Uncyclopedia:Pages for deletion/archive33

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.

Jump to: navigation, search

This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:VFD.


Contents

Undead

CHERUB Series

  • Ouch. I think this gave me cancer. --Splaka 09:33, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
Comment: User removed this VFD entry and VFD notice from page. Banned. --Splaka 09:47, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
You might want to think about a career in adult film then? Oh and kill this. --• Spang • UotF | talk • 11:37, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. I've lost track of how many times I've wanted to see the article vanish. --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 09:53, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Keep LOL, it's almost an inside joke, but REALLY funny if you get it. Leave it alone. Unsigned vote. But if it's what you say it is, it falls under the vanity policy and should be huffed right now... --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|UotM|+S 10:13, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Category:Leon Trotsky Fans

  • Delete. What is the point? --• Spang • UotF | talk • 06:54, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Keep Pretty funny, almost an inside joke but is an actualy book series he's making fun of. Perfectly fine.

Another almost inside joke? Oh, that's ok then. This vote isn't though. --• Spang • UotF | talk • 11:32, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Sick etiquete

I found this through random page... been around since September 2005 and doesn't seem to be expanding, which may be a good thing. I don't find it funny, but maybe it's just too Brutish or maybe I just have no patience for someone who can't even spellcheck their title. --Imrealized 06:34, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete. Or move it to some sort of social etiquette HowTo:. --• Spang • UotF | talk • 06:41, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Aggi

Template:SRV

This template was made by an anon ip who apparently feels that instead of nrv tagging things, we admins should fix up all 200 one-liner articles that get created per day, freeing up more time for him/her to start more articles s/he can't be bothered to finish. While the poster has a right to say this, I don't want yet another template floating out there with no real need. We already have {{noQVFD}} for pages that should be given full time for an author to come back and care. ---Rev. Isra (talk) 04:27, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

  • Useless. That's what {{fix}}, {{rewrite}}, {{expand}} etc. are for. --• Spang • UotF | talk • 04:35, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. This template could be useful. But, the user needs to ask permission before creating a template.--Jtaylor1Image:Small Egg.png 05:03, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Huff Already too many templates that do the same thing.
Comment - looking at the history, that's splaka's vote. Put your name on it, man! --• Spang • UotF | talk • 06:38, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
Make me! --Splaka 06:45, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
That's it. I'm telling. --• Spang • UotF | talk • 06:48, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Neutral I created this template and I'm fine with either keeping it or deleting it. I did not know that permission to create a template was required, otherwise I wouldn't have done it. But I think this conversation that the SRV template has brought about has raised a significant issue, which is this: is NRV just for short things? Or is it a content issue? Because, if "one liner"-ism is the problem, a tag that says "no redeeming value" doesn't seem to relate to the length, that is a content tag. If tagging a page with NRV just because it's short is the point, really some different template would be more useful than NRV.

And if NRV is used because the page is stupid in the opinion of the tagger, I'm not convinced of the value of a template whose purpose is to permit any user, without any vote for consensus, to tag a page as "stupid," which is what "no redeeming value" seems to imply. If everybody did this, I doubt any page here would be untagged, since at least one person in the world would probably find at least one of the pages here "stupid." IMHO, if page length is the issue, we need a "this article is too short" tag, not a "no redeeming value" tag. Or, if someone wants to tag something "no redeeming value," which is a content tag, they should have to get consensus first. User:RudolfRadna 15:51, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

The history of everything

I seem to have co-created a monster, and a crappy monster it is. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 15:25, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

North_War

From the same man who brought you Duel Masters, I give you... a piece of crap! --Hobelhouse 22:36, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep - While I will not be VFHing this, I see no reason to obliterate it either. This guy (?) has got a style all his own. --Imrealized 00:42, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. I think one is enough. --• Spang • UotF | talk • 06:28, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Alex Shrub

  • Delete - Dalek, this re-defines sad. An article about a minor video game character. Written straight. The horror, the horror. — 2ND LT. Sir David, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 14:45, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
  • O_o ... (long awkward pause, during which can be heard the faint grinding of miniature gears, and the subtle hiss-pop of shorting circuitry) ... Wow. You're right. Up until now, I've never been ashamed to be a gamer. Maybe I need to pay a visit to Jack Thompson, and apologize for my earlier remarks. Or maybe we just need to FUC-KING-EX-TER-MI-FUC-KING-NATE!!! this worthless shit right away! Ant-Farm Jesus! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 17:48, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. --Spang 18:04, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
  • The Guillotine is His Majesty's recommendation as to the appropriate sentencing for this defilement. --SimulacrumCaputosisTheGreat*moan* F@H MUN CM NS 19:40, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Please Delete - uh, please..? --Imrealized 05:44, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Beetles

Predacon Party

Kanye Bush

Burning Bush

Stub

If you clean it, it's best to make it not be about people with missing limbs. --TimeStopper 02:22, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Russian reversal

Nominate and DESTROY THIS FUCKING ARTICLE It's old, irrelevant, and causes n00bs to join IRC and spout an endless stream of In Soviet Russia, this and In Soviet Russia, that it's horribly annoying, and i believe the Uncyclopedia Admins would enjoy deleting less Russian reversals from articles that already contain a substantial amount of crap. >_< ANIDN MENOSCWICZ Image:Icons-flag-az.png 23:27, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

Against Keep - Doesn't need to be deleted, those n00bs just need to be banned, whether it's IRC or Uncyclopedia. --Clorox Yes, I'm American. No, I don't like George W. Bush. Please don't shoot. MUN ONS (diskussion) ☃ 23:42, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

AAAAgainst Keep - What other quotes can noobs write? --TimeStopper 00:01, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep !! This is one of the few pages that I really like. Granted, I have to decruft regularly...there's some sort of appropriate garden analogy that escapes me at the moment. Anidnmeno is out of his (or her...it's?) mind. Just because it refers to a mediocre joke from a crap comic who rapidly outlived his undeserved fifteen minutes of fame in the 80's doesn't mean we should give up our white-framed shades and skinny ties, dagnabit! Pesky kids these days with their interweb and their baggy pants...next they'll be asking us to give up our NES's, gol dern'd it! Modusoperandi 00:11, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep It's funny, and what's most important is if an article is funny to people who have never seen it before, not whether it's funny to someone who's been a member here for months. Scythe33 00:23, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - Because I'm feeling like a bastard this morning. Seriously, though, the joke isn't that good. In fact, it's terrible. Plus, it's spread around enough Uncyclopedia that killing this page would only add to its legend. In Soviet Russia, Article Voted for Deletion deletes YOU! — 2ND LT. Sir David, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 12:25, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep- being a n00b, I AM quite amused... maybe it should be seriously shortened to cut out the extra filler crap? but some parts of it were fairly clever methinks --Ishiki 15:23, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
  • I think that it's far too late to just delete this "article" -- it's insinuated itself into too many other pages. I do, however think, we need to CUT CON-TENT!!! from it, as it's turned into a nightmare, like all those brain-dead Chuck Norris "facts." --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 18:26, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep, but cut down. In Soviet Russia, article deletes YOU!!. Because it had to be done. --Spang 19:05, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, Should definatively be kept, Soviet Reversal jokes were pretty popular, and some of those in that list were nice. It just needs to be way cleaned up. Dandin1 23:42, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

Kibology

  • "to the Guillotine!" shouts His Royal Majesty, "for the crime containing mostly outside links, little content, and overusing the term "smart-ass" (6 occurences in a very short article)" --SimulacrumCaputosisTheGreat*moan* F@H MUN CM NS 20:23, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - This is one of the troubling occurences at Uncyclopedia where not only does the article need to be killed, but the author(s) need to be dragged into the street and beaten with riot sticks. Damned smart-asses. — 2ND LT. Sir David, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 12:31, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
  • EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! Holy jumped-up Jesus on a motorized candy cane. Shit like this really chaps my hovering metal ass. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 14:29, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. In Soviet Russia, article deletes YOU!!. Sorry, had to be done. --Spang 18:11, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

Necromancers

I've Gone Caliente Loco

American Genocide

  • Delete. -Seems to only insult in a non-funny manner? --Ishiki 19:32, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
  • The Guillotine is His Majesty's recommendation as to the appropriate sentencing for this defilement. It's first line is a fact. --SimulacrumCaputosisTheGreat*moan* F@H MUN CM NS 02:23, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Baleet - Not Uncyclopedia material. --Trevie 15:37, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete -Being American military makes me like what is said. However It's just not funny.--24.23.205.140 05:07, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - FoxNews is more entertaining than this slop (and less vitriolic which is hard to comprehend). --Imrealized 06:15, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Obidike Eze

  • Delete - He's a medical student in London from Nigeria. How do I know this? Because his life story can be found on Google. And so too can it be found here at Uncyclopedia. Alas, in either realm, it isn't funny in the least. If anyone votes to keep or rewrite this, I will know immediately that you are Obidike Eze or one of his friends. — 2ND LT. Sir David, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 18:43, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Yarr, Kill tha' article. Though I do fancy da eatin' of bones... --Cap'n SimzorzAr, Matey!02:28, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Hmm... smells like a clear-cut case of vanity to me. EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 14:38, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete! --Spang 17:58, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

Artem

Day-Wizzle

  • Huff ... Vanity? --Splaka 06:04, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Huff ... Shit. --Spang 07:31, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
  • NRV ... Not Vanity, but crap.--Jtaylor1Image:Small Egg.png 07:58, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete.--Winston 14:30, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Torpedo in surround sound (or at least stereo). --Captain Caputosis····hail02:30, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
  • EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! Ugh 2: Electric Boogaloo.

Decepticon Party

  • Delete Article about something from a lame TV show that about 5 people from our galaxy actually understand. Scythe33 23:01, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep and rewrite. I am saddened that I am one of the 5 remaining beings that believes this idea might have some value.--Winston 14:37, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Maul - The idea does have value, just not this shit execution. I kept expecting a Chuck Norris reference, but was sadly let down. C'mon, Chucksters, represent! — 2ND LT. Sir David, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 15:39, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
  • weak keep and rewrite. It's not quite bad enough to huff. --neko 19:39, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
  • "to the Guillotine!" shouts His Royal Majesty, "for the crime of redunda-redunda-redundancy" --SimulacrumCaputosisTheGreat*moan* F@H MUN CM NS 02:20, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
  • AAAAgainst deletion. If you delete this you will have to also delete the "Predacon Party." --TimeStopper 00:04, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
Why should that stop anything? Scythe33 00:20, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

The droids you're looking for

  • Delete. A rather poor Star Wars stub present since October of last year, with no signs of convalescing.--Winston 17:13, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Smashy. User:Hinoa4/sigVFD 17:43, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. This is not the article you're looking for. --Spang 19:31, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Fire Photons Torpedos at this intergalactic threat! I wish but could say something else, but I really can't. --Captain Caputosis····hail19:46, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
  • QVFD. - This is really Jedi vandalism/crap.--Jtaylor1Image:Small Egg.png 02:47, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
  • I'm the Droid you're looking for. And I say EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 14:19, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

Peach

  • Delete. I have nothing against vanity pages, providing they meet one singular criterion: Is It Funny. In this case... I'm forced to say... No. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 16:30, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete.--Winston 16:43, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Have it be moved to the userpage, if any, before it is mercilessly smashied. User:Hinoa4/sigVFD 16:47, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete it, for the good of humanity. --Spang 19:07, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
  • transport it to User:Flameviper/Peach --Captain Caputosis····hail19:48, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Move to userpage - Now excuse me, I'm going to retch. — 2ND LT. Sir David, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 15:53, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
  • This nit keeps recreating these vanity pages (Haska, for example.) They keep getting huffed. TRANS-PORT it to his userpage, and hopefully he'll finally get the cunting message. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 14:34, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Vanity pages about people are bad enough, vanity pages that people make about their pets are worse. Modusoperandi 10:21, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Raffles Institution Pot-bellied Bastards

Comment - That's a new one, Dalek. XD Oh, yeah, please maul this shitty article, too. — 2ND LT. Sir David, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 15:43, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Wow, I think this was actually written by someone in a prison. Too bad it's not funny. --Iritscen 16:32, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete.--Winston 16:44, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
  • SMASHY! User:Hinoa4/sigVFD 16:48, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Kill it dead. What is it about this website that makes people think that just anyone create an article? Fools. --Spang 19:01, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Either Guillotine this abominaton, or else QVFD it at once! --SimulacrumCaputosisTheGreat*moan* F@H MUN CM NS 19:55, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

Don Fraga

  • Found this one by looking at the history for Sherudo Garo. It's part of the ancient HUFFED Sercian empire. The author has refused to respond to numerous requests to alter/move to namespace these articles, which are based on an (unfunny) fictional universe. The author was banned months ago for similar offenses. (Logs can be checked... I dunno how! :))I say we EX-TER-MI-NATE all these pages once and for all! What say you? --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 15:57, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
  • You know what I say? I say...MAUL. Rawr. — 2ND LT. Sir David, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 16:02, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
  • I say die die die!. Any pages even similar to this should also be summarily executed. --Spang 17:31, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Wow. That's quite the impressively ugly block of unfunny, easily DELETEable text. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 20:47, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete--Rataube 23:59, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

Galicia

Raffles Institution

  • Huff. In joke? Crap? I think I got cancer just editing it to put in the vanity3 template. --Splaka 10:41, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete unless the author ever bothers to come back and look and fix it. Could be made permissible vanity, but no-one else will care - David Gerard 10:43, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
  • EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! Sorry, but I can't think that (any) vanity would ever be allowable -- that's just me, though. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 14:23, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete.--Winston 15:17, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Kill the article, then kill the author. Good god. --Spang 17:23, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Quotewhoring? Check. Abuse of the horizontal line? Check. Utter example of lameness? Check. Delete? Check. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 20:55, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete--Rataube 00:07, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Kill and skullfuck this is awful, real awful. The mutually linked Republic of Lee Kingdom deserves a skullfucking too.--Count of Monkey Crisco 03:30, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Smashy. It's vanity. Nobody cares. User:Hinoa4/sigVFD 16:55, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Done I redirected it to another article. slightly better taste, I hope. I apologise on behalf for my school's juniors so that we can teach them to write better lame articles.--202.156.6.75 07:41, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

The flying whale

  • Delete. It's not funny, and worse, he dares mock Oscar's poetry! Just no. --Spang 06:20, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete.--Winston 15:20, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
  • D'leat That sorta sucks--Count of Monkey Crisco 16:11, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Sink--Rataube 21:09, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

*keep it Well sorry if it appears not that funny, I made it as an inside joke between some friends of mine. And the oscar wilde thing fit the website, it is dicribing the whale from the hitchhikers guide to the galaxy.

  • Let it be It's pretty damn funny. Definately better than a lot of the other stuff I've read on here. Silly rabbit, unsigned votes don't count. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 14:40, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete or rewrite - Feels like there's only one joke. --Trevie 15:19, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Smashy. Oscar Wilde > everything > the author of this article. User:Hinoa4/sigVFD 16:56, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
  • I know what the author is referring to, but still, this is sub-standard. Plus, I hate lowercase titles. EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 18:39, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

*Leave it Hilarious We're still getting unsigned votes on this one!? Begone! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 14:31, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

UnNews:American President Dies

Sonnet

  • Delete- Poetry crap.--Jtaylor1Image:Small Egg.png 13:36, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - Excellent material for Encyclopædia Dramatica! --Naughtius Maximus F@H Woof! MeowMUN 21:12, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Poetry humour can be good fun, but we can't have an article if it's just one poem. --Spang 01:26, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
  • EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! Balls: the Sequel! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 14:40, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
  • NRV.--Winston 15:28, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
  • weak keep It's not bad and would serve as a great opener for a longer sonnet aricle.--Count of Monkey Crisco 16:09, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. For Petrarca's sake!!--Rataube 21:11, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Amusing. --Trevie 15:26, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
  • It's one of those articles that are written in the style of their name. This article on sonnets is written as a sonnet. However, there's only one sonnet so far, so either add more or may the hammer of smashy be upon you. User:Hinoa4/sigVFD 16:51, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - I'm torn. As far as I know, this is a real, live sonnet, and therefore justifies itself with its light, prancibald humor. However, an Uncyclopedia article should delve into the heart of the matter, and it's not really cutting it. But the positives (cute) outweigh the negatives (short), or maybe I'm just tired of reading articles about how stupid the security guards at your fucking elitist private school are. Boo-fucking-hoo. —