Uncyclopedia:Pages for deletion/archive36

• Huff this shit. --Sir Tripod2282 cun vfp talk Active ~17:25, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
• Oprah, ninjas, hitler zombies in the first paragraph. Kill it.--InfiniteMonkey 01:24, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
• Off with it's Head! This article makes me want to cry.TD ^{Complain here} MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 04:28, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
• Burn. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 07:42, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

• Abolish this Travesty User:TD TD ^{Complain here} MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 03:44, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
• Demolish ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 07:34, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
• Not coherent, not funny. Delete.--InfiniteMonkey 01:25, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

• It needs something... Life Support Maybe? Meh, pull the Plug, I say! User:TD TD ^{Complain here} MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 03:44, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

• Smells like vanity (ewwwwww!). --DW ^III 00:13, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
• Random humor is not funny. --Sbluen 02:19, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
• Kill User:TD03:20, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
• BURN! ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 07:34, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
• Murder. --DeathByPie 00:46, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
• delete.--InfiniteMonkey 01:26, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

• Sometimes, the initial 3 seconds of an article will tell you how bad things are. This was one of those times. User:TD03:20, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

• Demolish this piece of crap, we already have this article.... -- SonicChao ^Babbel!_Contribs 11:13, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
• 6x damage it to hell. The world will be a better place without it. --BLAPS priest #1 10:40, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
• Crap. Crappity crap crap crap. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 19:47, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
• Word play is not funny. --Sbluen 00:11, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
• Deserves Death more than Paris Hilton. Just simply Disgusting. User:TD 03:14, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
• Die.--Rataube 20:55, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

• ~CaputosistheHorrible13:24, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• Demolish. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 15:12, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• Trash & burn. --DW ^III 19:02, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• Grind into Dog food, then Burn User:TD 03:22, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete* Or move to: Santa clause's existence in full

• The author can't spell "Minnesota". Rather than correcting it, I think we're best served by simply throwing away the attempt. User:TD 03:22, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

• ~CaputosistheHorrible13:19, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• This article has way too many Chuck Norris references.--Sbluen 15:01, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• Burn it. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 15:11, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• Baleet. Grotesque, and Poorly written.TD ^{Complain here} MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here)

• Permissible Vanity ~CaputosistheHorrible15:34, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• It's not a GOOD article... but I've heard of Stuyvesant, so at least it's notable. --Hobelhouse 23:08, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Not bad writing but VANITY.----OEJ 03:51, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

• Isn't it time to clarify the existence of a Permissible vanity rule in this pages header? -- Swami A. Suresh 09:25, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

• Permissible Vanity ~CaputosistheHorrible15:34, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Vanity. Die. The purge is well underway, I see.----OEJ 03:48, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

• Permissible Vanity ~CaputosistheHorrible15:33, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Yes, another vanititious chancre.----OEJ 03:40, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

• Permissible Vanity ~CaputosistheHorrible15:35, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

What, more vanity?----OEJ 03:38, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Does not appear to be vanity. See its en.wp entry. ---Rev. Isra (talk) 06:09, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Appears to be devoid of any vanity, and since I am from the same state, many of the jokes are funny to me, as I suspect they would be to many people in the upper mid-west. ---Rev. Isra (talk) 05:54, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

• Permissible Vanity ~CaputosistheHorrible15:36, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep TD ^{Complain here} MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 03:17, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, yeah, yeah. Go away.----OEJ 03:33, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

1. Made me laugh, and I've been pretty damn heartless with Uncyclopedia articles in the past, so that's an accomplishment. TD ^{Complain here} MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 03:17, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

• Apparently Real. Permissible Vanity ~CaputosistheHorrible15:36, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• Quite well known in the UK I believe. And follows all the vanity rules. • Spang • UotF | talk • 15:51, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

• Utter cruftly garbage.----OEJ 03:30, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• I studied at UCL and I can confirm that the article is crap. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 06:48, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

• Permissible Vanity ~CaputosistheHorrible15:32, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Vanity school page.----OEJ 03:29, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

• I found it a funny page regardless, one that seems more focused on mocking the liberal basis of most college institutions more than anything. Maybe keep while just removing a few obvious vanity sections?Secondwhiteline 05:02, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• This is not vanity. Period. Again, this is a well-known institution in the US, and the material is appropriate for a satire of it. A good rule of thumb here is that if a printed encyclopedia would have an article on it, it is never vanity merely because of its subject. ---Rev. Isra (talk) 06:05, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• Permissible Vanity ~CaputosistheHorrible15:32, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• The page isn't that bad, isn't vanity if it's well known. • Spang • UotF | talk • 15:42, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

• Vanity school page...OK, it's a long one but burn them all.----OEJ 03:27, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Not a terribly good page, but this is a college that a real encyclopedia would have to have a page on and there is some material that could be used by future authors. ---Rev. Isra (talk) 05:58, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

• Permissible Vanity ~CaputosistheHorrible15:31, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• Permissible, but definitely needs a rewrite/expansion. • Spang • UotF | talk • 15:46, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• I found it sort of funny, but that's probably only because I'm going there next year. --Spin 16:27, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Vanity school page. ----OEJ 03:25, 30 May 2006

• Permissible Vanity ~CaputosistheHorrible15:31, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• Ok, but needs expansion and tidying. • Spang • UotF | talk • 15:48, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

• Vanity school page. (Hope I'm using the new page code rite.) (Fuck, I was not.) ----OEJ 03:23, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Ok, I admit I haven't heard of this college, but there is nothing here that constitutes vanity. It is short, but actually has humor value. ---Rev. Isra (talk) 06:01, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

• but only for it's discussion page. --Usewho'sname? 17:38, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• Because I don't see the harm in it. --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ign^STFU F@H|NS|+S 20:44, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Then i should go make an article about famous Menoscwiczs... --ANIDN MENOSCWICZ 01:11, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• Doesn't appear to be any threat. ~CaputosistheHorrible15:38, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

• Not because i don't like User:MoneySign, its that the article sucks. --ANIDN MENOSCWICZ 03:08, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• I agree. Smash into little pieces and recycle. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 07:03, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• Yeah, the article does pretty much suck. --Spin 16:25, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

• If voted off the island, please move to a sub-user page of mine. --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ign^STFU F@H|CM|+S 20:44, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • I agree. --ANIDN MENOSCWICZ 01:10, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• If it's a question of Vanity.. you could always just move it to Money Sign.   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 05:22, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

• I believe it to be vanity. ---Rev. Isra (talk) 00:30, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• Demolish. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 07:03, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• NOT Permissible Vanity ~CaputosistheHorrible15:40, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• Shit. --Spin 16:23, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

*Gay Gay Gay. Dicks Dicks Dicks. Fag Fag Fag. ---Rev. Isra (talk) 20:04, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

• Bad formatting. --Sbluen 01:01, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• Detonate. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 07:04, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

• Nuked by Nytrospawn. ~CaputosistheHorrible15:41, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

• It wasn't that bad. If it got a picture it would be a lot better, but I confess I never figured out how to do that.--Woody 01:54, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

• The terrorists won. Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 19:21, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• Burn. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 07:00, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• Yep. --Spin 16:21, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

KEEP! i wanna nom this for vfh. - jack mort | cun | f@h | talk - 19:35, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

• Very messed-up page--123Fat123 16:28, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• Burn. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 16:33, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• Burn Totally --Usewho'sname? 17:42, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• Yeah... --Spin 16:20, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

• It passed the "I can actually read all the way through it" test with flying colors. It sucks, but it has originality and charm. --Spin 16:19, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

• Bad, short, crap, too old to NRV. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 10:23, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• this article could've been good if it wasn't so bad. someone rewrite the idea good, add something about the timeline, like when the cavemen die other soldiers disapear cos they were never born anymore. - jack mort | cun | f@h | talk - 14:28, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• Lacks proper grammor and is not funny.--123Fat123 16:19, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

• Very funny, and I think it should be kept. SonicChao 20:37, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

• Not funny and too old for NRV. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 10:11, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

• Deserves to be wacked into non existance.--Usewho'sname? 10:18, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• very kill. - jack mort | cun | f@h | talk - 14:24, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

• Meh...needs work... --PiOfFive 02:59, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete page, ban everyone who edited or even looked at it. Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 23:38, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• Rape the users involved, pillage everything involved, and burn the article to oblivion. ~CaputosistheHorrible15:48, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• No Comment. --Spin 16:14, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

VFDing this as there seems to be a dispute (22 reverts today or so). NOTE: Please do not close this VFD until tuesday unless there is a clear consensus, as the two parties involved are banned for 24 hours. --Splaka 05:16, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

• again just move it to his userpage where it belongs - jack mort | cun | f@h | talk - 14:14, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

• Gobshite edit. -- Swami A. Suresh 03:02, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• Demolish. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 07:45, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• wtf is it? - jack mort | cun | f@h | talk - 14:06, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• Huff Tomorrow ~CaputosistheHorrible15:44, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

• Submitter is candidate for Gobshite of the month award for May. This page should stay until june 1:st to simplify voting process. -- Swami A. Suresh 03:02, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

• i don't really want to keep it, i just feel bad voting to destroy all those pages of words - jack mort | cun | f@h | talk - 13:51, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• I'm on the same line. I do not want to delete bad pages. I want to delete catastrophes. -- Swami A. Suresh 16:36, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• not infectious. ~CaputosistheHorrible15:45, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

• Anon IP has proved beyond a doubt that lots of time != a quality article. Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 13:38, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
• Destroy!™ ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 07:41, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• I made a valiant effort to read it, and failed. --Spin 16:12, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

• Short, rubbish, too old to NRV. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 10:03, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• What a waste of 30 seconds of my life that was.Still cheered me up, at least i'm not the unfunniest article writer here.--Usewho'sname? 10:22, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• kill. - jack mort | cun | f@h | talk - 14:20, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

• Short and stubby, too old to NRV. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 09:58, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• huff it, eh?--Usewho'sname? 10:23, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• make it be gone. - jack mort | cun | f@h | talk - 14:17, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

• Smells like vanity --Splaka 05:16, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• Burn. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 07:45, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• Then burn it some more.--Usewho'sname? 10:25, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

• instead of deleting it just move it straight to his userpage, cos that's what it is really. - jack mort | cun | f@h | talk - 14:09, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

• 1) not funny 2) partially factual 3) short 4) old 5) actual picture of the band. DELETE IT. --ZB 15:51, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• 6) bad formatting 7) many red links. --Sbluen 04:15, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• 8) total crap. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 07:44, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• 9) someone please use the farming technique of SLASH AND BURN on this--Usewho'sname? 10:31, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• kill. - jack mort | cun | f@h | talk - 14:05, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

• Superceded by Uncyclopedia:Department of Fun/Unstory. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 15:50, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• Merge into Uncyclopedia:Departure of Fun/Unstory. --Sbluen 22:22, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

• Pointless and contentless. ---Rev. Isra (talk) 21:12, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
• Agreed Modusoperandi 02:37, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• It's classic, but what was once classic is now QVFD-quality. Rising standards, you know. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 13:30, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• March it to the gulag --ZB 15:21, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• Tear it to shreads and recycle the bytes into something good. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 07:43, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• huff. - jack mort | cun | f@h | talk - 14:00, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

• Aweful stuff. To old for a QVFD. --ZB 20:24, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
• Burn. And nothing is too old for QVFD. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 07:42, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• huff. - jack mort | cun | f@h | talk - 13:58, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

• Terribly old, one edit, huffinate it.-- Sir Severian (