User talk:Mightydandylion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.

[edit] Welcome!

Hello, Mightydandylion, and welcome to Uncyclopedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If not, the door's right over there... no, a little more to your left... yeah. Anyway, here are a few good links for nooblets:

• Beginner's Guide
• How to be funny and not just stupid

If you read anything at all, make it the above two links. If you want to find out more about Uncyclopedia or need more help with something, try these:

• About Uncyclopedia and The five pliers of Uncyclopedia
• How to get started editing on uncyclopedia
• Everything you ever wanted to know, but were afraid to ask
• Help Pages - if you need help with a specific issue
• Our Vanity Policies - why we don't care about your friends

I hope you enjoy editing here and being an Uncyclopedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) or use the "sign" button () above the edit box. This will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, ask me on my talk page, ask at the Dump, ask an administrator on their talk page or add the following: {{help}} to this page along with a message and someone will come along and help you if they can. Additionally, the Uncyclopedian Adopt-a-Noob program is there to bring experienced editors straight to you. Simply put {{adoptme}} on your Userpage to join. Again, welcome!  -- Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally CUN GotA 03:05, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Pee Review

	Rejoice, Mightydandylion! You have been entitled to the Golden Shower Award
	For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.

Thank you for such an amazingly articulate and well-thought review. I can see that you're going to be contributing great things to this site. --THINKER 18:10, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] NotM?

So...I look at a user like you who has already written one fantastic article, done several quality Pee Reviews, and has also done some cool, handy stuff around the site, and I see a potential candidate for NotM. You think you would be on board with that? Come March, I'd be honored to nom you. Just let me know if you'd be down. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ CUN • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF (@ 02:13 Feb 25)

More importantly, I'd be down. As my n00b, he is of course, my property. Plus I was planning on doing it already. --THINKER 15:32, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

FINE, then I'll just BACK OFF and just VOTE FOR HIM WHEN YOU NOM HIM. Bastard. =D ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ CUN • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF (@ 15:38 Feb 25)

No no, he stole your opportunity to review my article, I'll bow out for you. ie. forget to do it. --THINKER 16:03, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Hey guys, I really appreciate it. Of course, I'd be down with it. However, I guarantee you the power will get to my head. I suggest you both prepare a sedative should the worst arise. And stow away any ladies' delicates.Mightydandylion 01:59, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Cool.

I've been watching the watchlist and saw that you fixed the ending on that one article I liked. I think I'll go ahead and nominate it now if you've got no further changes to make. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ CUN • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 00:12 Feb 29

Thank you! May your socks stay forever dry!Mightydandylion 00:19, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

What an odd expression. You're alright, kid. =D And keep in mind that I'm only doing this in hopes that you might notice that I have an article up for VFH as well. Well, that's not entirely true, I'll nominate your article even if you vote against mine. Really, this was just an excuse to be a whore. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ CUN • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 00:25 Feb 29

[edit] Claudius

	Rejoice, Mightydandylion! You have been entitled to the Golden Shower Award
	For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.

Your review was great! I've alreay started to filter the bad out of my article. One problem is making it more accessible. A lot of the best gags rely on an understanding of roman history. Feel free to make edits on it if you like.

Thanks for the pee, have a shower --Eldop 10:21, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Rargh

You forgot to review mah page that you stamped your "I have reviewed this Lolz" thing on. 0_0

--Ninja Kow 14:36, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] thanks

I don't mean to be pushy or anything, but the tag made it look like somebody had reviewed it, and I thought people wouldn't look.

[edit] Re: Hello!

Thanks! That's what it's all about. -- [SIR] e|m|c ^[talk] 22:57, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Rejoice!

	Rejoice, Mightydandylion! You have been entitled to the Golden Shower Award
	For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.

Also, receive THIS!

Nominated Reviewer of the Month This user has been nominated for Reviewer of the Month—you can vote for them or nominate any helpful reviewers at Reviewer of the Month.

Thanks ever so much for your helpful review. I made a couple of changes to the article, can you let me know if they've improved the story?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 16:39, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Alrighty! I decided to go for the gold here and make some more edits. I left one of the things you said could be taken out because it made me chuckle, but I took some consideration of your redux. I also added some more of what I think is humorous content, another image, and a late extra that I actually came up with for the initial article but never managed to work in. Good?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 18:04, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

I don't mind no nominations at all-wise.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 18:08, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Bail-Ling Gual

Thank you very much for your kind comments. I also wrote an article on 'The Man' called UnNews:I'm Sorry if you're interested. I'd love your opinion on that one, since you wrote a 'The Man' Article as well. --WesMan20 15:41, 17 March 2008 (UTC)WesMan20

[edit] Adding UnNews:I'm Sorry to Pee Review

I will do it today. Glad you liked the opening... --WesMan20 16:34, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Please forgive my idiocy

Exactly how do I add the article there? I went there to do it, but I'm not sure how to... --WesMan20 16:39, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Nevermind

Figured it out. At your leisure, sir... --WesMan20 18:36, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] UnNews:Oh Hell Nah!

Glad you like that one. That makes me feel really good. I'll submit it and remove one of the others. Don't want to be a review hog. As for UnNews:I'm Sorry, take your time reviewing it. I'm not a rushed person by any means. I'll probably write less and try to get some reviews in myself, now that work has eased up a bit. --WesMan20 22:33, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] If I have stepped on your toes in pee review...

...I am sorry. I just review things as I see them and have not bought into this "template" thing. Again, my action was done on the quick, but never meant to insult. Dame GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 23:25, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

As Ms Pretty said to me when I discussed the above with her - there is no limit to the number of reviews an article can have. Essentially, the templates are just a way of letting people know that a review is being done so they can choose to help someone else if they prefer. If they decide they still have something to say about that article, well, so much the better for the author who gets more help! Go right ahead and give your review! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 08:54, Mar 18

All right, Thanks! Mightydandylion 16:06, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Review

I was reviewed helpfully by Dame GUN WotM PotM VFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• but I still would like your opinion. I agree with some things she said, but the more opinions the better... ! --WesMan20 18:03, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Your Review

Thanks a great deal - to you and DamePrettiest. I'm going to work on the article in the coming 10 days (or so) and resubmit for Pee Review. (10 days because I just took on a weighty assignment at work - I thought I'd slowed, but of course... ). You guys have been quite helpful. Be well... --WesMan20 13:52, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Say...

How do you do an image / template for use in Pee Review (Still a noob...) --WesMan20 14:53, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] If you don't mind...

I'm gonna use a reworked version of your template (below) until I've had time to go through them all and choose one that works a little better for me, or create my own... If that's cool for now...

Behold! "I am the man who brought writing to life when it was dead, Whose hand combined sure accuracy with masterly ease. Whatever is to be found in nature, may be found in my scribes. To no one was it given to write more or to write better. I am WesMan! - What need was there to say it? This name of itself will for many years suffice as an epitaph." (Actually, I'm just gonna review your article. Cheers...) |, WesMan20!

Forgive me for commandeering your talk page, Mightydandylion, but I'd just like to point out that the {{PRIP}} would be much easier to use as a booking tag than making your own. And no, I'm not just saying that because I made the bloody template. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ CUN • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 18:43 Mar 19

Oh, it's fine! Good to hear from you SysRq! Yes, the {{PRIP}} template is an excellent template to work with, WesMan20. (concerning your template) How silly, haha. It's big though. Still, very silly. Try to really condense your thoughts. You'll find that many of the pee review templates are pithy (example. {{PRIP}}). Also, I noticed that in the end it says "I, Wesman20": yeah, I have no idea why but I can't seem to fix the code so that it just says "Mightydandylion". Anyhoo, have fun! Mightydandylion 18:54, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

For that, {{u|Mightdandylion}} produces Mightydandylion. You could also put [[User:Mightydandylion|Mightydandylion]] if you want. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ CUN • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 18:57 Mar 19

Hey, thanks! Mightydandylion 19:15, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Hey, thanks to you both! I'll look into the template you describe SysRq!.--WesMan20 13:25, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Template

Woo! Yay, go you! Under User has decided that you are "quite a decent sort", which is apparently one of his highest terms of praise! This is therefore a good thing, and in accordance with this, he's throwing a party down the manhole to celebrate. Look at him go! You're not invited though. Don't take it personally.

Because you're doing a decent job around here, and you've done some damn decent reviews recently. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 21:57, Mar 19

Incidentally, on the subject of those reviews, you're doing very well - if you're interested, you could consider yourself part of PEEING, which is a group for decent reviewers. You could pop the highly decorative {{User PEEING}} box on your userpage, and even call yourself a Fresh Stain, if it takes your fancy (I wasn't so taken with that title, myself). This denotes you as a consistently high quality reviewer, and may give you a feeling of self-satisfaction that comes with such recognition. Or not. It's up to you, really. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 22:08, Mar 19

I agree, PEEING seems like a great place for you. We'd love to have you if you feel like joining our ranks. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ CUN • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 22:12 Mar 19

Well, everyone is jumping onto this page now! I second the above, (or is that third???). In my experience it does actually help a little to be a member of Peeing if you are doing lots of reviews. As UU says, we don't just let anyone in, and if you are in Peeing, people will know to take your advice seriously. Well, except if the reviewer is Cajek of course, in which case, everyone knows he's a big old dufus. Oh, go join Peeing! MrN  22:16, Mar 19

Hey, Under User! Thanks! You sure know how to make a guy feel good inside. :)

All right! Shucks, I think I'll go on and mosey over there. Mightydandylion 22:21, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Mightydandylion's Talk Page: The Place To Be! ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ CUN • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 22:26 Mar 19

[edit] Further template

Under User has blessed you with cake for being friendly and/or useful. Eat it quickly before he changes his mind. Warning: cake prepared in an environment which also processes nuts, and contains lactose, gluten, ground glass and arsenic, which gives it a lovely tang.

For an awesome review (I never liked the Golden Shower award). --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 10:16, Mar 21

[edit] UnNews:I'm Sorry

I added some more jokes which helped to lengthen it. Any better? Worse? Thanks again for all your help. ..--WesMan20 (talk) 14:58, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

No rush!--WesMan20 (talk) 20:20, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Thank you for your words

I hope they are true :). "A kick in the pants"? Hey, are you trying to flatter me for motives unseen? As for a second look, I actually did send it to DamePrettiest for a second look. I tried reposting it on Pee Review, but it said it was already there so I couldn't put it back on the "current" page. If you know a way to do it, please enlighten me. By the way...

	Rejoice, Mightydandylion! You have been entitled to the Golden Shower Award
	For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.

When I get used to the templates and stuff after being around here awhile, I'll find a more personal way to show my appreciation. Until then, I hope this suffices. It seems to still bear meaning... :) --WesMan20 (talk) 00:05, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank you sir... I'll try to be expedient about putting it back on Pee Review...--WesMan20 (talk) 13:36, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] I suck. Let's face it.

But 50% health and only 4 total votes just isn't right. Forgive my whoriness, I hope we can still be friends after this. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ CUN • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 23:31 Mar 29

[edit] UN:PIC request

I done made it, and posted it there so I could show everyone "hey, I do photoshop too!" Just, er, letting you know.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 15:59, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

I made two different versions, one with another arm on the other side of the tank and one without said extra arm. Both have the original scrollbar.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:00, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] NotM

Congrats on the award, that's as well deserved as they come. It also allows you to give yourself airs and graces, if you care, such as calling yourself Sir Mightydandylion, and/or adding CUN in your sig somewhere. Woo! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 10:37, Apr 1

Wait, I thought you had to be a KUN to be a knight! You mean I could have been Sir SysRq all this time? And congrats to you, MDL. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ CUN • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 22:24 Apr 1

[edit] Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Otter

Hey Mightydandylion, remember me? It's Cajek, the guy you reviewed Otter for! Hey, would you mind going back and looking over my changes? I've fixed it up slightly for your pleasure... Thanks, if you can!   ~   Cajek! <Apr 05, 2008 [18:36]>

Thank you MDL! Could you maybe take another even quicker look at it? Do you feel like the score could go up (or, GULP, down)? Maybe jot your thoughts down in the pee review itself (easier for me to find later)?   ~   Cajek! <Apr 06, 2008 [16:49]>

[edit] Thanks

UU wishes to express his gratitude for your vote for UnScripts:Average Cop by giving you the promotional tie-in cup o' joe with donuts, available at your local franchise donut or coffee emporium now, probably. Thankies!

Cheers MDL, you are a gent! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | KUN | Natter | Lt? | Pee 09:23, Apr 7

[edit] A heartfelt thank you.

Cyber Ninjastar For your review of User:SysRq/High School. I understand that reviewing a Work In Progress is a lot to ask for, and you've stepped up to the plate and hit one home run of a review. I figured it merited a little more than a Golden Shower. Cheers. –SysRq

sirsysrq @ 01:31 Apr 11

[edit] Still Here (kinda :) )

I know I've disappeared for a bit. Sorry. I've been kind of busy at work and I'm moving to a new apartment soon as well as starting a new art project right after that. But I will try and at least get back in the UnNews swing, and soon (well, like in a month or so) I hope to get started working on my first actual Uncyclopedia (Non-UnNews) article. Thank you for the concern though, that actually means a lot to me... (yes, seriously) :)--WesMan20 (talk) 13:51, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

BTW, I added a new image to UnNews:I'm Sorry if you wanted to check it out. Just to complement one of the quotes from the article. Hope it works. Laterz...--WesMan20 (talk) 14:26, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

Thank you for your indepth review it has been very usefull. I think my problem is that prior to this article my only experience of writing is adding content to wikipedia that is either totaly irrelavent or totally untrue but delivering it in such a way that it goes unoticed or unchallaged for weeks or months. yes, i have a sad life. it's a good competitive multiplayer game though, seeing how long each persons edit of a previously featured article lasts. But anyway back to the point, i'm just stuck in that style of writing (obviously altered quite a bit for uncyclopedia but not enough) and that's not for here. Less comparing shakespeare to oppenheimer and more moist beef i think. more research into the style of writing acceptable on uncyclopedia needed. labia majora (major) rewrite coming in the next few weeks. this article will be featured! --Stains 10:58, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Crack Article

My attempt at a rewrite. I have more to add and some tweaking to do, but this is where I'm at so far. I pulled some ideas from my UnNews:I'm Sorry article. Let me know your thoughts and seriously, don't pull punches... :)--WesMan20 (talk) 19:37, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Haikus

I'm surprised, actually, that you didn't notice the grandest meta-humor of them all; the sections are organized such that the first has five haikus, the second has seven, and the third has five. This would probably only bring about a "what is the author's problem exactly?", but I just figured I would let you know. The absence of pictures is hard to overcome. I don't want to clog the page. I could try to do something like I did for this, but it might not work the same.

The only thing I'd like to ask is what exactly your "scale" of response is: smirk, recognition, etc. Approximation only is fine. Thanks for the review.~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN  [talk] 01:04, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

As asinine as it is, I'm going to request that you rethink your images score, so I can lift my sallow ego.~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN  [talk] 02:56, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

The extent of "artisticness" with which the pictures are placed is "does it look good" and "does it look deep". No, like, special meaning. I've been wracking my brain to figure out a way to deepen it, so to speak.~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN  [talk] 03:06, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnNews:Something Wicked This Way Comes

Is it Friday afternoon, yet? :)   ~   Cajek! <Apr 19, 2008 [3:26]>

SUT UP

NO WAI, HEZ DOIN MAH ARTICKLE

Thank you, MDL! Very good review!   ~   Cajek! <Apr 19, 2008 [13:14]>

I changed quite a few things and wrote down the changes at the pee review page. Maybe have a look again? Thank you again, MDL!   ~   Cajek! <Apr 19, 2008 [14:42]>

Wow, thank you MDL! Do you think the humor or image scores changed at all? I, like ljlego, have a fragile ego that can only be stimulated by big numbers. :D   ~   Cajek! <Apr 19, 2008 [17:17]>

[edit] Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Scat II

Thanks for the review. I've made a few minor additional changes, including adding a fake Wikipedia box. I thought about your suggestion to have some guide about where the songs came from-- I kind of think that this would be spoiling some of the fun; and part of the humor is reading the nonsense then suddenly seeing something that you recognize. A lot of them can be googled, but there are obviously different ways of spelling some of them. For example, I deliberately changed the spelling of "De Do Do Do, De Da Da Da" (a song by the Police), because I thought that a string of two-letter words in the article looked stupid.

I'm particularly proud of the "Hi de hi de hi de hi" table: that's from a 1940s song called "Minnie the Moocher" by Cab Calloway, although there was an early-90s rapper who borrowed from it. I'm also pleased with my "H to the izz-O, V to the izz-A" formula (from Jay-Z).

That "Tam bo li" part is, of course, Lionel Ritchie: Night Long (All Night) Strictly speaking, it might be words in a foreign language rather than scat, but I still thought it was funny.

Glad you liked it. Thanks again. Spikebrennan 14:01, 28 April 2008 (UTC) Spikebrennan 14:01, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

BTW MightyD, both UU and I thought that your review of this was... well, it was good, we just really disagree with the score you gave that article... I don't want to put words in UU's mouth, but I think he would agree.   ~   Cajek! <Apr 28, 2008 [14:53]>

[edit] Thanks

Good luck this month - hope you win! –—Hv (talk) 1/05 16:05

[edit] NotM - Thanks

Thanks oh Mighty one! - 16:23 2 May Sir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!

[edit] Pee Review/User:PF4Eva/Mr. Nice Guy

Thanks for the meta-pee-review! I will try to alter my pronouns accordingly, in the future. Sadly, I'm not sure that "This article looks like it was begun with no plan for what it was going to be" would elicit a much more positive response - and that's the main problem with the article. Still - worth a shot. No more second-person for me. Cheers! --Hyperbole 17:53, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] User:Mightydandylion/Simon da Busboi's The First Sex

I'll be curious to see what you do with this. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ CUN • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 00:24 May 5

Me too, lol Mightydandylion (talk) Fk 00:41, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

I won't say why, but I don't think I would be qualified to review this, *ahem*... I blame uncyc, not my beautiful back-hump! Leave my back-hump alone!   ~   Cajek! <May 05, 2008 [0:35]>

It's easy to imply it in the safety of a talk page; but it takes a MAN to disclose their sexual inadequacy to the world via template on a humor wiki. Show me your power! Mightydandylion (talk) Fk 00:41, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

I admit it, you're more man