Uncyclopedia:Pages for deletion/archive99

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.

Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

My Chemical Romance (band)

Keep
Delete
Comments

Italy

Keep
Delete
  • Delete Don't think it can be saved Mulehunter 17:30, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Comments
  • Comment Have you actually tried reading it? I'll give you an extract just in case "Rich in history yet curiously bereft of modern culture, Italy was announced to be the No. 1 best-selling foot garment of 2004 by John Woo & Ralph Lauren." ...
    • and sorry for the 15 rule thing...I thought Quack was "inactive" (I'm new don't hit me) Mulehunter 21:59, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Don't worry about it too much. I'm sure they'll let you off this time. Just keep an eye on the number of articles next time :) 12px-Is_loading_3.gif (Bonner) (Talk) Oct 25, 09:47

Monte Vista Christian School

Keep
Delete
Comments

Davey Bee

Keep
Delete
Comments

Austin

Keep
Delete
Comments

Camp Fuck You Die

Keep
Delete
Comments
  • Comment Isn't this supposed to be an injoke? I think it's described on HTBFANJS as vanity, but an example of good vanity, so it stays based on humor value. It's also mentioned on Worst 100 Uncyclopedia In-Jokes. And above all else, it's been nominated for deletion three times, yet survived. That's classic! Maybe it just needs to be cleaned up. -- Kip teh Dip Talk Works Faq Vote in '08 USA! 17:27, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This article's been on here so damn often it's not even funny. Go root around in the archives if you don't believe me. —Hinoa talk.kun 03:04, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

George Pell

Keep
Delete
Comments

Feet

Keep
  • I hate it however, I'm starting a new campaign: keep articles that people will probably look up and edit. Also, what kind of encyclopedia doesn't have an article on feet? --  CAKE J! <-> 16:43, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Comments

List of Jesus' special moves

Keep
Delete
Comments

Bad loser of year award

Keep
Delete
  • Delete Per Lounge nom. I actually think this idea has a certain amount of potential, but the article witters on about some totally obscure local team for far too long in vanity stylee, and it will probably never get reworked to something decent. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:06, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete It should be "sore loser" of the year, anyway. --  CAKE J! <-> 16:04, 24 October

2007 (UTC)

Comments

Scooch

Keep
Delete
Comments

Clank

Keep
Delete