Uncyclopedia talk:Adopt-A-Noob

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.

Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

[edit] Definition

Are they still considered n00bs if they've passed the 30 day mark but still look/walk/quack like a noob? -- T. (talk) 00:34, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Excellent question.....I would go for the latter. A n00b has to be defined by his/her n00b or n00blike actions. -- Sir Mhaille Image:Icons-flag-gb.png (talk to me)

[edit] Better name?

How about "Adopt-a-Loser"? ANNAfoxlover 15:36, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocks

Is the "must not have any recent blocks" rule strictly enforced? Because I was considering being an adopter, and I was blocked a few days ago for 2 hours. I don't think it was serious, it's not like it was a severe ban or anything. So can an exception be made? P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 00:42, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] PLEASE ADOPT ME!

I'VE BEEN UP FOR TWO MONTHS AND NOT ADOPTED! WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO? YOU WOULDN'T WANT A N00B LIKE ME EDITING!--Dummmmmmy 15:30, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ever check users requesting adoption?

No? I didn't think so. =3 Isshiki Kotonashi-kun =3 | Talk! | IMRAC! | Sign! | Play! | Courtier Isshiki FBu! 01:52, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Check what? 500px-Uncyclomedia_Community_Logo-C.png Premier Tom MayfairRedPhone.pngBlackberetsig.png 04/11 05:17


[edit] Recommendation

I recommend User: SovietGaara for the Adopt-a-Noob program. Oh, and is copying pages from editors pages qualifictation for n00bness. Cuz if it is, then SovietGaara is a supreme n00b. EPIC FAIL FOR SOVIETGAARA!!!--Evil Kangaroo 15:19, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Headline text

[edit] Headline text

Personal tools
projects