From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
| Article: Charles Lindbergh
|
Score: 12 high fliers
|
| Nomination:
| SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 10:35, Feb 24
|
For Votes: 12
|
- Nom & for. We have few really good biographical articles. This, I submit, is one of those few. Well written and funny, and worth your time. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 10:35, Feb 24
- Self-f♥r. I spent a good amount of time on this, making it historically accurate and all. I think that's what makes it good. Anyways, here I go again trying to get me a feature. =/ ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ CUN • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF (@ 14:32 Feb 24)
- For. Another blow struck against random humour --Zarbag 15:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
- For --Sir Starnestommy
(Talk • Contribs • CUN) 00:43, Feb. 26, 2008
- For Nice. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 03:42, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
- For It's, alright, though I think it could use one more "I punched him in the balls, hahaha I said balls" joke.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:13, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
For. 204.117.145.194 13:52, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
- Weak For --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent
06:01, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
- Weak For. Mightydandylion 01:06, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- For, as promised. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey) 17:44, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- For Great article from the cool user who adopted me. Sk8R Grl 23:06, 29 February 2008 (UTC
For. 192.138.70.245 18:58, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- For. –—Hv (talk) 6/03 21:23
|
Against Votes: 0
|
No against votes
|
| Comments
|
- I like it, but at the moment I feel that it lacks an ending. This could be a good joke, a simple sentence to wrap things up, or a whole section. It just needs that final something to secure my vote. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey) 15:28, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
- Really? Because I kinda felt like the exiting ending was nice, what with the reference to the Civil War bucks thing and all. But I'll take your advice and whip up a nicer way to close it. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ CUN • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF (@ 00:56 Feb 26)
- It's nearly a For but I just, well, um, am considering. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent
07:13, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
)
| Click here to place this article next in the feature queue
|
Check the feature queue first to make sure an article hasn't been featured already today. The queue normally shouldn't have more than 2 articles queued at a time.
|
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
|