From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
VFH changed. This page is kept for historical purposes. See the new VFH at
Uncyclopedia:VFH.
- Vote for an article you find excellent. Please add new nominations on the top.
- Initial nominations do not count as a vote For. Please use "Nomination and For" or some iteration thereof if you wish to vote for your nomination.
- When voting For or Against, please change the score number accordingly—this saves a lot of time later.
- IP votes carry half the weight of registered votes.
- Nonsigned votes and votes without timestamps will be struck out, so make sure you sign your votes with ~~~~ or press the "your signature with timestamp" button (
) above the edit box.
- When nominating an article, the template Template:VFH should be added to the end of the article using {{VFH}}. Anything you add {{VFH}} to also shows up in Category:Feature nomination.
- Failed VFH nominations should only be archived/removed by the sysops who pay attention to this sort of thing.
- Previous featured articles can be found on the archive pages.
- Voters: don't be dicks and do be constructive with criticism. Writers: Don't be prima donnas. Be open to criticism.
- Articles from all namespaces (including UnNews, HowTo, UnBooks, etc.) are eligible for VFH. Votes against articles based on namespace prejudice will be discarded.
- If your article doesn't make it to the front page, don't despair. It may be eligible to be Quasi-featured so long as it meets certain criteria.
THIS IS A VOTE, NOT A DISCUSSION.
If you feel the need to whine or start flamewars please do it
HERE.
Violators of this policy will be kicked into next week.
Current Nominations (new stuff at top, prefix votes with * )
SELF-NOMINATION REGULATION: self-nominated articles (i.e. you write an article and then decide to nominate it yourself) must receive at least one critique via Pee Review before nomination (or at spend a week on Pee Review if you can't get anyone to look at it). Articles nominated by people other than the author can still be nominated at any time and require no review (though it is still recommended).
VFH IS NOT A DISCUSSION PAGE. If you'd like constructive criticism for your article, please submit it to Uncyclopedia:Pee Review.
| Vote: U.S. Presidential Election, 1840
|
Score: 2 drunk voters
|
| Nomination:
| << >> 02:21, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
|
For Votes: 2
|
- N&F. Another classic by the late Kwakerjack, back from the dead for your viewing pleasure. (This one is actually my favorite of the bunch, but I suspect that's because it's the first of his great series on the quirks of American politics).--<<
>> 02:21, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
- For, but I resetn the acusatino that I am vtoing drunk! — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 05:12, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 0
|
No against votes
|
| Vote: But Seriously...
|
Score: 7 moments of sanity on this wacky site
|
| Nomination:
| << >> 14:41, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
|
For Votes: 7
|
- N&F, from the annals of QFA comes a winner from the Fundlebuggy.--<<
>> 14:41, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- For--Dr. Fenwick 15:12, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- For. Where did he go, anyway? --Grand General Wizard Etc x2 and Senator G/K/O/CUNT.K.F. WHORE! ZOTM MAFE VANDL UOTM WOTM TOP10 FP PMOTM UWotM 16:21, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- For. Another well written oddity from HF. He's off becoming a famous author, I hear. Sir Modusoperandi 17:07, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- For, because I wanted to vote for last time as well. --~
Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p. 17:42, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- For -- [SIR] e|m|c [talk] 19:39, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- Didn't get this last time, but I must have been in a bad mood or something. For. Only "The Hardwick" could have pulled it off, though. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 05:12, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 0
|
No against votes
|
| Vote: HowTo:Write a Stephen King Novel
|
Score: 3 copyright infringements
|
| Nomination:
| Vana 21:23, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
|
For Votes: 3
|
- Nom and For--Okay, kiddies, I figure its about time. Vana 21:23, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Dig good job, fun article --THINKER 21:50, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- For Had to think about it for a while, but sure why not. -RAHB 00:42, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 0
|
No against votes
|
| Comments
|
It's been peer reviewed and edited many many many times. In my (slightly rose-colored spectacle-covered) eyes, I've done pretty darn well.
|
| Vote: HowTo:Beat the Odds
|
Score: 13.5 Beaten odds
|
| Nomination:
| Nom P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) UnBlog 22:52, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
|
For Votes: 16.5
|
- Nom + For Re-nomming an older piece of Ljlego's work I remember from "back in the day." P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon
(Tick Tock) (Contribs) UnBlog 20:18, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- For Cajek 21:43, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- Dig I liked it enough to vote for it the first time, why not again? ;) --THINKER 21:52, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- For Because this is pretty much the last remaining article with a UQG quote. And its funny. That too.-- Sir Leoispotter, SpecOps (garble! jank!) 02:53, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah sure, why not Another testament of his deserving the WotM -RAHB 04:48, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Beats an Odd in spite of the VOTE-WHORING. --Ekashp 15:07, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- For I reviewed this article about 90 times, and would love to see it featured. oh yeah and it's funny too. --THE 15:09, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- For Greatest article ever.
King of the Cats <3 John Cusack ~ Rebel! ~ Spell Fixx~ 15:09, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Catchy soundtrack for evil I'm Lovin' it, padapapapa 195.241.149.38 20:42, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- F☭R,
Premier Tom Mayfair 09:08, 09 July 2007
- For. I thought it was funny, and we all know that's all that matters --Grand General Wizard Etc x2 and Senator G/K/O/CUNT.K.F. WHORE! ZOTM MAFE VANDL UOTM WOTM TOP10 FP PMOTM UWotM 21:21, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- For. Politics...or something. No, I legitimately enjoyed this article and wasn't bribed with Monopoly Money or chocolate bars. AT ALL! mrthejazz
(please talk to me i'm lonely.) 21:39, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- For Hey that's funny, neither was I! ...hehe. >_> --Señor DiZtheGreat
CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 23:43, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Self-For -Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:26, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- For Finntastic 17:34, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- Frosted Wow. That's the good stuff. a-slice-of-cake 13:53, 10 July 2007 (EDT)
For --Ekashp 21:05, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- For Not because of bribery, the concept is clever! --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 01:29, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 3
|
- Weak Against - Sorry, just don't think that it is funny enough. {Ikabu}BUZZ...FLICK...GURGLE... 02:10, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Against. Same as Ikabu. • • • SIR FELLOW Necropaxx KUN {PotM VFH VFP VotM} (Beseech)
21:16, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Against. Some good lines but, overall, it's not a standout page. Sir Modusoperandi 17:11, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
- Oh dear.
I believe I may have been zorked that night.<s> Terribly sorry. I'll try not to do it again. --Ekashp 02:22, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
- Update: I looked at the timestamps. I'm sure I was pasted. Small wonder I forgot I'd voted. --Ekashp 02:33, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
|
| Vote: Afairyism
|
Score: 2 afairyisms
|
| Nomination:
| Weri long wang
|
For Votes: 2
|
- Nom and for I don’t know what people think of this article, but I got a 41 in the pee review (after adding some pictures), so I might as well put it up. --Weri long wang 17:00, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- For Enough jokes to keep me reading it. -RAHB 04:25, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 0
|
No against votes
|
| Vote: Commercial
|
Score: 16 commercials
|
| Nomination:
| Ljlego
|
For Votes: 16
|
- N+F e|m|c keeps making humorous pages. Fucking e|m|c.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 23:31, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- For Sir Roger 02:29, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- For --THE 13:00, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- For --vyvyan 13:26, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- For --BurekSP 14:32, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- For --Wizardman 15:14, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- HeadOn! Apply directly to the forehead! -- Sir Leoispotter, SpecOps (garble! jank!) 16:10, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- HeadOn! Apply directly to the forehead! --Grand General Wizard Etc x2 and Senator G/K/O/CUNT.K.F. WHORE! ZOTM MAFE VANDL UOTM WOTM TOP10 FP PMOTM UWotM 17:07, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- HardOn! Apply directly to the forehead! Err...I mean. Crap. For. -- [SIR] e|m|c [talk] 20:16, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- HeadOn! Apply directly to the forehead! --General Insineratehymn 23:13, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- HeadOn, Apply directly to the... Penis??? ----Mgr. Sir Sonic80☭ 02:58, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Test-i-cleez mmmm -RAHB 04:20, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- HeadOn! Apply dir...HEADON! HEADON! HEADON! I HATE your commercials, but your article is amazing!--Mr.Vib 14:07, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Commerical! Apply directly to Main Page! I HATE your commercials, but your article is amazing! --Ekashp 16:02, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- For--General And Min. THEDUDEMAN
21:09, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- For Well written. Also, apply directly to forehead. Or else! P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon
(Tick Tock) (Contribs) UnBlog 21:42, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 0
|
No against votes
|
| Vote: UnNews:Uncyclopedia is better than Wikipedia
|
Score: 7 rivals beaten down
|
| Nomination:
| Sir Andorin Kato CUN and Bombad General [This] [That] [The baseball bat] 00:50, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
|
For Votes: 11
|
- Self-Nom & For. Nobody can argue the title. Built like an actual journalism article, and it did well in Pee Review. --Sir Andorin Kato CUN and Bombad General [This] [That] [The baseball bat] 00:50, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- For Whee pah! THE TRUTH MUST BE REVEALED --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 01:31, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Yes!--Dr. Fenwick 03:21, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- For - Because it is better than Wikipedia, duh! A while ago, I wrote a sequel to this UnNews:Wikipedia will merge with Uncyclopedia which failed on VFH.--Sir Manforman
12:18, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- For--Lt.Wyoming 17:39, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- For P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon
(Tick Tock) (Contribs) UnBlog 19:54, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- For-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:57, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- For!--K-Gamer_B29 | Discussion | Station Square 20:22, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- For. I'm a fan of smoking and collecting asses. --Grand General Wizard Etc x2 and Senator G/K/O/CUNT.K.F. WHORE! ZOTM MAFE VANDL UOTM WOTM TOP10 FP PMOTM UWotM 23:41, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- For, but I may need to change my vote. After all, its true. -- --Mgr. Sir Sonic80☭ 02:35, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- F0R! Yes. --Trar (talk|contribs|grueslayer)
11:33, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 4
|
- --L 05:19, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- There's no need to suck up to the hometown crowd, even if it is nice to have smoke blown up our collective asses. Sir Modusoperandi 20:16, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- Against Never really laughed. -- Sir Leoispotter, SpecOps (garble! jank!) 02:54, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Against A nice thing to have on the site, but not funny enough for main page glory. -RAHB 04:18, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
|
| Vote: HowTo:Deceive people on eBay
|
Score: 9 smart eBay sellers
|
| Nomination:
| Sir Manforman 
|
For Votes: 10
|
- Self Nom/For--Sir Manforman
14:12, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- sDig I did a lot of work on this one, and I must say, it came out pretty damn good. :) --THINKER 16:44, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- For Who cares if it's listy? -- Sir Leoispotter, SpecOps (garble! jank!) 18:26, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- For. Lists work sometimes. Also: two self noms? What is dis shiznit? --Grand General Wizard Etc x2 and Senator G/K/O/CUNT.K.F. WHORE! ZOTM MAFE VANDL UOTM WOTM TOP10 FP PMOTM UWotM 18:45, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- For Sir Roger 19:38, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- For This shows the exact reason why my parents are broke. -RAHB 01:12, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- For Yah, yah.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 12:58, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- For Yes, you gotta love it really. Cause it's good. I like the lists. The lists make me want to dance. I'll dance because of those lists. The Oblong Lobster 14:25, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Definite For'd - Wow, I may actually make some money off eBay. -- --Mgr. Sir Sonic80☭ 21:22, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Formrthejazz
(please talk to me i'm lonely.) 22:17, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 1
|
- Against, a bit too listy in the middle IMO, and it didn't really make me laugh all that much. –—Hv (talk) 6/07 17:44
|
| Comments
|
- One self-nom, two self-fors. :) And for the record, there is a difference between an article containing lists and an article being listy: in the first, an article has detailed lists which are jokes themselves, and help facilitate the humor of the piece. A listy piece has lists with little to no detail that just take up space and generally do not serve the humor of the work. Of course, this is perceived differently by different people, so I have no qualms about Againsts for such a reason. --THINKER 18:53, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- I'll be gone tommorow so there will be a delay in returning favors for votes--Sir Manforman
23:28, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
|
| Vote: 667:Neighbor of The Beast
|
Score: 12 wacky neighbors
|
| Nomination:
| nom P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) UnBlog 16:10, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
|
For Votes: 14
|
- SN+F -- I have no idea as to how this will fare, but it's worth a shot P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon
(Tick Tock) (Contribs) UnBlog 16:10, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
- For. --Sir Andorin Kato CUN and Bombad General [This] [That] [The baseball bat] 18:45, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
- Most Definitely For. // Sgt.Montez
19:41, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
- F☭R,
Premier Tom Mayfair 02:11, 06 July 2007
- For --~
Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p. 02:12, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- For--Dr. Fenwick 14:24, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- For 1) The title 2) The TV Land line 3) The article -RAHB 01:23, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- For Needs a theme song by Iron Maiden, called "Neighbor of the Beast" (A rip off of "Number of the Beast", of course! --FumbDucker 02:03, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- For --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 04:04, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Fo very funny --THE 12:59, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- For-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:14, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- For. Sure, why not. • • • SIR FELLOW Necropaxx KUN {PotM VFH VFP VotM} (Beseech)
21:07, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- For Marmalade, indeed. Truly a classic. -- Sir Leoispotter, SpecOps (garble! jank!) 01:25, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- For --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 01:19, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 2
|
- Against, didn't really make me laugh. –—Hv (talk) 5/07 19:32
- Against Cajek 06:20, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
|
| Vote: UnNews:Poor planning ruins Rapture
|
Score: 12 pious appendages
|
| Nomination:
| » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 2007.07.04.02:40
|
For Votes: 12
|
- N+F This one actually made me laugh. Amazing. Good work here.
» Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 2007.07.04.02:40
- For -- Sir Leoispotter, SpecOps (garble! jank!) 03:11, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
- For Sir Roger 05:07, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
- For. My left ear got Raptured. Now my glasses are crooked. Sir Modusoperandi 06:46, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
- For unfoturnately the ratpier left jme with no eys -!!RAHB 07:05, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
- --L 09:54, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
- For
Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 14:22, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
- For --Pie-tony 19:57, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
- For Hilarious! rev. zim_ulator (Talk - Edits Logs) I am the dirt under your rollers. 00:26, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
- For P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon
(Tick Tock) (Contribs) UnBlog 03:19, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- For. –—Hv (talk) 6/07 18:02
- For --
~ GCD 03:51, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 0
|
No against votes
|
| Vote: UnBooks:Tuesdays with Maury
|
Score: 10 bold, brazen journalists
|
| Nomination:
| THINKER 01:03, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
|
For Votes: 10
|
- Nom+sDig Prettiestpretty hit the nail on the head as to why this one probably wont make it to feature, but I'm going to nom it anyway; its a 100% satire, and I love it. :) --THINKER 01:03, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
- For Satire at its best. -RAHB 05:37, 3 July 2007 (UTC)#
- For --Sir Manforman
12:07, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
- For --vyvyan 01:40, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
- I've never voted on an Unbook before, but this one is damn funny. --So So 07:28, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
- Strong For I believe I pee reviewed it. Very good.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:11, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- For. I'm not very happy that I'm not the father of this one :( --
|