From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.

Main Current Reviewed Archived Guidelines FAQ Committee ROTM

Welcome to the official page for the official award Reviewer of the Month.

Contents 1 Eligibility 2 Rules and guidelines 3 Reward 4 Past Winners 5 Nominations for May 5.1 Mightydandylion (Talk • Contribs • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser) 5.2 Javascap (Talk • Contribs • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser) 5.3 orian57 (Talk • Contribs • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser) 5.4 Boomer (Talk • Contribs • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

[edit] Eligibility

To qualify for the Reviewer of the Month award, you must first meet certain criteria.

1. You must be a registered user.
2. You must not have nominated yourself. You can vote for yourself, but not nominate yourself.
3. You must have done at least one review within the last month.

[edit] Rules and guidelines

These are the rules and less-official guidelines for the Reviewer of the Month.

1. IP votes carry full weight. Because many IP's submit articles for review, they benefit from good Reviewers as much as anyone else does. IP's get a full vote instead of the usual half-vote.
2. Nominate those reviewers who have consistently given exceptional reviews. If a user happened to review multiple articles of yours but never gave any suggestions for improvement, do not nominate them. There are many other, far more deserving users out there.
3. You can only vote once. You can cancel your vote using slashes to change your vote, but you still only get one vote to cast every month.
4. Additionally, when a user is nominated, the nomination template {{VoteRotM}} should be added to their user page.

[edit] Reward

Tell 'em what they won, Jon!:

• Winner(s) become a CUN.
• You will receive a free "Steel Kidney" (and will be forever called one)
• You will become an honorary member of People for the Evaluation of Excrement and Influencing Nominations for Greatness
• You will be entitled to the special template for Reviewer of the Month.

[edit] Past Winners

One-eyed Jack • Cajek • MrN9000 • Under user • SysRq • Heerenveen

The archive is that blue thing.

[edit] Nominations for May

[edit] Mightydandylion (Talk • Contribs • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

• Nom & for. Again, there are several good candidates this month, in my opinion, but I think MDL deserves to come out on top. Quite simply the most in-depth reviewer on the site, bar none, and thoroughly decent with it. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 08:59, May 1
• Should have won last month. When a guy's shortest recorded review is 4,000 characters, that's a heck of a reviewer. For. –—HV (talk) 1/05 15:27
• F♥r. as per HV. He's been a star around here for months. He deserves it this month. No question about it. ~Major Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ CUN • RotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 18:26 May 1
• Fo' sho. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 02:09, May 2
• Absolutely —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ljlego (talk • contribs)
• For So good, he should have won this before he joined. Yeah. He's that good. -RAHB 04:23, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
• Yep --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 08:49, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Javascap (Talk • Contribs • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

• Nom. Javascap continues to improve, and continues to produce plenty of good reviews. I like his work, and think he could give MDL a good run for his money this month. The only one in the current top 5 not to be RotM... --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 08:59, May 1
• For This guy's enthusiasm is compelling. -OptyC Sucks! cun18:36, 1 May
• FOR. Heck, I am not embarrassed to vote for myself... Warm Regards, Javascap
• For. Sorry Dandy, it's just something about your "Notes" style I just don't like :\ --Grand General Wizard Etc x2 and Senator G/K/O/CUNT.K.F. WHORE! ZOTM MAFE VANDL UOTM WOTM TOP10 FP 22:45, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] orian57 (Talk • Contribs • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

• Nom. Another improving reviewer, and one who continues to provide a good volume of work, deserving of recognition. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 08:59, May 1
• For - He won't get it this month but I just wanted to vote for to show my support, cause he's a great reviewer and MightyDandelion doesn't need any more support, really. - 15:49 4 May Sir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!

[edit] Boomer (Talk • Contribs • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

• Nom. We have nominated him again and again, and he still hasn't won. Plus, he's the Cap'n! Warm Regards, Javascap
• For. Gave me two ery good and helpful reviews. • • • SIR Necropaxx KUN PotM VFH HS VotM (blah, blah, blah...) 22:40, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Hahaha, ineligable! He hasn't done a review in a month.   ~  May 04, 2008 [15:37] Cajek! Talk2Me! News!
    • You misspelled ineligible. Captain Mindless drivel Pointless edits 22:52, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
      • I don't believe you. Now, if you don't mind, I'm going to do a REVIEW! ha!   ~  May 05, 2008 [23:05] Cajek! Talk2Me! News!
        • Have fun. If you need me you can find me on IRC. ;) Captain Mindless drivel Pointless edits 23:29, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment:For the love of Sophia! Ah well, we love ya BoomerWarm Regards, Javascap