Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk)

• DJ Irreverent, while proving to be a quite competent writer, has twice plagiarized The Onion
• The articles mentioned above were received as his own work initially and did not credit the source in any way.

• DJ Irreverent will not author any UnNews articles for the next three months'.
• There shall be no restriction on DJ Irreverent's editing in any other namespace but UnNews.
• Should DJ Irreverent author an UnNews article during his period of probation, he shall be placed under a ban for one day. If it is discovered that the article is plagiarized, it will be deleted and the ban extended to two weeks. Each subsequent offense during this time period will stack.
• If, after his period of restriction is over, another plagiarized UnNews is created, this restriction shall be placed again, with an indefinite end date.

DJ Irreverent is an excellent writer and a promising one, but this is an inexcusable action that does not do justice the source from which he drew inspiration.

NEW- Currently serving a monthlong ban. When it ends, the above guidelines will be in place anew.

-- Major Sir Zombiebaron GUN • WotM • UotM • PotM • AotM • EGAEDM • UPotM • MAFE • ZotM • IotM • VotM • UGotM (shout) 16:28, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

• Kip the Dip has been banned, unbanned, and banned again more than any other active user on the site. And why? Well, there is a very strong trend of Kip being a dick. However, because Kip does, sometimes, help out around the site, he has been able to worm his way out of every ban he has ever been given.
• Kip has also requested that he be listed here, in order that it might help him "reform".
• Also, it should be noted that Kip is currently blocked for 6 months (ending 18 August 2008), as part of his plan to help him "reform".

• In Kip's own words, "If I don't show the slightest improvement the first few days back, ban my ass forever. No questions asked."

Premier Tom Mayfair 12/26 02:50

Zana Dark has served time for welcoming IPs, creating too many personal templates & spamming them, & for not getting along with some users in our community. Zana's ban will be lifted at 02:43, on 3 January 2008 (UTC).

• No welcoming IPs EVER!
• No spamming of personal templates unless it has relativity to a user's talk page. No personal templates in the main space. All personal templates remain in the user space.
• No flamewars.
• All of these can be avoided. If you feel that a user is being a dick about something you did, then don't retaliate. Just talk to an admin to resolve the situation. We are a community & should be helpful with our criticism & not be a dick about it, even if it is warranted. The ban policy will be followed for up to 2 violations within the 6 month restriction period. A 3^rd violation within the 6 month restriction period will result in an infinite ban. No exceptions.

Don't let me down, Zana. You're a genius & need to maintain control of your actions or else you will end up like Theodore Kaczynski. Premier Tom Mayfair 12/26 02:50

Grand General Wizard Etc x2 and Senator G/K/O/CUNT.K.F. WHORE! ZOTM MAFE VANDL UOTM WOTM TOP10 FP 00:03, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Fonchezzz has just returned from a vacation of just about five months, so naturally, his behavior must be put on close watch for the next few weeks.

• Prior to his initial banning, Fonchezzz was a notable pest on user talk pages, spamming them with random messages and the ilk. Thusly, Fonchezzz can not post on anyone's talk page unless said other person initiates the conversation first. This will be in effect until further notice.
• One of the main reasons Fonchezzz was unbanned was because of his good behavior on Uncyclopedia's "sister wiki" Illogicopedia, but odds are that this is due to a drop in the necessary level of sensibility to be a contributor over there. Thusly, each and every article made by Fonchezzz must be subject to at least one pee review, to ensure that we beat a lesson of quality into his brain.

--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 22:02, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Kakun has self-nominated at least 10 images to VFP, all of which have failed miserably. Therefore, The following rules concerning Kakun are in place:

• Kakun must gain admin approval for image he wishes to nominate by placing it in uncyclopedia:VFP/Kakuns_Place and alerting an admin as to his intent to nominate. Approval is mandatory, and addition of images into VFP without admin permission will result in a 2 day ban.
• Kakun must also get images approved for insertion into articles. The volume of atrociously unfunny and badly-made images he has churned out requires that his images gain admin approval prior to their placement into articles.

--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 22:35, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

JohnnyRaven has proven himself to be confrontational, pugilistic, and otherwise disruptive when conducting serious discussion. He as made numerous bias-based edits, also harassing admins. He has been warned numerous times, but has otherwise been very uncooperative. As such, the following rules for JohnnyRaven are in place:

• Any edit deemed in the context of ideological disagreement (i.e. religion, politics, not based on humor) warrants a 24 hour ban per edit. Revert wars in this vein warrant 1 week.
• Any unnecessary, unproductive flamewars between this user and other problem users will be given a 2 post countdown between the two parties. This allows for at least one general statement and one rebuttal. The matter will be dropped immediately after. If this user opts to continue arguing after this countdown, he/she will be banned for at least 24 hours per post.

Boothman has made several blatantly bad votes to the Uncyclopedia voting pages, and despite warnings has refused to stop. Because of this, the following rules have been put into place:

• Votes made on any of the four major award pages (NotM, UotM, WotM, and UGotM.) will be instantly invalidated, and either removed from record, or makred by strikethrough.
• After an invalidated vote, if this user continues to vote, he or she may be banned at administrator discretion. Voting after the ban has expired will result in subsequent bans, doubling in length for every successive infraction.

Mcmlxxviii (hereafter referred to as "1978") has proven to be obstinate, unreasonable and uncivil regarding The Uncyclomania Edit War. Despite being awarded joint first prize in the aforementioned contest, he has made a number of uncivil and bad faith attacks on the associated talk page.

• Any further uncivil or protesting edits to the above mentioned pages warrant a 1 day ban per edit.
• Continuation of whining about said contest elsewhere on Uncyclopedia (i.e. complaining on user talk pages) to be dealt with as situation and severity warrant.
• Each of the above rules are subject to progressive doubling.

—RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 02:57, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

This user is a supposedly reformed vandal--the Crack Vandal no less--and has vandalised Uncyclopedia in the past. Due to this fact, the following restrictions are in place:

• ANY vandalism from this user will warrant an infinite ban per his previous dossier.
• Any edits that result in difficulty may result in a ban for one week.
• Admins will check to ensure that Rich's contributions are of sufficient quality to Uncyclopedia.

I'll volunteer to keep an eye on him for a while. Also, I'm in favor of delaying probation to at least nine months. –H. 02:57, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

I'm also monitoring his edits. Seems pretty pleasant and well-adjusted on IRC these days, but there's no reason to get complacent. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 10:53, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

-- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 00:41, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Unistyle has repeatedly uploaded pornographic and semi-pornographic images, many of which are also copyright violations, and which appear to serve little or no satirical purpose. He has ignored or attempted to circumvent warnings that questionable uploaded content must be used for a satirical or humourous purpose, and that copyrighted images must qualify as "fair use" under the restrictions of the site-wide Creative Commons license.

• Any and all questionable images that have been uploaded by this user must be utilised in a genuine context within one week of this notice, or they will be deleted without further warning. "Genuine context" in this case means that the images must be used on legitimate mainspace articles, not user, talk, forum or sandbox pages (including, but not limited to Vandalism and subpages thereof). Furthermore, images placed in articles must be relevant to the article, and contribute to the humourous and/or satirical value of the article in a manner that could not be adequately conveyed by an equivalent non-pornographic image.
• Any further uploading or linking of pornographic or semi-pornographic images by this user warrants an immediate 48-hour ban, and the immediate deletion of said images.
• Subsequent violations of the above conditions will result in progressive doublings of the block.

—RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)08:03, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Theusedgoth has demonstrated that he/she is incapable of abiding by Uncyclopedia image policy through repeated uploads of duplicate pictures in addition to pictures in poor taste. In addition, this user has demonstrated that he/she is incapable of using pictures in articles in a funny and not just stupid manner. Therefore, the following restrictions are in place on this user:

• Any image uploads from this user not approved by an administrator will result in an immediate one day ban per image uploaded and the immediate deletion of said image(s).
• Furthermore, any additions of images to articles that are not approved by an administrator will result in a reversion and a notice posted to the user's talk page on the first violation. The next violation will result in an immediate 48 hour ban, and further violations will result in progressively doubling blocks.

I'm open to modifications to this ruleset. –H.08:03 UTC, 02.20.2007

--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 22:35, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Flameviper has been problematic in terms of his/her use of the "Template:" namespace, often making frivolous or otherwise useless templates despite administrator actions and warnings not to. Furthermore, this user has been demonstrably slow in responding to communication attempts by administrators. As such, the following rules have been put into place regarding Flameviper:

• Any edits or additions to the namespace "Template:" will be heretofore result in a 2 day ban.
• Repetition of actions despite repeated (2 or more) deletions or attempts by administrators to discourage these behaviors will result in a subsequent, progressive doubling of his/her current or resulting block.

As this guy's now infiniblocked, can we remove this entry or do you want it for archival purposes? –H.16:25 UTC, 11.27.2006

For some reason this person was unbanned by MoneySign. I know not why, but this stays in effect. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 2007.01.20.06:57

--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 22:02, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

This user has proven to be obstinate and unreasonable. Becuase of this user's previous dissent with the page Euroipods, the following rules concerning Nintendorulez are in place

• Any edits to Euroipods and related non-talk pages warrant an IMMEDIATE ban for at least 4 days.
• Any attempts to insist that he is "improving the page" by adding content, or otherwise inciting further argument on any of the Euroipods-related pages warrant the same block length.
• Any unnecessary, unproductive flamewars between this user and other problem users will be given a 2 post countdown between the two parties. This allows for at least one general statement and one rebuttal. The matter will be dropped immediately after. If this user opts to continue arguing after this countdown, he/she will be banned for at least 24 hours per post.

This user has been permabanned, but this should stay in the unlikely case that someone is ever talked into unbanning this user. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 2007.01.20.06:59

--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 22:35, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Chomu Sclavus has done some very questionable page moves in the last few weeks (Zimbabwe to Jim Bob Way) that not only fail to improve the humor of the article, but also is in violation of policy as outlined in BGBU. As such, the following restriction has been enacted regarding Chomu Sclavus:

• This user restricted from moving pages of which he is not the creator and major contributor. Each move warrants a 2 day ban, with successive doubling for each page move.

Additional statements pending.--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 22:37, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 22:35, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

User:SU182 has shown exceedingly poor judgement in nominating articles on VFH, including his own userpage, deleted pages, and hallmarks of low quality. Furthermore, he has shown that he cannot be trusted with templates and the "Template:" namespace (Namely NRV, VFD, and his own creations.) He is unresponsive to any advice or admonition regarding his behavior, and in half-baked attempts to curry favor with adminatti has clogged VFD and VFH with an abundance of irrelevant entries. This user has consitently shown a lack of understanding the Uncyclopedia and its logistics, and appears to be incapable of changing his disruptive behavior. As such, the following rules have been instituted regarding this user:

• Any creation of pages in the "Template:" namespace warrant an immediate 48 hour ban, doubling progressively with each instance.
• This user is forbidden from adding articles to VFD or VFH, nor is he allowed to use the templates {{QVFD}}, {{VFD}}, {{VFH}} or {{NRV}} Violations warrant a 48 hour ban, doubling with each instance.
• Any additions to administrative pages deemed inappropriate or frivolous are to be met with a 48 hour ban
• Repetition of actions despite repeated (2 or more) deletions or attempts by administrators to discourage these behaviors will result in a subsequent, progressive doubling of his/her current or resulting block.

As this guy's now infiniblocked, can we remove this entry or do you want it for archival purposes? –H.16:24 UTC, 11.27.2006

--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 15:43, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

ManforMan has demonstrated, on multiple occasions, a complete failure to take anything in stride, much less anything resembling a sense of humor. He has plagiarized (minor), abused templatespace, and overall caused a huge ruckus amongst the community with his whining about UGotM. ManforMan is a detriment to this community for the fact that he clearly lacks a sense of what is and is not appropriate, as well as for the fact that he simply takes himself and others so seriously, but fails to self-improve in this respect.

• ManforMan's actions on VFD, QVFD, VFS, FFS, and other similar nom/voting pages will be carefully monitored. Any edits deemed in poor faith are to be awarded with a one day ban.
• ManforMan's attitude is to be closely monitored. Any time he a)complains on frivolous grounds, b)attempts to make changes in this vein, or c)takes anything too seriously, it will be meted with a 1 day ban, with progressive doubling per infraction.
• ManforMan will have the honor of being the first person to have his IRC behavior linked to wiki banning. Any non-legitimate or continued complaints beyond the initial "Why was I banned" on IRC will warrant an extension of his block by one day per line.

• To be honest. He's fucking whiny. I personally think this user needs to be infinibanned for having that goddmaned stick too far up his butt, in addition to derailing any sort of democracy here by being a whiny killjoy. If you ever wanted a textbook example of ad misercordiram and being a killjoy, he's the man to look at. --Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 15:43, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Blocked indefinitely by Famine on 3 November 2007. —Hinoa talk.kun 22:17, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 22:35, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Because of his previous history of political/religious bias-based edits, multiple redirects, page moves, and otherwise visually offensive and heartily useless templates, the following rules for Nerd42 are in place:

• Page moves restiction: Each unapproved page move warrants a 24 hour ban per page move
• Templates must be approved by admins. Unapproved template generation warrants a 48 hour ban, plus 24 hours per template placement.
• Any edit deemed in the context of ideological disagreement (i.e. religion, politics, not based on humor) warrants a 24 hour ban per edit. Revert wars in this vein warrant 1 week.

• Probation'd!: 08:08, 12 August 2006 (UTC)) After 30 copypaste to parolled