From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.

Contents 1 2007 1.1 December 1.1.1 Cajek (Talk • Contribs • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser) 1.2 November 1.2.1 One-eyed Jack (Talk • Contribs • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser) 2 2008 3 January 3.1 Fag (Talk • Contribs • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser) 3.2 Under user (Talk • Contribs • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser) 3.3 MrN9000 (Talk • Contribs • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser) 3.4 Finnius (Talk • Contribs • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser) 4 February 4.1 Fag (Talk • Contribs • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser) 4.2 Under user (Talk • Contribs • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser) 5 March 5.1 Mightydandylion (Talk • Contribs • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser) 5.2 SysRq (Talk • Contribs • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser) 5.3 Fag (Talk • Contribs • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser) 5.4 Boomer (Talk • Contribs • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser) 6 April 6.1 Heerenveen (Talk • Contribs • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser) 6.2 Mightydandylion (Talk • Contribs • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser) 6.3 Javascap (Talk • Contribs • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser) 6.4 Boomer (Talk • Contribs • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser) 7 May 7.1 Mightydandylion (Talk • Contribs • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser) 7.2 Javascap (Talk • Contribs • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser) 7.3 orian57 (Talk • Contribs • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser) 7.4 Boomer (Talk • Contribs • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser) 8 June 8.1 Orian57 (Talk • Contribs • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser) 8.2 Javascap (Talk • Contribs • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser) 8.3 Sycamore (Talk • Contribs • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser) 8.4 YesTimeToEdit (Talk • Contribs • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser) 8.5 Boomer (Talk • Contribs • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

[edit] 2007

[edit] December

[edit] Cajek (Talk • Contribs • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

• Nom & For. It's not just the volume of reviews, although he has cranked out many, it's the fact that he is helpful with all of them. Now that OEJ has the inaugural award as is fair and just, time to recognise the shift Cajek's put in this last month. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 18:14, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
• Strong For what a hard worker--Æ 18:21, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
• Fro. His broken-down system is quite intuitive and helpful. --Grand General Wizard Etc x2 and Senator G/K/O/CUNT.K.F. WHORE! ZOTM MAFE VANDL UOTM WOTM TOP10 FP
• For He's really earned it.--Major'GUN' Ggarfield, Le Marquis de Nofu .Canada! 19:43, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
• Absolutely. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • bloggings) 20:27 Dec 03, 2007
• Does great reviews. Duh. I like to think it's completely thanks to my guidance. None of you better burst my bubble! Under User's next. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 22:49, Dec 3
• Obviously. Despite Cajek's attempts to get me to get off my ass and do a few more reviews myself, it's obvious that this man will win the reviewer of the month this month. Shall we close the vote now? MrN  16:29, Dec 5
• Fine I'll vote for myself because I dug through the archives and I want you to see my very first pee review and the results of that review :D   ~   Cajek! <-> (Dec 6 / 21:22)
• Well, duh. -- Kip teh Dip • Talk • Works • Faq • Vote in '08 • 12:38, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
• for. at time of my vote, cajek has done exactly 50% of the reviews on the 'reviewed' page. and his reviews are in-depth and helpful, not just 'OMG, that wuz funnay lolz'. highest quantity times highest quality equals highest awesome. also, his humor break-down has forever revolutionized pee review. --OfficerGerrycheeversKunTalk 09:41, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
• Most Definite For. I may have had something to do with Cajek becoming a great reviewer. Exactly what, though, shall remain in the annals of history.... Sir Groovester (CUN, NotM, AotM, Fresh Stain) Contributions | I'm listening... 06:49, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
• For He really works hard to do helpful reviews, and do a lot of them, unlike most users who only occasionally write reviews when they "feel" like it. He's helped make pee reviewing into an ART FORM!!!!111. --THE 14:03, 9 December 2007

(UTC)

• Por. I would have nominated him myself. @-}— 75.71.94.153 03:26, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
• He's mad! MAD! ~ 08:58, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
• Oh! definitely! Duh! ~Fag x FS
• ForD produces crappy American cars. Cajek doesn't. - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 02:23, Dec 20
• For. Very dedicated. -- [SIR] e|m|c ^[talk] 00:08, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] November

[edit] One-eyed Jack (Talk • Contribs • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

• Nom & For. And frankly I reckon we could close the noms for this month right here. He consistently and regularly pumps out the best, most helpful, in-depth reviews on the site. Bar none. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:23, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
• Aye. It is always a pleasure getting a review for old Jack. ~ 11:19, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
• Strong for, per UU. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 18:39, Oct 30
• For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 19:15, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
• A professional in the art of peeing. And of course, for. -- [SIR] e|m|c ^[talk] 19:31, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
• For Captain Mindless drivel Pointless edits 21:50, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
• For--Sir Manforman 22:38, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
• For. Sir Groovester (CUN, NotM, AotM, Fresh Stain) Contributions | I'm listening... 01:34, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
• Stronger For than Led's For, per TheLedBalloon, but better in every way. - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 21:21, Nov 1
• Forsooth, there's not a reviewer of higher caliber to be found. --The Acceptable  Cainad  (Fnord) 02:11, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
• Nom and For. --Grand General Wizard Etc x2 and Senator G/K/O/CUNT.K.F. WHORE! ZOTM MAFE VANDL UOTM WOTM TOP10 FP 02:27, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
• Forrrr • • • SIR FELLOW Necropaxx KUN {PotM VFH VFP Chop HS VotM} (blah, blah, blah...) 23:09, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
• For. I usually abstain from this vote, since I'm far too lazy to review stuff. However, OEJ is a sincere and genuinely helpful reviwer who deserves recognition. RabbiTechno 22:24, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
• For He inspired me to start reviewing more, which I hope is a good thing.   ~   Cajek! <-> Nov 15, 22:42
• Yup after what everyone's said <3 .talk.work.?pedia.

[edit] 2008

[edit] January

[edit] Fag (Talk • Contribs • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

• Nomination Fag deserves a shot at this award. He does a good job.   ~   Cajek! <-> Jan 15 (15:24)
  • Comment hey, thanks Cajek! However, I think there are people who deserve it more at the moment. *shifts eyes downward* ~Fag x FS

[edit] Under user (Talk • Contribs • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

• Nomination Where do the steel kidneys go to get their stuff reviewed? ...UNDER USER!   ~   Cajek! <-> Jan 3 (20:34)
• For - UnIdiot | Talk? | Theme - 00:11, Jan 5
• For. --Sir Xiao Li CUN VFH WH NS (Talk)^{[citation needed]} 03:49, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
• For The nuts muts. Also, UU has been helping out with Cajek's Pee list as Sir Random has (for a short time) pissed off... MrN  00:06, Jan 23
• For - tough call, as MrN9000 has helped me numerous times as well as others, but Under user has done more qwality reviews than MrN9000. It should be notes his review on Why?:Wear clothes 3 sizes too small was almost 8,000 characters long--Æ 01:49, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
• I see a triple tie in the making. ~ Mordillo 12:37, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

  Dammit, I was trying to avoid having to vote. grumble grumble tie grumble bastards grumble grumble conspiracy grumble Captain Mindless drivel Pointless edits 00:45, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] MrN9000 (Talk • Contribs • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

• Nom + For --Grand General Wizard Etc x2 and Senator G/K/O/CUNT.K.F. WHORE! ZOTM MAFE VANDL UOTM WOTM TOP10 FP 03:13, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
  • so tempted to vote for Because even though Finnius is a damn good reviewer, so is Mr. N and he half-wrote the UN:PRG. I will reserve my vote until the end of the month, though.   ~   Cajek! <-> (Jan 1) 03:34
• For. Does good work, and his contributions to the PRG should be recognised. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 11:07, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
• For because. Also, he's a brilliant reviewer. Also, he's really helpful. Also, also. Also, wut? Also,~Fag x FS
• For He really helped with one of my articles. --Nomoredonkeys 21:49, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
• For I see the girls walk by me in their summer clothes....I have to turn my head until the darkness goes. And that's how I feel about N.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:35, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

  That's scary. Captain Mindless drivel Pointless edits 23:13, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

• For. I've been through the reviews bastards made me do work and out of everybody that I've seen, MrN9000 simply has the best ones. He not only gives honest reviews and many suggestions for improvement, he even looks into why it's funny. As well as Finnius and Under User have been doing in Pee Review, I think MrN separates himself. In a good way. Captain Mindless drivel Pointless edits 23:07, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Finnius (Talk • Contribs • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

• Nom - he did 19 Pee Reviews, 14 of which were in-depth--Æ 02:40, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment That's just according to me, though! (even though I love me)   ~   Cajek! <-> (Jan 1) 03:12
• For - 'cause he does a really good job. • • • SIR FELLOW Necropaxx KUN {PotM VFH VFP Chop HS VotM} (blah, blah, blah...) 05:51, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
• For I like fish--Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally CUN GotA 22:38, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
• Yeah, I like the fin-man. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 22:47, Jan 14
• For -- [SIR] e|m|c ^[talk] 14:40, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
• For - Finnius reminds me of a salmon. -- Major Sir Zombiebaron GUN • WotM • UotM • PotM • AotM • EGAEDM • UPotM • MAFE • ZotM • IotM • VotM • UGotM (shout) 22:32, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February

[edit] Fag (Talk • Contribs • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

• Nomination Has significantly improved the quality of his reviews, and is now a serious contender for this award. MrN  18:18, Feb 1
• VOTE FAG: What, are you some kind of homophobe? Ж Kalir _{totally not Wario at all} 19:49, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Under user (Talk • Contribs • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

• Nomination Took it all the way to the wire last month, and will be hard to beat this time around. MrN  18:18, Feb 1
• For--Æ 18:18, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
• For --Grand General Wizard Etc x2 and Senator G/K/O/CUNT.K.F. WHORE! ZOTM MAFE VANDL UOTM WOTM TOP10 FP 20:40, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
• For. He's had it coming, I think. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 00:20, Feb 6

  In the sexy way? Captain Mindless drivel Pointless edits 00:37, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

  Is there any other way? - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 21:42, Feb 13

• Hell. Yes. I check this stupid website from time to time, and UU is who I see reviewing. UU is who I see updating Pee. UU is who... I, uh... see.   ~   Cajek! <-> Feb 6 (00:22)

  In the sexy way? Captain Mindless drivel Pointless edits 00:28, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

• For. What can I say? Mr. UU far exceeds me in pretty much anything even vaguely urinal. :P --_^(sir)Fag!chat|pee|fail|vote! 12:21, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

comment hey Fag, dont vote for the enemy, AND don't let your self-critic become more powerful than your self-worth...Finn has spoken.

comment nah, it's because he by far deserves it more :P It's not like he wasn't going to win anyway --_^(sir)Fag!chat|pee|fail|vote! 09:02, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Comment. B...but I'm not anyone's enemy. Honest! I'm nice, do you hear me Finnius? Niiice! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 09:14, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

comment you're right, i shouldn't have used the word 'enemy'.../me checks Santa's List

• Keep up the good work UU. -- Spillin DylanTALKEDITS19:27, Feb 7 2008
• Obviously... Good luck next month Fag. MrN  11:10, Feb 12
• UU has brought some sunshine into my dreary life. Try UU yourself kids, success is guaranteed. Sir Mordillo GUN WotM FP UotM AotM