From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
| Article: Battle of the Sexes
|
Score: 11 Battered Spouses
|
| Nomination:
| ~ Cajek! <-> Mar 23 (19:24)
|
For Votes: 13
|
- N+F MrN has been working on this article since December, I believe. It's about time it got its place in the sun. ~ Cajek! <-> Mar 23 (19:24)
- So true --DyslexicRetard 01:28, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
- For The epitome of a well-rounded article. Dispenses with most of the cliche's about the topic at hand and gives a nice funny commentary on the situation. -RAHB 05:52, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
- For Well, I was not going to vote for myself on this one, but as Randy Bentwick appears to virtually only vote against in VFH [1] , I don't feel like I'm doing anything ungentlemanly... MrN
   18:35, Mar 24
- Weak for, bordering on abstain. It's pretty good, but it's almost too random to be funny and FA. But it just makes the cut IMO. –—Hv (talk) 24/03 18:51
- Sexay! Looks good. --OptyC Sucks!
 cun 21:52, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
- Good and "long" Dossier 05:41, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
- For --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 06:52, Mar. 26, 2008
- For. Possibly a little long for its own good, but plenty of chuckles to be had. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 08:30, Mar 30
- /me flops out the old man and lets slip the dogs of war. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
- Almost Perfect - I love, Love, LOVE this article --Dr. Fenwick 01:59, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
- Looks good Dossier 14:40, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
 Great article, even better pictures --  忍者男 • Ninja Man  • Talk! • The Hitlist • Pages I've Attacked • Ninja-style Main Page Time→ 18:24, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 2
|
- Against I would be vote for if it was humour. --Randy Bentwick 16:31, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
 Against. I decided that mehgasmic isn't feature-worthy Robertodole 16:43, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
 Abstain mehgasmic Robertodole 20:26, 30 March 2008 (UTC)- Abs. but leaning towards against. I'm just kinda scratching my head on this one. --THINKER 18:22, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
| Click here to place this article next in the feature queue
|
Check the feature queue first to make sure an article hasn't been featured already today.
The queue normally shouldn't have more than 2 articles queued at a time.
|
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
|
07:02, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
