From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
What's this stupid piece of crap? ~ Cajek! <-> (Dec 24 / 21:02)
- hahahaha I knew it! ~ Cajek! <-> (Dec 31) 22:33
| Humo(u)r:
| 6
| I agree fully with your statement! I hated this article! No not really, but it had some serious problems:
- Did not seem like a game that was about the rules, more like some piece of crap Cajek wrote (No offense though, you are a great writer).
- WTF??!?!?! I had a very difficult time following what you were saying, as there were too many explosions and "!!!!!" to allow me to follow it.
- You did mention something about ADD. That would have cleared up all my concerns on this article if it only made sense according to the title. Otherwise, there is no need to write an article in the style of ADD if it is not a central element to the article.
- Where were the rules? I didn't see any "rules" used in a style that parodied them and made them into a game. It would have been hilarious if you put a section in about the rules to playing the rules game. NOW that right there would have been funny. But you chose to write this in a WTK (What the kitten?) style, thus I must give you a WTF score. Sorry, man.
|
| Concept:
| 8
| A game about its own rules the game? What a paradox! But you seem to have missed the point COMPLETELY in your article...
|
| Prose and Formatting:
| 5
| WTF? and "!!!!" are way overused. For the love of Sophia, please limit your "!!!!" intake lest you become one of them and write things like: <insert name here> wants to be an hero!!11111!!!!1!!1! GO SEE!!!1!!1!1
Also, way too many unrelated images. I strongly suggest a full rewrite, as I could barely keep myself on the page reading it. As soon as I got on it, I soon skidded off on the very slippery "!!!!" and "WTF!!!"
|
| Images:
| 2
| OMG!!! EXPOLSION!!! Those would have been perfect for an article on explosives, but not on an article that was supposed to be about a game about its own rules.
|
| Miscellaneous:
| 5.3
| avged it.
|
| Final Score:
| 26.3
| Are you ADHD or something? So am I. Get over it and take your adderall. You need it for this article. And BTW this better count as a "quality" review because I took the time to write a whole friggin paragraph on a shit article that I feel compelled to rewrite! I'm sorry comrade, this article is crap, and makes me sad. Very, very sad. Good luck and may Sophia forgive you for your transgressions.
|
| Reviewer:
| -- Sir Unknown User (Talk : Cont : VFH : PEE : CUN) 22:24, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
|
Sir Unknown U (Talk : Cont : VFH : PEE : CUN) 22:24, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
