User talk:Gwax/Archive2

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.

Contents 1 Nice and tidy 2 Report of my demise 3 NRV 4 NRV 5 AH! MY SIG! 6 Oh poo to you too. 7 I think it's a new record 8 Kraken 9 Jan 28th, National Fine Print Day 10 Thanks^2 11 China 12 Wow... that was really nice! 13 VoteUOTM 14 Cthulhu 15 Redirect 16 Word of the day 17 Dangermouse 18 kitten huffers anonymous 19 Wha happa? 20 Moved from VFD - Oscar Wilde quotes 21 Delete 22 Trojan War (video game) 23 Some user or some other user? 24 Gustavus Adolphus 25 Asshole 26 VFD archiving? 27 NRVous breakdown 28 Unblock 29 Deletion 30 Main page 31 Killya 32 Marcus Allaman 33 The Punisher 34 LineBall 35 Teenager(s) 36 My User Page! 37 Deletion 38 Super Smash Bros. Melee "bad list" 39 Undeletions 40 Forum:The Great Uncyclopedia Writing Contest, Take 2 41 For Voting 42 Loke 43 Jesse Award 44 Vote Deletion 45 Pie 46 Ban Patrol 47 WHY DON'T YOU HAVE EMAIL 48 Judgement Day 49 You should read this 50 Help with VFD archive 51 Admin candidacy? 52 A note for Pultizer Prize Poo Lit Surprise Judges 53 New Contest 54 VFD Questions 55 Here is a NinjaStar 56 PLS results 57 Vacation 58 Gwax.com 59 Permission 60 Logo copyright issues 61 McReskin 62 No response 63 Timeline of future World history merge ?

Nice and tidy

There, my talk page is nice and tidy now; go ahead and make a mess of it again. --Sir gwax (talk) » Major KUN UotM FH++ F@H CM GD NS Bur. +S 02:45, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Woooooooooooooo!

• Spilled paint
• Muddy footprints
• Coffee stains
• Bloody fingerprints
• Broken flowerpots
• Some chickens
• Six months' worth of rotting garbage
• That corpse in the corner
• --Skyscraper 03:25, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)

MY FLOORS! --Sir gwax (talk) » Major KUN UotM FH++ F@H CM GD NS Bur. +S 03:31, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Run away! Salad Shooter(tm) malfunctioning!

^0 BlindingMask 19:02, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Report of my demise

Reports of my demise have been grossly exaggerated. The gwax is back. --Sir gwax (talk) » Major KUN UotM FH++ F@H CM GD NS Bur. +S 23:18, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)

You can still hold a memorial service if you want; I'll even speak at it if you ask nicely. --Sir gwax (talk) » Major KUN UotM FH++ F@H CM GD NS Bur. +S 23:26, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)

So now after we've arranged everything he tells us. We've all got black suits now.......and all these bloody wreaths..... -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

Don't return them on my account, please get your money's worth out of them. So it's a black tie affair, then? I was wondering about the dress code. --Sir gwax (talk) » Major KUN UotM FH++ F@H CM GD NS Bur. +S 23:50, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)

and we've arranged a twenty-one bun salute too -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

Sorry. I lost a cheek in Desert Storm.  :P -- T. (talk) 12:02, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)

NRV

So what's this about changing the NRV tag without consulting anybody, hmm? Nazi! --KATIE!! 17:10, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)

I was the one who made that change in the first place without consulting anybody. Then I changed my mind about the motivations behind my initial modification. My thoughts on the matter were, what happens if I come across a page that's marked NRV but which I think is a good page; what do I do? Removing the tag can result in a ban, but I like the page so I want the NRV tag off. Banning someone for removing a NRV tag is wrong. Hmmm, now that I think about it, the right solution is to say that a NRV tag may only be removed if it is being replaced by a vfd tag. I'll go re-refix NRV. --Sir gwax (talk) » Major KUN UotM FH++ F@H CM GD NS Bur. +S 19:42, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)

NRV

Why you put every my pages this template?!:

Why you not put this instead?:

This stub-related stub is a stub. The stub's stubmitter may also have been stubmitting a stub. You can help stubs by un-stubbing it.

- Answer to me!! ---- DudeMan January 15

My template choice is a question of quality. I find that your articles contain barely readable English and hold no humor value for me. If you disagree with my analysis of your pages, feel free to change it from {{NRV}} to {{vfd}}, and list it on VFD with a note that you think it should be kept and are putting it there to remove a NRV tag. --Sir gwax (talk) » Major KUN UotM FH++ F@H CM GD NS Bur. +S 18:56, 15 Jan 2006 (UTC)

AH! MY SIG!

I don't know what happened to it, i didn't even touch it, but now it has an underline and i do not like underlines. If you could please fix it or at least tell me how it would be greatly appreciated.   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 21:16, 15 Jan 2006 (UTC)

I'm not seeing an underline on your signature and looking at the code makes me think you shouldn't be either. Are you looking at it with a different browser or doing anything funny like that? --Sir gwax (talk) » Major KUN UotM FH++ F@H CM GD NS Bur. +S 22:21, 15 Jan 2006 (UTC)

That's weird. It went away. But i know it was there, anidnmeno saw it too, and i think others did too. Well, hopefully that was only a one-time thing. Sorry to bother you.   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 22:45, 15 Jan 2006 (UTC)

My guess would be that there was a problem loading a CSS file briefly, which could have been caused by a server hiccup or such. --Sir gwax (talk) » Major KUN UotM FH++ F@H CM GD NS Bur. +S 22:48, 15 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Okay, well as long as it's nothing that's going to happen like every day, I'll leave you alone (for now.) See you around.   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 22:53, 15 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Oh poo to you too.

Fun Hater Award This user HATES fun. They sit on their proverbial porch all day and shake their canes at anyone who dances or laughs on their wiki. "Get a hair cut, you hippie!"

I think it's a new record

1. 15:57, 21 January 2006 Gwax deleted "European Parliament" (NRV expiration)
2. 15:57, 21 January 2006 Gwax deleted "Newy" (NRV expiration)
3. 15:57, 21 January 2006 Gwax deleted "Orthodontist" (NRV expiration)
4. 15:57, 21 January 2006 Gwax deleted "Operation Swedish Liberation" (NRV expiration)
5. 15:57, 21 January 2006 Gwax deleted "Oligarchy" (NRV expiration)
6. 15:57, 21 January 2006 Gwax deleted "Ninetails" (NRV expiration)
7. 15:57, 21 January 2006 Gwax deleted "Nestlé" (NRV expiration)
8. 15:57, 21 January 2006 Gwax deleted "Name" (NRV expiration)
9. 15:57, 21 January 2006 Gwax deleted "Muhammad Allah-Lee" (NRV expiration)
10. 15:57, 21 January 2006 Gwax deleted "Moonico" (NRV expiration)
11. 15:57, 21 January 2006 Gwax deleted "Mind Control" (NRV expiration)
12. 15:57, 21 January 2006 Gwax deleted "Message from the past" (NRV expiration)
13. 15:57, 21 January 2006 Gwax deleted "Melmac" (NRV expiration)
14. 15:57, 21 January 2006 Gwax deleted "Matti Vanhanen" (NRV expiration)
15. 15:57, 21 January 2006 Gwax deleted "Marsh wiggle" (NRV expiration)
16. 15:57, 21 January 2006 Gwax deleted "Marines" (NRV expiration)
17. 15:57, 21 January 2006 Gwax deleted "Mar" (NRV expiration)
18. 15:57, 21 January 2006 Gwax deleted "Maple spirit" (NRV expiration)
19. 15:57, 21 January 2006 Gwax deleted "Mao" (NRV expiration)
20. 15:57, 21 January 2006 Gwax deleted "Mamatobes" (NRV expiration)
21. 15:57, 21 January 2006 Gwax deleted "Majorstuen" (NRV expiration)
22. 15:57, 21 January 2006 Gwax deleted "Linyos Torovoltos" (NRV expiration)
23. 15:57, 21 January 2006 Gwax deleted "Linköping" (NRV expiration)
24. 15:57, 21 January 2006 Gwax deleted "Light bulbs" (NRV expiration)
25. 15:57, 21 January 2006 Gwax deleted "Lebron james" (NRV expiration)
26. 15:57, 21 January 2006 Gwax deleted "Kitchen roll" (NRV expiration)
27. 15:57, 21 January 2006 Gwax deleted "Key Skills" (NRV expiration)
28. 15:57, 21 January 2006 Gwax deleted "Kamtschatka" (NRV expiration)
29. 15:57, 21 January 2006 Gwax deleted "Hung over" (NRV expiration)
30. 15:57, 21 January 2006 Gwax deleted "Hitlerland" (NRV expiration)
31. 15:57, 21 January 2006 Gwax deleted "Hillbilly Hijinks" (NRV expiration)
32. 15:57, 21 January 2006 Gwax deleted "Happy Meal" (NRV expiration)
33. 15:57, 21 January 2006 Gwax deleted "Hana" (NRV expiration)
34. 15:57, 21 January 2006 Gwax deleted "Ha ha!" (NRV expiration)
35. 15:57, 21 January 2006 Gwax deleted "HAFF" (NRV expiration)
36. 15:57, 21 January 2006 Gwax deleted "Göbbel" (NRV expiration)
37. 15:57, 21 January 2006 Gwax deleted "Grandiosa" (NRV expiration)
38. 15:57, 21 January 2006 Gwax deleted "Graham cracker" (NRV expiration)
39. 15:57, 21 January 2006 Gwax deleted "Gossip" (NRV expiration)
40. 15:57, 21 January 2006 Gwax deleted "GBH" (NRV expiration)
41. 15:57, 21 January 2006 Gwax deleted "Fuck Face" (NRV expiration)
42. 15:57, 21 January 2006 Gwax deleted "Friday Night Fish Fry" (NRV expiration)
43. 15:57, 21 January 2006 Gwax deleted "Formula One Mythical Champions" (NRV expiration)
44. 15:57, 21 January 2006 Gwax deleted "Fluffy" (NRV expiration)
45. 15:57, 21 January 2006 Gwax deleted "European Commission" (NRV expiration)
46. 15:57, 21 January 2006 Gwax deleted "Es:Riatón" (NRV expiration)
47. 15:57, 21 January 2006 Gwax deleted "Es: Los Tiras" (NRV expiration)
48. 15:57, 21 January 2006 Gwax deleted "Duncan Cameron" (NRV expiration)
49. 15:57, 21 January 2006 Gwax deleted "Dr. Jumanji, the Cross-eyed African Dental Surgeon" (NRV expiration)

49 deletions in one minute; who's the huff-daddy now? --Sir gwax (talk) » Major KUN UotM FH++ F@H CM GD NS Bur. +S 20:01, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

Also, as of just a moment ago, I hit 666 deletes. --Sir gwax (talk) » Major KUN UotM FH++ F@H CM GD NS Bur. +S 20:42, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

Well, I'll salute that! Hey-O! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 19:45, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

Huff huff pant pant... Now that's hot! --Skyscraper 22:32, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

Kraken

Hey, when you get around to writing the Kraken article, I have a picture of him (it?) in my Divine Retribution article if you need one.--Claudius Prime 18:36, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

Keen (if I ever get around to do anything on my todo list). --Sir gwax (talk) » Major KUN UotM FH++ F@H CM GD NS Bur. +S 05:00, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

Jan 28th, National Fine Print Day

Suggestion for Uncyclopedia Skining:

http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Fp: We'd have to modify the Selected anniversaries and make Jan 28th, "National Fine Print Day".

--Keithhackworth MUN 17:54, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

That's fantastically clever. Unfortunately, I probably won't be around at a good time to make the changeover, so I recommend suggesting it to another admin; IRC is a good way to do that quickly. Also, if you convince people to do it tomorrow, drop me a note and I'll change tomorrow's word of the day to 'legalese'. --Sir gwax (talk) » Major KUN UotM FH++ F@H CM GD NS Bur. +S 21:31, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

I had some things come up, and was unable to get it done. Perhaps Jan 31st? --Keithhackworth MUN 12:32, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

I'd rather not have it happen on the 31st. We're running "strategery" as the word of the day to mark the State of the Union Address. --Sir gwax (talk) » Major KUN UotM FH++ F@H CM GD NS Bur. +S 18:33, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

That's funny! Whenever it's convenient. It's there... Keithhackworth MUN 18:53, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

Thanks^2

I'd like to thank you for finally deciding to vote for me in the Noob of the Month race. But I'm afraid only one of your votes will count. Will it be the "Underdog"-vote for MoneySign, or the "Still January?"-vote for MoneySign?
Silly gwax... You must really like me. :D --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ign^STFU F@H|VFP|+S 19:53, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

China

Hmm... My campaign to embarass the PRC leadership got twarted. Don't you approve of provoking rederects as such or did you think this was an unclear one? ?-- Swami A. Suresh 07:30, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

I get the joke and do find it kind of funny, but I'm a stickler for things being in the right place and that redirect just makes thing sdifficult for people trying to obtain information about China. --Sir gwax (talk) » Major KUN UotM FH++ F@H CM GD NS Bur. +S 15:43, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

OK. No confusing redirects. Next time then I'll create a page of Totally Unaffectous Diplomacy and redirect it to PRC . Clear as Crystal.-- Swami A. Suresh 18:43, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

Alternatively, you could try writing something in the PRC article or replacing the redirect at China with a comedically inspired disambiguation page. --Sir gwax (talk) » Major KUN UotM FH++ F@H CM GD NS Bur. +S 19:11, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

Wow... that was really nice!

It has recently come to my attention that on the 24th of January, you nominated me for Sysop! I, being the complete gormless bastard I am, never even knew about it, and only found out when Todd Lyons posted a reference to it on my talk page. I just want to thank you (a bit late, I know) for your vote of confidence, even if I do feel less than worthy at the moment. I read the archive comment on the VFS page, and I'm glad that you feel I'm actually helping by my constant anal-retentive watchdog behavior. Perhaps someday soon I can actually figure out how to go on IRC again (something I haven't done since my college years during the Second Crusade for Jerusalem) and begin to contribute in ways other than critiquing useless crap. So once again, a sincere thanks to you, and a deep bow in case you happen to be in Japan at the moment! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 17:34, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, I think that you'd make a fantastic ally in my jihad against the crap that clogs up the filters of the swimming pool that is Uncyclopedia, so thank you. --Sir gwax (talk) » Major KUN UotM FH++ F@H CM GD NS Bur. +S 18:41, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

Sure is a lot of condor shit in the pool trap these days, isn't there? I guess that's the price of popularity and the consequence of winning the ED war... Ah well, I'm here if you need me (for legitimate, above-the-table reasons only, of course. None of that tat.) --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 19:01, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

VoteUOTM

Nominated Uncyclopedian of the Month This user has been nominated for Uncyclopedian of the Month—you can vote for them or nominate your favourite users at Uncyclopedia:Uncyclopedian of the Month.

U may want to place this template somewhere in your userpage. --Rataube 19:13, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

Gee, thanks. --Sir gwax (talk) » Major KUN UotM FH++ F@H CM GD NS Bur. +S 19:14, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

Cthulhu

I think we should talk about this. Why the pointless merge tag, etc? Jack Cain 06:32, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

The removal of all the lists at the bottom was in accordance with a general Uncyclopedia policy of not allowing long content-free lists of links. The merge tag was placed because both Cthulhu and Cthulu exist and are (in theory) about the same thing and as such, the content of both articles should be merged into Cthulhu and Cthulu should be turned into a redirect; that's the way we do things here. --Sir gwax (talk) » Major KUN UotM FH++ F@H CM GD NS Bur. +S 18:18, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

Though, it looks like you've been around long enough to know how things work around here; could you be a little more specific about your issues with my edits? Sorry for reverting your revert so hastily; I assumed you were a n00b. --Sir gwax (talk) » Major KUN UotM FH++ F@H CM GD NS Bur. +S 18:20, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

Eh.....forget it, just do as you like with it, neither is my article or anything. Jack Cain 22:20, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

Redirect

I found the Medea article amusing inspite of being too short, I didn't want to NRV or VFD it, so i sent its content to Greek mythology and made it a redirect. The thing is that I'm not sure I'm allowed to do that. Am I? If I'm not I can take it back, but then I suggest an admind do the same or just give me a retroactive permission.--Rataube 18:55, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

There's no good reason I can think of why you wouldn't be allowed to do that. You're making a positive contribution to both articles and it's equivalent to the proper handling method of {{eat}} or {{merge}}. --Sir gwax (talk) » Major KUN UotM FH++ F@H CM GD NS Bur. +S 20:32, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Word of the day

Any reason why you reverted my edit for Feb 14th? "Unrequited" seems to fit with the theme of the day much better than "cinder block" IMO. If I've made a big no-no, let me know. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 20:12, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

What better way is there to tell someone you love them than to give them a cinder block on Valentine's Day? --Sir gwax (talk) » Major KUN UotM FH++ F@H CM GD NS Bur. +S 20:25, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Dangermouse

I just wanted to say thanks for the vote of confidence with the Dangermouse article

Tumms up. --Sir gwax (talk) » Major KUN UotM FH++ F@H CM GD NS Bur. +S 05:49, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

kitten huffers anonymous

Hi, while I appreciate your work at keeping alot of junk off of pages, I really simply disagree with your decision to continue to delete the KHA section in kitten huffing... Why do you do that? I think it is hilarious, now only your sense of humor counts?? I looked and it doesnt appear that you initated the page so why do you get to axe our section...

Furthermore, the KHA group has been instrumental to me not only does k-train find me kittens when I fall off the VERY small wagon (you do understand what being on the wagon is right?) but when i try to get back into the wagon other KHA members are there to give me a boost!!! I think it is very important to advertise KHA so that other chapters can be formed around the country...

what the problem is???

The problem is that the Kitten Huffers Anonymous section is poorly written, poorly formatted and funny in concept but not implementation. I get the idea, it has potential, but the implementation is crap. Also, I am of the opinion that Kitten Huffing is about as long as it needs to be right now. As a resolution to the matter, I have split Kitten Huffers Anonymous off as a separate page, please make it a worthy article. --Sir gwax (talk) » Major KUN UotM FH++ F@H CM GD NS Bur. +S 21:39, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Wha happa?

Heyaz, Gwax. Sorry to pester you, but I was just going back through the VFD's, and I notice that you decided to keep 'n' stub Super Smash Bros. Curious (morbidly, I admit,) I went back to the article to see if it had improved since I voted -- nope. Still not funny, still sucks hind wind. So my question is this: why keep it when the vote count was 10-2 in favor of Deleting it? And would I be out of place putting an NRV tag on it? --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 21:02, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

I must be going senile. I'd swear there were more keep votes under that listing. Oh well, nothing a quick delete can't solve. Thanks for double checking me. --Sir gwax (talk) » Major KUN UotM FH++ F@H CM GD NS Bur. +S 21:35, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

No prob! You think you've got it bad; I went the entire day yesterday with my sweater on inside out and backwards. Damn master's thesis is killing me. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 17:21, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

Moved from VFD - Oscar Wilde quotes

I'd go the route of writing an actual article about how to make up Oscar Wilde quotes and use as few examples as possible, then include a linke to Wilde, where people can see more examples. That way the page will have genuine content instead of being a giant pile of crap. Go ahead, delete tons of stuff and if anyone gives you a hard time, let me know and I'll use my admin clout to yell at them. --Sir gwax (talk) » Major KUN UotM FH++ F@H CM GD NS Bur. +S 20:08, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

• gwax, I'm glad you're taking a positive approach to this; you've always been one of my favorite admins, though I've never really understood why, precisely... Anyway, what you're suggesting isn't exactly going to make me Mister Popularity around here, so if I do agree to take this on - and it's a big job - can I at least get some assurance that the other quotes pages are reasonably safe? And do you really have that much clout? And I assume you're aware of HowTo:Make up quotes, which while hardly stellar, is probably Nerd42's best article on the whole site?  c • > • cunwapquc? 20:48, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the compliment. Now, I'm not quite sure what you mean about the other quote pages being "reasonably safe"; are you asking me to not delete them? are you planning to rewrite all of them? are you asking that they be left as is? As far as worrying about backlash, I recommend starting a thread on the Village Dump announcing that you plan to rewrite the making up quotes pages to actually be what they're supposed to be, I'll voice my support and then we can see if we can get enough other people rallied behind us that you won't actually be unpopular with the bigwigs. Beyond that, dealing with random people getting pissed off that you're deleting crappy content that they like is easily accomplished and something that I've had to do on a number of occasions. In the end, I'm willing to take responsibility in the face of common users if you come under heavy fire, so long as we can get some other admins to ok the project. --Sir gwax (talk) » Major KUN UotM FH++ F@H CM GD NS Bur. +S 21:00, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

• Gwax, I've already rewritten them... Look at the pages, and the page histories, and compare the pre-SU and post-SU versions for Einstein, Churchill, God, Anonymous, etc. (What I do is take the whole page out of the edit window, dump it into UltraEdit, work it up, and post it back in one major edit. So in nearly all cases the earliest, and maybe only, edit you see from me is the rewrite, along with all the shiny new pics. Everything after that is touch-up and maintenance.) I just didn't feel like I could delete large portions of them - though I did delete some stuff - without upsetting all the nice people. Hopefully I'm wrong about that! I also don't want to be seen as "taking over"; maybe I am, but it's not in my nature to do that. But I do want to see this stuff moved into its own namespace, with a nice logo of its own (see Uncyclopedia:Logos#QuoteUnquote:), and maybe expanded into other quotable people, if there's some humor value in them... and at the same, time, get the chaff thrown out. But to answer your first question, of course I don't want them deleted, I'd like to ensure that they look substantially the way they do now, but to ask that they be left "as-is" is unreasonable, is it? This is a wiki, and I would never ask that. Besides, if a few of my entries get thrown out in someone else's cleanup attempt, I'm not going to whine about it.  c • > • cunwapquc? 21:36, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

Actually, I recommend "taking over", so to speak. Some of the best parts of Uncyclopedia are those that have been adopted by someone. In fact, I'd go so far as to say that any article that doesn't have at least one devoted guardian/editor tends to go to crap. I could cite dozens of examples of pages that survive only because they've been adopted by someone. Don't think of it as taking over and don't act like the ruler of the pages, just take an active role in them and slowly weed out the chaff and eventually you'll be the person in charge, whether you like it or not (that's how I got stuck with VFD and a number of other pages). Besides, you're a good judge of things, only n00bs and idiots are going to question your actions and all but the unreasonable ones can be handled by explaining what's up. --Sir gwax (talk) » Major KUN UotM FH++ F@H CM GD NS Bur. +S 21:53, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

• Okay, gwax, it's a deal, though I think that's pretty much what's going on right now, i.e., already. Mhaille is taking a keen interest in this stuff too, by the way... He can do the messy "guardian" stuff, I'll just be the editor when he doesn't have any extra time on his hands. (Actually, I spell the word "being" better than he does, so maybe I should do most of the editing.) Maybe there's no way in this case to avoid rubbing some people the wrong way, but hey, it's not like I ever want to be an admin, and I've already got more awards than I probably need... Anyway, thanks, and I'm sorry about all this turning into a bigger deal than necessary!  c • > • cunwapquc? 22:16, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

No problem, I'm just glad to see progress be made on those (once) God foresaken articles. Oh, and you'd best be careful if you're going to keep doing good things for Uncyclopedia or someone just might try to make an admin out of you someday. --Sir gwax (talk) » Major KUN UotM FH++ F@H CM GD NS Bur. +S 00:35, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

• Don't worry, I'll be extra careful. Anyway, the move is mostly complete now; I just have to do something about the preponderance of Oscar Wilde quote pages. That may have to wait until the weekend... But the rest of them are taken care of. I'd like to leave the redirects in place for a while, maybe even indefinitely, but that's your call, of course! Ta ta,  c • > • cunwapquc? 07:28, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Delete

Picture needs to be deleted. skeato.jpg

Thanks.

Post it to QVFD and in the future, please sign your comments; signed comments get more attention. --Sir gwax (talk) » Major KUN UotM FH++