Uncyclopedia:Pages for deletion/archive22
From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
That one about the rabbi and the Pope playing a round of golf
- Delete I'd even say that it should be put in QVFD, but I'm not sure...
--CX 15:51, 10 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- QVFD--Rataube 01:06, 10 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Björk
*Delete - This page is Gibberish. And more - it blocks a rewrite of the page Bjork which could be something if someone gave it a hand - and two dots over the 'o' - letter.--Suresh 20:49, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)
The other languages
- Delete - Keithhackworth MUN F@H 18:30, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Zongo
- Delete - Found AFD template on the page. Redundant crap which makes no sense. --sColdWhat<Just|Say|It> 09:26, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - too many pages like this and this one is just dumb - Keithhackworth MUN F@H 18:41, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Keep - it is no more redundant than Fanta or Woof. -ANIDN MENOSCWICZ
- Delete - Bad pages don't justify leaving other bad pages in. ----OEJ 21:27, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Papa Smurf
- Merged with "The Smurfs". --Bongo 06:28, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Against: I have undone the merge because the articles need to be reconciled, not merged. Papa Smurf is a decent article in its own right that should be kept; we just need to reconcile the overlap with The Smurfs. --Sir gwax (talk)
» 
Major KUN UotM FH++ F@H CM GD NS Bur. +S 
17:04, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Pie man
Either delete or re-write, 1 sentence on a bad idea = not good.
Bzflag
- Delete Lame/ This article scores zero: the "z" part is z for "zzzzz". The article thus sucks. --Arroganto! 02:56, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- QuickVFD--Rataube 03:12, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Happy Masks
- Delete: Did not warrant a laugh from me, and I failed to laugh at it. Why? Because it serves no purpose other than spam.--Verizanni 02:50, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- I sympathise with you on this, so let's "delete"! --Arroganto! 02:58, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- QVFD worthy... I think I'll post it! --King In Yellow 14:48, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Sense
- Delete: That the article on sense makes no sense just isn't funny, it's rubbish. --Sir gwax (talk) » Major KUN UotM FH++ F@H CM GD NS Bur. +S 22:42, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Delete It leaves me utterly at a loss to defend its reason for being. Prettiestpretty 23:24, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Smite thee! Yeh, I understand the 'irony' of the article, but it just sucks. It's random, not smart. --202.63.33.118 02:46, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Johnny the Homicidal Maniac
Not funny, random, and in my opinion, pathetic. At least spell 'Delilah' right! Delete. --Arroganto! 04:06, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC) Shoot it and end its suffering. Prettiestpretty 23:25, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Delete: This topic could be done so much better. --Sir gwax (talk) » Major KUN UotM FH++ F@H CM GD NS Bur. +S 23:54, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Dlete --
S P I N N I E 06:18, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Muslim (food)
I don't get it. Delete. 
t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 00:40, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Pun on muesli / slim. Keep but it's pretty dam' weak and needs to build satiric muscle and bulk up on some high-carb chuckles. ----OEJ 03:49, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Not funny. Delete --Jakemcmahon 21:17, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Lame. Delete or move the pun to undictionary.--Suresh 21:44, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Lame ass. Delete and to Hell with undictionary. --Sir gwax' (talk) 
» 
Major KUN UotM FH++ F@H CM GD NS Bur. +S 23:55, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Is there really need to vote to delete this? --Rataube 03:17, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Server here free --59.93.34.252 14:43, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)
My Space
There is already an article at MySpace which is a lot more funnier and doesn't read as cliche as this one does. Delete -68.63.88.28 04:13, 7 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Delete - Not feeling it Jlove1982 05:45, 7 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Keep While there is already a diffrent article about my space, this onle is totaly diffrent. The style it is written in is totaly unique to its contemporary and they both offer a diffrent prespective on the subject. How many jesus pages are there? Tons, they're all about jesus, we don't go deleting them. This is no diffrent, Its My Space just a diffrent interpritation. At anyrate, I don't see why this one gets to die and the other stays. This My Space is quite well developed as well as being accurate and true to the nature of real my space pages.--Stalin 06:41, 7 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Keep - with reservations. I thought it was cute...a nice little commentary on the inanity of myspace presented more or less as a myspace entry. Could be better, could be worse. I chuckled. — — 2nd Lt. Sir David, the Weasel of Wild KUN VFH FP Fire! 14:59, 7 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Keep, but reformat. I know it's meant to be a MySpace page, but it's really irritating to read. --Trevie 15:05, 7 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Hehehe, I think that might be the point. That being said I would like to really improve the page, if anyone would like to put some time into it that would be great or has insiration for wha to change that would be good too, but deleting this artcle is not the solution.--Stalin 15:48, 7 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Keep -- The page is not at all the same as MySpace and is a good parody in its own right. Er, it has some good parodic material that needs to be tightened up. But. Somehow they should be merged: it makes no sense to have two articles with what is logically the same title.----OEJ 03:48, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)
I Have An Idea' why don't we change the name of this page to somthing like AngleFariyDust666 rather than my space and just keep the two connected in some way, make them disambiguations of each other or at least make them synonymous with each other. That and a little improvement to the article for good measure, and I think we've fixed the problem.--Stalin 16:27, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Golden Age Batman
- Delete it. Acid Ammo 03:00, 7 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Delete it it isn't sure what it is...Prettiestpretty 03:15, 7 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Implode--Rataube 03:16, 7 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Execute --Harp Heaven 14:43, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Jewish Gods
Nuke. --Rataube 02:58, 6 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Expand There's definitely some potential here. --
S P I N N I E 15:26, 6 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Expand And don't forget the golden calf. Prettiestpretty 01:48, 7 Jan 2006 (UTC)
The Ring
It doesn't seem to be serving much purpose, though it may be able to be improved rather than deleted? Either way, I think it might be easier to start from scratch, so I vote delete that son of a bitch. Shame... --biggy 01:35, 6 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Weak keep the idea of there being a hundred and nintety seven different films and translations and japanese versions was kinda funny. it's alot like something I read on Wikipedia:The Cursed Videotape. --Nerd42eMailTalkUnMetaWPediah2g2 15:28, 6 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Final Fantasy
Long, random gibberish, sex jokes (ha ha ha ANAL Fantasy!) and a section for each of the games which is obviously written by someone who loves Final Fantasy. Rewrite or kill rewrite action time! Harp Heaven 22:04, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)
I vote rewrite but just the spam of Final Fantasys below the first section. Maybe cut the number of Final Fantasies down or remove the unfunny ones.
- I read the article again, but there was nothing remotely funny I could salvage out of it. I just did a complete rewrite, revert if you don't like it :) Harp Heaven 05:57, 6 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Comment I've been trying to save the crappy article Square-Enix ... --Nerd42eMailTalkUnMetaWPediah2g2 15:31, 6 Jan 2006 (UTC)
System of a Down
Delete. All edits after 10:40, 4 Jan 2006 have reduced it to a block of text with an infobox. --Dr. Stupid 20:28, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Looking good as I vote to keep. --Unissakävelijä 00:44, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, mildly rewrite. Acid Ammo 13:23, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Keep Keithhackworth MUN F@H 13:47 6 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Wake up, and put on a little makeup. Or, keep and make it better. Somehow, someway. — — 2nd Lt. Sir David, the Weasel of Wild KUN VFH FP Fire! 15:48, 6 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Keep as is. It's been rewritten from what it was. CX 23:27, 7 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Metroid
Rewrite. This is terrible. I'm sure someone can do better.
Delete. "someone" don't work here. If an when a rewriter comes along they can re-create the article. It's horrid.Herostratus 18:20, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC) --Zyrac 23:56, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Complete rewrite Pathetic, but still an article worth having. Don't get rid of it because it sucks for now. --Poofers 02:00, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)
I shall re-write it, because I made it to the end of Metroid Prime and then couldn't beat the end boss. I have a bone to pick, and I think I can make one or two semi-funny jokes here. I re-wrote it, and I am confident it's slightly better than the "Halo sucks, Metroid is better" comedy of before. — — 2nd Lt. Sir David, the Weasel of Wild KUN VFH FP Fire! 14:54, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Keep the rewrite: It's not the best article, but now it's got enough potential to be worth keeping. --Sir gwax (talk) » Major KUN UotM FH++ F@H CM GD NS Bur. +S 16:20, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Ha ha!
As far as I can tell, a direct copy & paste of Wikipedia's article. Delete - Nonymous 17:21, 31 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- huffed: I was a direct rip off of a wikipedia article, which makes it instahuffable. Next time you come across this sort of thing, report it to QVFD with a note that it's a plagarism. --Sir gwax (talk) » Major KUN UotM FH++ F@H CM GD NS Bur. +S 17:48, 31 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- I do believe it was supposed to be a rip off of Wikipedia's article. It's called sporking, and as far as I know, changes were made. I think a more fair and just vote should be taken. KATIE!! 06:21, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Fine, but I still think it's crap that should be huffed. --Sir gwax (talk) » Major KUN UotM FH++ F@H CM GD NS Bur. +S 18:29, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)
New Trier Township High School
Kept since I read it. --Chronarion 03:24, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- KEEP This hilarious article is viewed by many to be a vanity page. It is not in fact a vanity page and pokes fun at a nationally recognized high school. The article was so well done, that a copycat article full of lies has been posted on wikipedia at: [wikipedia.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Trier_Township_High_School]--Chimp888 02:34, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- KEEP --24.13.83.102 02:41, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Mao
DELETE This page is not very funny at all and has nothing to do with Mao Zedong. Based on what we have seen at Hitler and to a certain extent Stalin, there is a lot of funny stuff that can be written about such types of people. This article, sadly is not, and should therefore be deleted so that a much better on can eventually replace it.--68.22.207.151 01:55, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Just total DELETE. --Suresh 16:07, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Suffocate on the basis of pointlessness. --Simulacrum Caputosis 18:27, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Keepsies I love that game (and the article, too!) XD --Flourentina 18:35, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Voted off the island. --Sir gwax (talk) » Major KUN UotM FH++ F@H CM GD NS Bur. +S 19:37, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)
I am your father
Yeh, I know, a good name for an eventually good future entry. But unless anyone volunteer himself to rewrite such crapy article, for now i say huff!!!--Rataube 00:31, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Delete--Chimp888 02:45, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Kill it too few words. --Simulacrum Caputosis 18:29, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Voted off the island. --Sir gwax (talk) » Major KUN UotM FH++ F@H CM GD NS Bur. +S 19:39, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Jewish neo-nazi
Destroy. --Rataube 00:00, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)
DELETE Too short and not funny at all.--68.22.207.151 01:57, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC) Slaughter it, but make it kosher.--Suresh 17:41, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Phil Anselmo
Delete. Partial spork from Wikipedia, characterised by a severe absence of funny. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 23:20, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
DELETE Not sure, but looks suspiciously like an actual wikipedia article. Not funny.--68.22.207.151 01:58, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Might as well DELETE. It's a subtle parody, and thus beyond the comprehension of idiots.
O'Reilly Factor Matrix
Move to Undictionary --Keithhackworth MUN 20:39, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
The Galactic Jewish Empire
It currently causes acute physical pain when read. Rewrite would be nice. Complete destruction would work too. --Neko 02:24, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Expunge --Simulacrum Caputosis 18:42, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Delete or move to another adress. All articles with the words galactic and empire in them
suck! --Suresh 18:47, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Bang. It makes me want to punch the writer--Rataube 19:20, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
FRAG 'EM TA ZOG!!! --King In Yellow 20:30, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
BALEETE. I tried to bring some sense to it, or at least proper capitalization, but it is hopeless and made my brain cell spasm. ----OEJ 20:39, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
POW blocks
Nuke. Acid Ammo 16:32, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Delete Prettiestpretty 17:16, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Pillage --Simulacrum Caputosis 18:38, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Delete--Rataube 19:22, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
This should have been Huffed on QVFD. But I'll vote here. --King In Yellow 20:31, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC) Delete--68.22.207.151 01:59, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Tim Hortons
QVFD'd as per User:King in Yellow--
Sir Flammable KUN 
(Na Naaaaa...)
14:40, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
I didn't put this on QVFD. But as long as we're on it, yeah Kill it. --King In Yellow 20:32, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Kill it. This article is utter nonsense. --Ogopogo 23:31, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
DELETE The writer needs to read the beginner's guide about being funny and not just stupid.--68.22.207.151 02:00, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Save the Hortons, because the article's cute. --Flourentina 18:36, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Screech
- QVFD'd as per User:King in Yellow--
Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...)
14:40, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Sucks--Rataube 19:30, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Again, not me on da QVFD. Ya got da wrong guy, copper, yah, see, yah! But burninate it anyway -- think of the children. --King In Yellow 20:33, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Chorizos
Vanity. May campaign for community allowed status thingy. Otherwise, deletedeletedelete. --KATIE!! 14:13, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Already on QVFD. Vanity or no, it deserves Huffing with extreme prejudice for being a miserable little wet fart of a page. --King In Yellow 14:19, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- I have a feeling that instahuff will inspire recreation, or I'd delete it on the spot. --KATIE!! 14:21, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Holocaust denial
This was already passed last week. No revote this fast. --Chronarion 02:05, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)
DELETE this page! It is not funny, and sadly most of the stuff on it is true. Because of the serious nature of the Holocaust Denial, a crappy article does more to offend than entertain. A much better, funnier, and more ridiculous page exists at Holocaust Denial.Please delete this page. If it cannot be deleted please consider a rewrite or merging some of the better material from this page with the other page titled HOLOCAUST DENIAL. --68.22.207.151 00:38, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy keep NTSA. How long has it been since the last VFD on this page failed? A week? Please just give it a rest. --EvilZak 04:01, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- This is the third time since it was nominated in no more than ten days. I was the one who nominated it the first time, couse i agree with 68.22.207.151. But voters alredy decided to keep it. Is there any template to warn no to keep sending this article to VFD? And another one to warn it contains true information?--Rataube 17:54, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Now there is.--Suresh 18:27, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Very nice template suresh, but where is your vote? Also, Rataube, if you previously put it up for deletion, then why now vote for keep. Consider this a recount.
Life expectancy
Almost QVFD'd but someone mustve liked it if they only stubbed it. anyway, Delete. t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 22:57, 10 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Burn this garbage. It is QVFD worthy. --King In Yellow 13:49, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
To a crisp Two sentences does not a Uncyclopedia article make... Prettiestpretty 16:27, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
DELETE--68.22.207.151 02:03, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)
DELETE Life expectancy needs an entry, but this one ain't up to it. Lets say bye to this page --195.92.40.49 18:12, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)
delete Since in commenting I'n writing something longer than the whole article. --Simulacrum Caputosis 18:31, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Best Chinese Writing
- Delete - this should be an undictionary entry --Keithhackworth MUN F@H 18:29, 10 Jan 2006 (UTC)
I'd say Delete, but anyone wh's seen this who ask "Delete what?" There's nothing freakin' there but the VFD tag! --Simulacrum Caputosis 18:44, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Moved to QVFD --Keithhackworth MUN F@H 20:08, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Eden
- Same thing that with Jude (see below). Huff.--Rataube 18:09, 10 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Burn. Twenty-some redirects and almost no text does not constitute an article. The only effort put into this garbage was linking it to countless other unrelated pages. --King In Yellow 13:54, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Rewrite There's a lot that can be done with this article (Satire, not childish gibberish) and it could out rather funny. Prettiestpretty 16:29, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Keep/rewite As Prettiestpretty above. With a little expansion could work well. Like the satirical links...made me smile anyway. --195.92.40.49 18:24, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Huff --Simulacrum Caputosis 18:40, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Jude
Yeh, I know, a good name for an eventually good future entry. But unless anyone volunteer himself to rewrite such HORRIBLE article, for now i say huff, kill, destroy, terminate!!!--Rataube 01:04, 10 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- I agree, huff to make way for something better. --Sir gwax (talk) » Major KUN UotM FH++ F@H CM GD NS Bur. +S 15:49, 10 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Me too - delete it Prettiestpretty 16:29, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Whack 'em Baby! Whack 'em good. --King In Yellow 20:37, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Rudolph Hitler
- Delete Silly stuff about made-up silly stuff. Dumb non-jokes about sodomy and Pokemon. ----OEJ 21:02, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Deletezor: It's crap. --Sir gwax (talk) » Major KUN UotM FH++ F@H CM GD NS Bur. +S 15:53, 10 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Kill. Nothing further. --King In Yellow 13:50, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Kill it another example of how slapping Hitler into an article doesn't make it any funnier.Prettiestpretty 16:25, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Delete--Rataube 00:47, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Uncyclopedia:Undictionary
KEEP Undictionary is hilarious, and must be kept.--68.22.207.151 02:06, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Delete the whole thing: This is a little unorthodox but Undictionary is crap, has always been crap, was designed as a crap repository and I'm totally serious about suggesting its destruction. --Sir gwax (talk) » Major KUN UotM FH++ F@H CM GD NS Bur. +S 05:19, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Delete an article or move it to undictionary -- basically the same thing, only the latter takes more work. --Sir Volte KUN Talk (+S NS CM Bur. VFP VFH) 05:34, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Keep but prune (see previous efforts). --Splaka 05:40, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. As other said, seems to be a good and useful trash. Besides, It does have a few good entries.--Rataube 05:45, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Pretty bold, but there's very little usefull stuff in Undictionary --Keithhackworth MUN F@H 13:02, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Kill it It's not funny at all and annoying to navigate through. --Harp Heaven 14:05, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Keep it But really make it a dictionary and just not a dump for stubs. That is - entries should be short and fun redeefinitions of ordinary words. Delete all other entries --Suresh 14:25, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, that is, don't just delete it like it's any old crappy stub. This has a lot of content by a lot of people, so it deserves a little discussion. Personally I would prefer to see all pages blanked (with history intact). That way we get a fresh new start (with some watchful and passionate management), but people can still fish entries that they care about out of the history. And of course the policy should be changed to just delete bad articles, instead of moving them to undictionary. Doug 14:36, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Keep as a repository for all the one liners that are actually funny. -- Sir Mhaille
(talk to me) 14:38, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Rewrite in the style of Ambrose Bierce's The Devil's Dictionary, complete with word classification and useage. (For those of you unfamiliar with tDD, pick up a copy -- not only is it one of the best works of satire in the English language, but you can get a copy for $5.00 or less.) --King In Yellow 14:47, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Keep -- Its another useful Uncyclopedia tool, just like UnNews and Uncyclopedia itself. To want to delete Undictionary is to want to delete Uncyclopedia. --ANIDN MENOSCWICZ 02:59, 10 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Is that even allowed? Anyway... uhhh... keep it's got alot of crap, but underneath the crap lies a beautiful orchard... smeared with crap.
t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 03:08, 10 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Rewrite to be an actual uncyclopedic dictionary that definatively defines words in an uncyclopedic manner. --Nerd42eMailTalkUnMetaWPediah2g2 03:41, 10 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. It does us no disservice, though no great credit, either. — 2nd Lt. Sir David, the Weasel of Wild KUN VFH FP Fire! 17:52, 10 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Keep It has many funny sections on it and has been edited by a lot of people. It could use some re-writes and/or deletions for some of its entries, but anybody can do that on their own.--68.22.207.151 01:07, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Keep I hate Undictionary. That's probably common knowledge. However, it has its uses. So long as it remains at 27 pages (or whatever it's at now) I can deal with it. But like Splarka said, it could certainly use some pruning. --—rc (t) 04:31, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Keep It serves a purpose, but it needs structure and formating. Besides, does it take up that much room on the server? Prettiestpretty 16:32, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Keep it. It is kinda rubbish, but it could be encouraged to be pruned and not just made a dump for crap :) --biggy 20:25, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Tales of Symphonia