From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
| Article: Why?:Stick Things in the Electrical Outlet
|
Score: 16 screwdrivers jammed in the outlet
|
| Nomination:
| Sir Unknown User (Talk : Cont : VFH : PEE : CUN) 01:28, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
|
For Votes: 16
|
- Nom and For-Brilliant concept, did excellent (41!) on Pee. Enjoy!--
Sir Unknown User (Talk : Cont : VFH : PEE : CUN) 01:28, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
- For--Æ 01:29, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
- For CAKE J! <-> (Dec 19 / 01:29)
- 4 - Solid, man. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon
(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 01:55, Dec 19
- foa - Nice work --
Major'GUN' Ggarfield, Le Marquis de Nofu .Canada! 20:03, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
- Forks go in the outlet --
Spillin Dylan TALK EDITS 02:49, Dec 20
- For. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 11:33, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
- Фор This is very funny. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S]
MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 23:53, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
- Фор --General Insineratehymn 02:10, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
- For --Shocking idea. MrN
22:55, Dec 21
- For Dame
GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 16:03, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
Blrzzt – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • bloggings) Quote of the Day 17:54 Dec 22, 2007
- For. This article is as irresistible as an...electrical...outletttttttt.../me gets my fork and goes to my outlet. Pretty! ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ CUN • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF (@ 18:36 23 Dec, 2007)
- For --Grand General Wizard Etc x2 and Senator G/K/O/CUNT.K.F. WHORE! ZOTM MAFE VANDL UOTM WOTM TOP10 FP PMOTM UWotM 20:35, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
- Forktastic. -- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 18:10, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
- For Why not? --Dallasallad 21:48, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 0
|
#Just doesn't do it for me :( This article is a bit funny in its coverage of what can be done with an electrical outlet, but it doesnt really cover why to do those things. It continuously says what has been done, but never lives up to the title of the article. I have to admit that i love the concept, but this concept got almost no coverage in the article, instead letting other articles explain why to do such things. Robertodole 17:52, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
- Thank you for your opinion. I really appreciate it. But could you be a bit more specific when you say that it got almost no coverage of the concept? I don't mind that you voted no but you really should take another look at it, and tell me what you didn't like or wanted to be included, before voting.--
Sir Unknown User (Talk : Cont : VFH : PEE : CUN) 19:41, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
I just woke up, and now im all groggy and cant tell funny from not funny, so i took out my vote comletely Robertodole 01:58, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
| Click here to place this article next in the feature queue
|
Check the feature queue first to make sure an article hasn't been featured already today. The queue normally shouldn't have more than 2 articles queued at a time.
|
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
|