User talk:Dr. Skullthumper/Archive 3

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.

Jump to: navigation, search
Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion on April 13, 2008. The result of the discussion was keep, against Zombiebaron's better judgement.
Uncyclopedia At-A-Glance
Nominated Writer of the Month
This user has been nominated for Writer of the Month—you can vote for them or nominate your favourite users at Uncyclopedia:Writer of the Month.
Nominated Useless Gobshite of the Month
This user has been nominated for Useless Gobshite of the Month—you can vote for them or nominate your least favourite users at Uncyclopedia:Useless Gobshite of the Month.

And now for... that place where messages go.

Contents

RED LIGHTS

You win a template Mr. Skull! --  CAKE J! <-> 03:10, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Hi

Thanks for the greeting. I know you'll hate me for this, but I'm starting to rewrite the skateboarding article. The preceding unsigned comment was added by Skrayl (talk • contribs)

Hate? Good god, no. Rewrite anything you want (that sucks). That's the purpose of this being a wiki — to tear down everyone else's hard work and start anew if there's no humor in it. Rewrite the article all you want!  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • bloggings) MUP 03:58 Oct 20, 2007
Cool. It's done. tell me what you think. The preceding unsigned comment was added by Skrayl (talk • contribs)
I'll take a look in a moment. In the meantime, though, sign your posts with four tildes, like this: ~~~~, for future reference.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • bloggings) MUP 04:14 Oct 20, 2007
It's a start. It needs more content, though. Take a look at HTBFANJS for a whole slew of writing pointers (despite the title, it's not for people who write stupid, it's the general guide for all writers here), it's a helpful read. After you work on an article for a while, and you're stuck or need a real second opinion, pop on over to Pee Review so that another user can give it a numerical score with pretty colors. (I've always liked the pretty colors.) It's midnight here and I'm not going to stick around much longer, but I'm hoping these links'll point you in the right direction to getting your soul sucked out of your body becoming an Uncyclopedian.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • bloggings) MUP 04:18 Oct 20, 2007
At least it's better than it was before. I'll read the links tommorow.Skrayl 04:19, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Agreed. You're off to a good start already by recognizing utter shite.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • bloggings) MUP 04:20 Oct 20, 2007

It's that guy that keeps talking to me

Looky what I found!

{{vfh health|score=,|age={{#expr:({{#time: U}} - {{#time: U | %DATE%}}) / 86400 round 0}}


I think that clears everything up. --  CAKE J! <-> 17:58, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Lovely! Except by "clear up" you really mean "gunk up the rusty gears in my brain," right? It looks pretty though.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • bloggings) MUP 17:59 Oct 21, 2007
Maybe if I center it and make it pink? --  CAKE J! <-> 18:04, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
It looks like shit now. It must be modern art!  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • bloggings) MUP 18:05 Oct 21, 2007
Better add a frame. Everything looks more professional with frames around 'em. --  CAKE J! <-> 18:07, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
I like it. It's hypnotizing. A bit nauseating too, but that's probably because of those damn number things. Get the math off me! Off!  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • bloggings) MUP 18:09 Oct 21, 2007
I killed the math for you and something else... --  CAKE J! <-> 18:23, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Still looks like math on this browser. Oh, thanks for the vote! I see my not-so-subliminal "messaging" works... [insert evil laughter here]  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • bloggings) MUP 18:25 Oct 21, 2007
I'm using firefox, too, and it looks like webdings... ya' tard! Would you like to repay your debt? --  CAKE J! <-> 18:31, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, yeah, I will, after lunch. Yum, greasy food, it lubes up the gears in the brain, don't you know. Would you like to click here?  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • bloggings) MUP 18:34 Oct 21, 2007
Thank you! I hope you really did like it, and not just because we're user talk buddies NO! CLICK HERE! HURRY!! --  CAKE J! <-> 19:29, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Hahaha, I liked it, don't worry. I don't ever vote just 'cuz someone asks me to. (Well, that's not true, I usually do vote whenever someone asks if I'm not busy... just not always For.)  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • bloggings) MUP 19:31 Oct 21, 2007

Thanks for the Aid ;)

It seems that The User:Does it Really Matter? has decided to tear apart all of my work, and you've aided me greatly in getting it reverted to the proper forms before his edits. I was curious if you would by chance know of any such method that we can get the community on him for this? I don't believe he has anything to contribute to These articles and is indeed just tearing them apart on some personal vendetta. I've yet to see him contribute anything major, aside from getting rid of as many of my articles as possible... Either Thanks muchly comrade for the aid, you've helped me out greatly in getting all of this back together properly. ;)

-St. Fenix (UserTalk) 23:51, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Bam! I think that takes care of that. Oh, and I don't think you'll have to worry about him for a while...  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • bloggings) MUP 23:58 Oct 21, 2007

Re:Time Travel

"I stared at that sentence for a good five minutes. Honestly. I'm thinking it's some sort of Simpsons reference. But I still don't get it." What? You mean you've never once heard of A Sound of Thunder, the other definitive time travel story? Just look at how long its "In Popular Culture" section is! --L 09:41, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

YARGH! No, I haven't. Nor do I get the joke. Nor do I know what else you've added to the article. Which is what I suppose I'm going to go look at now.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • bloggings) MUP 16:55 Oct 23, 2007
You're making my "I didn't write that!" bits itch. Unfortunately your additions are really good. Really, really good. Wouldn't-have-thought-of-them-in-a-million-years type good. So if you'll excuse me, my left brain and my right brain have a good bit of fighting to do. In the meantime, I'll go write another article or something.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • bloggings) MUP 16:57 Oct 23, 2007
Well, I read over your additions entirely, and I'm damn impressed. Usually when people add entire sections to my articles, they kill the flow, or use a different writing style or humor style, and I just have to hack away at it. It's just a shame I've got 22 votes on VFH already before you added things, otherwise half the feature would technically be yours. So thanks a lot for your work on it!  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • bloggings) MUP 17:06 Oct 23, 2007

I'm going to travel back in time to 1979... SuperPants. --Rick Davies Supertramp 17:22, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Are you an admin?

Are you an admin? Elassint Throw things at me 00:52, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Nope, sorry. Last time I checked, I still have a soul.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • bloggings) MUP 00:57 Oct 24, 2007

I was just getting to that!

For scooping my edit, have a minimalist award: *

I call it the too-lazy-to-look-up-code not-very-ninja-ish star. --Image:Strange.PNG (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:08, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

OMIGOSH I JUST GOT AN AWARD!!! From a real, live administrator! I feel almost important now! Wait. No. Feeling's gone.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • bloggings) MUP 23:13 Oct 24, 2007

oh shit

Are you the author of why cancer is great? If so I'm sorry --Tampa 20:56, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

No, Cajek is--Sir Manforman 21:07, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
According to my friends, I am, since they think I wrote every single article on Uncyclopedia. --Grand General Wizard Etc x2 and Senator G/K/O/CUNT.K.F. WHORE! ZOTM MAFE VANDL UOTM WOTM TOP10 FP PMOTM UWotM 21:52, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
No, just the ones on QVFD.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • bloggings) MUP 01:46 Oct 26, 2007
Yeah, what Manforman said. It is a joke anyway, right? Right? Otherwise, you've seriously got some things to learn.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • bloggings) MUP 01:46 Oct 26, 2007
I don't wanna talk to him now. He'll be so mad, man. --Tampa 02:43, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
I doubt it majorly. We all screw up, especially during our first few weeks here. I messed up on ICU's and deleted too many quotes, among other things. It's not like anything happened. He'll understand. Or else he'll get banned for drama.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • bloggings) MUP 02:47 Oct 26, 2007
Water off a duck's back. Besides, I got two more votes out of the deal!! Why didn't I nominate it for deletion?? --  CAKE J! <-> 17:08, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
I guess there is no such thing as bad publicity. Maybe this'll be a new article whoring technique.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • bloggings) MUP 00:06 Oct 27, 2007

Templates

Yes, I have read HTBFANJS, and I'm not an idiot, so don't give me that crap. And yes, I am aware that you hate templates, but they are a necessity, and in case you haven't noticed, they're here to stay.

Now let me ask you this: what does that have to do with the article? It's obviously intended to be a humorous template, so why, dare I ask, should we go about using it in a serious way? You're acting like I'm actually violating a written, established rule - the only one I can think of that I'd even be close to is HTBFANJS, but I really fail to see how I've even come close to breaking it. For one thing, I was not the person who added all those templates. Someone else was. But when I saw the page for the first time and saw all the templates, I thought it was really, really funny. For another, the person who removed the templates is obviously controversial, so it was natural of me to assume that the edit probably wasn't right.

Really, what does it matter? The Pig Latin article is written in Pig Latin. It's nearly impossible to read. Does that mean we should change it? No. Why? Because it's funny! I don't need years of experience here to know that. It makes people laugh, and that's what's important. And if eight million cowbell templates on the cowbell article are funny, why not? --<-Captain Random-> ¿Huggle? 23:03, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

You're illiterate, aren't you? "I was not the person who added all those templates" <-- Remember that? It was me, like two minutes ago. I have been reverted twice - once by someone who I have seen, on numerous occasions, hastily revert things that were not necessarily bad edits; and once by someone who I have never even heard of or spoken to and who I'm assuming didn't get the joke.
The debate here is not whether or not the template really belongs there; it's about whether not not it's funny. So far two people have said that it's not. I thought that it was. And several of my friends saw it with all the templates and thought it was.
And isn't it more ironic to have a disproportionate (read: crapload) of cowbell templates on the cowbell page itself than just to have one, as would be the norm on most pages? Hm? If you don't think that it's funny, fine. But don't tell me it's against the rules or that I don't know what I'm talking about, because that's not true. --<-Captain Random-> ¿Huggle? 23:23, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Also, Pig Latin is anything but readable. The same goes for 1337, but we're not about to change them. --<-Captain Random-> ¿Huggle? 23:25, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

I am now writing a very forceful letter of inquiry

Dear sir,

I am writing you regarding your edits to my userpage recently. How dare you, sir! *FACEPALM!* I cannot stand people who disagree with my opinions, or people who have opinions, or people. That young man was helping me with my page, and brought to light my vagrant gay bashing. I implore you, as one gentleman to "another" that you revert your reversions to the previous version.

Thank you,

Nerd42

You is a funny person, Cajek, I can't deny that. Despite the fact that I disagree with Nerd42's gay-bashing entirely and completely, and it makes me angry inside, I'm afraid that vandalizing userspace is just something you shan't do. Everyone's entitled to their opinions, even if they're stupid enough to be against homosexuality.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • bloggings) MUP 19:43 Oct 31, 2007
Dear sir,

Would you consider reviewing "Classy" for me?

Thank you,

Cajek

Dear sir,

Would you consider considering "Classy" for honors consideration, considering the recent considerations you considered for the betterment of the page itself?

I'm a whore,

Cajek

There's a fine line between good natured whoring and mustachio abuse. You just ate that line. --Grand General Wizard Etc x2 and Senator G/K/O/CUNT.K.F. WHORE! ZOTM MAFE VANDL UOTM WOTM TOP10 FP PMOTM UWotM 02:55, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Ironically, I was just clicking on the VFH link when I got a new message. Sheesh. Ya whore.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • bloggings) MUP 02:56 Nov 01, 2007

It's the sockpuppet of that guy that won't stop talking to me

U is admin? Why you is rite on user page? I is just noob would you adopt me? --Cajek is a big ol doofus 17:28, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

It's a continuation of the most indirect whoring in the history of the universe

I just got back from my SAT II's and you indirectly whore at me? How dare you, sir?  Sir Skullthumper, MD (