Uncyclopedia:VFH/archive4
From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
Distraction
Featured - 14.5 votes according to my count. —rc (t) 03:02, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
- Nomiforated -- Baron Village Idiot♠CUN Free Speech 00:35, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
- <!--for-->
t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 02:32, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
- Weak for I did, in fact, chortle.--<<
>> 02:46, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
- For - nice one - David Gerard 17:40, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
- Weak for. Week four?—Sir Mandaliet ♠ CUN PS VFH GN (talk) 18:01, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
- AgaFornst. Speaking of four (blah blah blah)... --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 18:10, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
- For I think... Hey guys, what's that bird over there? - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 18:17, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
- I dig it — 2nd Lt. Sir David, the Weasel of Wild KUN VFH FP
Fire! 17:45, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
- For. Is the part about the celtics true?--Rataube 00:55, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
- Some of it... I had just read an article in National Geographic the night before. So, I tried to remember as best I could. So, in conclusion, there may be one or two facts in there...
t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 03:38, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
- For this is great! --The Rt. Hon. BarryC
MUN (Symposium!) Sigh. Double Sigh. 10:11, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
- For --71.213.200.43 23:15, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
- Against. -Conniption 13:16, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
- Weak For, but I am almost out of for so...
talking of being out of four, or four, the Greeks did not have a word for four, well they did, but nobody cares. Anyway, it's a very weak for. Talking about four weeks... ~ 16:04, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
- For loops are a quite useful construct in computer science. They allow you to... --Andrusi 16:14, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
- For. This is really rather good, it snuck right up on me. More like [tangent] than [distraction] though - jack mort | cun | f@h | talk
- 12:08, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
- For nice --Severian 13:31, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
- For. ~ T. (talk) 13:19, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
The Root of All Evil
Featured —rc (t) 03:28, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
- Nom and 4. A gem. --
Cap'n SimzorzAr, Matey! 20:51, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
- For. —Hinoa KUN (talk) 20:54, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
- For--2nd Lt. Claudius Prime 21:14, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
- Wow. Of all the stuff I've written so far this month, I'm not certain this is this best of the bunch, but thank you thank you & thank you. :) And For. ~ T. (talk) 22:31, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
CommentFor <s>I can't vote for this one because every time I read "Root of all Evil"... I think wait... it should be "Route of all Evil" in this context... which distracts me from the article itself... and I can't vote against it, because if the word Root was replaced in each instance with Route... I would love the article...</s>Good Article... I re-read it... nevermind the crap i said before... --Mindsunwound: (F@H) Peek & Pie
Man Babies 23:03, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
- For. --OsirisX 23:05, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
- Hugely strong FOR that's backed up with tanks. The source idea is good, the writing is smart and this one well deserves its place in the sun. --Hardwick Fundlebuggy 05:19, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- For. This one and Perfect Disaster were my favorite in the Poo Lit. Isn't someone going to nominate PD? ...Why don't I? 'Cause. --So So 07:28, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- For. Funny.--<<
>> 12:08, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- For. Nice Job, I've been to the Root of All Evil, it was pleasant and warm to the touch.--Severian 01:33, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
- For. Wonderfully subtle and just plain fun to read. --Johnfn 01:55, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
- Against. Unfunny, and pretty boring. Done before. Bilky Asko Talk Here 18:14, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
- For, stayed there for three glorious days and nites last year. Nice place, not enough sinning.
Modusoperandi 18:20, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
For, halarious!! id love to go and spend at week there.- For because of a surprisingly good implementation of random humor. It's funny, and not just stupid. --Poofers 02:24, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
- For A masterpiece of humour! --The Rt. Hon. BarryC
MUN (Symposium!) Sigh. Double Sigh. 07:49, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
- Foramusing

...
05:59, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
- For. --KATIE!! 02:44, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
- I'm going to vote For this lovely entry on a very important place in human history.
Sir Dawg cun | tlk | vdp 02:53, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
Age of Umpires
Featured —rc (t) 03:16, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
- Nominated and Four. This is a truly funny article... if you don't agree, vote elsewhere --Mindsunwound: (NS) Pissing Vinegar
Here
16:01, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
- For, being Australian it is my duty to vote in favour of this marvellous game. --OsirisX 23:02, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
- For And not just becuase Age of Emprires is my favorite game ever. It's a damn good article. (Forgot to long in.) --ENeGMA 21:29, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- Weak For If the quality of the writing matched that of the illustrations it would be great. --Hardwick Fundlebuggy 05:07, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- For, even though I pesonally don't like the usage of one-equal-sign titles, I love the photoshop job. Lenin & McCarthy 06:00, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- For.
Bloopy 08:09, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- Gosh, yes. -- Sir Codeine KUN VFP Bur. MDA NS UotM CM +S (Harangue) 11:45, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- For. Though I'm American, I still see the humor here. Incidentally, everyone who was complaining about this winning a Poo Lit can just ignore Minds' message up there.--<<
>> 12:21, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- I'm confused, what does poo lit have to do with people voting elsewhere? --Mindsunwound: (NS) Astroglide Diplomacy
Puppy Luff
17:37, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- For. I spent ages on them pics... Hindleyite
Talk 17:49, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- Weak for. Although I didn't get a lot of the jokes, the pics and such are funny. It just needs some more jokes that people who aren't British will understand. --User:Nintendorulez 21:18, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- Absolutely For - I'm still unsure if Americans understand Cricket, but this article superb. Billy Bowden rules!!!! Das Boot 23:13, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- against, makes cricket sound just a boring as baseball. Which it is. Modusoperandi 00:11, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
- Four, not out. -- Sir Mhaille
(talk to me) 08:46, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
- For, Just truly brilliant, and the jokes are well phrased Bilky Asko Talk Here 18:09, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
- For. My lack of being British showed when reading this... but I laughed enough times for this vote.--Witt E, 04:35, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
- For --Spin 05:15, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
- For --EvilZak 18:17, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
- For --Definately for this article, it is really funny and hilarious!--Death motor 02:44, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
Internet (video game)
Featured —rc (t) 03:12, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
- Nomination and For Another PLS entry. —rc (t) 23:56, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- For This is actually pretty funny, and the idea is great. --Johnfn 01:50, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
- For, I've played it a couple of times. --OsirisX 02:29, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
- For Great article.--Chris - Talk - Contribs -19:35, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
- For. Holy crap OverlordChris, put your sig in a template. --User:Nintendorulez 11:45, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry, I'm still rather new to this. ^^;;
- For. Would have won PLS if not for Mr Grumpikins, IMO. --Hindleyite
Talk 16:15, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
- For. Pretty clever. --Zyrac 19:03, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
- For. Not die-hard hilarious, but still funny enough to be on VFH.--123Fat123 21:18, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
- For. Yeah, this is worthy.--<<
>> 21:33, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
- For Modusoperandi 18:13, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
- For. Funny article. --Witt E, 05:04, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
- For Nice me likes. --Severian 13:44, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
- For. I am very entertain. --So So 10:53, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
- For. --EvilZak 18:56, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
- For --Insineratehymn
Bouncy Castle
Featured —rc (t) 03:23, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
- Self nomination and For. It's time to run the gauntlet --Hardwick Fundlebuggy 17:46, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
- For It had it's good moments and it's dull moments, but it definitely got a few laughs out of me, so here you go. --Johnfn 19:19, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
- FOR Kafka ist mir ueber lustig. --Severian 19:22, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
- For maybe even five or six. Dame
GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 19:36, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
- All in Favour (means FOR) Wow. this was a brilliantly written article, something out of british comedy. Go this person. 16:19, 01 May 2006 (UTC)
- For We are amused, but one must wonder about the plumbing system in a bouncy castle. Well done bit of Brit humor. 23:47, 01 May 2006 (UTC)
- for it has castles, bouncing and kafka (unknown if he was bouncing). Plus it didn't win PLS, which makes it my brother, spritually. Modusoperandi 20:16, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
- For Das Boot 23:07, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
- For I support all Kafka references. --Spencer (yiff)
Cheer up! Hitler's still dead. 01:53, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
- For Another good one. —rc (t) 04:23, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
- For.
Bloopy 11:39, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
- For. The first paragraph and the picture alone make this worthy. --Wyattj 12:58, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
- For- I like the new picture!--2nd Lt. Claudius Prime 14:58, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
- For. This article set me giggling, and I blame YOU, HARDWICK!!!!--<<
>> 18:25, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
- For Astoundingly brilliant. These are the kind of ideas I wish I could come up with. --ENeGMA 02:47, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
- For. Brilliant. • Spang • UotF | talk • 05:22, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
BoiiingFor. —Hinoa KUN (talk) 05:27, 29 April 2006 (UTC)- Hell yes.--Hobelhouse 18:31, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
- For What else? --Noremakk 21:46, 1 May 2006 (PST)
Water powered bus
Featured —rc (t) 04:49, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
- Nomination and For Another excellent PLS entry. —rc (t) 04:40, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
- For one (of many) Poo Lit Surpise entries that made mine, by comparison, look not-good (I'm still not bitter) Modusoperandi 05:00, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
- For. Argh god the water powered bus is going to stab me to death.
Bloopy 10:20, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
- Water powered for. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 11:28, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
- The number of hydrogen atoms in 2 molecules of water. I am such a geek. —Hinoa KUN (talk) 14:55, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
- For. I lost my virginity on a water powered bus... twice... --Mindsunwound: (F@H) Pantsu Getta!
There
15:02, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
- For. It's the future. --Hindleyite
Talk 15:06, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
- For. This is great. --Hardwick Fundlebuggy 04:58, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- For. RC promised me sex for this vote. --Splaka 05:04, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- For. That article is on fire... or is it--Witt E, 05:06, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- For. --OsirisX 05:09, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- For. Yeah, this is good.--<<
>> 12:22, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- For! Of course. • Spang • UotF | talk • 03:59, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
For this article because it does not smell Amen sista sista. I bet I am the only one who lives on Akmankakan and talks out of my butt. Akmid Hermad, 5:14, May 1, 2006.
UnNews:Last spot in heaven taken; hundreds waitlisted
Featured —rc (t) 04:17, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- Self-nomination and for. Just testing the water. This seems like the best way to get feedback on things. And Todd's reading makes it really cool. --
23:33, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
- Against. Boo religion jokes. --POJoe!
TALKCONTRIBSF@H 04:14, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
- Comment Religion jokes are bad only if they are ignorant, and I did my research. --
15:56, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
- For, even if religion isn't as inherently funny as cancer, say - David Gerard 15:38, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
- For - Even though God is never available for a comment. Good stuff. --Imrealized 16:19, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
- For - I have never been so offended! Religion and comedy do not mix! — 2nd Lt. Sir David, the Weasel of Wild KUN VFH FP
Fire! 16:23, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
- For. Shame on your people for pointing out mathematical fallacies in a major religion. You're all going to Hell (as well as, apparently, millions of the faithful).--<<
>> 20:13, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
- I suppose so. We definately need an UnNews featured article, this is getting insane.
t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 20:49, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
- For. If it's not obvious, I'm reading the recent UnNews stories I like the best (though it's been hard to resist the egotistical temptation to read all my own stories). :) ~ T. (talk) 03:28, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
- For I agree with Tompkins --The Rt. Hon. BarryC
MUN (Symposium!) Sigh. Double Sigh. 13:56, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
- Mild against. It's kinda funny, but not really funny enough to be featured --Joewithajay 14:15, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
- AF-FIR-MA-TIVE!!! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 15:48, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
- For. An UnNews feature would be good. --Spang 18:00, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
- FOR A large FOR because the article is funny, Jehovah's Witnesses are funny, and anything about God is funny. Good one. --rev. zim_ulator (Talk - Edits Logs) I am the dirt under your rollers. 23:53, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
AGAINST. Unnews should have its own highlights--Rataube 13:57, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
- DON'T FEATURE UNNEWS! ANIDN MENOSCWICZ
22:43, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
- HELL, YEAH Das Boot 14:10, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
- Request Could you guys please vote based on the merits of the article, not on if it's UnNews? --
00:43, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
- For. I like the waitlist idea. -Conniption 10:24, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
- For. Removing 'don't feature because it's UnNews' votes. And for featuring.--(~Sir)Nuke || Talk v MUN v Not An Admin v Completely Unimportant 22:51, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
- Weak For. Very weak. In fact, if it was any weaker, it'd be neutral. ~ 15:52, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
- For. —Hinoa KUN (talk) 18:29, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
- For Whiney bitches not liking UnNews... the idea is to vote on the quality of the article, jeez --Olipro
Co-Anc (Harass) 15:53, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
Maozilla
Featured Finally. —rc (t) 04:55, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
- Chron suggested we nominated it again. I can't believe it wasn't featured. For. --Rataube 19:40, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Ok, for. I must confess, this made me laugh.--Bradaphraser 20:37, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- For Kakun 21:43, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- For --Chronarion 22:58, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- ForForFor. --KATIE!! 00:21, 13 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- For and may I say very clever too. Prettiestpretty 00:40, 13 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- For - I like his take on Tianemen Smowton 00:51, 13 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 07:02, 13 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- For --ANIDN MENOSCWICZ
14:08, 13 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- For Probably the highest quality article on this page.
17:32, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- 32/8. Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 16:22, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Against - (yeah, I know, this makes me a pariah here, but I just didn't find it humorous.) Insane? Check. Well-executed? Double check. But no gut-buster, this. --King In Yellow 16:50, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, erh, Against. ^_^. I quite agree with KIY. I have read this article repeatedly and just cannot appreiciate it enough to be neutral on it.--Winston 20:50, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
- McFeast. This is funny in its own way. Worth featuring IMVHAIO --Dr. Pepper 21:56, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
- Weak Against. I hate mosters. Ever since that damn SimCity...
t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 20:49, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
- For. 毛主席万岁! --
Sir Xiao Li CUN VFH WH NS (Talk)[citation needed] 00:20, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
- Against I find it hard not to say Delete sometimes.... --The Rt. Hon. BarryC
MUN (Symposium!) Sigh. Double Sigh. 20:01, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
- For --
Bloopy 07:49, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- For. Some good satire in amongst the wackiness. -Conniption 12:50, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
- For. But where's Capitalist Mothra? —Hinoa KUN (talk) 01:38, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
- Against. ~ 16:11, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
- For. A strange idea, but a well written one --Hardwick Fundlebuggy 19:58, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
- For...a little. made me laugh, and it's a nice parody. but could perhaps be lengthened. --sqsz 13.39, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
- Against --71.213.200.153 05:58, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
Vote Fish Penis
Featured I was going to feature Maozilla, but I didn't want there to be two Mozilla-related featured articles in a row. Maozilla will be the next feature. —rc (t) 07:53, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
I was alerted to this one when LinkTGF said on IRC, "that vote fish penis article has fucked my brain up". It does a pretty good job of the promise of the title IMO. Nominate and For - David Gerard 17:53, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
- For. Mumble mumble mumble...
blamethank keitei User:Tompkins/sig1 19:16, 23 March 2006 (UTC) - For. Grumble grumble grumble... --rev. zim_ulator (Talk - Edits Logs) I am the dirt under your rollers. 21:01, 23 March 2006 (UTC
- For. Penis penis penis... --POJoe!
TALKCONTRIBSF@H 23:41, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
- Against. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 06:46, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
- For, because campaign slogans almost never make any sense.--<<
>> 20:05, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
- For this article, I am politically motivated (and even oddly compelled) to cast my vote. --DW III

09:08, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
- For methods of mass-hypnosis. --—Hinoa KUN (talk) 21:20, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
- Ewww.... For I liek dirty humor Flourentina 00:12, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
- Penispenispenis. --KATIE!! 02:17, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
- No. --Uncle Guff (guff) 11:59, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
- Nope. Dame
GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 23:05, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
- For - Rough in spots and flat in others, in the end, vote fish penis has not only garnered my vote but somehow made me travel in time to 1987. — 2nd Lt. Sir David, the Weasel of Wild KUN VFH FP
Fire! 13:55, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
- Against---2nd Lt. Claudius Prime 22:12, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
- For. Fish Penis. -Ximm the Odd, Defender of The Space Five Inches In Front of His Eyes 30 March 2006
- Against. Conniption 13:54, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
- Make it so --Captain Caputosis····
hail20:23, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
- For it kept my attention for..... 2--Mindsunwound: (MUN) Peek & Pie
Dog Fart Trombone
16:10, 7 April 2006 (UTC) minutes... Way to go!
- For.--Rataube 17:49, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
- For Because I want to see the phrase "fish penis" on the front page. --
19:51, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
- Fish Penis. • Spang • UotF | talk • 23:07, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
- For WHAT THE FUCK? -- 18:00, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
- For God, it'll be awesome to go to the mainpage and see that jesusfish with its junk circled...heh --The Captain Zombiebaron MUN, ⌘, UGotM, CM, POW (shout) 13:08, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
- Against!—Sir Mandaliet ♠ CUN PS VFH GN (talk) 10:47, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
- Against It does not smell of VFH --PiOfFive 13:29, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
- For - brilliantly depicts the sheer stupidity of campaign slogans, especially the American variety. --Imrealized 09:18, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
- Absolutely For - This is superb. Das Boot 09:10, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
- Against. Yes, I'm awkward. ~ 16:13, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
- For --71.213.200.153 05:55, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
Mozilla Firefox
Featured --—rc (t) 06:03, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
- Someone added the VFH template to the page, but didn't make a heading. Anyway, I'm FOR it - we can make fun of anime nerds and FF fanboys at the same time! --Poofers 11:47, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
- For - David Gerard 14:04, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
- Better to say, someone forgot to remove the VFH template after it was removed from VFH due to stagnation... Anyway, self-for. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 14:14, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
- For. --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 22:56, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
- For. Yes, this is still awesome.--<<
>> 02:46, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
- Against. Conniption 13:54, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
- For. Funny.
Bloopy 08:54, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- Against--2nd Lt. Claudius Prime 17:56, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
- Meh, why not? --officer designate
Lugiatm
MUN NS CM ZM WH 18:08, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
- Four heh, I didn't think the four would work with all them 's. I like the writing, about half-understand the Linuxy stuff and still found it funny. Pics, links, good formatting, what more could Oscar Wilde want in a date? --rev. zim_ulator (Talk - Edits Logs) I am the dirt under your rollers. 00:27, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
- For That FireFox is hot! --Mindsunwound: (MUN) Peek & Pie
There 16:00, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
- For Although I didn't really "read" it, I did enjoy looking at the words, and that fine ass picture of firefox. (not the anime, the Clint Eastwood...) --Major Sir <
