Uncyclopedia:VFH/Battle of the Sexes

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.

Jump to: navigation, search

Battle of the Sexes (history, logs)

Article: Battle of the Sexes

Score: 11 Battered Spouses

Nomination:   ~   Cajek! <-> Mar 23 (19:24)
For Votes: 13
  1. N+F MrN has been working on this article since December, I believe. It's about time it got its place in the sun.   ~   Cajek! <-> Mar 23 (19:24)
  2. So true --DyslexicRetard 01:28, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
  3. For The epitome of a well-rounded article. Dispenses with most of the cliche's about the topic at hand and gives a nice funny commentary on the situation. -RAHB 05:52, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
  4. For Well, I was not going to vote for myself on this one, but as Randy Bentwick appears to virtually only vote against in VFH [1] , I don't feel like I'm doing anything ungentlemanly... MrN Image:Icons-flag-gb.png HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png 18:35, Mar 24
  5. Weak for, bordering on abstain. It's pretty good, but it's almost too random to be funny and FA. But it just makes the cut IMO. –—Hv (talk) 24/03 18:51
  6. Sexay! Looks good. --OptyC Sucks! Image:Icons-flag-us.png cun 21:52, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
  7. Good and "long" Dossier 05:41, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
  8. For --Sir Starnestommy Image:Icons-flag-us.png (TalkContribsCUN) 06:52, Mar. 26, 2008
  9. For. Possibly a little long for its own good, but plenty of chuckles to be had. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 08:30, Mar 30
  10. /me flops out the old man and lets slip the dogs of war. -- Sir Mhaille Image:Icons-flag-gb.png (talk to me)
  11. Almost Perfect - I love, Love, LOVE this article --Dr. Fenwick 01:59, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
  12. Looks good Dossier 14:40, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
  13. Great article, even better pictures -- Image:Icon flag-Jp.png 忍者男Ninja Man Talk! The Hitlist Pages I've AttackedNinja-style Main Page Time→ 18:24, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
Against Votes: 2
  1. Against I would be vote for if it was humour. --Randy Bentwick 16:31, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
  2. Against. I decided that mehgasmic isn't feature-worthy Robertodole 16:43, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
Comments
  • Abstain mehgasmic Robertodole 20:26, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Abs. but leaning towards against. I'm just kinda scratching my head on this one. --THINKER 18:22, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH


Click here to place this article next in the feature queue
Check the feature queue first to make sure an article hasn't been featured already today.
The queue normally shouldn't have more than 2 articles queued at a time.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
Personal tools
projects