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I went and did that .... so, uh, what do you think now, Famine and Cap'n Ben? --Nerd42 21:16, 7 Dec 2005 (UTC)

1 - it's unnecessary, since people wanting to go from one making up quotes page to another can just go via Catergory:People for wom quotes are made up. 2 - It's still horribly large and unweildy. 3 - Don't be a drama queen. I could understand you getting upset if we talking about huffing some long article that you put a lot of thought and effort into; we're talking about a template. Just get over it. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 22:55, 7 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I'm not upset. :) The trouble with Category:People for whom Quotes are Made up is that very few people would know that -- who's going to click a category -- especially if it's only one of the fifteen-or-so categories the article is in -- whereas if there's a list of links there to the other "Making up quotes" pages, it becomes much easier to navigate, and people realize there are other pages out there besides Making up Oscar Wilde quotes. --Nerd42 23:39, 7 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Nerd, you still miss the entire fucking point - why are we advertising that the quotes are made up? They are not made up. They are true. 112% true. Mislableing them is inappropriate and irresponsible. Not to mention that lots of people click on categories, based on the amount of reverts I have to do to category pages.

Check out Wikiquote so you can help me parody it well at Uncyclopedia:QuoteUnquote. The quotes are real, and we need to make sure that we tell people that. Let us leave behind the silliness of Uncyclopedia and create something which will benefit the world. Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 00:06, 8 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Wow! Uncyclopedia:QuoteUnquote looks awesome! but wouldn't it be better/easier to just call it UnQuote? Like UnDictionary? --Nerd42 00:35, 8 Dec 2005 (UTC)

So ... I'm assuming this template will eventually be replaced by something QuoteUnquoteish ... till then it will stay then ... right? or is this vote still going on or what? --Nerd42 22:11, 13 Dec 2005 (UTC)

ADHD

Delete. Was a (kinda) funny two-liner in the past, has been moved to undictionary, and is now another, but boring, two-liner. ComaVN 10:16, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Ok, it should actually just be a redirect to undictionary again. ComaVN 10:17, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)</s>

I've rewritten it. Have a look and see what you think. Strong RadX 20:01, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Looks better. But I still like the undictionary entry better. More concise. ComaVN 11:39, 3 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Kept. --KATIE!! 23:24, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)

East

Plagiarized from Wikipedia's article on Yeast. --Peder 02:59, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)

^^ Not anymore. It is guilty of being stubby though. -- neoEva88 MUN F@H PS CM NS (talk.to-do)

Random Pages

Acid Ammo 21:10, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC): Just clicking on Random Page, I came across such things as:

You should put up a {{vfd}} tag in those articles when you nominate them.ComaVN 10:33, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Powers That Be

Now, now that's just bad.

Keep. it's not that bad. ComaVN 10:33, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Delete, although it could possibly become a template and put on multiple pages randomly. --Ianweller 14:56, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Keep tis a stub but it doesn't give me eye beams --Nerd42 22:12, 13 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Akropolis

I tried to laugh, I really did.

Delete. I'm sure you did. ComaVN 10:33, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)</s>

Moved to Undictionary. I thought it deserved to stay..--Ianweller 14:56, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Erik Estrada

The first sentece gives away the quality of the article: "American (possibly Costa Rican, who the fuck knows) television actor."

Delete. it's that bad. ComaVN 10:33, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Huff. --Ianweller 14:56, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Eradicate. C'mon, how much effort did this really take?--King In Yellow 18:34, 13 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Lesbos

A few good jokes don't make up for a mostly unfunny article.

Keep, with a hint of rewrite. ComaVN 10:33, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Rewrite. It deserves to be attacked by the strange that is Uncyclopedia. --Ianweller 14:56, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Keep for now. Needs a rewrite. Dasphoebus 09:05, 22 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Ingenstans

Flush. Acid Ammo 23:48, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete. ComaVN 10:57, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Keep. I actually found it funny, but it may have to do with me understanding swedish and thus understanding the joke ("Ingenstans" is swedsih for "nowhere").--DeathByPie 19:55, 3 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Keep A subtle joke, but worth it. Could do with expanding.

Keep I came here intending to vote delete, but I didn't know about the Swedish thing. Maybe add a reference in the categories or see also to tip us non-Swedes off --Poofers 02:51, 6 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Keep. I just added the word definition. --noob

So, this is gonna become the Brazil article, where there are hundreds of sentences in Portuguese mistranslated to English and that doedn't make sense if one doesn't understand the language. Acid Ammo 15:39, 9 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I deleted it because I don't believe in democracy. --KATIE!! 23:19, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Cut

Go. That, my friends, is what we call not worthy for Uncyclopedia.

• CUT!!! - Guest 18:54, 13 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• I deleted this once, so I guess I'll do it again. Baleeted. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] 20:02, 13 Dec 2005 (UTC)

This page is crap DELETE!!!

Deleted again? --KATIE!! 23:12, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Undictionary

Pages for deletion/UndictionaryA-C - Pages for deletion/UndictionaryD-K - Pages for deletion/UndictionaryL-R - Pages for deletion/UndictionaryS-Z

A dumping ground for useless substubs that admins haven't bothered to delete. (see individual entries) --Carlb 08:06, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)

• I'm confused, can we just vote to delete the entirety of the Undictionary? If so, than I say kill the whole damned thing! By definition, the Undictionary can be nothing more than a collection of one-liners. That's great if you're Ambrose Bierce, but there's a really good chance it doesn't work if your name consists of a random string of dot-delimited numbers, each one <= 255. Since Uncyclopedia Is Not Wikipedia, who cares if we have a few (or more than a few) sub-stubs in the main article space? I'd rather have an article space with a bunch of funny substubs, than an Undictionary full of unfunny one-liners. Damn, I've wanted to get that off my chest for a while. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] 16:42, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Comment: Presumably, any page is fair game for VfD. (and no, I'm not going to VfD the main page as we have admins insane enough to actually go ahead and delete it) --Carlb 16:47, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I vote to go ahead and purge whatever's not funny. --Algorithm 22:35, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Keep. SOmetimes there's good stuff that simply can't be extended beyond a one-liner. Who said one-liners can't be funny? --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 00:28, 29 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete Crap, Move Rest Back To Uncyclopedia. Take UnDictionary Out Back, Beat It, Shoot It, Jump Up And Down On It, Belittle It's Parents, And Then Bury It Face Down In An Unmarked Grave

“It's not the size of your page, but rather the motion of the ocean, er I mean its humor.”

~ Oscar Wilde on Humor over Size

As a member of VFUDD I say kill it baby! If it makes you laugh even just a little then it's qualifies for Uncyclopedia. People can expand it or not as long as it's funny. When I came across Laos it was one line that said, "A beautiful southeast asian country that anglocentric Americans should learn more about" (Which was actually a decent one liner). Of course I killed it to add 6 pages of crap, but that's irrevelant. I learned the hard way to add pictures and at least three lines in order to keep the UnDictionary Nazis away from my stuff. See Bizarro Coke, and Non sequitur

• Wiki Tiki God 09:27, 29 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete --Overlordzoloft 02:22, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Comment: At least half of the Undictionary entries should be huffed on sight, but for the rest: if there's an existing article on any related topic, should that one bit of text be taken out of Undictionary entirely and merged to the main article? (for instance Undictionary:D#D-Bay to eBay?) --Carlb 16:47, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Ammendment: Keep UnDictionary, but only for actual definitions of words that are funny. Could possibly only take up one page. I'd still like to see an UnQuote kind of thing to parody WikiQuote. --Nerd42 17:09, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Keep Some of that is funny, and hey, we're not paying for server space ^^ Scythe33 02:55, 11 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Delete. Undictionary is just unwieldy, REDIRECTS don't work right, and half of the entries would (and should) have been deleted if Undictionary hadn't ever existed. I'd rather see the funnier entries survive as stubs and huff the rest. --FlyingFool 20:52, 12 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Ameri'an language

This probably should have been put out of its misery sooner, but was apparently expanded on request. It still sucks; delete. --DWIII 06:37, 27 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Bah. Balete. "...coisinences?" ----OEJ 16:02, 27 Nov 2005 (UTC)

• Comment: The page's author, 80.5.160.5, recently removed the VFD template. I've reverted the removal unless voting has already been decided upon ? MadMax 04:30, 11 Dec 2005 (UTC)

• Comment: The VFD tag has again been deleted by the author. Would it be fair to assume the current voting is for deletion ? MadMax 06:06, 19 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Kill. Just another stupid limey/canuck trying to bash America, and once again it's not funny.

Deleted. --KATIE!! 23:09, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Uncyclopedia:Pages for deletion/templates

There are an awful lot of templates that need voting for/against, please do your civic duty and tell the admins what sucks. --Sir gwax (talk) » Major KUN UotM FH++ F@H CM GD NS Bur. +S 01:23, 27 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Armenia

Factual. Poorly written. Not funny. Looks like a work of an ultra-nationalist Armenian. Unissakävelijä 11:09, 23 Nov 2005 (UTC)

After a month on VFD there has been considerable progress. I thank those who took the time and rewrote. It is no more nationalist, factual or poorly written. But still it lacks humour. Needs more rewrite but for now I withdraw my deletion proposal and vote to keep.--Unissakävelijä 20:37, 24 Dec 2005 (UTC)

• Doesn't look that bad to me. Keep. I, for one, welcome our new ultra-nationalist Armenian overlords. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] 19:09, 23 Nov 2005 (UTC)

DELETE NOT FUNNY. Patriots are crap. Who cares about such a small country?

DELETE - who the hell thinks this is funny?!?

BORING Delete--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 00:22, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)

• Keep It can be salvaged, needs Template:Accurate, besides Armenian chicks are Hawt, and its cool having a country were every damn persons' last name ends in 'ian'. It's also funny how Armenians constantly fight oveBold textr who's a 'real' Armenian and who's really a Turk with 'ian' added to the back of their name. Wiki Tiki God 15:19, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)

• Did a major rewrite please take the VFD tag off now. Wiki Tiki God 09:05, 3 Dec 2005 (UTC)

• Major rewrite (again) Added spoof of Template:Wikipedia to Armeniapedia (which actually exists). Added Template:Mortal Enemies. Expect the obligatory indignant yelling from people new to Uncyclopedia. Please remove the VFD tag. Wiki Tiki God 01:07, 4 Dec 2005 (UTC)

• KEEP needs some work but its not that bad--Joseph Stalin 18:43, 5 Dec 2005 (UTC)

• Revert War This guy 69.242.105.27 keeps putting back the original text for "History of Armenia" which was the major lameness that led to the VFD tag in the first place. I've had to revert it now twice. If you go look (to delete or take vfd tag off) check the history for the latest version NOT by 69.242.105.27 before you make your decision. Or the latest version by me.
  Wiki Tiki God 01:25, 7 Dec 2005 (UTC)

DELETE Racial hatred? No thanks. Neo-Nazis and Extremists would be proud about some articles in the Armenia section. SAD, JUST SAD.

DELETE Badly written, neonazi slur. Who does this doesn't know that it isn't funny it's just plain stupid and childish --Vladino 03:13, 22 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Kept. Looks fine to me. --KATIE!! 23:05, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Slime Cube

Nuke: It was funny at Time Cube, but it's not funny here, even with a search and replace Time/Slime. --Sir gwax (talk) » Major KUN UotM FH++ F@H CM GD NS Bur. +S 03:06, 22 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Hurts my eyes. Vote for Delete, but I won't swing the axe myself (yet) mostly 'cause there are a lot of contributors. Maybe they can explain the joke? -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] 16:03, 22 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Keep It's a meme joke, what you gonna do? --Poofers 01:58, 23 Nov 2005 (UTC)

zelete--Spintherism 06:16, 23 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Rewrite same visual style, D&D slime/gelatinous cube content. Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 17:23, 23 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Wot Famine Said--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 00:23, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Bettered - Still needs some TLC, but I beat on it a bit. Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 01:11, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Kept because I love the colors and stuff. --KATIE!! 23:02, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Destroy the Foreigners!

• I say pwn all the foreign-language templates instantly back to their own-language Uncyclopedias. They have their places there, not here. Democracy shall decide the fate of the rest! Karma Llama 03:23, 25 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete. Hell yeah! --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 00:30, 29 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Category: Uncle Joe's College

• Kill: This is a completely unnecessary subcategory. --Sir gwax (talk) » Major KUN UotM FH++ F@H CM GD NS Bur. +S 23:19, 19 Nov 2005 (UTC)
  • Haxx. Whatever he said. --Unissakävelijä 15:55, 23 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Deleted. --KATIE!! 23:00, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Category: Wheeling Jesuit University

• Eat: This category really does not need to exist. The underlying need is pretty well covered by Category: Pages not created by UtarEmpire. Additionally, the contents should be eatten by Wheeling Jesuit University. --Sir gwax (talk) » Major KUN UotM FH++ F@H CM GD NS Bur. +S 23:19, 19 Nov 2005 (UTC)

• Keep out of respect for User:UtarEmpire and his work --The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 17:39, 22 Nov 2005 (UTC)

• I still think that it should be eaten by Wheeling Jesuit University and need not be a category. --Sir gwax (talk) » Major KUN UotM FH++ F@H CM GD NS Bur. +S 01:02, 27 Nov 2005 (UTC)

• Keep the category, but the category page itself should be trimmed to a short meaningful description only (transfer excess baggage to Wheeling Jesuit University). --DWIII 02:33, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)

• Keep this category. I'm one of UtarEmpire's real-life friends, the author of several of these articles, and a recent graduate of the school (it does exist!) to boot. The category "Pages not created by UtarEmpire" was created by me to shield him from any possible reprisals from the school. In no way does "Category:Pages not created by UtarEmpire" replace this category, nor was it intended to. The common theme of the articles in Category:Wheeling Jesuit University is that they're all related to Wheeling Jesuit University, and their placement in a category should reflect this. Feel free to delete Category:Pages not created by UtarEmpire with my blessing. --I made a profile! yay. 00:50 UTC
• Yes, please keep. Deletion would make me sad indeed. --UtarEmpire 14:42, 23 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Kept. --KATIE!! 22:57, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Custard blankets

Eat blankets=funny? Not only that, but it's a false Front Page Nominated. Acid Ammo 23:17, 19 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Keep due to lots of edits by logged-in authors. They may be trying for something, so I'd give them the benefit of the doubt. However, they do seem to spend an inordinate amount of time reverting edits by 66.66.207.246 for some reason. I even joined the reversion bandwagon myself. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] 23:17, 21 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Update: The owner of the IP addie above appears to have some sort of morbid fixation on the article, and has again vandalized it in some minor but annoying way. So, he's banned for a while. This may be enough reason to Keep the article -- in between annoying vandalism, additional content keeps sticking to the blanket like flies sticking to Your Mom. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] 18:33, 21 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Retarded, but I kept it. --KATIE!! 22:55, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Hayden Lake

• Sink it. Unfunny. :( --Carlb 19:48, 19 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Sometimes brevity is the soul of wit; in some cases, it's evidence of an insubstantial idea. Burn it. Burn it down.--King In Yellow 21:28, 13 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Deleted. --KATIE!! 22:52, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Harry Krishnas

Delete. Stubby and not funny. -- neoEva88 MUN F@H PS CM NS (talk.to-do)

I kinda liked it. Reference to gravy and meat may be parody (though it could just be a lucky accident, too). Keep and move to Hare Krishna (ref wikipedia:Hare Krishna). -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] 23:13, 21 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Kept. Hare Krishna redirects to it now. It's got potential, I guess. --KATIE!! 22:50, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Graham Coxon

I almost huffed it, but just in case, I googled it. Turns out that the guy is a member of the band Blur (I must have missed them while listening to Asleep at the Wheel). He's even warranted one of these crazy things: Wikipedia:Graham Coxon. So, does that mean that this article stays? It could use a little work, but then, couldn't we all. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] 21:49, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)

gah! The man's a musical genius but nevertheless i've read funnier obituaries than that article. Rewrite please, some kind soul with more comedy talent than me. And if we can't do that, get out the two-by-four and prepare for whacking season. Then huff it. Karma Llama 01:22, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)

• Keep - verifiable Peter 12:23, 21 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• Rewrite. Coxon deserves a better effort than this. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 12:27, 21 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Requested rewrite. --KATIE!! 22:46, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Vtamn

Delete I don't care if it's an inside joke. It's a dupe of Vitamin (without the I's). --Clorox MUN ONS (diskussion) ☃ 00:27, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete or at least change the font --RaRanax 00:44, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Hasn't this been discussed before? And didn't someone bring it up again about a week ago? --Paulgb 01:03, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Maybe, but it's still there. --Clorox MUN ONS (diskussion) ☃ 01:19, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)

If I remember correctly, the decision was keep each time --Paulgb 03:32, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Oh, its in the village dump right now. I don't understand this...

(VD Discussion)
It's an inside joke! Keep it, for god's sake! You'll never understand! --Clorox MUN ONS (diskussion) ☃ 02:36, 11 Nov 2005 (UTC)
(Next day, VFD Discussion)
Delete I don't care if it's an inside joke. It's a dupe of Vitamin (without the I's). --Clorox MUN ONS (diskussion) ☃ 00:27, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC) ... split personality?

You got a problem with that? At least I fixed it. --Clorox MUN ONS (diskussion) ☃ 21:47, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete You Have Two Dicks was a much funnier copy-and-change-something article, and even that couldn't be saved. --EvilZak 21:08, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete We have AAAAAAA now, we dont need this article --Nytrospawn 00:01, 14 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Keep I have gone to delete this article 3 times now. Each time I feel guilty for thinking about deleting it. It's not fantastic, but it's not bad. Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 02:40, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Keep: It's funny in that, I don't get it kind of way. It might be nice if there were an explanation of what the hell is going on. It might also be funny to make Vitamin redirect to it and have the 'i'less article be the real one. --Sir gwax (talk) » Major KUN UotM FH++ F@H CM GD NS Bur. +S 23:01, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Keep The joke is that in the entry for the letter "I", there's a line that says "Vitamin without I's presence would merely be vtamn." Thus, the lack of "I"s in the article. --Putz 07:25, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Kept. I like it. --KATIE!! 22:42, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)

32 Quote templates at Uncyclopedia:Pages_for_deletion/templates

See this subpage for a list of 25 canned quotes and a variety of variable quotes. Culling time! Please vote on that page. --Splaka 10:34, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC) P.S. Should we have a separate folder permanently for templates specifically? They have their own VFD template, and that template could link people there to 'save' their favorite quote.

As a trial balloon, I've created the template:AnyPersonQuote this morning. This template can allow writers to put in any less-common quote-person's name for the quotation and could allow writers to have a variety of quoter-names while keeping down the number of different templates. (And it would save having to copy and paste code each time.) I'm not sure if such a template already exists (perhaps it already does somewhere) and whether this template would be of interest to others. --Ogopogo 14:51, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)

I made something like that at template:Quote.Redirect one to the other.--Foo21 17:40, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)

I say we use the "any person" template. Garby 03:53, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)

I never saw, and still don't see the over-abundadnce of quote templates as a problem ... --Nerd42 14:56, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Same here --Willy on wheels! 23:33, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)

The People of Moldova

Stupid --Willy on wheels! 16:44, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)

This is totally in spirit with that delightful mess that constitutes Uncyclopedia's world-famous Romania series of articles. KEEPSIES! --DWIII 04:23, 9 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Kept because I trust DWIII. --KATIE!! 22:34, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Coprolites (Fossilized Crap)

Taking a look at Special:Ancientpages turned up an interesting web (heh) (you'll get it later) of stories that I think are ripe for the huffing.

• "Hob Hobberton's Guide to Intrinsic Budding and its effects on the Threaded Five" (complete with quotes, I should flamify it right now)
• Referenced only by Undictionary:S ("Spider drought")
• Spawned Spider Drought of 1412 (two unrelated but easily fixed references)
• In turn, the above brought us The Arthropod Armada (no references)

I'd like to KILL THEM ALL!!!1``1!! um, sorry, I mean I would like to suggest their removal as part of a healthy hygeine regimen. I don't think their author will mind, as he hasn't come to visit since April. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] 23:22, 4 Nov 2005 (UTC)

• Lol. That's nothing. Try checking out Special:Uncategorizedpages sometime if you looking for QVFD candidates. ;-) MadMax 01:48, 5 Nov 2005 (UTC)

• Baleeted. Nobody even cared enough to vote. Kinda like America. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] 18:26, 16 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Template:Correcttitle

I thought it was funny, eg [[1]], but others don't agree. What say you? Juan Kerr 10:48, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)

I think its got a lot of potential....but then I work in a related industry to Marketeering -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

Keep. I think it's incredibly hilarious.

However. If a lot of people don't understand the joke and we have to compromise it, I think if we somehow make a reference to game systems it would work better. (GameCube, GameBoy, PlayStation, XBox) Especially since Uncyclopedia's visitor profile pretty much matches gamers. (Dudes, adolescent to early twenties, it's so true.) --neoEva88 20:19, 4 Nov 2005 (UTC)

One week later, two people like it and nobody else cares. I'll put the references to this template back into those pages. Juan Kerr 12:29, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Meh. --KATIE!! 22:33, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Numpad8

2 edits, same user, one month apart, no work in the last month = Broken Pencil. -- T. (talk) 05:39, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Keep It's aabout Numpad8 for god sake what do you expect Monty Python?!?--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 00:19, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Keep and hexxadecimate yourself for vfding for such an absurd reason. --Unissakävelijä 21:52, 14 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Kept. --KATIE!! 22:31, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)

The Real Truth About the Brazilian Political Crisis of 2005

Template:Wtf It's too long for QVFD, but too pointless to keep IMHO. Or do we keep it and add an appropriate "wtf" template? Obviously, though, {{wtf}} isn't the appropriate "wtf". wtf is? -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] 20:12, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)

... (Actually it is a joke about the mindless - or is it? - concoctment of pseudofacts by mainstream brazilian media, but if you wish to delete it, feel free...) Greetings

Well, that's not a vote, technically, even if you did sign it. Man, I want to KILL (sorry), but the article is *so* long. Can anyone find a way to patch it into Brazil? Or should it just go home with the kittens? -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] 20:13, 7 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Deleted because I'm cleaning and it hasn't been merged and Bob3 is a nice guy. --KATIE!! 22:29, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Febrewery and various other fake months

Has gotten out of hand. I have taken measures to attempt to return the teh funnay to Template:Months. I suggest any months not there be merged or deleted. General Specific 15:52, 30 Oct 2005 (UTC)

• Febrewery
• Febtober
• Febutober
• Gaypril
• Janutober
• Julanuary
• Nowvember
• Smarch
• Thursday

All the above are one-liner stubs that would have been deleted long ago if not for the 23 months template.

Delete I could probably safely delete these, but I might as well leave it open for voting. --—rc (t) 04:02, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Delete --Sir AlexMW KUN PS FIYC 17:47, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Merge into one article. They're all one-liners, seems to me like the content should all be combined into some sort of list article. Like, "List of the 13 Months" or something. Alas, I am at school now, but maybe I'll do it later. --neoEva88 20:35, 1 Nov 2005 (UTC)

• Delete --Paulgb 23:48, 30 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Merge into one article' - I like that idea better. --Paulgb 20:44, 1 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Okay, so, here's what I've done so far. I created the Wildean Calendar as a sort of repository for one-liner/stub month articles. I've added most of the months of the month template, however, there are more months that need to be added. The article is in need of a lot of help. The other thing I have noticed is that the articles for actually months seem about as shitty as some of the stubs for made-up months, in some cases they're even worse. So, I propose a Month-Project similar too of Sarducci's Jesii Project. IMO the deletion discussion is over, and so I plan on starting a discussion section for the months in the Village Dump. --neoEva88 23:05, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Kept per neoEva.

Febtober

Delete. This is one of the made-up months I have been working with. The article is a one-liner stub that I don't believe is funny enough to be merged into the Wildean Calendar with the other one-liner months being put in there. --neoEva88 01:34, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Buckethead

This article says almost nothing original (try checking out the official website, Welcome To Bucketheadland, and you'll see what I mean) and furthermore the very few original bits are not very funny. The topic itself has some great potential, but it's not being used here. I would support a rewrite. --Zwabaphone 05:07, 28 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Delete If you know who busket head is this is not funny, if you dont it is only marginaly funny. Burn it to the ground! Illogicalbeats 19:29, 28 Oct 2005 (UTC)

keep, flag for a rewrite--Sarducci 16:00, 29 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Delete It's not funny, just stupid --Poofers 22:02, 27 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Re-write A guitarist with a bucket on his head certainly provides more material than this crappy article. I could re-write it, if there are no objections. — 2nd Lt. Sir David, the Weasel of Wild KUN