User:Boomer/People for the Evaluation of Excrement and Influencing Nominations for Greatness

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.

Jump to: navigation, search

FAQ

Committee

People for the Evaluation of Excrement and Influencing Nominations for Greatness!

PEEING Top Secret Headquarters.
PEEING Top Secret Headquarters.

This is a group dedicated to creating, submitting, and, if you feel like it, whoring quality Pee Reviews.

Contents

[edit] Recent News

[edit] Guidelines

Taking the piss is serious business (it's not personal)
Taking the piss is serious business (it's not personal)

There are currently only 2 rules for membership in the Society.

  1. You must give quality Pee Reviews. I will may probably won't be going through Pee Review every few weeks to make sure that members are giving good reviews, but that's OK, because some other guys do it almost daily. This means being completely honest in the review and giving at least a couple of suggestions for improvement (if improvement is needed). Otherwise, you'll get a good firm talking to.
  2. You must give at least 1 Pee Review per month. Obviously, we'd like you to do much more than that, but if you don't do at least that you'll end up with the smelly ol' retirees. Our goal is to make sure that the authors of potentially good articles receive the help they need, and to do so we need to make sure that articles actually get reviewed. Doing more than the required amount of reviews every week will likely result in promotion to a higher rank. Whether or not that's a good thing is all up to interpretation.
  3. Don't always believe what they tell you about the number of rules.


[edit] Membership Requests (currently: 1)

You can't bribe your way in, you have to do some Pee Reviews!
You can't bribe your way in, you have to do some Pee Reviews!

Place requests here. An Attending Urologist will be along shortly to check you out. 5 good reviews and you're in. (We decide if they're good, not you!)

  • Hi, I'd like to join PEEING. I love getting a good review and want to be part of the reviewing committee. Plus I do good reviews every now and again. That's good... right? Yeah.... so... • • • SIR Necropaxx KUN PotM VFH HS VotM (blah, blah, blah...) CheeseChapel_small.jpg 22:21, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
    Hi there Necropaxx, nice to see you here. The list says yu have one good review so far, so that's 4 more and you're in. You'll need to be a bit more in-depth than your last though, that was not really what we're after. Have you had a good look at the guidelines? --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 09:37, Apr 27

[edit] Members

[edit] Ranking

(1) Piss artists of rank Fresh Stain and above

  • Entitlement to {{PEEING}} which may be added to their user page identifying as being of high urinary quality.

(2) Piss artists of rank Attending Urologists and above

  • Must have been a contender for RotM, and be nominated for this rank by another member of Peeing using the talk page. Boomer (cos he's chief bum around here) will then judge the suitability of the candidate, and promote as appropriate. Boomer's decisions are final.
  • May patrol recent Pees and contact those distributing particularly piss poor Pee Reviews and encourage them to improve. That's without pissing them off.
  • May update Cajek's list at any time, provided they know how to.

(3) Piss artists of rank Steel Kidney and above

[edit] Captain Catheter

He likes doing review s.

[edit] Fresh Stains


OEJ skilfully performs his work
OEJ skilfully performs his work

[edit] Attending Urologists

[edit] Steel Kidneys

These badasses can piss for hours, while asleep, without a break, in the Arctic, with a bunch of whiny n00bs bugging them. They also won the Reviewer of the Month award.

[edit] Retirees

Sometimes, PEEING members need to take a break, either from Pee Review or all of Uncyclopedia, and either temporarily or permanently. However, we still love them (except for that one guy. You know the one.) and they are welcome back anytime they wish. For that purpose, they are forever preserved here, ranks intact.

Rather depressing, isn't it?

[edit] Current Pee Review Artists

Updated by lots of different people Cajek, Under User, Heerenveen, and sometimes even SysRq cos everyone else is too dam lazy.

User:Cajek/Pee
user # of reviews # of "in-depth" reviews
Under user7069
SysRq5348
Heerenveen4746
Javascap4436
MrN90003534


Personal tools
projects