User talk:Boomer/People for the Evaluation of Excrement and Influencing Nominations for Greatness/Archive2
From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
WOW
Cajek sure got this place working. Now even I can't do one of my second rate Pees -- 09:51, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
- HEY! Give credit where it deserves! ...Oh, I see you did. I command you to review shit, DJ. <Apr 02, 2008 [12:41]>
Forum:Expanding Pee Review Numbers :O
I didn't realize this page existed! Haha, what a weird place. Mightydandylion
(talk) Fk 23:01, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
- Welcome. We've just been here talking about you behind your back about how you married that panda. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ CUN • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 23:11 Apr 2
- I hear pandas refuse to eat ice cream. Is this true? Mindless drivel Pointless edits 03:18, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
- I just happen to have a panda right here! <Apr 03, 2008 [3:19]>
- Dear? Mightydandylion
(talk) Fk 15:35, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
- Dear? Mightydandylion
- I just happen to have a panda right here! <Apr 03, 2008 [3:19]>
- I hear pandas refuse to eat ice cream. Is this true? Mindless drivel Pointless edits 03:18, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
THREAD HIJACKED
Why is PEEING doing so damn well? Is it all because of me? <Apr 03, 2008 [15:57]>
- Obviously. /me bows in supplication. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 16:00, Apr 3
- Thanks! Is there any award that goes along with that bow of supplication? Like RotY? <Apr 03, 2008 [16:46]>
- You get a warm fuzzy feeling. However, I believe that spring break is the reason that Pee Review is emptying, and that it's actually our favorite little noobs (relatively) that caused PEEING to do so well, so you get nothing. Now go review something, minion. Mindless drivel Pointless edits 00:29, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, madam Boomer! <Apr 04, 2008 [0:42]>
- Ohh, sometimes you make me so angry! *puffs cheeks* Mindless drivel Pointless edits 02:11, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, madam Boomer! <Apr 04, 2008 [0:42]>
- You get a warm fuzzy feeling. However, I believe that spring break is the reason that Pee Review is emptying, and that it's actually our favorite little noobs (relatively) that caused PEEING to do so well, so you get nothing. Now go review something, minion. Mindless drivel Pointless edits 00:29, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks! Is there any award that goes along with that bow of supplication? Like RotY? <Apr 03, 2008 [16:46]>
Can we make a bit of a change?
Specifically, can we change the rule bit? #2 - you must do one review a week - is not being enforced at all. If we did enforce it, we'd currently have 2 fresh stains, Javascap and DJ Irreverent (who's just joined - welcome DJI!). Frankly, I'd like to see the list of stains stay roughly as it is, reflecting those who can be relied on, when they're active, to give good, helpful reviews, so that there guideline is of no help, and may even be putting off some from getting involved. What say the rest of you? --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 09:18, Apr 11
- We have rules and stuff? Oh, that bit at the top... MrN
11:28, Apr 11
- I evidently haven't really looked at the main page in a while, or I would have seen that. I also would have seen the agonizing pun that I had to eradicate. If I ever find the bastard that put it there... Anyway, the rules are now revised, and I have performed my second depressing forceful retirement ceremony. I was sad to have to add Led, Finnius, and Fag to the list, but alas. 'twas how it was meant to be. Mindless drivel Pointless edits 00:57, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
- Yep, you know how it is; admin work keeping me peeless. Ah well, maybe once school gets out I'll have some time... - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon
(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 01:34, Apr 14
- So, looking at it, we have, what, nine active members now? That's quite a cut from what it was... –—Hv (talk) 14/04 17:04
- Yep, you know how it is; admin work keeping me peeless. Ah well, maybe once school gets out I'll have some time... - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon
An (un)interesting look into the people PEEING attract(s/ed)
So, I was browsing the awards pages earlier, just to make sure that I'd voted for people, and when I got to UotM (that I didn't really need to check, I knew I'd voted UU, but I was bored), I noticeed something, well, that you'll probably find boring. Anyways, PEEING will probably have three of its steel kidneys get UotM in a row - MrN obviously won last month, UU is walking it already this month, and who would bet against Cajek next month, really? Just goes to show how good the PEEING people really are... –—Hv (talk) 14/04 17:04
- Well aren't we just swell? sir
sysrq @ 17:19 Apr 14
- I'm walking it this month? Who would bet against Cajek next month? I think you are doing yourself a huge disservice with both those statements, Hv. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 20:16, Apr 14
- Under user's walking it this month? Who would bet against me next month? I think you are trying to seduce us with your magical words! <Apr 15, 2008 [0:41]>
- Ah, who knows. A month is a long time, and I don't do uncyclopedian-type stuff. But, yes, peeing is a really powerful and interesting group when you look at it that way. <Apr 14, 2008 [23:54]>
- And then, if you look at it another way, it's headed by me. I'll let you think about that. Mindless drivel Pointless edits 00:18, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
- Ah, who knows. A month is a long time, and I don't do uncyclopedian-type stuff. But, yes, peeing is a really powerful and interesting group when you look at it that way. <Apr 14, 2008 [23:54]>
A formal welcoming to our newest member
On behalf of the other delinquents over here at PEEING, I'd like to welcome young Mr. The Improver as our newest member. He seems mighty promising. Welcome aboard, sailor. sir
sysrq @ 01:21 Apr 22
- Yes, he shows much promise with his 100% accuracy. <Apr 22, 2008 [1:41]>
- Welcome! Do your best! Mightydandylion
(talk) Fk 03:40, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- Yes... welcome... please, have a seat on my lovely... "couch"... Mindless drivel Pointless edits 00:01, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
- shudder <Apr 23, 2008 [0:46]>
- Ooh, I've been there before. I still can't get some of the stains out of my pants. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ CUN • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 02:05 Apr 23
- It's not my fault you spilled grape juice all over. Do you know how long it took me to get that out of the carpet? Mindless drivel Pointless edits 02:15, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
- Ooh, I've been there before. I still can't get some of the stains out of my pants. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ CUN • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 02:05 Apr 23
- shudder <Apr 23, 2008 [0:46]>
And now, please extend the warm and slightly sweaty handshake of welcome to Sycamore. He's doing some good work, and it's great to have him aboard! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 09:49, Apr 25
- Sycamore...yeah, I know that cat. Bit of a dandy but a good guy in a sticky nonetheless. Welcome, Sycamore. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ CUN • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 11:46 Apr 25
- Shiver me timbers, another fine matey... I'm sure Boomer said something about us being a pirate ship once... MrN
00:06, Apr 26
- Actually, we're a merchant ship, bound for the high seas to trade silk for slaves with the Indians. Mindless drivel Pointless edits 02:06, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
- Ahh, a good honest profession then, nothing like piracy... MrN
02:22, Apr 26
- Ahh, a good honest profession then, nothing like piracy... MrN
- Actually, we're a merchant ship, bound for the high seas to trade silk for slaves with the Indians. Mindless drivel Pointless edits 02:06, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
- Shiver me timbers, another fine matey... I'm sure Boomer said something about us being a pirate ship once... MrN
So... um...
Not to ruin me becoming the Oscar Wilde of PEEING or anything, but I'm afraid we must say goodbye to the subject of the above thread. As confirmed by our lovely Zombiebaron, The Improver is a quite blatant sockpuppet of NXWave. So... yea... I'm taking him out of the roster and everything... heh... yea...... Mindless drivel Pointless edits 19:54, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
- ...what??? <Apr 27, 2008 [20:01]>
- NXWave came back, and he joined PEEING. He is now infinibanned. Mindless drivel Pointless edits 20:03, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
- Ah jeez, does that guy just not know when to quit or what? --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 22:06, Apr 27
- NXWave came back, and he joined PEEING. He is now infinibanned. Mindless drivel Pointless edits 20:03, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Javascap for Attending
- Nom & For only one on top 5 who isn't AU. <May 03, 2008 [14:07]>
- For. Knows what he's doing when it comes to pee. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 14:39, May 3
- F♥r. He is by no means a Fresh Stain anymore. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ CUN • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 15:04 May 3
- For as above. 3/05 15:13
- Yes as above the above. Also, I think we should consider breaking the "Steal kidneys are better than Attendings" thing. Not that it really matters much... MrN
15:49, May 3
- Finally. I was wondering when one of you would nominate him. I've gone through a few of his reviews, and I liked what I saw. If you happen to see this, Javascap, I especially liked the numbered points of "what needs work" in the final comments. Also, this was the nicest critical review that I've ever seen. Welcome to attending, Javascap. Now GET TO WORK. Mindless drivel Pointless edits 19:28, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
YesTimeToWelcome
Woo, we got us another fine reviewer. The lil' bugger takes after MDL, and both of em were NotMs. I already expect great things from this guy. Let's give a formal welcome to YesTimeToEdit! ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ CUN • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 15:38 May 3
- It's nice having this constant flow of Fresh Stains I feel. It
gives us more meat for the ovengives us a lot more quality over at Pee Review. Welcome YTTE! 3/05 15:45- Awesome. Pee Review is really kicking arse now despite whatever else might be going on. Great to have another fresh stain in our pants... Welcome aboard. MrN
15:53, May 3
- Hi! See, I just wondered in here, when I really needed a piss and I found you guys! Hello you guys! - 16:00 3 May Sir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTE
- Welcome YTTE! Yeah, I bumped into this place by accident too. Don't mind the overpowering aroma of sweat and salt. And torrid unabashed pee parties. Mightydandylion
(talk) Fk 17:30, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
- Welcome YTTE! Yeah, I bumped into this place by accident too. Don't mind the overpowering aroma of sweat and salt. And torrid unabashed pee parties. Mightydandylion
- Hi! See, I just wondered in here, when I really needed a piss and I found you guys! Hello you guys! - 16:00 3 May Sir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTE
- Awesome. Pee Review is really kicking arse now despite whatever else might be going on. Great to have another fresh stain in our pants... Welcome aboard. MrN
Steel Kidneys
Take a look at the below...
- OEJ (November, '07)
- <> (December, '07)
- MrN
(January, '08)
- SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee (February, '08)
- ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ CUN • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF (March, '08)
- ―― Sir Heerenveen, KUN [UotM RotM VFH FFS SK CM NS] (talk), (April, '08)
Am I the only one to notice that HV (despite being an awesome reviewer) has managed to completely bugger up the nice pattern we had going of each progressive Steel Kidney having a slightly longer sig than the previous one? I have always suspected that this is the main reason why Boomer voted for me when I won, and it's very important you know... Order!!! Order!!! I must have order. "Um, a small portion of chips and a bag of otters noses please MrStupid..." MrN
16:05, May 3
- I think that the problem is that people's sigs are sometimes too long, and sometimes too short. That's what's wrong here. Definitely. You can have your otter nose when I get my Moons over My Hammy! <May 03, 2008 [16:30]>
- Heh, I noticed that... Couldn't you re-order it so the pattern continues but the dates are mixed up? - 16:48 3 May Sir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTE
- Now there's a great idea... Na, hang on! That would just be silly, pointless, and a complete waste of time... Not like this talk page topic obviously... HeHe... MrN
17:11, May 3
- Obviously, this topic is very important. And it's serious too...You've put an "an" before "great", I think you need to change that so you have correct grammar...see, serious? Very serious, very important. - 17:31 3 May Sir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTE
- Thanks, fixed now... MrN
17:38, May 3
- And that just goes to show what a not waste of time, not silly topic this really is. - 17:39 3 May Sir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTE
- Thanks, fixed now... MrN
- Obviously, this topic is very important. And it's serious too...You've put an "an" before "great", I think you need to change that so you have correct grammar...see, serious? Very serious, very important. - 17:31 3 May Sir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTE
- Now there's a great idea... Na, hang on! That would just be silly, pointless, and a complete waste of time... Not like this talk page topic obviously... HeHe... MrN
- Heh, I noticed that... Couldn't you re-order it so the pattern continues but the dates are mixed up? - 16:48 3 May Sir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTE
- Ah, but I could argue, if I were so inclined, that Cajek's sig is longer than yours. And UU's. And mine (just). If I were so inclined, of course. 4/05 16:35
- It's true, I'm glad you have brought this issue back into perspective for us HV. It's certainly true that UU's sig is longer than mine as is SysRq's. I'm not sure about Cajek's, but as you say, I guess that's a matter of opinion. As for what's going to happen if ever OEJ ever puts his sig onto the list... all hell is likely to break loose. I think Cajek summed it up rather well with his "I think that the problem is that people's sigs are sometimes too long, and sometimes too short." position, and I guess it's just something we are going to have to learn to deal with... Oh, also... Pee Review kicks arse currently! MrN
17:17, May 4
- It's true, I'm glad you have brought this issue back into perspective for us HV. It's certainly true that UU's sig is longer than mine as is SysRq's. I'm not sure about Cajek's, but as you say, I guess that's a matter of opinion. As for what's going to happen if ever OEJ ever puts his sig onto the list... all hell is likely to break loose. I think Cajek summed it up rather well with his "I think that the problem is that people's sigs are sometimes too long, and sometimes too short." position, and I guess it's just something we are going to have to learn to deal with... Oh, also... Pee Review kicks arse currently! MrN