User:Todd Lyons/scrapbook
From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
| | | | | |
| Log | Clipboard | Birthdays | Scrapbook | Help |
[edit] Article Votes
[edit] Ecky-Thump
| Vote: Ecky-Thump |
Score: 17 sausage based ninja skills |
| Nomination: | Sir Mhaille |
| For Votes: 19 |
Featured —rc (t) 04:40, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
|
| Against Votes: 2 |
|
| Comments |
|
[edit] The Vagina Monologues
Score: +16 genitalia that won't shut the hell up
Featured —rc (t) 07:13, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- Nomination and For because puns rock. -- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 20:51, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
- For Literalism strikes again. Fucking unions. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 22:14, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
- For --monika 22:57, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
- For The later half redeems.
06:31, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
- Heh. I felt like I needed to build some foundation before the payload delivery, but I'm sure the intro could be tightened up. :) ~ Major Sir Todd Lyons GUN WotM MI UotM NotM MDA VFH AotM Bur. AlBur. CM NS PC 17:09, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
- For. I put a lot of thought into this, but welcome any additions or edits to make it better. ~ Major Sir Todd Lyons GUN WotM MI UotM NotM MDA VFH AotM Bur. AlBur. CM NS PC 16:11, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
- For - jack mort | cun | f@h | talk
- 00:54, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
- For, obviously. -- Sir Mhaille
(talk to me) 14:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
- Foreplay -- Sir Severian
(Sprich mit mir!)
14:58, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
- For...Todd's got culture, all of the sudden...--Shandon 22:34, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
- For...lots of culture...--Kevin Bell 02:29, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
- Strong For. This is great stuff. It's got Vaginae. It's got Monologs. What's not to love? --Anyone 20:37, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
- For. OMGWTFROTFLMAOZEDONG11!! Mr T is on a roll!! first Idiot's Guide and now this? (though this one's of a much better quality & also, it's clear that he's NEVER getting laid, ever, and he knows) -- mowgli 17:26, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
- Comment ~ Yes. Sad, but true. I even complained about it in one of my recent newscasts. Sadly. ~ Sir Todd GUN WotM MI UotM NotM MDA VFH AotM Bur. AlBur. CM NS PC (talk) 05:55, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
- For, ^_^ Premier Tom Mayfair 17:33, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
- Against. Just not getting it. Sorry. --GOSHZILLaDISGUSTING UNFUNNY NONSENSE 10:31, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
- For.--Winston 12:47, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. mrthejazz
(please talk to me i'm lonely.) 21:49, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. Let's see -- tonight I've voted for Penis joke and The Vagina Monologues. That about covers the options.--Procopius 00:12, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Strong For Ahh, I wish my vagina could talk. Lucky bitches. --♥ Lacey • clicky
[edit] Dear John letter
Score: +18 versions enjoyed
Featured —rc (t) 07:05, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
- Nom and For. Ninety seven hilarious articles for the price of one. Highly original. Technically accomplished. Fun to edit. Kind to children. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy - (Ring for service) 06:36, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
- For Wasn't sure, but the second last paragraph sold me. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 10:47, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
- For a new humourous letter with every pageload. ~ Sir Todd GUN WotM MI UotM NotM MDA VFH AotM Bur. AlBur. CM NS PC (talk) 11:11, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
- For- I make it
articles for the price of one. --Sir Jam 11:27, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
- 4 - Oh, that is fuckin' clever! •••• I
my cat! 11:58, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
- For --Zyrac 20:21, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
- Against too close to reality for my taste. Been getting letters like that for the past 18 years. I co-operated with authorities, and still...No -- di Mario 20:46, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
- Wow, for. -- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 20:50, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
- For --GOSHZILLaDISGUSTING UNFUNNY NONSENSE 00:44, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- Against' -- Oh, ye Gads!!! Anyway, it's too short for an article, too long for a dear john letter. At least to me. Feureau 04:27, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- Clarification ~ Actually, it's as long as several of its competitors combined: 15:04, 12 November 2006 Dear John letter (hist) [16,775 bytes] Todd Lyons ~ but the content is random. It's meant to be re-loaded and re-read several dozen (97?) times. :) ~ Sir Todd GUN WotM MI UotM NotM MDA VFH AotM Bur. AlBur. CM NS PC (talk) 05:34, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- Strong for. This article screams
at that heartless bitchto be on the front page.--Procopius 13:35, 1 December 2006 (UTC) - For --—Braydie 13:44, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- For Brilliant idea brilliantly executed. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 23:43, 1 December 2006
- Five it's like a For but one integer more emphatic.Nullius in Verba 19:37, 2 December 2006 (UTC) (UTC)
- For; I oppose tax cuts for the wealthy. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 20:02, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
- For--Winston 12:20, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
- For, but only because it occasionally mentions "restraining order". Ahhh, good times.--Sir Modusoperandi 07:31, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- Weak For. I like random, but it can be sometimes too random. Still good though. --Anyone 18:45, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- FOR! Very good, but by the time you read this ill be looking at the next article.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Drewcoll (talk • contribs) - dif
- Weak For Okay, I love the idea.. but I dislike how this would work on the front page. But I'll leave it up to the admins to figure that out :] Though I am still a little meh about it. --♥ Lacey • clicky 00:19, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
- For a classic article Phal112 09:28, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
- For unrequented love. -- Tits McGee 14:01, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
- Floor Mr. Bob approves.--Mr. Bob 16:49, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] UnBooks:The Complete Idiot's Guide To Talking To Women
Score: +19.5 stupid thoughts
Featured (He always does this when it's my turn at bat. Gone, like a fart in the wind.) ~ Major Sir Todd Lyons GUN WotM MI UotM NotM MDA VFH AotM Bur. AlBur. CM NS PC 06:48, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
Nom & For - A lot of work went into this; one of the best UnBooks out there by far. Absolutely terrific. -- [SIR] e|m|c [talk] 05:33, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
| Todd Lyons will never get laid. | For--monika 05:44, 4 November 2006 (UTC) |
- For. -- Sir C
Holla | CUN 09:13, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
- For - The Blaque
- For (?) ~ This just goes to show that after a over year here, I still have no idea which of my articles are funny, and which ones suck. Thanks for pointing this one out. ~ T. (talk) 11:40, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
- For -- Agree with Monika. Todd Lyons is the only one who'll never get laid. -- mowgli 12:46, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
- For. XD --
SonicChao Babbel!Contribs 13:15, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
- Strong For. The Todd Lyons hit parade continues.--Procopius 13:53, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
- For - --
Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 14:44, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
- Weak against. Funny, definitely. But you can find this kind of humor all over the place. "Speaking of all over the place, my wife/girlfriend/whatever is so fat that her ass..." ..Ah, forget it...--So So 15:04, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
- For -- Hindleyite 15:16, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
- For -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 19:33, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
- against, don't hit me. it is funny, but it's an unbook not an article, it should be here UnBooks:Vote for Featured UnBook - jack mort | cun | f@h | talk
- 19:59, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
- For --Llama-Llover 21:54, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
- For --User:Nintendorulez 22:02, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
- Against unbooks are mediocre jokes in themed giftwrapping. + article much to close to the truth. Be off with you --Vosnul 23:43, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
- For - I must admit, the lack of any "Now really, what kind of question is that?" responses was odd. Although if one formed it that way, it may be out of the question already... --Ж Kalir nobody knows my gender 03:30, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
- For Seems good enough Premier Tom Mayfair 03:49, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
- For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 06:27, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
- For.--Winston 15:46, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
- For -- I helped it a little bit, and I think it's funny, so why not. LadySway1985 00:23, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- For. Funny and useful. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 11:46, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- For. You saved my love life AND my marriage--I'll never get kicked in the balls again! Thanks T.! --Anyone 20:30, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- For Mrthejazz 23:38, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- Definitely Against I didn't laugh at all, pretty weak. 24.94.19.107 00:31, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- Against I think that it could make for a good satire on the stupidity of male attitudes to women, but it just seems to use those attitudes as props - and that stuff has been done before, sadly. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 08:39, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- Against, as per SoSo & HF.--Sir Modusoperandi 08:48, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- Against. I would prefer there to be some more general advice mixed in, rather than just an endless procession of questions and answers. Well, not endless, but a procession nonetheless. 15Mickey20 21:54, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- Weak against. It is funny, but mostly a collection of good jokes and not really "a great piece of writing".---Asteroid B612
(aka Rataube) - Ñ 03:30, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
- For--Viking 12:55, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
- Weak AgainstFunny but more of a list than an article.--Winstanley1 11:46, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
- For the love of a good woman. -- Sir Mhaille
(talk to me) 14:04, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
- For. Because I could actually use this. I can't get past hooking up at parties. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 01:10, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
- For- Nice! --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 01:20, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
- For- Amazing article props - Noradseven
- For, it's funny enough as it is. Johnleemk 15:38, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Against. Just against. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 09:57, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- For. I could have sworn I already voted for this, like, a month ago.--<<
>> 00:45, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
- For Very good stuff you've got ther. --Sir Zombiebaron 00:49, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] UnBooks:Horton Hires a Ho
Score: +28
Featured —rc (t) 02:36, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
- Just Nom for now Okay, I don't know what demented mind wrote this (I don't check authors before I vote or nominate articles), but it's a stark discourse on human sexuality that deserves to be burned in a fire. I mean read. —rc (t) 00:50, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
- Strong For I was thinking of nomming this myself. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 01:00, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
- For -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 01:09, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
- Obligatory For. - You'd have to know the guy it's based on. His theory was that marriage is just prostitution with more expensive gifts and less exciting sex. With a guy like that, the story writes itself. ~ T. (talk) 01:16, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
- For. This is a disgrace to the internet that has infuriated the puritan within me with its tasteless irreverance. That being said, it's a funny funny.--<<
>> 01:48, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
- For but it's a shame (for me) this got here just after my self-nom. Ah well. --Ж Cake-eating Cave Monkey or was it a giant monster or a robot? 02:08, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
- For. Ho, the places you'll go!--Procopius 02:15, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
- This is sick, and has "lawsuit" written all over it. Hm, come to think of it, a lawsuit is just what we need to raise our profile. Strong for. InfiniteMonkey 04:33, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
- Strong For, and there will be more Dr. Seuss coming soon. -- Sir C
Holla | CUN 05:47, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
- 4444! •••• I
my cat! 07:44, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
- 3. --L 10:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
- Oh yeaaah. Daddy likee. And who hasn't gotten stiffed by a prostitute? --Anyone 14:04, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
- For - David Gerard 16:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
- For - -Stevo the Human, now with an article!!
- For. But the question is, can he do it in a train? Can he do it in the rain? Can he do it in the park? Can he do it just for a lark? Help me, I'm just bullshitting in Seussian verse... —
Major Sir Hinoa (Plead) (KUN) (01:14, 11 October 2006 (UTC))
- For. I'd be a ho if I passed up the chance to vote for this before it got on the main page. John1728 09:26, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
- For ^_^ Premier Tom Mayfair 12:01, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
- For -- Sir Severian
(Sprich mit mir!)
13:14, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
- Strong for. Hilarious!--T-Roooy 15:59, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
- Ho yeah. Such whornederful prose. -- Hindleyite 16:02, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
- For. Something rhyming with for. --User:Nintendorulez 21:55, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
- For- priceless. --The Llama Llover
- Sure said the...fur? --Ginchael 23:42, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
- For. Hell yes. -- [SIR] e|m|c [talk] 23:54, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
- For just to be redundant. Also, I saw this linked, I think it was in the recent articles template, and just from the title I could tell it was nommed. -- 02:06, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
- For Har har.--Witt,
of
UNion Entertain me* 03:18, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
- Ho ho ho. Great to see poetry on the front page....FOR. -- Sir Mhaille
(talk to me) 07:43, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
- For---Asteroid B612
(aka Rataube) - Ñ 13:54, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
- For One of the absolute best articles I have ever seen on Uncyclopedia. Bravo. --Thetanmancan 00:51, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] HowTo:Get Banned
Featured - ⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 06:16, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
Score: +19
- For Hah. I have to admit that I'm guilty of a few of those things...--
BirdEgal202 17:41, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
For: LOL. This is teh funnay.- unsigned vote- For. Hasn't this been nominated recently? - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 04:13, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
- Against Yes, as a matter of fact it was. Modusoperandi 04:47, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
- For the record, this has been nommed by a different user each time. Third trip down the aisle, always always left standing at the altar. ~ T. (talk) 10:22, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
- For ; I have my reasons, such as I am anti-Skub --ccdimeanc | cantabria 11:10, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
- Against. it's not really.... good. or an article - jack mort | cun | f@h | talk
- - 14:44, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
For good idea, seriously- unsigned vote- For <3 this article. --User:Nintendorulez 01:08, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- For. This article has been improved with pictures. --Sbluen 20:15, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- Oh, fine. The pictures help a lot. --Hobelhouse 23:55, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- Against. Just seems like a lot of bitching about annoying uncyclopedia users.--InfiniteMonkey 01:30, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
ForLOL phrom ph00blet - Unsigned- Against c • > • cunwapquc? 04:48, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
- Against. Not funny. --Emmzee (flame me here)
- For. New and improved. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 11:32, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
- I have added "Not vote FOR this article on VFH" into the list. Those listed above may want to reconsider their vote..... -- Sir Mhaille
(talk to me) 18:47, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
- For, and I was not coerced into this vote. —Hinoa KUN (talk) 17:48, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
- Against. --Rataube 09:16, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
- Just say No to inside jokes. ~
CaputosistheHorrible
15:09, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
- For haha, every website needs a how to get banned manual! --Snerlin 21:14, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
- For I must be a moron... I think it's funny. rev. zim_ulator (Talk - Edits Logs) I am the dirt under your rollers. 19:38, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- For, if only for the opening.--<<
>> 21:31, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- For. Funny, and sadly true. It's much improved with the pictures. The extended introduction is quite good, though not markedly better than the short, snappy original one.--Winston 02:06, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- For...but wasn't this taken directly from the howto--be a good wikipedian?? --
HP talk 03:20, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
- For I got banned for #15 in Expert Users....-- Sir Severian
(Sprich mit mir!)
11:27, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
- For --Insineratehymn 15:14, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
- For I've only got to intermediate level. :( --The Rt. Hon. BarryC
MUN (Symposium!) Sigh. Double Sigh. 16:08, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
- For. meh...not every how:to needs to be nominated, but this is alright.--Witt E, 05:01, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
- For.
t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 03:25, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
--
Sir Xiao Li CUN VFH WH NS (Talk)[citation needed] 05:05, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
- Say For to funny pics. OMFG STFU N00b! Demonbob 22:08, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
- Aganist - Unpocalypse is here!! -- Colonel Swordman 14:21, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
- Weak For. Needs "Add a B to AAAAAAAAA!" back in there. Crazyswordsman 23:45, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: That cannot be followed because AAAAAAAAA! is protected. Instead, there is "Add a 2 to 01000010 01101001 01101110 01100001 01110010 01111001." --Sbluen 11:14, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
- Against. Bleh--TKF 16:24, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
- Against - How to get banned? Was somebody having trouble with that? Here? Now that's funny.--Immy 19:06, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
- For. Now the admins track the people who do what it says to make their job easier.--Cray Z. 07:22, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
- Against...Doesnt even really count as an article, just OK anyway...--Sir Cornbread 22:30, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
- For --The Stig | Abt me | Rant 06:24, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
For. Half the stuff on there is a direct reference to something Flameviper has done. 24.145.222.85 16:24, 26 June 2006 (UTC)vote by sockpuppet/meatpuppet of Flameviper, both banned (ironic).- For I wish I had had this when I first got here! --Chimzar 22:15, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
for this is funyunsigned vote- No because it's a list inside of a HowTo. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN



