Uncyclopedia:Pee Review

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.

Jump to: navigation, search


Main

FAQ


What is Pee Review?

Pee Review is a mechanism created by R Kelly for requesting writing help and criticism from the members of the community. When a Pee Review request is created, other members can review it and provide constructive feedback and tips to make it better. It is useful for anything from bringing a doomed article back from the brink of damnation to improving upon a completed article written by Jesus himself. Reviewers are provided with a form to fill out that focuses on the important areas of a good Uncyclopedia article, and it is an author's job to improve the article based on the feedback given. Please don't make a Pee Review request solely to show off your work with no intention of changing it. If you are not going to take the criticism to heart one way or the other, don't bother requesting it. If an article is incomplete and thus in danger of deletion, you may wish to put {{PeeReview}} on the page to notify the prospective executioner that it is still being worked on. This does not bestow immunity on the article however; normal vanity and content restrictions still apply and articles with little to no actual content will still be deleted.

Before reviewing anything, be sure that you have thoroughly read and are familiar with the Guidelines.

For dynamic review of an article on IRC, go to irc://irc.freenode.net/unresource.

Articles that need Reviewing

PageLast Edit
Intelligent Falling by Utter Bastard07:07, 7 May 2008 by Orian57
UnNews:Wikipedia Re-Labelled “Pornopedia” By Conservatives by Orian5719:44, 7 May 2008 by Orian57
Japanese High Schools by Hyperbole20:16, 7 May 2008 by Hyperbole

New Pee Review Requests

PageLast Edit
Bubble Wrap by Under user16:10, 9 May 2008 by Under user
Why?:Watch Kitty Porn by Cheapinitreal05:52, 9 May 2008 by Cheapinitreal
Why?:Trade Your Family's Only Cow For Magic Beans (2) by An Ape that Only Exists on Thursdays20:11, 8 May 2008 by An Ape that Only Exists on Thursdays
HowTo:Throw a Fireball by Hyperbole17:06, 8 May 2008 by AAA!
James Brown by Under user12:08, 8 May 2008 by Javascap

Tables are provided for reviewers to use; however you must bring your own chairs. When a new pee review request is made, one pre-made table will be put on the page. It is highly recommended that these tables are used, as they give the article's author specific and relevant information regarding the strong and weak areas of the article. Please use coasters if you are planning to put any drinks on the table. If the table on the page has already been filled out by a previous reviewer, the table can be found here, or you may simply copy and paste the previous one on the page. You may also go to your local IKEA to find another table to better suit your needs, although there are no guarantees that it will last for any length of time.

If one of the areas of the pee review table does not apply to the article, either give it a 10 or average all your other scores using the Pee template: {{Pee|#|#|#|#}} and write "Not applicable" in the comments section. Giving it a 0 will result in a massive reduction in the final score.

It would be nice if you review someone else's article when you post yours. We do live in a civilized world after all. If you don't have anything constructive to say, don't say anything at all. An in-depth review is always better than one that is all score and no comment.

New Entry

Create a new subpage by entering the name of your article in the box below. Click "Create entry".


Personal tools
projects