User talk:Garionepsilon
From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
This is Garionepsilon's talk page. Add comments and whatnot things here.
Contents |
[edit] Pee review feedback-thingy. Kinda...
I noticed you tried out some suggestions from the review. It looks better already. The Summary is now in easily digested snippets, while it was originally a huge mass of text that wouldn't fit my laptop's screen, but I had to scroll to find the beginning and the end of it. It worked better than I thought. /me hugs Garionepsilon. Good boy... ;) -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 11:47, 29 Feb
- Gee, thanks for the boost of confidence. I'll try to get some more work done for it and try and scrounge up some pictures. Thanks for reviewing it, anyway. I thought it'd never get reviewed.--Garionepsilon 12:45, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- Well, I don't want to crush anyone on the first go. ;P -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 13:31, 29 Feb
- Well, it's not really my first go. I've had a go at making loads of other articles. One even got Quasi-featured.--Garionepsilon 13:34, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- Trust me, though I haven't reviewed anything here before, the first time I review someone is always gentle. I can be quite a nasty person if I so choose... Next time, especially if I remember you from before, I won't excuse repeated mistakes. If you're too daft to learn on the first go, then you need a proper switching /me cracks the whip... :) -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 13:48, 29 Feb
- 0_0...I'll try to keep that in mind.--Garionepsilon 20:07, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- Well, it's not really my first go. I've had a go at making loads of other articles. One even got Quasi-featured.--Garionepsilon 13:34, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- Honestly, though, I'm really, really cuddly... -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 20:18, 29 Feb
- Yeah, I suppose...--Garionepsilon 20:26, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- Go on, give us a
votehug... *puppy eyes* -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 20:29, 29 Feb- ...uh...so, you help people out often?--Garionepsilon 20:31, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- '*notices she ran away*'hmm.--Garionepsilon 20:47, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- Go on, give us a
- Yeah, I suppose...--Garionepsilon 20:26, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- I've been a schoolteacher, then a Grammar Nazi, did a little time in a Correctional Institution for the Real Life Depraved as a Warden, then I stumbled over Uncyclopedia and joined the Comma Brigade... I'm a very helpful person... :P -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 21:10, 29 Feb
- Cool, cool. Oh, and congrats on winning noob of the month.--Garionepsilon 15:22, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
- Hey, my sig is pink, it's got a heart and I love to hug people. I'm just too cute not to vote for... *puppy eyes* -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 19:01, 1 Mar
- Well, I don't want to crush anyone on the first go. ;P -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) 13:31, 29 Feb
[edit] Further to my VFH Comment
I just wanted to add something here about your Metal Sonic article. I hate it when people don't give any feedback on VFH votes if they say they don't think an article's up to feature (unless it's obvious crap). So: I was, as I said on VFH, pleasantly surprised by the article - I suspect the reason you have no votes so far is because people, like me, are worried it will be gamecruft, and I'm not sure how you're going to overcome that to get them reading it. Which is a bit of a shame, because this is an unusual thing: a decent game-related article (we have so few of those - sigh).
However, I couldn't vote for. Why? Well, it's a fairly straightforward cross between Sonic and Terminator, and while that's an interesting take, there aren't that many funny lines in the article - the writing's quite good, the basic idea is fun, but I didn't really get that many laughs from it. (Oh, and that Fat kid gif is so overused on so many bad articles that it hurts to see it on a decent one). Hope you don't feel damned with faint praise by this - getting an article like this featured would be a big achievement, and I think you've got an idea capable of making it, but you're not there just yet. Mind you, this is only my opinion, others may decide differently when they do read it, so good luck! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 10:31, May 2
- K, thanks for the tips. I'll try to redo it as you see fit. Should I struggle with writing 'funny lines', I can hope that you come running to help.--Garionepsilon 11:32, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry about the vagueness of that comment (I really hate it on pee review when people just say "make it funnier" and leave it at that). I'd be more helpful now if I could, but I'm a bit busy (at work - who'd'a thunk it?) If you like, you can pop it up for review (again!) and mention you'd like me to pick it up. I promise to give it a thorough going over and all the help I can. However, there's still chance for it to pick up some votes yet - it's still got 100% health, so you might wanna leave it for now, maybe others will disagree with me when they read it! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 11:36, May 2
- Right, Ok. Leave it on VFH to see how it goes, then stick it in Pee Review for more help. Got it.--Garionepsilon 11:52, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry about the vagueness of that comment (I really hate it on pee review when people just say "make it funnier" and leave it at that). I'd be more helpful now if I could, but I'm a bit busy (at work - who'd'a thunk it?) If you like, you can pop it up for review (again!) and mention you'd like me to pick it up. I promise to give it a thorough going over and all the help I can. However, there's still chance for it to pick up some votes yet - it's still got 100% health, so you might wanna leave it for now, maybe others will disagree with me when they read it! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 11:36, May 2
[edit] The Tempest
OK, Garion, I did some editing, especially on the Act II section. Here's the thing: if you don't like it at all, please tell me and then revert it to the original. If you like only bits of it, please edit it to include only the bits you like. If you think my changes are the right direction, edit them anyway to bring them ever closer to your vision for the article. I do NOT want to "take over" your article, so now it's your turn again... ;) ----OEJ 20:03, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Hey, garionepsilon
Hey, I'm new to Uncyclopedia. I added the 5th article to the Smash Bros. Brawl page. The one entitled "FBI Investigations" I am unsure of whether or not you mind this. You see, I was the one who editted it so many times. I was proof-reading it, and made several minor edits to the text. From now on, I will use the 'show preview' button when editting things rather than saving it and keep on editting it.
Now, I feel like playing piano. I'll check this soon to read your response.
...I have but one question: Are you voting for this article to be deleted because of the sole reason that it was editted so many times, thus flooding your watch message thing?
-Ðion
- No, I'm sending it for deletion because I seriously cannot be bothered to keep editing it and keeping it in check when people such as yourself (no offence) arrive and change it. I keep trying to keep it in check and stop it being a gamecruft and I keep failing. So I've had it. Enough. Let some bugger else deal with it.--Garionepsilon 16:40, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] UnNews:Burma wants guns to combat Cyclone
I never thanked you for using my picture on your UnNews page, so I figured I'd do it now. Thanks. //
Berry; speak to me // 20:46 6 June 2008
- No probs.--Garionepsilon 14:27, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Yo
Your UnBook is here now, as the tag on it expired. Work on it as long as you like, and put it in mainspace when you're done. - Don Leddy the Crunch (Nyah, see, nyah!) 12:17, Jun 9
- Thanks, I've been away for a bit so I didn't get a chance to work on it.--Garionepsilon 08:39, 12 June 2008 (UTC)



