Uncyclopedia talk:What You Can Do
From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
Wow, I seriously disagree. I think everything is Stupiper with Oscar Wilde. What isn't funny is random F-ing shit--all the "bios" that have no satyrical relationship to the subject that are filled with random dates, random relatives, random accomplishments, random boink affairs. That's the kind of crap that should be cleaned up. How about starting a biography improvement project? 01/02/07
- The constant references to Wilde, Mr. T, Norris, et cetera add some coherence to uncyclopedia, as its sort of a running joke. BTW, it seems that the policy here is less than completely consistent on the level of acceptable nonsense. For example, the help pages advocate a "satirical point of view" while some pages are given (what appear to be) awards for being "Ape-sh*t Crazy" or "bat-f*ck insane" --Template:Blkgardner 4/19/07
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
oh crap I could use some help with human nature if anybody has a spare moment. It was supposed to be funnier than it turned out to be. --NERD42 EMAIL TALK H2G2 PEDIA NEWS 14:57, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
um yeah ditto for UnNews:NASA discovers Moon is actually giant pancake! --Nerd42eMailTalkUnMetaWPediah2g2 17:48, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
No Oscar?!?! I can understand Norris, but Oscar is an integral part of Uncyc! --User:Nintendorulez 17:48, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
“I disagree, Nintendorulez - the sooner someo
ne burninates 98% of those godawful Template:Wilde's, the better.”
I think Wilde quotes add to the article when they are in something resembling Wilde's actual style. Unfortunately, the vast majority of the Template:Wilde's have him saying moronic stuff like "I'd tap that," and I'm all for removing them. But if a quote shows at least cursory familiarity with Oscar's works, anecdotes, or sense of humour, I say leave it in. --Ialdabaoth 23:43, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Most wanted?
Is there a list of Most Wanted Articles like on Wikipedia (Articles which have the most red links pointing to them)? Or are those more often written, then abandoned as single-sentence deadweights? --Lenoxus 17:08, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
- Special:Wantedpages (also see Uncyclopedia:Requested Articles). --Splaka
- Excelente. Muchas grácias, señor(a). --Lenoxus 15:50, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] flag??!!
this flag is really bad joke and its made by serbian citizen who hate croatians, please remove it, if u dont know thats nazy sign!!!!!!thank u
[edit] OK. Here's one thing you should add.
Grammar police-ing. Ooh. time to make a new page... (Walks off to go do so.)
- User:Ceridwyn/Proofreading Service. Done. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 11:04, 26 May 2007
[edit] {{Title}}
is no longer working. What's up? Lenoxus 15:41, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Some other things to do.
- Hyperlink every word in the HowTo article HowTo:Hyperlink every single word in your article. I already started with the first paragraph.
- Adopt a N00b with the Uncyclopedia:AAN Foundation.
--[citations needed] 19:34, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Has anyone realised..
When you do work on the lonely pages catogry, they do not disapear from the Catogory. Why?
[edit] What is this site about?
Hey, I don't know if you find yourselves funny. I saw my countries article and it didn't came funny to me. You must delete it. This site sucks. You'll probably delete this message to!
Link to my countries article:
http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Turkey
- Yeah but the Greeks find it hysterical!!! Humour is often subjective and many people find it hard to laugh at themselves, their nation or their beliefs. Short answer is no, the article ISN'T going to be deleted any time soon. If you don't like it, click that little X in the top corner of your browser. -- Sir Mhaille
(talk to me)
