Uncyclopedia:Pages for deletion/archive42

• Delete Do I really need to say anything? Just go to it. Destroy. --Hhamdy283 06:32, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Sucks. -- Premier Tom Mayfair 07:07, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
• Irradiate with that uranium. --Sbluen 07:27, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, and why do we have to bolden the word "delete" or similar if it's obvious as per the section we're voting in? ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 07:51, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, boring, stupid. Vembloud 08:38, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
• Crud -- Hindleyite 14:29, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Utter rubbish. Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S]  MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 18:15, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, although "saxophone" is a good pun. --  !!! ??? 21:58, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Just to prove I can write that word. -- Swami A. Suresh 22:42, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

• Keep This is substandard, but not VFD material. It can be improved and I think I can be the one to do that. Mr. Briggs Inc. 22:25, 4 September 2006 (UTC) YES! IT'S ME! Eh?
• Keep as long as someone's going to work on it. --  !!! ??? 22:27, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep the picture...-- Swami A. Suresh 22:39, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Sucks. Not funny, yadda yadda yadda. Usual crap. Destroy it until it's dead. --Hhamdy283 00:58, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S]  MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 01:25, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. A completely random link to Google under the name "The Almighty Oracle"? The picture's mildly clever, though. --  !!! ??? 01:45, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Sucks. -- Premier Tom Mayfair 07:07, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
• Iyhh... see ^. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 07:49, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Something new could be made out of this picture of the fallen tower. Vembloud 08:41, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
• Looks promising with the pic and is pretty well formatted... but it sucks. Randomness abounds -- Hindleyite 14:31, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

I'm going to rewrite this article, but I'll need some help, what about that picture Vembloud? Mr. Briggs Inc. 10:38, 5 September 2006 (UTC) Eh?

• Delete With great, great, great shame, I must admit that I am the majority contributor to this article. This is really stupid, and it's haunting me. Please, end this article while I end my shame and commit seppuku. --Hhamdy283 23:18, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. It's not that terrible, but it needs work, and I'm guessing from the above that it's not going to get any. --  !!! ??? 23:26, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
• Baleet. This is awful. Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S]  MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 01:24, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete I feel like I should be offended, but I'm not.. -- Premier Tom Mayfair 07:07, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete should've been NRV'd. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 07:48, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Vembloud 08:43, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
• Yep. -- Imrealized ...huh? 13:01, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

• I stumbled across this, and it was worse. This is an improvement, as amazing of a concept that is. The concept is simply too stupid to improve. --Hhamdy283 07:54, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
• It's gone -- Hindleyite 13:05, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Stupid title, stupid article, just stupid. It could've been better, it was already NRV'ed a while ago and was never improved. It should've been huffed then. Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S]  MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 00:57, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Do it now, and get a free iPod! --Hhamdy283 01:22, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
• Making a parody of a satire must be tough, if this is the best they can do.--Sir Modusoperandi 02:09, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
• Iyhh... (that's "Eughhh" spelt in... erm... Martian? Perhaps?) that's bad. And that's just the title I'm talking about. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 08:06, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Whoa, this was deleted? After not even a day of being at VFD? Crazy. Anyway, just wanted to go on record and say that I thought the article title alone was hysterical. The article had a few good bits (admittedly not many) but I don't think it warranted deleting. Would some kind admin wanna throw it on a subpage for me so's I can fix it up? Please? -- Imrealized ...huh? 12:58, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

• I'd have deleted it on sight. But it's now at User:Imrealized/Strangelove if you really think you can make it better. Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 14:35, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Thanks... I'll begin work on it as soon as the swelling goes down. And yes, that is a quadruple entendre, but I'm mainly talking about the ocean, you pervs. -- Imrealized ...huh? 03:17, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, not funny. -- SonicChao ^Babbel!_Contribs 13:07, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
• Not funny, delete. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 13:42, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Now that's a lot of showt marks!!! ( I also spell rong)
• Destroy. Lame. Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S]  MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 18:21, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 20:09, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete ......... -- Premier Tom Mayfair 20:15, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete End it. Just, end it. --Hhamdy283 01:20, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Way too short and not funny. -- Shade 6:44 September 5, 2006 (UTC)

• Destroy It's blank for crap's sake. -- Shade 6:50, September 5 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Apparently this survived an NRV tag somehow, so I'm putting it here. I found it whilst hunting down "...approves" templates... Yuck.  c • > • cunwapquc?01:01, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete: Uck. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 06:35, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete this, because it's too stupid even to qualify as slandanity. --  !!! ??? 07:39, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete This is what happens when we let 13 year olds use the internet. Vanity article, or a parallel to himself. --Hhamdy283 17:41, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
• Put it to sleep. -- Hindleyite 18:29, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
• Another boring page. --Sbluen 21:32, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
• Pages that use external links as their punchline make me sad.--Sir Modusoperandi 23:18, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Looks like a personal problem.----OEJ 23:56, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete!. This article is completely stupid. It's not funny, and its completely incoherent. It's not stupid-funny, it's just stupid and immature.--hhamdy283 22:53 29 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. I don't know, I found it perfectly coherent. The formatting is simple, the English is fine. I had no problem finding the jokes, understanding them completely, and realizing that they were not funny. --Falcotron 23:42, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
• Agreed, not very funny. Better than some of the crap on here, but still. Also, too short. -- Hindleyite 18:52, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
• I too agree, also. It's tough to make the Holocaust funny.--Sir Modusoperandi 23:16, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

• I just thought it was incoherent because there isn't a clear idea or flow. Alot of articles are like that, but this is unbearable in such a regard. And to agree with Falcotron, it is not funny.--hhamdy283 23:44, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

• Huff Away: It's horrible. They try to be funny by being stupid later down the page, with the 'we must have bad grammar.. so hre geos lol..' joke, and it isn't funny. --Lassaris 10:21, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. One-eyed Jack, I don't think the author was really trying to be stupid-funny; I think he was actually trying to be just stupid: to literally write the worst page ever. I'm not sure he succeeded (I mean, there's not even any slanderous vandalism), but it's certainly bad enough to be deleted. --Falcotron 19:31, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete: Just Godawful. It's terrible. It's not funny, and it's completely idiotic. Absolutely deserves to be huffed. --hhamdy283 22:54, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
• Worst meta-humor ever. --Sbluen 05:28, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete: A disaster in meta-humor! So obvious, so blunt, you'll wonder why nobody else created this article! Then you'll realize everyone else had some clue what meta-humor is! --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 06:31, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
• Just kill it. -- Hindleyite 18:50, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

• Neutral. Boring article. Copied section should be about 3 sentences, not 30, for one thing. And the article is go-nowhere shallow.----OEJ 15:29, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

• Terminate. Incoherent beyond repair. --Admiral06 03:54, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

• Nevermind, Already Huffed. --Admiral06 04:34, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

• Destroy. --Major Sir Zombiebaron GUN • WotM • UotM • PotM • AotM • EGAEDM • UPotM • MAFE • ZotM • IotM • VotM • UGotM (shout) 23:40, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• Kill the Fucker Kill it good. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 00:38, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
• Fuck it up. --Falcotron 05:07, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Started off good but it was too fucking short.--Lassaris 12:31, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
• Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 12:33, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete.----OEJ 15:22, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

F*^$ing executed. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 16:59, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

• Mime Mame. I found this through a template. It is utter crap. --Major Sir Zombiebaron GUN • WotM • UotM • PotM • AotM • EGAEDM • UPotM • MAFE • ZotM • IotM • VotM • UGotM (shout) 22:56, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete this; I was just about to VFD it myself. Good find. -- [SIR] e|m|c ^[talk] 00:30, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
• D-Stroy That is all. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 00:37, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. He spent 4 months improving it, but then seems to have given up. --Falcotron 05:09, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
• Huff this mother. Same story; not funny, stupid, immature. Huff away. --hhamdy283 22:55, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
• Eradicate. Immature, 'leet'. Enough said. -- Hindleyite 18:55, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

• Keep Ouroboros pwns you! So you can't delete him! --Parinoid 03:25, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep It is so over-the-top it makes the top look very small and far away. The author is either a compleat idoit or a sly dog.----OEJ 04:04, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep I don't mind it. --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 08:31, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep because it's by far DiZ's finest work. -- [SIR] e|m|c ^[talk] 19:41, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep-Because a.) Ouroboros pwns you b.) emc is right, I think...and c.) I haven't spammed it in ages...--Señor DiZtheGreat  CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 20:22, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. I love this kind of subtle, understated, dry wit that writes Pronoun in lowercase!! --Falcotron 05:15, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

• Ouroboros makes me very sad and confused. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 00:19, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• DELETE. Please, make it go away. Not funny, and DiZ whores it on IRC too much. Also makes my eyes bleed. --SarinZero (blabber ) 00:21, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• Ouroboros gets pwnt.--Sbluen 00:28, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• Kill utter incoherency, please. -- Sir C  Holla | CUN 03:33, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Ridiculous. It should have been written better, or better yet, not written at all. --Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S]  MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 03:52, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• Destroy the symbol of Torment. Redundancy is only funny when the article's name is Redundancy. --EvilZak 06:09, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• PILLAGE. It sucks and is crowded with stupid images and templates. --Major Sir Zombiebaron GUN • WotM • UotM • PotM • AotM • EGAEDM • UPotM • MAFE • ZotM • IotM • VotM • UGotM (shout) 22:57, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• Destroy it until it is dead. Makes no sense. Please, end the children's suffering and delete this motherfucker. --hhamdy283 22:55, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

• My personal take is that Ouroboros uses l337 in a kind of Madison-Avenue + Orwellian newspeak. If I took the ardickle at face value -- as a kid-l33t paean to a way dank mythological thingie -- then I probably would vote to baleete. However, my personal take may be all in my head (along with the toilet plunger, which I have been trying to find for several weeks...)----OEJ 15:32, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• Just as a note, you can put this in your userspace and keep it there. As an article, it serves no purpose though. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 23:36, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete because it's a horrible parody of the Wikipedia article (Enslaved (band)). -- [SIR] e|m|c ^[talk] 19:45, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. It's badly written, ugly, and completely without comedic merit, as well as being a horrible parody. --OpenFaceSurgery 21:40, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Very boring. --Sbluen 00:23, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. ----OEJ 04:07, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. You could write a funny parody of masonic conspiracy theories; try again. --Falcotron 05:03, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Not much there, I'm afraid.  c • > • cunwapquc? 01:06, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

• Y'all can delete if it you think it sux that bad, but I must correct the first comment above: It has absolutely NOTHING to do with "Enslaved (band)" article. This is the first I've heard of that article. The article in question, re: "the Brickmasons" is merely a spin-off stub from the Montana article, and the concept is a parodic conflation of conspiracy theories about the ["Free and Accepted"] Masons and "the Freemen," the latter group having caused a stand-off with the FBI in Eastern Montana some years ago.

• BURN. Apparent vanity (no entry on WP, no google hits), and author keeps removing maintainence tags. -- Sir C  Holla | CUN 18:43, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
• Really stupid; doesnt make any sense.--Redribbbon 19:03, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Looks like a private joke, poorly done.----OEJ 19:31, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. I don't understand how this is supposed to be funny. --OpenFaceSurgery 21:42, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. It's a shame that someone put so much effort into this article about some guy down the hall that he doesn't like. --Falcotron 05:02, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Executed. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 16:59, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

• This page sucks, it is a page created by some IP who spends way too much time gaming. Admiral06 05:14, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete: This looks better served by QVFD. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 05:56, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
• 'Delete. Kill it via QVFD or any other way possible.----OEJ 19:26, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. I could be mistaken, but it looks like a personal attack on someone, or a rant by some idiot who doesn't know that Uncyclopedia is not his or her personal forum. --OpenFaceSurgery 21:44, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Ugly, crap, unfunny. --SarinZero (blabber ) 00:17, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. I don't like to vote against things I don't get, but I don't want to get this one. --Falcotron 04:55, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

• Sorry for that, I'm not entirely used to the Uncyclopedian System yet. --Admiral06 06:43, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

• You were in the right ballpark, at least. A lot closer than a lot of people get. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 23:31, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

• This is hilarious, but it needs to be expanded (and grammar doctored with better word choice). Mr. Briggs Inc. 22:11, 27 August 2006 (UTC) Eh?

• Recently rewritten, but both the rewrite and the original suck. • Spang • UotF | talk • 02:39, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
• Yes, it's bad.--Sir Modusoperandi 04:12, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Awful offal.----OEJ 19:28, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Ye gods, that's terrible. --OpenFaceSurgery 21:43, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete: Wow. That's horrifying. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 23:29, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Grammar like this makes my eyes bleed. --SarinZero (blabber ) 00:18, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Yes, if it were completely rewritten as a different article, it could be really funny. --Falcotron 04:54, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

• Not at all funny, plus it doesn't really fit in with anything else. Utter nonsense. --OpenFaceSurgery 01:28, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete because it's ugly and stupid. -- [SIR] e|m|c ^[talk] 01:37, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Or, better, revert to the one-line vandalized version, which was funnier than this, and then delete that. --Falcotron 03:15, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. It sounds like a blaxploitation film. There's a page there...hmmmm. My nimble fingers, sadly, are currently occupied. Maybe later...--Sir Modusoperandi 19:47, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

• Keep the rewrite. Sure, it could be improved, but what can't? It's funny already. I like the TCN logo. --Falcotron 06:41, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep the rewrite. Slaughter the original. --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 21:13, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

• This isn't funny, even outside the lists. It is too random to understand. --Sbluen 03:58, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
• This article violates and desecrates, but doesn't really penetrate. Fuck it like an animal. -- Imrealized ...huh? 05:42, 24 August 2006
• Die. -- Sir C  Holla | CUN 06:28, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

(UTC)

• I recently wrote Uncyclopedia:Writing lists because of too much crap like this. --EvilZak 07:23, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
• It's an intro followed by a list, followed by a list, followed by a list, followed by a list.--Sir Modusoperandi 08:10, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
• This is the first day of its last days. EX-TER-MI-NATE. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 13:02, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
• I refuse to quote ancient NIN songs, but otherwise, I agree. Someone made this article up to hurt himself. There is no funny joke, there is only lists. I mean, it becomes less defined as lines go by, fades away, you might say it loses focus. Ack, sorry... <s>OnlyKill --Falcotron 21:37, 24 August 2006 (UTC)</s>

• KILL! Vanity crap about users on some website, edited by all IPs, who keep removing maintainence tags. -- Sir C  Holla | CUN 01:24, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

• This needs to be saved and featured or something, this is rather funny.-- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 00:13, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
• Feature It I thought it was really funny.--User:Tom mayfair/Sig 13:23, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and immediately export to VFH. -- SonicChao ^Babbel!