User talk:Javascap/Archive 3

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.

Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

[edit] RotM

It's still too early in the month for me to cast a vote in good conscience, but rest assured I will give you every consideration. You've done alright by me and right now I'm leaning in your direction. --OptyC Sucks! Image:Icons-flag-us.png cun 17:18, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Your Powers of Perception are Incredible!

Hey, like most of the other lame-o's who seem to leave comments on your page, I just wanted to thank you for your review. Contrary to unpopular belief, I am not a very good speller. Thanks for the catch. There were a few others. And I definitely enjoy the props. Just throwing them on back. --Beavnation 01:45, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

Well, well, well. I never would have guessed that Javascap was stupid enough to vote for this tripe! Goes to show you never can tell.
Thanks for voting!

Thanks for the review and the vote! -OptyC Sucks! Image:Icons-flag-us.png cun00:03, 30 Apr

[edit] Thankees!

Thanks for the review, Javascap, I'm just getting to changing those things right now... The links did prove a problem because I was struggling for things to link to. - 16:59 2 May Sir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!

[edit] Thanks!


Thanks for reviewing Veteran for me, you gave me some really good points. Perhaps you'll nom it for me after I make the necessary improvements? People don't really like self noms, I've noticed. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ CUNRotMAotMVFHSKPEEINGHPBFF @ 19:25 May 5

[edit] HALP!

Doctor Miles Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart Skullthumper
has awarded you a cat brain
for being part of the largest HALP! chain on IRC, ever
 Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • bloggings) Quote of the Day 03:33 May 06, 2008

[edit] The List

OK, an attempt to explain how it works:

  1. Edit the appropriate table, update no. of reviews + no. of in-depth reviews next to the name accordingly
  2. Add the latest score to the end of the score average bit and remember to increase the nuber they're divided by accordingly
  3. Update the percentage box, date of most recent review and the most recent review itself
  4. Go to the foot of the table, to the three long total expressions; find the no. of reviews for that person and increase it accordingly, then do the same for the no. of in depth reviews
  5. Hit the preview button
  6. View the person's new average in the preview, then change their average in the final total box at the bottom
  7. Put the latest checked review, who it was by and the date in the final space in the table
  8. Put the name and the article checked in the edit summary
  9. Save the page
  10. Cross off the review you just checked on the maintenance list
  11. Do it all again for the other reviews
  12. Wonder exactly why we bother
  13. ???
  14. Profit!

Alternatively, just look through the history at my last few edits on it and see if you can figure out what's going on. It started out quite simple, but it's constantly growing and mutating to the point where it needs this level of explanation. Fun, isn't it?! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 11:40, May 6

Hmm, that was close... The trick with the bit at the end is not to add in extra numbers for people already on the table (as for Flumpa), but to change their existing number in that bit at the bottom. So Flumpa is 10 before the bottom of the table at the moment - count back 10 in the first mathy bit at the bottom and increase his 1 to a 2. Don't increase his 0 to a 1 in the second mathy bit, and then hit preview - that shows you his new average, so find his old average in the final long mathy bit and change it (I look for the average above his, which won't have changed, makes it easier to track down). Only add new numbers on the end and increase the "divided by" count if you add a new bod to the table. It really sounds long winded when you explain it like that, but you get used to it. Honest! Also: glad to hear the golf club missed both your legs! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 12:55, May 16

[edit] Veteran

I don't need you to re-review the whole thing, but just tell me if you think it's ready with what I added. I don't think I'm going to replace the image at the end, but I think I've followed your other advice and I'm pretty pleased with the results. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ CUNRotMAotMVFHSKPEEINGHPBFF @ 12:08 May 6

[edit] PeeReview

Thanks for the kind, thoughtful review of my play. I shall certainly take your advice on board - though allow me a moment of slight pedantry - paedophile is simply British English for the American pedophile- so not a typo strictly speaking! --Knucmo2 15:19, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Ah, yes, my apology fr that, I completly forgot, for the moment, the AE usage in Brithish spelling (But it doesn't change the fact that was a good article!) Warm Regards, Javascap

[edit] UnSignpost Sunday Edition: May 11th, 2008

~ Fnoodle (talk) (my creator) 04:17, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] You busy at the moment man?

Just wondering, because you've had Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/James Brown tagged for nearly a week now, and you're usually quite quick with the reviews. Everything OK on planet Javascap? --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 08:57, May 14

That wasn't meant as a hurry up, I was just wondering if all was OK! However, thanks for the review - a better score than I was expecting, to be honest! However, have you never encountered the FU Spang phenomenon on here? I feel there's always a place for an in-joke in an article if it's subtly done and most casual readers won't even spot it. Anyway, I feel confident that I've not given you cake before, so have a slice for a good review:

Image:Cake.gif Under User has blessed you with cake for being friendly and/or useful.
Eat it quickly before he changes his mind.


Warning: cake prepared in an environment which also processes nuts,
and contains lactose, gluten, ground glass and arsenic, which gives it a lovely tang.

--SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 18:52, May 14

[edit] UnSignpost: May 15th, 2008

~ Fnoodle (talk) (my creator) 00:45, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] the list

Yep, looks like you did okay on editing the list. Thanks for pitching in, Javascap! It may look like a waste of time at first, but it's actually a good weathervane for how pee review is doing. If only there was a list of people who edit the list, THEN we would have some good times! User:Javascap/Pee/Pee thanks again!   CAKE J! <May 17, 2008 [2:34]>

[edit] UnSignpost: May 22nd, 2008

~ Fnoodle (talk) (my creator) 20:11, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] UnSignpost: May 29nd, 2008

THEDUDEBOT Armed and Ready Say The Word 02:57, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Siggy things

Dude, can you get around to adding the date to your sig in some way? Or at the very least, add the date on reviews you do - it's a pain having to check through to the history on your reviews when I update the list. It's a small thing, but it would please me greatly. Ta! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 13:03, May 29 Yeh about this: they way you've added the time doesn't exactly work, because what your using is the "current" variables. They just display the current time, not the time at which you posted. - [17:14 30 May] Sir FSt. Don Pleb Yettie (talk) QotF BFF NotM RotM UNPotM UGotM CUN PEE SR UnProvise I think I've fixed it for you, now. That should work. - [17:17 30 May] Sir FSt. Don Pleb Yettie (talk) QotF BFF NotM RotM UNPotM UGotM CUN PEE SR UnProvise

[edit] Ninjastar


For 50 reviews, you get this. For 50 in-depth, it's the far more rare Platinum Pisser - so well done, and keep it up! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 10:55, Jun 3

Also, I'm putting together a little page of pics of decent folks. Care to donate your likeness? --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 11:38, Jun 3

[edit] Late thanks!

Thanks, son!
But Uncle Sam didn't thank me! All you bastards can GO TO HELL!! Eh, got any change, son? I sure hope no one writes an incredibly offensive article about me. Wait, where ya goin, son?

Thanks for voting for Veteran.

~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ CUNRotMAotMVFHSKPEEINGHPBFF @ 18:43 Jun 3

[edit] Your sig

You've got a sig page, but you appear to paste all of the code on a page when you sign. Am I confused, or is it just me? Do you need help? Are you drowning in a sea of debt? Are those high interest rate credit cards sapping away more and more of your income? Does 4.7% financing sound good to...oh. Sorry. These aren't my cards. Who swapped my cards? /me storms off

me storms back. Also, your automated comment making thingy doesn't work properly. It makes a new page. That's just silly.