Uncyclopedia:Past Winners 6
From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
| 2005 • 2006 (part 1) • 2006 (part 2) • 2007 (part 1) • 2007 (part 2) • 2008 (part 1) • 2008 (part 2) |
[edit] Writer of the Year
[edit] The Thinker (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
Score: 17 people who are not Thinkerer
- Nomination + Support. The Thinker has had one hell of a year writing articles; he's got a number 17 on the Hall of Shame, but if you counted all the collaborations and rewritings he's done in full, that number balloons to a full 20. Not to mention that he's the man with the most articles in the Top3, including but not limited to Mr. Kearsy, Folgers Crystals, Drunk Olympics, and the most highly favored article on VFH to date, Why?:Pour Boiling Hot Water Down Your Trousers?. His features aren't all he's got, though, as he's spent a lot of his writing on the site THINKERING less fortunate articles rather than just starting from scratch, and these rewrites and collaborations are only second in quantity to One Eyed Jack, and likely the best in quality the whole wiki over. In short, it's a real tough call to make, but Thinker just about edges out the competition in my book, and since I didn't get to vote for him on WotM, I'll give him my vote here. --Grand General Wizard Etc x2 and Senator G/K/O/CUNT.K.F. WHORE! ZOTM MAFE VANDL UOTM WOTM TOP10 FP PMOTM UWotM 00:12, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
- Big Support. THINKER is my favorite writer on this site (even more than myself). Many of his articles are my personal favorites. I log on to Uncyc looking forward any new articles he might have. I believe that he deserves it the most. • • • SIR FELLOW Necropaxx KUN {PotM VFH VFP VotM} (Beseech)
06:01, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
- For. Whether it be his own originals, collaborations, or THINKERing the hell out of other people's stuff, he contributes brilliant stuff consistently. This is a really tough call given the quality of the noms, and I wouldn't complain if any of these guys won, but THINKER deserves it most in my book. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 13:31, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
- I'm too hungover to write things. THINKER is the best writer on the site. Give him this. The end. -RAHB 20:40, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
- For -- 20:43, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
- STRONG FOR. Per RAHB's hungover yet true comment. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • bloggings) Quote of the Day 20:54 Jan 01, 2008
- For. After going through some of his stuff, I must say he is a very funny guy. - UnIdiot |
| Talk | Contribs - 19:04, Jan 2
- For. Responsible (at least in part) for two of the very best articles of the year. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey) 19:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Five Just cause I can--Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally CUN GotA 08:16, 4 January 2008 (UTC
- for THINKER is genuinely hilarious. if he wins, i shall erect a monument in his honor. "Violetflavoured nuisance 01:10, 7
- for Funny, funny stuff... I nearly peed myself.
04:43, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
- WHY IS THIS SO HARD EACH YEAR?!?!?!?! Oh, I mean, for Thinker, but damn, that's an awesome field of candidates.--<<
>> 13:22, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- For. His vote for me means a lot, but that's irrelevant. I came to this page intending to vote for him in the first place. --So So 09:54, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- Dig. A difficult choice between The Thinker and So So. Sir Roger 04:47, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
- AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH TOO HARD Can I split my vote up amongst Thinker, LedBalloon, Ljlego, Mhaille and Modusoperandi?
Support This is the one I should be voting for. I like some of those articles he wrote. --Pleb- Sawblade5 [citation needed] ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 14:26, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
- Quite possibly the best writer on the site at this time, though many others on this list have pushed him pretty close. For. -- Sir Mhaille
(talk to me)
[edit] TheLedBalloon (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
Score: 2 classic rock band ripoffs
- Nomination. TLB started out the year as a bit of a noob, but as time progressed his talent in writing became exponentially more obvious. He's composed two of the funniest articles I've ever read, Volcano and Heat death of the universe, and another whopping 13 features to boot. --Grand General Wizard Etc x2 and Senator G/K/O/CUNT.K.F. WHORE! ZOTM MAFE VANDL UOTM WOTM TOP10 FP PMOTM UWotM 00:12, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
- For Led knows what's going on. I haven't graduated from his adoption program yet, but I can tell you that he actually knows what "funny" is. I have had close experience writing with him (see Heat death of the universe), and he is not only a funny writer, but is someone who can explain why what they write is funny. I think that is the essence of someone who is the best writer of the year, out of some 60,000 registered users. <-> (Jan 1) 00:29
For. as per woah, what cajek said. Also, he's great on ?pedia too. Also, wut? Also,~Fag x FS
[edit] Ljlego (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
Score: 5jlego
- Nomination. Ljlego's got it all: quality, quantity, and cajones. He's got the highest article-to-feature ratio on the site and a total feature count of 22.5, a number rivaled only by the legendary Savethemooses. Plus, he's from Long Island. Who could forget such articles as Nazi, HowTo:Be a Gangsta, the iconic Chuck Norris, and my personal favorite Mad TV. --Grand General Wizard Etc x2 and Senator G/K/O/CUNT.K.F. WHORE! ZOTM MAFE VANDL UOTM WOTM TOP10 FP PMOTM UWotM 00:12, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
- For --Imperator█Dark_Apostrophe█The Memory Hole 13:24, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
- For I've watched this Uncyclopedian grow from a young youngster to a youngster (sniff) and I'm so proud of the work that Ljlego contributes, and the ongoing quality apparent in it. Many of the other nominees are real Hall of Fame members, Ljlego should be the next to join you. Dame
GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 18:15, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
- 4. Lj's a talented writer who writes some damn good articles. -- 10:59, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- For. This was extremely close between him and Modus. Extremely close. I mean, I actually went back and forth, editing Lj and then MO's sections, drafting witty vote after witty vote and then changing my mind and having to write more witty votes for the other candidate. Then I played Tetris for about an hour. But after that it became clear that the best choice was Ljlego. He's hilarious, and he's got a boatload of features. I mean, Jesus, 22.5 features. I don't know if that's skill or luck or whoring or what, but whatever it is it's pretty goddamned impressive if you ask me. So yeah. Ljlego's cool and should win whatever award this is. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 03:55, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- For - I like statistics. I like funnies. I like Ljlego. — Sir Manticore
12:49, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Modusoperandi (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
Score: +11 Mad Cats
- N+F This has been MO's year, from an unknown Canadian to that pompous parade of odd letters you see trailing his signature. In my opinion, one of the most talented writers we have around, who makes not only top notch articles but also makes every conversation with him an "exciting" experience. Modus is my choice for the year, he deserves it, that handsome bastard. ~ Mordillo 07:11, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
- For...I'm glad we have so many great writers to choose from, but I can only vote for one--Sir Shandon
(Talk) (Trophy Room) 13:26, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
- For As per spinning Jew-star-- Phlegm ikeepchangingmypassword, Bullshit (garble! jank!) 16:00, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
- Whereas I cannot morally vote for a loose whore like Ljlego, I'm torn between so many of these other writers, so I have to say that this is a really tough decision for me. However, I must vote for MO because he's an excellent writer, Uncyclopedia's lead commentator on the Village Dump, and because I fucked his father in the ass. There's a video out on the internet about it. It's called something like "mrhands.mpg". Anyways, For. -- [SIR] e|m|c [talk] 20:42, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
- For. Per the above. He deserves this award. Give it to him. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon
(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 21:06, Jan 1
- For - I knew this was going to be a hard choice. Everyone who has been nominated is very talented, but Modus just edges ahead of the rest IMO.
Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:44, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- For --
08:56, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- For --MrN
19:15, Jan 6
For. - Hell yes, he's written some damn good stuff if you ask me...And well anyone else for that matter Jan 6, 19:18
- Strong For. One of the few writers I know who can write just as easily with caustic satire as with patent silliness, he has consistently written above and beyond the competition. He's also written quite a few articles that have slipped under the VFH radar, but are brilliant nonetheless. (He's also one of the funniest posters around, both in forums and, it seems, even on VFH.) As Mordillo said, this has been MO's year. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 06:15, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
- For. • Spang • UotF | talk • 04:41, 28 Jan 2008
[edit] So So (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
Score: +1 ...so?
- Nomination. Meet So So. See So So write. See So So write well. See So So write funny. He may have few features in comparison with the likes of Lj and Modus, but I think his consistent, awesome quality merits a nom, in my book. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon
(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 16:49, Jan 1
- Dig. I'm not going to delve into a long tirade on why I love So So's work, or why I believe he deserves this award. Let me just say that, of the people that I personally believe to have an innate command of comedic functions (especially subtlety), his name tops the list. And to me, that command is one of the highest benchmarks a humorist can attain. Everyone nominated here is already a champion. So So gets my vote. --THINKER 21:57, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- And I-I-I-I-I-ee-I will always love yooooo-ooooo-ooooooouuu, oh! --Whitney Houston 10:33, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Mhaille (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
Score: +7 Cheeky Scouse Chappies
- Nomination - he has twenty features under his belt. While he isn't getting my vote, he still should have the nom. -- 17:00, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
- For. The Master. That is all. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 22:10, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
- For He's sung, but not sung enough. Far not enough. ADDENDUM: I realize now that my reason sucks like a monkey on a popsicle, so read this part too. Mhaille is far more than a writer like me, who puts many articles out. He is far more than Modusoperandi, who puts out many good articles, and will occasionally help a brother out. He is far more than a writer even like Thinker, a man who I greatly respect and admire, who will reshape an article to better suit the high-quality standard we like to pretend to uphold. No, Mhaille is more than that. Mhaille is an always-brilliant satirist who takes his adaptable tone and will subtly apply it to others' work, also giving the authors tips and tricks of the trade. A true maker of featured articles whose count is far higher than mine and STM's combined when you count the uncredited features he helped build, he deserves this, and it's a pity he doesn't seem to be getting it. As the author of the article which inspired me to start here, Mhaille will always be #1 for me.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 03:33, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- For. This year is fucking hard. I mean, I'm not nominated, which would probably make this vote even more of a close race in my heart, but this is still pretty damn hard. That said, Mhaille is the best, and always will be the best. -- Major Sir Zombiebaron GUN • WotM • UotM • PotM • AotM • EGAEDM • UPotM • MAFE • ZotM • IotM • VotM • UGotM (sho
