Uncyclopedia talk:Adopt-A-Noob
From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
Contents |
[edit] Definition
Are they still considered n00bs if they've passed the 30 day mark but still look/walk/quack like a noob? -- T. (talk) 00:34, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Excellent question.....I would go for the latter. A n00b has to be defined by his/her n00b or n00blike actions. -- Sir Mhaille
(talk to me)
[edit] Better name?
How about "Adopt-a-Loser"? ANNAfoxlover 15:36, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Blocks
Is the "must not have any recent blocks" rule strictly enforced? Because I was considering being an adopter, and I was blocked a few days ago for 2 hours. I don't think it was serious, it's not like it was a severe ban or anything. So can an exception be made? P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon
(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 00:42, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] PLEASE ADOPT ME!
I'VE BEEN UP FOR TWO MONTHS AND NOT ADOPTED! WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO? YOU WOULDN'T WANT A N00B LIKE ME EDITING!--Dummmmmmy 15:30, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Ever check users requesting adoption?
No? I didn't think so. =3 Isshiki Kotonashi-kun =3 | Talk! | IMRAC! | Sign! | Play! | Courtier Isshiki FBu! 01:52, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
- Check what?
Premier Tom Mayfair
04/11 05:17
[edit] Recommendation
I recommend User: SovietGaara for the Adopt-a-Noob program. Oh, and is copying pages from editors pages qualifictation for n00bness. Cuz if it is, then SovietGaara is a supreme n00b. EPIC FAIL FOR SOVIETGAARA!!!--Evil Kangaroo 15:19, 21 April 2008 (UTC)


